Introduction: Patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) have lower peak oxygen uptake (VO2) than healthy peers. The mechanism of peak VO2 limitation in HCM has not been fully elucidated. Hypothesis: We assessed the hypothesis that resting echocardiographic parameters are predictive of peak VO2 in HCM. Methods: A retrospective review of adult HCM patients seen at a tertiary referral center from 2006-2012 was performed. Patients who underwent a comprehensive echocardiogram and cardiopulmonary treadmill exercise test within 1 week were included. Multivariate modeling was used to identify predictors of peak VO2 adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, beta blocker use, diabetes, smoking, systolic blood pressure, and obstructive HCM. Results: Five hundred and forty one patients met the inclusion criteria. The average age was 52 +/- 0.65 years, 62% were male, 78% had obstructive HCM, and 42% were NYHA class III or IV. Independent predictors of peak VO2 included averaged left ventricular (LV) longitudinal peak systolic strain (p<0.01) and right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) (p<0.01) (Figure 1). Obstructive versus non-obstructive HCM, grade of diastolic dysfunction, LV mass and wall thickness, left atrial volume index, right ventricular dysfunction and moderate or greater mitral or tricuspid regurgitation were not independent predictors of peak VO2. Conclusions: In conclusion, higher RVSP and less negative LV longitudinal peak systolic strain were moderate independent predictors of lower peak VO2. These findings confirm the hypothesis that resting echocardiographic parameters are predictive of peak VO2 in HCM. Further study of the relationship between echocardiographic findings and outcomes on cardiopulmonary exercise testing may help elucidate the mechanisms of exercise limitation in HCM.
Abstract 16775: Body Mass Index Predicts Exercise Capacity in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Introduction: Impaired peak VO2 and obesity are known predictors of morbidity and mortality in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (HCM). The purpose of this study is to determine the degree of exercise impairment due to excess weight in patients with HCM. Methods: Adult HCM patients who underwent cardiopulmonary treadmill testing at our tertiary referral center from 2006 - 2012 and had consented to research participation were identified retrospectively. Percent predicted peak VO2 was calculated by the Astrand formula for men and the Jones formula for women which adjust for age and gender. Baseline echocardiographic features obtained within 1 week of exercise testing and % predicted peak VO2 were compared among four groups of patients stratified by body mass index (BMI). Results: 510 patients were identified, with a mean age at diagnosis of 44.3 ± 16.1 years, 186 (36.5%) female. Mean BMI at the time of cardiopulmonary exercise testing was 29.7 ± 5.3 and 227 (44.6%) patients had a BMI ≥ 30. Overweight and obese patients were older and were more likely to be male than their normal weight peers. However, there was no significant difference in ejection fraction (EF), resting left ventricular outflow tract gradient, right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP), or septal thickness among the groups. HCM patients show impaired peak VO2 across all BMI groups. While peak VO2 increased progressively across BMI groups consistent with greater O2 demand generated by higher body weight, the adjusted peak VO2 in mL/kg/min fell progressively, indicating progressively greater performance impairment with increasing BMI despite similar degrees of cardiac impairment (p <0.0001) (Table 1). Conclusion: Increased BMI is associated with reduced exercise performance in a graded manner in HCM patients independent of cardiac impairment identified on echocardiography.
