Koleilat, Alaa

Objectives: Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) occurs commonly as part of mitochondriopathies and varies in severity and onset. In this study, we characterized hearing with specific consideration for hearing loss as a potential early indicator of mitochondrial disease (MD). We hypothesize that genetic testing at the earliest detection of SNHL may lead to an earlier MD diagnosis. Design: We reviewed the clinical and audiometric data of 49 patients undergoing genetic testing for MD. Results: One-third of individuals with molecularly confirmed MD presented with SNHL. On average, patients had hearing loss at least 10 years before genetic testing. The collective audiometric profile includes mild to moderate SNHL at lower frequencies and moderate SNHL at 2 kHz and higher frequencies. Conclusions: This study suggests that screening for SNHL could be an early indicator of MD. We propose that the audiometric profile for those with a MD diagnosis may have clinical triage utility.

Abstract Background Despite clinically demonstrated accuracy in next generation sequencing (NGS) data, many clinical laboratories continue to confirm variants with Sanger sequencing, which increases cost of testing and turnaround time. Several studies have assessed the accuracy of NGS in detecting single nucleotide variants; however, less has been reported about insertion, deletion, and deletion-insertion variants (indels). Methods We performed a retrospective analysis from 2015–2022 of indel results from a subset of NGS targeted gene panel tests offered through the Mayo Clinic Genomics Laboratories. We compared results from NGS and Sanger sequencing of indels observed in clinical runs and during the intra-assay validation of the tests. Results Results demonstrated 100% concordance between NGS and Sanger sequencing for over 490 indels (217 unique), ranging in size from 1 to 68 basepairs (bp). The majority of indels were deletions (77%) and 1 to 5 bp in length (90%). Variant frequencies ranged from 11.4% to 67.4% and 85.1% to 100% for heterozygous and homozygous variants, respectively, with a median depth of coverage of 2562×. A subset of indels (7%) were located in complex regions of the genome, and these were accurately detected by NGS. We also demonstrated 100% reproducibility of indel detection (n = 179) during intra-assay validation. Conclusions Together this data demonstrates that reportable indel variants up to 68 bp can be accurately assessed using NGS, even when they occur in complex regions. Depending on the complexity of the region or variant, Sanger sequence confirmation of indels is usually not necessary if the variants meet appropriate coverage and allele frequency thresholds.

Our understanding of inner ear hair cell ultrastructure has heretofore relied upon two-dimensional imaging; however, serial block-face scanning electron microscopy (SBFSEM) changes this paradigm allowing for three-dimensional evaluation. We compared inner ear hair cells of the apical cristae in myo7aa −/− null zebrafish, a model of human Usher Syndrome type 1B, to hair cells in wild-type zebrafish by SBFSEM to investigate possible ribbon synapse ultrastructural differences. Previously, it has been shown that compared to wild type, myo7aa −/− zebrafish neuromast hair cells have fewer ribbon synapses yet similar ribbon areas. We expect the recapitulation of these results within the inner ear apical crista hair cells furthering the knowledge of three-dimensional ribbon synapse structure while resolving the feasibility of therapeutically targeting myo7aa −/− mutant ribbons. In this report, we evaluated ribbon synapse number, volume, surface area, and sphericity. Localization of ribbons and their distance from the nearest innervation were also evaluated. We determined that myo7aa −/− mutant ribbon synapses are smaller in volume and surface area; however, all other measurements were not significantly different from wild-type zebrafish. Because the ribbon synapses are nearly indistinguishable between the myo7aa −/− mutant and wild type, it suggests that the ribbons are structurally receptive, supporting that therapeutic intervention may be feasible.

