Usmani, Saad Z.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Multiple Myeloma (MM) is an incurable disease with no known germline high penetrant risk gene. The higher risk of MM among affected relatives suggests a genetic contribution to the etiology. To date, 24 common risk variants with low effect sizes were identified using genome-wide association studies, which account for 17% of heritability. However, a systematic analysis of the known rare alleles in cancer predisposition genes has not been undertaken so far in MM. We collaborated with six other academic centers across the United States to identify and select cases for analysis of germline predisposition of MM. METHODS: We performed whole exome, next-generation sequencing of 2,387 familial or early onset germline MM cases from the myeloma sequencing consortium (MMSEQ). We called 1.5 million variants and performed standard quality control of the data. We also obtained exome data on 1,285 cases from UK Biobank (UKBB) and 344,513 non-cancer controls (total=3,672 cases). We analyzed the ultra-rare, coding variants in 90 clinically relevant or putative candidates for cancer predisposition. We then used the automated variant curator PathoMAN to annotate and assert pathogenicity of each variant. We contrasted our results with assertions of pathogenicity from ClinVar and tested for gene association with MM. RESULTS: Overall, we observed several pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants, both singleton and recurrent founder mutations. In the MMSEQ, 8.7% of MM cases harbored a pathogenic variant in these known/putative cancer predisposition genes. Predominant group of pathogenic variants were observed within CHEK2 (19%), TP53 (8%), and ATM (5%). A case-control analysis revealed strong association with TP53 and weakly with ATM. In the familial/early onset MMSEQ cases, TP53 mutations were enriched 68 times more than in the UKBB controls. Our preliminary results suggest that known genes of cancer susceptibility such as TP53 and ATM may also play a role in myeloma risk. CONCLUSION: In a large study of multi-center MM cases, we identified a significant proportion of individuals who are carriers of known (solid) cancer predisposition genes. This study suggests that these known cancer predisposition genes may be relevant in a subset of MM cases. Citation Format: Michael T. Conry, Nicola Camp, Celine Vachon, Michelle Hildebrandt, Elizabeth E. Brown, Steven M. Lipkin, Judy Garber, Susan L. Slager, Samantha Stokes, Aaron D. Norman, Aalin Izhar, Sita Dandiker, Kylee Maclachlan, Kenneth Offit, Saad Usmani, Vijai Joseph. Pathogenic germline mutations and risk of multiple myeloma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 5229.

Abstract The overall survival (OS) has improved significantly in multiple myeloma (MM) over the last decade with the use of proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulatory drug-based combinations, followed by high-dose melphalan and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) and subsequent maintenance therapies in eligible newly diagnosed patients. However, clinical trials using auto-HSCT followed by lenalidomide maintenance have shown an increased risk of second primary malignancies (SPM), including second hematological malignancies (SHM). We evaluated the impact of SPM and SHM on progression-free survival (PFS) and OS in patients with MM after auto-HSCT using CIBMTR registry data. Adult patients with MM who underwent first auto-HSCT in the United States with melphalan conditioning regimen from 2011 to 2018 and received maintenance therapy were included (n = 3948). At a median follow-up of 37 months, 175 (4%) patients developed SPM, including 112 (64%) solid, 36 (20%) myeloid, 24 (14%) SHM, not otherwise specified, and 3 (2%) lymphoid malignancies. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that SPM and SHM were associated with an inferior PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.62, P < .001 and HR 5.01, P < .001, respectively) and OS (HR 3.85, P < .001 and HR 8.13, P < .001, respectively). In patients who developed SPM and SHM, MM remained the most frequent primary cause of death (42% vs 30% and 53% vs 18%, respectively). We conclude the development of SPM and SHM leads to a poor survival in patients with MM and is an important survivorship challenge. Given the median survival for MM continues to improve, continued vigilance is needed to assess the risks of SPM and SHM with maintenance therapy post–auto-HSCT.