Back to Authors

Ajijola, Olujimi A.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6197-7593

Mayo Clinic

University of California, Los Angeles

Citations 3

Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Cancer Undergoing Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Implantation
Krishan, Satyam , Munir, Muhammad Bilal, Yang, Eric H., Torbey, Estelle , Cheng, Richard K. , Munir, Muhammad Bilal , Torbey, Estelle , Munir, Muhammad Bilal , Cheng, Richard , Agarwal, Siddharth, Ajijola, Olujimi A. , Yang, Eric H., Deswal, Anita M , Asad, Zain Ul Abideen

Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology | October 10, 2025 | Volume: 48 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1309-1319

10.1111/pace.70061 Get It

ABSTRACT Background Patients with cancer undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation face unique challenges. This study evaluates the outcomes and implications of CIED implantation in this population. Methods Using data from the National Readmission Database (NRD) from 2016 to 2019, we analyzed CIED implantations in patients aged ≥18 years, categorized by cancer status: no cancer, historical cancer, and active cancer. Multivariable logistic and linear regression models assessed associations with in‐hospital, 30‐day, and 90‐day outcomes, adjusting for various patient characteristics. Results A total of 748,957 CIED procedures were analyzed among which 13.3% were in patients with historical cancer and 3.8% with active cancer. Active cancer was linked to higher odds of pacemaker implantation but lower odds for ICD and CRT devices. Patients with active cancer experienced higher index hospitalization mortality (aOR 1.68; 1.50–1.89; p < 0.001), major adverse cardiovascular events (aOR 1.07; 1.02–1.14; p = 0.01), bleeding (aOR 1.36; 1.27–1.46; p < 0.01), and sepsis‐related (aOR 1.31; 1.19–1.44; p < 0.01) complications, with increased readmission rates at 30 (aOR 1.37; 1.30–1.44; p < 0.01) and 90 days (aOR 1.37; 1.31–1.44; p < 0.01) compared to those without cancer. Historical cancer was associated with better outcomes. Key predictors of adverse outcomes included chronic heart failure, kidney disease, cerebrovascular disease, and protein‐calorie malnutrition. Conclusions Patients with active cancer undergoing CIED implantation have an increased risk of in‐hospital complications and readmissions as compared to those without cancer.
Clinical neurocardiology: defining the value of neuroscience‐based cardiovascular therapeutics – 2024 update
Aksu, Tolga , Arora, Rishi , Chen, Peng‐Sheng , Fudim, Marat , Herring, Neil , Po, Sunny S. , Stavrakis, Stavros , Somers, Virend K. , Tan, Alex Y. , Valderrábano, Miguel , Shivkumar, Kalyanam , Shivkumar, Kalyanam , Ajijola, Olujimi A. , Biaggioni, Italo , Ferrari, Gaetano Maria De , Dusi, Veronica , Goldberger, Jeffrey J , Green, Alexander L. , Khalsa, Sahib S. , Kumar, Rajesh , Lakatta, Edward G. , Mehra, Reena , Meyer, Christian , Somers, Virend K.

The Journal of Physiology | March 12, 2025 | Volume: 603 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1781-1839

10.1113/jp284741 Get It

AbstractThe intricate role of the autonomic nervous system (ANS) in regulating cardiac physiology has long been recognized. Aberrant function of the ANS is central to the pathophysiology of cardiovascular diseases. It stands to reason, therefore, that neuroscience‐based cardiovascular therapeutics hold great promise in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases in humans. A decade after the inaugural edition, this White Paper reviews the current state of understanding of human cardiac neuroanatomy, neurophysiology and pathophysiology in specific disease conditions, autonomic testing, risk stratification, and neuromodulatory strategies to mitigate the progression of cardiovascular diseases. image
Clinical neurocardiology defining the value of neuroscience‐based cardiovascular therapeutics
Shivkumar, Kalyanam , Ajijola, Olujimi A. , Anand, Inder S. , Armour, J. Andrew, Chen, Peng‐Sheng , Esler, Murray , Ferrari, Gaetano Maria De , Fishbein, Michael C. , Harper, Ronald M. , Joyner, Michael J. , Khalsa, Sahib S. , Lane, Richard D. , Mahajan, Aman , Po, Sunny S. , Valderrábano, Miguel , Vaseghi, Marmar , Goldberger, Jeffrey J , Kumar, Rajesh , Schwartz, Peter J. , Somers, Virend K. , Zipes, Douglas P. , Shivkumar, Kalyanam , Anand, Inder S , Joyner, Michael J , Khalsa, Sahib S

The Journal of Physiology | April 27, 2016 | Volume: 594 | Issue: 14 | Pages: 3911-3954

10.1113/jp271870 Get It

AbstractThe autonomic nervous system regulates all aspects of normal cardiac function, and is recognized to play a critical role in the pathophysiology of many cardiovascular diseases. As such, the value of neuroscience‐based cardiovascular therapeutics is increasingly evident. This White Paper reviews the current state of understanding of human cardiac neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, pathophysiology in specific disease conditions, autonomic testing, risk stratification, and neuromodulatory strategies to mitigate the progression of cardiovascular diseases.