Nord, Sara Linker

SummaryBackgroundIn primary bile acid diarrhoea, feedback by farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and fibroblast growth hormone 19 (FGF19) on hepatic bile acid production is impaired.AimsTo evaluate the safety, mechanisms and efficacy of negative feedback by FXR activation with tropifexor, a non‐bile acid FXR agonist, in patients with primary bile acid diarrhoea.MethodsIn this double‐blind, multicentre, randomised, cross‐over study, patients received tropifexor 60 µg or placebo once daily for 14 days in each of two treatment periods. Primary objectives included tropifexor safety and tolerability, and on stool frequency and form. Other assessments included pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic measures, biochemical markers and gastrointestinal transit.ResultsTwenty patients (tropifexor 60 µg/placebo [N = 10]; placebo/tropifexor 60 µg [N = 10]) were enrolled. Adverse event rates were lower with tropifexor vs placebo (52.9% vs 73.7%). No patient had pruritus during tropifexor intake. There were no significant differences in stool frequency, stool form or loperamide use between treatments. Tropifexor increased FGF19 and decreased 7α‐hydroxy‐4‐cholesten‐3‐one (C4) levels for up to 8 h. Plasma tropifexor concentrations peaked at 5 hours post‐dose on days 1 and 12. At day 12, tropifexor caused reduction in peak total bile acid concentration (33%, P = 0.032) and exposure (36%, P = 0.005). Moreover, tropifexor showed a significant increase in ascending colon half‐emptying time (P = 0.036).ConclusionsTropifexor 60 µg once daily had acceptable safety and tolerability. Changes in FGF19 and C4 showed effective target engagement; however, higher doses may be required to observe stool frequency changes. Slowing of ascending colon emptying suggests therapeutic potential of tropifexor in patients with primary bile acid diarrhoea.ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02713243.

INTRODUCTION: Increasing rates of obesity have led to increased numbers of bariatric surgeries performed world-wide. However, some patients do not achieve significant weight loss or develop weight regain following these procedures. Other than estimating the size of the gastric remnant at endoscopy or transaxial imaging, there are limited approaches to quantitate the function of the post-surgical stomach in order to evaluate the disparate weight patterns, or to develop strategy for future treatments, e.g., pharmacotherapy or endoscopic intervention. We hypothesize that altered gastric function in the pre- and post-surgical periods may offer an explanation. Studies performed thus far are difficult to interpret due to heterogeneity in approaches to diagnostic evaluation. The aims of this project were: to assess the feasibility of a new protocol for simultaneous evaluation of gastric accommodation and gastric emptying in the post-bariatric state; and to report normative values in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Methods: We utilized single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) and gamma scintigraphy to concurrently study postprandial gastric accommodation responses and gastric emptying rates of a limited size meal designed for subsequent use in post-bariatric patients. The standard meal consisted of 1 egg and 1 extra egg yolk scrambled with 111 Indium-activated charcoal (∼130kcal, 9.5g fat) and 120mL 2% milk (130kcal, 4.4g fat). Gastric accommodation was measured using 99m Technetium-SPECT. SPECT imaging was obtained concomitant with gastric emptying of the 111 In-labeled meal. Anterior and posterior scans of the abdomen were obtained for estimating gastric emptying parameters every 15 minute until 90 minutes, and then in 30-minute intervals until 240 minutes or complete emptying. RESULTS: Data on 28/30 healthy volunteers (35.7% men; 67% Caucasian) with completed studies to date are shown in the Table 1 (data presented as mean ± standard deviation). Gastric emptying proportion at 1, 2, and 4 hours, T 1/2 , and gastric volumes including accommodation are graphically depicted in Figures 1 and 2, respectively. CONCLUSION: Discussion: This study has demonstrated feasibility of simultaneous measurement of gastric emptying and accommodation and provides normal values; this sets the stage for future baseline and post-operative scans on patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy.

AbstractBackgroundSynthetic human ghrelin accelerates gastric emptying, reduces gastric accommodation, and results in numerical increases in postprandial symptom scores. The ghrelin receptor agonist, relamorelin, accelerates gastric emptying in patients with diabetic gastroparesis.AimTo measure pharmacological effects of relamorelin on gastric accommodation, distal antral motility, and satiation in healthy volunteers.MethodsIn a placebo‐controlled, double‐blind, randomized study of 16 healthy volunteers, we compared effects of 30 μg subcutaneous (s.c.) relamorelin to placebo on: (i) gastric volumes measured by single photon emission computed tomography, (ii) 1‐h postprandial distal antral motility index (MI) by 15‐lumen perfusion gastroduodenal manometry, and (iii) satiation tested by Ensure nutrient drink test. Primary endpoints were: fasting and postprandial gastric volumes, distal antral phasic pressure activity (number of contractions, mean amplitude, and MI), and maximum tolerated volume. Results were normally distributed and the two treatment groups were compared using t‐test.Key ResultsRelamorelin, 30 μg s.c., significantly increased the number of contractions in the distal antrum during 0–60 min postmeal when compared to placebo (p = 0.022); this was also observed in the first two 15‐min periods (p = 0.005 and 0.015 for number of contractions 0–15 and 16–30). There was borderline increase in MI0‐15 (p = 0.055) and numerically increased MI0‐60 (p = 0.139) and MI16‐30 (p = 0.116). The amplitude of contractions was not significantly increased. Relamorelin did not significantly alter fasting or postprandial gastric volumes, gastric accommodation, or satiation volumes and symptoms.Conclusions & InferencesRelamorelin increases frequency of distal antral motility contractions without significant effects on amplitude of contractions. The lack of inhibition of accommodation and absence of increase in satiation symptoms support relamorelin for the treatment of symptomatic gastroparesis (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02466711).