Prognostic Utility of Stress Testing and Cardiac Biomarkers in Menopausal Women at Low to Intermediate Risk for Coronary ARTery Disease (SMART Study): 5-Year Outcome
Background: In women with low to intermediate risk of coronary artery disease (CAD), prognostic detection strategies have been controversial. We present the follow-up data of the SMART trial in peri/postmenopausal women at low to intermediate risk of CAD. Objectives: To determine the value of contrast stress echocardiography (CSE), stress electrocardiogram (sECG), and serum biomarkers for prediction of cardiovascular events (CE) in peri/postmenopausal women at low to intermediate risk of CAD. Materials and Methods: From January 2004 to August 2007, 400 peri/postmenopausal women were prospectively enrolled. All women had detailed risk factor assessment, and underwent simultaneous CSE (Definity ® , Lantheus Medical Imaging) and sECG. Laboratories included brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), atrial natriuretic peptide, endothelin, and high sensitivity C-reactive protein. Wall motion score index was based on a 16-segment model. Abnormal CSE was defined as new or worsening wall motion abnormality at stress, while abnormal sECG was ≥1 mm horizontal/downsloping ST segment depression/elevation (80 mseconds duration). Self-reported outcome data were collected from a mailed Women's Heart Clinic Questionnaire. CE outcomes included all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure, chest pain hospitalization or development of typical angina (CP), and revascularization (REVASC). Adjusted Cox proportional hazard ratios (HR; 95% confidence intervals) were reported. Results: A total of 366 women (54.4 ± 5.5 years, Framingham risk 6.5% ± 4.4%) completed simultaneous CSE and sECG. Forty-two (11.5%) had abnormal CSE, while sECG was abnormal in 22 (6%) women. Follow-up (4.4 ± 1.2 years) was available in 315/366 (86%) women (78% exercise-CSE, 22% dobutamine-CSE). In those who completed follow-up, CSE was abnormal in 33 women (10.5%) and sECG was abnormal in 21 (6.7%). In 33 women with abnormal CSE, sECG was abnormal in 7 (21.2%) and normal in 26 (79%), p = 0.0004. CE occurred in 27 (8.6%) women: 8 all-cause mortality, 2 nonfatal MI, 13 CP, and 4 REVASC. CE occurred in 21% versus 7% of women with abnormal versus normal CSE, p = 0.014 and 38% versus 6% of women with abnormal versus normal sECG, p < 0.0001. Rest BNP was higher in women with CE versus those without ( p = 0.018). Abnormal sECG and abnormal CSE were associated with CE, while only abnormal sECG was an independent predictor of CE (adjusted HR 10.3 [1.9–61.4], p = 0.007). Of the laboratory results, only BNP was associated with CE (adjusted HR 2.9 [1.1–7.3], p = 0.028). Conclusions: sECG and rest BNP were independent predictors of subsequent CE within 5 years in peri/postmenopausal women at low to intermediate risk of CAD.
Changes in Exercise Patterns in Menopausal Women at Low–Intermediate Risk for Cardiovascular Disease: A Prospective Survey Study
Introduction: We aim to describe changes in exercise habits and barriers to physical activity over 5 years in menopausal women at low–intermediate risk for cardiovascular disease. Materials and Methods: Women in the Stress Echocardiography in Menopausal Women at Risk for Coronary Artery Disease trial were prospectively enrolled in a multisite study from 2004 to 2007. Inclusion criteria were as follows: peri- and postmenopausal women with symptoms and/or risk factors for cardiovascular disease resulting in referral for stress echocardiography. A questionnaire, which assessed details of medical history, physical activity, and body mass index (BMI), was administered at baseline and 5 years. Results: 216 menopausal women (62.5% hypertensive, 15.3% diabetic, 52.3% prior or current smokers) were studied. At baseline, age was 54.9 ± 4.8 years, BMI was 30.7 ± 6.4 kg/m 2 , and Framingham risk score was 4.05% ± 3.76%. One hundred women (46.3%) were obese, 79 (36.6%) overweight, and 37 (17.1%) had a normal BMI. Women changed their self-reported aerobic exercise patterns in similar patterns regardless of their BMI at baseline. There was low participation in strength training among all women. Mean BMI decreased by 0.12 kg/m 2 in obese women and increased by 1.63 kg/m 2 in normal BMI women at 5 years ( p < 0.0001). Conclusion: These data suggest that women can increase their level of physical activity regardless of BMI and that overweight or obese status is not a barrier to initiating an aerobic, nonaerobic, or strength training exercise routine.