AbstractAcute lymphoblastic leukemia (B‐ALL) with intrachromosomal amplification of chromosome 21 (iAMP21‐ALL) represents a recurrent high‐risk cytogenetic abnormality and accurate identification is critical for appropriate clinical management. Identification of iAMP21‐ALL has historically relied on fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using a RUNX1 probe. Current classification requires ≥ five copies of RUNX1 per cell and ≥ three additional copies of RUNX1 on a single abnormal iAMP21‐chromosome. We sought to evaluate the performance of the RUNX1 probe in the identification of iAMP21‐ALL. This study was a retrospective evaluation of iAMP21‐ALL in the Mayo Clinic and Children's Oncology Group cohorts. Of 207 cases of iAMP21‐ALL, 188 (91%) were classified as “typical” iAMP21‐ALL, while 19 (9%) cases were classified as “unusual” iAMP21‐ALL. The “unusual” iAMP21 cases did not meet the current definition of iAMP21 by FISH but were confirmed to have iAMP21 by chromosomal microarray. Half of the “unusual” iAMP21‐ALL cases had less than five RUNX1 signals, while the remainder had ≥ five RUNX1 signals with some located apart from the abnormal iAMP21‐chromosome. Nine percent of iAMP21‐ALL cases fail to meet the FISH definition of iAMP21‐ALL demonstrating that laboratories are at risk of misidentification of iAMP21‐ALL when relying only on the RUNX1 FISH probe. Incorporation of chromosomal microarray testing circumvents these risks.

Abstract Purpose: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell (PC) malignancy with an increasing incidence in the United States. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is currently the gold-standard diagnostic assay to detect recurrent genomic abnormalities of prognostic and therapeutic significance in MM. Hyperdiploid MM, a standard risk abnormality, is characterized by gains of odd-numbered chromosomes including chromosome 15. While gains of chromosome 15 have been reported in approximately 53% of standard risk MM patients (Chretien, Blood, 2015), losses of chromosome 15 are rarely reported. Enumeration of chromosome 15 centromere is detected using the alpha satellite FISH probe. We previously discovered ~9% of cases had false-negative chromosome 15 FISH results when compared to Mate Pair Sequencing (MPseq) (Smadbeck, BCJ, 2019). To our knowledge, no previous studies have reported a reduced performance of the alpha satellite D15Z4 FISH probe in PC FISH studies. A false-negative result for D15Z4 could result in an underreporting of trisomy 15 and overreporting of monosomy 15. Here, we investigated the incidence of false-negative D15Z4 FISH results by examining the presence of monosomy 15 from patients with a monoclonal gammopathy. Methods: We identified 1231 samples from patients with a monoclonal gammopathy who had undergone uniform testing to identify MM-specific cytogenetic abnormalities. DNA from bone marrow samples was genotyped on the Precision Medicine Research Array and biogeographical ancestry was assessed using the Geographic Population Structure Origins tool (Elhaik, Nat Commun, 2014; Home DNA 2016). FISH of immunoglobulin (cIg)-stained PCs was performed as described (Baughn, BCJ, 2018). Chromosome 15 centromere probe (Vysis CEP 15 D15Z4, Abbott Molecular, Abbott Park, IL) was used for chromosome 15 enumeration. Samples were divided into two groups: Cases with or without evidence of monosomy 15 by FISH. Mann-Whitney U test was applied to compare difference between groups for data deviating from normal distribution. A Chi-squared test evaluating the differences across these two groups was used. Results: We identified monosomy 15 in 31 cases (2.5% of cohort). Monosomy 15 was observed in nearly 100% of both the PC (cIg+) and non-PC (cIg-) populations, by contrast to the other recurrent PC-specific genomic abnormalities which were restricted to only the PC population. All samples with a banded analysis revealed most metaphases had two normal chromosome 15s demonstrating that the D15Z4 FISH probe failed to correctly enumerate the number of chromosome 15 centromere signals. Of the samples with a monosomy 15 result, the median African ancestry was 76.2% (95% percentiles: 77.5%-89.0%), while the median African ancestry of the non-monosomy 15 cohort was 2.3% (95% percentiles: 0%-87.7%) (). Although not all patients with >50% African ancestry had evidence of monosomy 15, 26/31 (83.9%) of patients with monosomy 15 had >50% African ancestry. Accordingly, patients with African ancestry (similarity ≥ 0.70) had 8.02-fold (95% confidence interval: 3.73-17.25, P = 9.92 X10 -8) increased possibility to have monosomy 15. Of cases with monosomy 15, 22 (71.0%) had an IGH rearrangement with the most prevalent IGH partner being CCND1. The incidence of t(11;14) was greater in the monosomy 15 group (13/31:41.9%), in contrast to the non-monosomy 15 group (330/1200=27.5%) (P = 0.12). Conclusions: We report a polymorphic variant of the chromosome 15 centromere resulting in a false-negative FISH result using the D15Z4 FISH probe. Surprisingly, the false-negative FISH result was not uniformly distributed among patients and was highly enriched in individuals of African ancestry. This may be due to a variation of the chromosome 15 alpha satellite in some individuals that prevents the D15Z4 FISH probe from sufficiently binding (O'Keefe, Genome Research, 2000). Although this study focused on identification of monosomy 15, the incidence of a false-negative result is likely greater than we have reported in this study since we did not evaluate cases that had a true trisomy 15 that was reported as normal chromosome 15 enumeration by FISH. This study highlights a critical need to ensure diagnostic reagents have equal performance for all patients independent of their ancestry. Evaluation of genomic events using unbiased approaches such as whole genome sequencing may circumvent some of these limitations. Disclosures Elhaik: DDC: Consultancy. Baird: DDC: Current Employment. Kumar: Antengene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Beigene: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Tenebio: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; KITE: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche-Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Carsgen: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding.

