Harrison, Christine J.

AbstractAcute lymphoblastic leukemia (B‐ALL) with intrachromosomal amplification of chromosome 21 (iAMP21‐ALL) represents a recurrent high‐risk cytogenetic abnormality and accurate identification is critical for appropriate clinical management. Identification of iAMP21‐ALL has historically relied on fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using a RUNX1 probe. Current classification requires ≥ five copies of RUNX1 per cell and ≥ three additional copies of RUNX1 on a single abnormal iAMP21‐chromosome. We sought to evaluate the performance of the RUNX1 probe in the identification of iAMP21‐ALL. This study was a retrospective evaluation of iAMP21‐ALL in the Mayo Clinic and Children's Oncology Group cohorts. Of 207 cases of iAMP21‐ALL, 188 (91%) were classified as “typical” iAMP21‐ALL, while 19 (9%) cases were classified as “unusual” iAMP21‐ALL. The “unusual” iAMP21 cases did not meet the current definition of iAMP21 by FISH but were confirmed to have iAMP21 by chromosomal microarray. Half of the “unusual” iAMP21‐ALL cases had less than five RUNX1 signals, while the remainder had ≥ five RUNX1 signals with some located apart from the abnormal iAMP21‐chromosome. Nine percent of iAMP21‐ALL cases fail to meet the FISH definition of iAMP21‐ALL demonstrating that laboratories are at risk of misidentification of iAMP21‐ALL when relying only on the RUNX1 FISH probe. Incorporation of chromosomal microarray testing circumvents these risks.

Abstract Background: Pre-treatment cytogenetics is a known predictor of outcome in haematological malignancies. However, its value in adult ALL is generally limited to the presence of the Philadelphia (Ph) translocation; mostly due to the low incidence of other recurrent chromosomal abnormalities. Methods: Since 1993, cytogenetic data from patients enrolled on a joint MRC/ECOG trial have been collated and reviewed centrally in the UK and US. Karyotype data from patients registered before the Imatinib amendment were pooled using standard cytogenetic definitions and classification criteria. Results: A successful cytogenetic result was achieved in 938/1235 (76%) cases; while 297 (24%) failed with <20 normal metaphases analyzed. Patients were classified into the following mutually exclusive groups: t(9;22)(q34;q11) n=193(21%); t(4;11)(q21;q23) n=50(5%); other MLL translocations n=11(1%), t(8;14)(q24;q32) and variants n=14(1%); t(1;19)(q23;p13) n=23(2%); T cell receptor translocations n=35(4%); low hypodiploidy (30–39 chromosomes) /near triploidy n=23(2%); high hyperdiploidy n=83(9%); tetraploidy n=12(1%); complex karyotype (>=5 aberrations) n=48(5%); other abnormal n=255(27%); normal n=191(20%). MRC and ECOG patients showed similar cytogenetic distributions, except for t(9;22), which was significantly more prevalent in the ECOG cohort (27% v 18%, p<0.001). However, the incidence of t(9;22) increased with age and ECOG patients were significantly older. Overall, the 5 year event free survival (EFS) was 32% (95% CI 30%–35%) with a median follow-up time of 5.1 years and did not differ between the two cohorts. The EFS of t(9;22) patients [15% (11%–21%)] was significantly inferior compared with all other cases [36% (32%–39%)] (p<0.001) and was independent of age and white cell count (WCC). Univariate logrank analyses identified t(4;11) and high hyperdiploidy as indicators of poor and good prognosis, respectively, compared with other Ph negative cases, but neither was independent of age and WCC. Three subgroups were shown to have a significantly worse EFS compared to other Ph negative cases by logrank analyses after adjusting for age and WCC: t(8;14) 14% (2%–37%) v 36% (32%–40%) (p=0.01); low hypodiploidy 22% (8%–40%) v 36% (32%–40%) (p=0.02); complex karyotype 21% (10%–33%) v 32% (29%–35%) (p=0.005). Neither of the latter two subgroups were associated with other poor risk features such as age, WCC or failure to achieve a remission within 4 weeks. Conclusions: This is the largest cytogenetic dataset of adult ALL reported to date and demonstrates the importance of combining cohorts to increase the number of cases available for analysis. The observation that low hypodiploidy and, for the first time, karyotype complexity confer a poor risk, demonstrates that cytogenetic subgroups other than the Ph translocation can and should be used to risk stratify adults with ALL to alternative treatments.

Abstract Pretreatment cytogenetics is a known predictor of outcome in hematologic malignancies. However, its usefulness in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is generally limited to the presence of the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome because of the low incidence of other recurrent abnormalities. We present centrally reviewed cytogenetic data from 1522 adult patients enrolled on the Medical Research Council (MRC) UKALLXII/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 2993 trial. The incidence and clinical associations for more than 20 specific chromosomal abnormalities are presented. Patients with a Ph chromosome, t(4;11)(q21;q23), t(8;14)(q24.1;q32), complex karyotype (5 or more chromosomal abnormalities), or low hypodiploidy/near triploidy (Ho-Tr) all had inferior rates of event-free and overall survival when compared with other patients. In contrast, patients with high hyperdiploidy or a del(9p) had a significantly improved outcome. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the prognostic relevance of t(8;14), complex karyotype, and Ho-Tr was independent of sex, age, white cell count, and T-cell status among Ph-negative patients. The observation that Ho-Tr and, for the first time, karyotype complexity confer an increased risk of treatment failure demonstrates that cytogenetic subgroups other than the Ph chromosome can and should be used to risk stratify adults with ALL in future trials.