Two out of every thousand newborns are born deaf or hard of hearing. Sixty percent of hearing loss has an identifiable genetic cause. One of the most common forms of genetic hearing loss is Pendred syndrome. Disease causing genetic alterations or pathogenic variants in SLC26A4 are associated with Pendred Syndrome, a disorder characterized by bilateral sensorineural hearing loss and occasionally thyroid goiter. Patients with SLC26A4 pathogenic variants have an enlarged vestibular aqueduct, a malformation of the temporal bone. Pendrin, the protein product of SLC26A4 , is a solute carrier. Pendrin is expressed in the inner ear, thyroid, and kidney. In the inner ear, pendrin modulates the transport of bicarbonate and chloride, allowing bicarbonate to leave the supporting cells of the inner ear and chloride to enter. This helps maintain a relatively neutral pH environment in the inner ear. It is not known how the abnormal SLC26A4 protein products modulate hearing loss and contribute to temporal bone abnormalities. The goal of this study was to model SLC26A4 associated genetic hearing loss in zebrafish and elucidate a mechanism responsible for hearing loss in patients with pathogenic variants in SLC26A4 . To model the human condition, slc26a4 mutations in zebrafish were generated via transcription activator like effector nucleases (TALENs) at the site of the the most common SLC26A4 pathogenic variants. We obtained a 23bp deletion mutation in exon 10 of slc26a4 . We hypothesized that fish with biallelic slc26a4 mutations would closely recapitulate the human phenotype and have significant hearing loss and structural ear malformations. To test for deafness in zebrafish, we developed a hearing assessment which exposes larval or adult fish to specific sound stimuli while recording startle responses. To quantitatively study the slc26a4 mutant ear phenotype, we took measurements of the posterior and anterior otolith area and the ear area using bright field microscopy. Results indicate that homozygous embryos tested at 5 days post fertilization, the day of hearing onset in zebrafish, have hearing that was not different that wildype, however adult fish with two copies of mutated slc26a4 have frequency specific reduced responses at 400 Hz, 80db. These results indicate that slc26a4 mutants have progressive frequency specific hearing loss. Bright field imaging and measurement analysis showed that slc26a4 mutant larvae have significantly smaller standardized posterior otolith areas, anterior otolith areas, and ear areas on average compared to wildtype at 5dpf. This closely matches the human phenotype, as humans with SLC26A4 pathogenic variants may have progressive hearing loss and temporal bone abnormalities. Support or Funding Information Mayo Center for Individualized Medicine Mayo Clinic Department of Otorhinolaryngology NIH 5R25GM075148‐11 This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal .

ABSTRACT The mariner (myo7aa−/−) mutant is a zebrafish model for Usher syndrome type 1 (USH1). To further characterize hair cell synaptic elements in myo7aa−/− mutants, we focused on the ribbon synapse and evaluated ultrastructure, number and distribution of immunolabeled ribbons, and postsynaptic densities. By transmission electron microscopy, we determined that myo7aa−/− zebrafish have fewer glutamatergic vesicles tethered to ribbon synapses, yet maintain a comparable ribbon area. In myo7aa−/− hair cells, immunolocalization of Ctbp2 showed fewer ribbon-containing cells in total and an altered distribution of Ctbp2 puncta compared to wild-type hair cells. myo7aa−/− mutants have fewer postsynaptic densities – as assessed by MAGUK immunolabeling – compared to wild-type zebrafish. We quantified the circular swimming behavior of myo7aa−/− mutant fish and measured a greater turning angle (absolute smooth orientation). It has previously been shown that L-type voltage-gated calcium channels are necessary for ribbon localization and occurrence of postsynaptic density; thus, we hypothesized and observed that L-type voltage-gated calcium channel agonists change behavioral and synaptic phenotypes in myo7aa−/− mutants in a drug-specific manner. Our results indicate that treatment with L-type voltage-gated calcium channel agonists alter hair cell synaptic elements and improve behavioral phenotypes of myo7aa−/− mutants. Our data support that L-type voltage-gated calcium channel agonists induce morphological changes at the ribbon synapse – in both the number of tethered vesicles and regarding the distribution of Ctbp2 puncta – shift swimming behavior and improve acoustic startle response.

Purpose Hearing loss is a common impairment of the human senses with an estimated 48 million American adults reporting some trouble hearing; however, access to hearing health care is limited. Detection of hearing loss through a mobile, handheld tool can provide an important access point and potentially expedited access to the continuum of hearing health care. Here, we determined that GoAudio, a portable, automated hearing assessment tool, can be used to identify individuals who require additional hearing evaluation in a clinical workflow. Method This initial study included 24 adults, ages 18–65 years ( M = 50, SD = 12), tested with GoAudio versus “gold-standard” clinical audiometry for eight frequencies to evaluate “real-world” applications. Participants utilized noise-canceling headphones combined with a tablet-based application for the GoAudio assessment. Results The primary study outcome measurements were the comparison of hearing thresholds (dB HL) from clinical audiometry and GoAudio. Results suggest that GoAudio is comparable to clinical audiometry for the identification of hearing loss at most frequencies (except 1 kHz for both ears and 2 kHz in the right ear). Upon stratifying data based on age, we identified that GoAudio is capable of identifying suspected age-related hearing loss or hearing thresholds greater than 30 dB HL at higher frequencies in both ears. Conclusion The study results support that GoAudio can be used effectively in clinical practice workflows as a reliable hearing assessment tool for the identification of hearing loss at the majority of frequencies outside a sound-treated booth and can detect characteristics of age-related hearing loss. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.13087682

PurposeMore than 460 million people are impacted by disabling hearing loss worldwide. Hearing loss has negative impacts across the life span and varies by individual. Specifically, in children, hearing loss has been shown to affect learning outcomes, behavioral and cognitive growth, and psychosocial development. In adults, hearing loss has been shown to affect quality of life, social isolation, depression, and anxiety. The purpose of this review is to advance the understanding of the latest research in the development of new treatments of hearing loss, including gene therapy, stem cell therapy, and pharmacotherapies. We address the use of animals to model human hearing loss and the importance of animals in previous discoveries and developing new therapies. We highlight the importance of early identification for better speech and developmental outcomes specifically in pediatric individuals. Lastly, we review new possibilities in the prevention of hearing loss and the path to translation into practice.ConclusionsResearch and development of new therapies to treat hearing loss is an ever growing field with many notable successes. However, clinical translation still poses many challenges. Many discoveries related to gene therapy, stem cell therapy, and pharmacotherapy are in the early phases of clinical trials and hold promise. This review empowers audiologists to be aware of these most recent developments and be conscious of the evolving future landscape of treatment and management of hearing loss.