Shah, Sahrish

Abstract Background U2AF1 mutations occur in approximately 16% of patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and were significantly associated with anemia, thrombocytopenia, older age, JAK2V617F, ASXL1 mutations and normal karyotype (Leukemia 2014;28:431); furthermore, U2AF1 mutations were associated with inferior survival in univariate but not multivariable analysis. In the current study, we looked for the possibility of a differential effect from U2AF1 mutation variants on these observations in PMF. Methods Study patients fulfilled the 2016 WHO criteria for the diagnosis of PMF (Blood. 2016;127:2391). Additional selection criteria included the availability of U2AF1 mutational status. Previously published methods (Leukemia 2014;28:431), including targeted next generation sequencing (Blood 2015 126:354), were used to screen for U2AF1 and other prognostically-relevant mutations. Statistical analyses considered clinical and laboratory parameters obtained at time of initial referral to the Mayo Clinic. Results Patient characteristics: U2AF1 mutational status was available for 457 patients and 72 (16%) harbored one of several mutation variants: these mutations affected residue Q157 in 44 (10%) patients, S34 in 24 (5%) and the remaining 1% displayed other variants. The 44 patients with U2AF1Q157 mutations included 23 with Q157P, 18 with Q157R and 3 with Q157-Y158insYE. The 24 patients with U2AF1S34 included 16 with S34F and 8 with S34Y. Only one patient harbored both Q157 and S34 mutations (Q157R, S34Y). Among all 457 study patients, median age was 63 years, 64% were males, dynamic international prognostic scoring system (DIPSS)-plus (JCO 2011;29:392) risk distributions were 13% low, 18% intermediate-1, 38% intermediate-2 and 32% high and driver mutation distributions were 54% JAK2, 22% CALR type 1/ type1-like, 4% CALR type 2/type 2-like, 7% MPL and 13% triple-negative. Cytogenetic studies were available in 449 patients: 39% abnormal and 10% unfavorable. All 457 patients were screened for ASXL1 mutations with 37% mutated, 450 for SRSF2 mutations with 15% mutated, 403 for SF3B1 with 8% mutated, 366 for IDH1/2 with 5% mutated and 369 for EZH2 with 4% mutated. Median follow-up was 4.4 years and during this period, 318 (70%) deaths and 53 (12%) leukemic transformations were documented. Phenotypic correlates of U2AF1 mutation variants: Because of the relatively small number of informative cases with specific mutations, we classified all patients into Q157 (n=44) and S34 (n=24) mutation variants and compared them with the 385 U2AF1 un-mutated cases. First, we confirmed our previous observations regarding the association between U2AF1 mutations in general and older age (p=0.0003), JAK2V617F (p<0.0001), ASXL1 mutations (p=0.0002), normal karyotype (p=0.03), hemoglobin <10 g/dL (p<0.0001) and platelet count <100 x 10(9)/L (p<0.0001); when the two U2AF1 mutation categories were analyzed separately, the corresponding p values for Q157 were 0.0005, 0.001, <0.0001, 0.04, <0.0001 and <0.0001 and for S34 were 0.12, 0.001, 0.41, 0.41, <0.0001 and 0.67. Phenotypic correlates of U2AF1 mutation variants: In univariate analysis, survival was adversely affected by U2AF1Q157 (p<0.0001; HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.6-3.1) but not by U2AF1S34 (p=0.8; HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.6-1.8) mutations (Figure 1a). Furthermore, the negative survival effect of U2AF1Q157 mutations was independent of anemia, thrombocytopenia, ASXL1, SRSF2, IDH1/2 and EZH2 mutations, as well as driver mutational status; multivariable analysis that included all molecular alterations identified U2AF1Q157 (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.3), ASXL1 (HR 2.3, 95% CI 1.8-3.5), SRSF2 (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.2) and absence of CALR type-1/like (HR 2.6, 95% CI 1.8-3.5) mutations as independent risk factors for survival. Finally, the survival effect of U2AF1Q157 mutations was independent of DIPSS-plus in patients with hemoglobin ≥10 g/dL (HR 2.6, 95% CI 1.3-5.3; p=0.007) (Figure 1c) but not in those with hemoglobin <10 g/dL (p=0.98) (Figure 1b). Conclusion Both U2AF1Q157 and U2AF1S34 mutation variants in PMF are associated with JAK2V617F and severe anemia whereas only the former is associated with ASXL1 mutations and thrombocytopenia. More importantly, U2AF1Q157, but not U2AF1S34, mutation variants in PMF are predictive of inferior survival, independent of other adverse mutations, and, in the absence of severe anemia, independent of DIPSS-plus. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background The Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS)-plus currently provides the most comprehensive prognostic model for primary myelofibrosis (PMF) (JCO 2011;29:392). DIPSS-pluse uses eight independent predictors of inferior survival: age >65 years, hemoglobin <10 g/dL, leukocyte count >25 x 109/L, circulating blasts ³1%, constitutional symptoms, unfavorable karyotype, red cell transfusion need and platelet count <100 x 109/L. More recently, type 1/type 1-like CALR driver mutational status and ASXL1 andSRSF2 mutations were identified as additional DIPSS-plus-independent risk factors for survival in PMF (JAMAOncol. 2015;1:97). Based on our earlier preliminary observation (Leuk Res. 2007;31:1503), we conducted the current study to fully examine the additional prognostic relevance of monocytosis (absolute monocyte count ≥1 x 10(9)/L) in PMF. Methods Study patients fulfilled the 2016 WHO criteria for the diagnosis of PMF, including both pre-PMF and overt PMF (Blood. 2016;127:2391). Additional selection criteria included the availability of absolute monocyte count (AMC) and percentage at time of referral. Targeted next generation sequencing was used to screen for prognostically-relevant mutations (Blood 2015 126:354). Statistical analyses considered clinical and laboratory parameters obtained at time of initial referral to the Mayo Clinic. Results Patient characteristics: The study population included 454 patients (median age 64 years; 62% males); 293 (64%) patients harbored JAK2 mutations, 74 (16%) type 1/like CALR, 16 (3%) type 2/like CALR, 24 (5%) MPL and 47 (10%) were "triple-negative". DIPSS-plus risk distribution was 29% high, 38% intermediate-2, 17% intermediate-1 and 15% low; 27% displayed red cell transfusion-dependency, 29% constitutional symptoms, 70% palpable splenomegaly and 36% abnormal karyotype, including 13% with unfavorable karyotype. 301 patients were screened for ASXL1 mutations with 39% mutated, 297 for SRSF2 mutations with 15% mutated, 286 for U2AF1 with 18% mutated, 253 for SF3B1 with 6% mutated, 229 for EZH2 with 5% mutated and 110 for IDH1/2 with 7% mutated. Clinical, cytogenetic and molecular comparisons between PMF patients with and without monocytosis: Among all study patients, 376 (83%) displayed AMC <1 x 10(9)/L; the remaining had either moderate (AMC between 1 and 3 x 10(9)/L; n=65) or marked (AMC >3 x 10(9)/L; n=13) monocytosis. Comparison of these three groups revealed that monocytosis was significantly associated with older age (p=0.0001), higher leukocyte count (p<0.0001), lower platelet count (p=0.01), higher circulating blast percentage (p=0.0002) and higher DIPSS-plus risk distribution (p=0.01). There were no significant differences in the distribution of driver mutations, ASXL1, SRSF2, U2AF, SF3B1, EZH2 or IDH1/2 mutations or incidence of unfavorable karyotype. Survival analysis: After a median follow up of 3.2 years, 265 (58%) deaths and 38 (8%) leukemic transformations were documented. In univariate analysis, all 8 variables included in DIPSS-plus were significantly associated with shortened survival (p<0.001 in all instances). Significant risk factors in univariate analysis also included AMC >3 x 10(9)/L (p<0.0001; HR 5.6, 95% CI 3.1-10.0), AMC 1 to 3 x 10(9)/L (p<0.0001; HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.5-2.9), absence of CALR type 1/type 1-like (p<0.0001) and presence of ASXL1 (p<0.0001) or SRSF2 (p<0.0001) mutations. The significant difference in survival between the three AMC categories (i.e. <1, 1-3 and >3 x 10(9)L) was independent of each one of the eight DIPSS-plus variables, DIPSS-plus, driver mutational status, ASXL1 and SRSF2 mutations (p<0.0001 in all instances). The survival difference between patients with and without monocytosis was evident in both high/intermediate-2 and low/intermediate-1 DIPSS-plus risk groups (Figure). Patients with monocytosis were also more likely to undergo leukemic transformation (HR 3.0, 95% CI 1.4-6.5) and this effect was also independent of karyotype, driver mutational status, ASXL1 or SRSF2 mutations. Conclusion The current study identifies monocytosis as a powerful risk factor for both overall and leukemia-free survival in PMF and the effect was independent of currently established prognostic models and genetic risk factors. It was particularly noteworthy to document similar distribution of driver mutations among the three monocyte categories. Figure Figure. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background The 2016 revised World Health Organization (WHO) classification system distinguishes prefibrotic (pre-PMF) from overtly fibrotic (overt PMF) primary myelofibrosis, based on the respective absence or presence of grade ≥2 bone marrow (BM) reticulin fibrosis (Blood. 2016;127:2391). The main objective of the current study was to determine the prognostic relevance of this distinction and compare clinical and genetic features between the two entities. Methods Study patients fulfilled the 2016 WHO criteria for the diagnosis of pre-PMF or overt PMF (Blood. 2016;127:2391). The degree of BM reticulin fibrosis was based on "real life" BM reports from Mayo Clinic hematopathologists and often in accordance with the European consensus scoring system (Haematologica 2005;90:1128). Targeted next generation sequencing was used to screen for prognostically-relevant mutations (Blood 2015 126:354). Statistical analyses considered clinical and laboratory parameters obtained at time of BM examination that was graded for reticulin fibrosis. Results Patient characteristics: Analysis was conducted on 467 patients (median age 64 years; 62% males), including 63 with pre-PMF and 404 with overt PMF. 302 (65%) patients harbored JAK2 mutations, 90 (19%) CALR, 24 (5%) MPL and 51 (11%) were "triple-negative"; among the 90 CALR-mutated cases, 74 (82%) were classified as "type 1/type 1-like". Dynamic international prognostic scoring system (DIPSS)-plus risk distribution (JCO 2011;29:392) was 30% high, 38% intermediate-2, 16% intermediate-1 and 15% low; 29% displayed red cell transfusion-dependency, 29% constitutional symptoms, 70% palpable splenomegaly and 37% abnormal karyotype, including 13% with unfavorable karyotype. 308 patients were screened for ASXL1 mutations with 39% mutated, 305 for SRSF2 mutations with 16% mutated, 291 for U2AF1 with 18% mutated, 264 for SF3B1 with 6% mutated, 240 for EZH2 with 5% mutated and 118 for IDH1/2 with 7% mutated. BM reticulin fibrosis was reported as grade '0' in 5 (1%) patients, grade '1' in 58 (12%), grade '2' in 169 (36%) and grade '3' in 235 (50%). After a median follow up of 3 years, 273 (59%) deaths and 42 (9%) leukemic transformations were documented. Clinical, cytogenetic and molecular comparisons between pre-PMF vs overt PMF: Significant differences included higher hemoglobin level (p<0.0001), higher platelet count (p<0.0001), higher incidence of thrombocytosis (p<0.0001), lower circulating blast percentage (p=0.0002), lower incidence of constitutional symptoms (p=0.003), lower incidence of palpable splenomegaly and lower DIPSS-plus risk distribution (p=0.0004), in pre-PMF, compared to overt PMF. There were significantly more triple-negative patients with pre-PMF (22% vs 9% for overt PMF; p=0.02) but otherwise no significant difference in the distribution of ASXL1, SRSF2, U2AF1, SF3B1, EZH2 or IDH1/2 mutations or incidence of unfavorable karyotype. Survival analysis: In univariate analysis, all 8 variables included in DIPSS-plus were significantly associated with shortened survival (p<0.001 in all instances). Significant risk factors in univariate analysis also included overt PMF vs pre-PMF (p=0.002; HR 2.0, 95% CI 1.3-3.1), absence of CALR type 1/type 1-like (p<0.0001) and presence of ASXL1 (p<0.0001) or SRSF2 (p<0.0001) mutations. The significant difference in survival between pre-PMF and overt PMF was independent of DIPSS-plus (p=0.03), driver mutational status (p=0.001), ASXL1 (p=0.008) and SRSF2 (p=0.02) mutations; no significant difference in leukemia-free survival was noted (p=0.25). The survival difference between pre-PMF and overt PMF was most evident in high/intermediate-2 DIPSS-plus risk groups (Figure). Of note, we found no difference in survival when patients with grade '0' were compared to those with grade '1' reticulin fibrosis (p=0.96) and when those with grade '2' were compared with grade '3' (p=0.08). Conclusion The current study demonstrates the risk-adjusted prognostic relevance of the WHO distinction between pre-PMF and overt PMF. The two clinic-pathologic entities were otherwise similar in their spectrum of prognostically-relevant mutations or cytogenetic abnormalities, although pre-PMF clustered with thrombocythemic and triple-negative phenotype and overt PMF with adverse clinical features. Figure Figure. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Background Increased serum levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) typically accompany primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and might be linked to increased cell turnover from clonal myeloproliferation, including leukocytosis, low grade hemolysis and extra-medullary hematopoiesis in the liver. Despite the fact that serum LDH has been extensively utilized as a prognostic marker in both lymphoid neoplasms and solid tumors, there are limited studies in PMF that have systematically examined the clinical significance of the degree of serum LDH elevation in PMF. Methods Study patients fulfilled the 2016 WHO criteria for the diagnosis of PMF, including both pre-PMF and overt PMF (Blood. 2016;127:2391). Additional selection criteria included the availability of serum LDH at time of referral. Marked elevation of serum LDH was defined as a value of ≥1000 U/L (i.e. over 4-fold increase from the upper limit of the normal range for our institution, which was 122-222 U/L), based on preliminary analysis of the threshold for prognostic effect. Targeted next generation sequencing was used to screen for prognostically-relevant mutations (Blood 2015126:354). Statistical analyses considered clinical and laboratory parameters obtained at time of initial referral to the Mayo Clinic. Results LDH values in overt PMF versus pre-PMF: The entire study population consisted of 357 patients, including 311 with overt PMF and 46 with pre-PMF. The median serum LDH level was 514 U/L (range 136-2263): overt PMF 532 U/L (range 136-2263); pre-PMF 401 U/L (range 180-1237) (p=0.0003). Accordingly, in order to avoid the confounding effect of the difference in serum LDH level between overt PMF and pre-PMF, and considering the small number of patients with pre-PMF, further analysis was limited to the 311 patients with overt PMF. Patient characteristics: The 311 patients (median age 64 years; 66% males) with overt PMF included 205 (66%) JAK2, 49 (16%) type 1/like CALR, 13 (4%) type 2/like CALR, 16 (5%) MPL mutated cases and 28 (9%) were "triple-negative". DIPSS-plus risk distribution was 31% high, 43% intermediate-2, 15% intermediate-1 and 12% low; 30% displayed red cell transfusion-dependency and 37% abnormal karyotype, including 14% with unfavorable karyotype. 184 patients were screened for ASXL1 mutations with 42% mutated and 205 for SRSF2 mutations with 16% mutated. Clinical correlates of markedly elevated LDH (≥1000 U/L): Among all 311 study patients with overt PMF, 37 (12%) displayed marked elevation of LDH (≥1000/L). Patients with marked elevation of LDH displayed significantly higher leukocyte count (p=0.005; R-squared = 0.05), circulating blast percentage (p=0.03; R-squared = 0.07) and SRSF2 mutational frequency (44% vs 12%; p<0.0001). Survival analysis: After a median follow up of 3 years, 199 (64%) deaths and 31 (10%) leukemic transformations were documented. In univariate analysis, increased serum LDH level was associated with inferior survival, both as a continuous variable (p=0.002) and as a categorical variable with the cutoff level of 1000 U/L (HR 2.02, 95% CI 1.3-3.1; p=0.001); the survival effect LDH ≥1000/L was independent of DIPSS-plus (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.1-2.5). Other variables that were significantly associated with shortened survival, on univariate analysis, included all 8 DIPSS-plus variables (p≤0.01 in all instances), absence of CALR type 1/type 1-like (p<0.0001) and presence of ASXL1 (p<0.0001) or SRSF2 (p=0.0006) mutations. In multivariable analysis that included only genetic risk factors, serum LDH retained its significance (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.3-3.6), along with absence of CALR type 1/type 1-like, or presence of ASXL1 or SRSF2 mutations or unfavorable karyotype. In multivariable analysis that included only clinical variables, serum LDH ≥1000/L was again independently predictive of poor survival (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.1-2.6), along with age >65 years, hemoglobin <10 g/dL, platelets <100 x 10(9)/L, leukocyte count >25 x 10(9)/L and constitutional symptoms. Patients with marked LDH elevation were also more likely to undergo leukemic transformation (HR 3.1, 95% CI 1.2-7.6). Conclusion The current study suggests that marked elevation of serum LDH in PMF indicates aggressive tumor biology that is currently not accounted for by established clinical or genetic risk factors; the low R-squared values seen in relation to leukocyte count and circulating blasts are consistent with this assumption. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a clinically heterogeneous disease with prognosis chiefly assigned based on World Health Organization (WHO) morphologic subclassification. We assessed the feasibility of developing contemporary risk models for SM based on clinical and integrated clinical-genetics information. Diagnosis of SM was per WHO criteria, and karyotype and next-generation sequencing data were available in a subset of the total 580 patients (median age, 55 years; range, 18-88 years) seen at the Mayo Clinic between 1968 and 2015. Morphologic subcategories were indolent/smoldering in 291 (50%) and “advanced” in 289 (50%): SM with an associated hematological neoplasm in 199, aggressive SM in 85, and mast cell leukemia in 5. Multivariable analysis of clinical variables identified age &gt;60 years, advanced SM, thrombocytopenia &lt;150 × 109/L, anemia below sex-adjusted normal, and increased alkaline phosphatase (ALP) as independent risk factors for survival; respective hazard ratios (HRs) 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were 2.5 (1.9-3.4), 2.7 (1.8-4.0), 2.5 (1.9-3.4), 2.2 (1.6-3.1), and 2.1 (1.5-3.0). In addition, ASXL1 (HR, 4.5; 95% CI, 2.6-7.6), RUNX1 (HR, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.3-10.8), and NRAS (HR, 5.0, 95% CI, 1.5-13.2) mutations were independently associated with inferior survival. Combined clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular risk factor analysis confirmed the independent prognostic contribution of adverse mutations (2.6, 1.6-4.4), advanced SM (4.0, 1.8-10.0), thrombocytopenia (2.8, 1.7-4.5), increased ALP (2.1, 1.2-4.0), and age &gt;60 years (2.2, 1.3-3.6). These data were subsequently used to develop clinical and hybrid clinical-molecular risk models. The current study advances 2 complementary risk models for SM and highlights the independent prognostic contribution of mutations.

AbstractThe World Health Organization (WHO) system lists five morphological categories of systemic mastocytosis (SM): indolent (ISM), smoldering, SM with an associated hematological neoplasm (SM‐AHN), aggressive (ASM) and mast cell leukemia (MCL). Recent studies have highlighted the prognostic importance of mutations in SM, including ASXL1, RUNX1, and SRSF2. In contrast, information on incidence of cytogenetic abnormalities in SM and their prognostic relevance, especially in the context of mutations, is limited. In the current study, we retrospectively reviewed the cytogenetic findings in 348 consecutive cases of SM (median age 59 years; 53% males); 41% constituted ISM, 45% SM‐AHN, 14% ASM and two cases of MCL. Karyotype was abnormal in 53 (15%) cases with incidences of 6% for ISM, 26% for SM‐AHN and 8% for ASM (P < .001); among SM‐AHN cases, abnormal karyotype incidences were 0% for SM‐AHN‐lymphoid and 28% for SM‐AHN‐myeloid (P < .001). Clinical correlative studies disclosed significant associations between abnormal karyotype and male sex (P = .002), age > 60 years (P = .04), thrombocytopenia (P < .001) and anemia (P < .001), but not with the presence of adverse mutations (P = .19). In univariate analysis, abnormal karyotype was associated with inferior survival (HR 3.0, 95% CI 2.0‐4.3), specifically confirmed for ASM (HR 4.9, 95% CI 1.1‐16.1) and SM‐AHN (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.2‐2.7). Sample size adequacy allowed additional multivariable analysis in SM‐AHN‐myeloid, which disclosed independent prognostic contribution from adverse mutations (P = .003), anemia (P = .003) and thrombocytopenia (P = .001), but not from abnormal karyotype (P = .31). Our observations suggest that mutations are prognostically more relevant than karyotype in SM.

Abstract Based on suggestive information from recent epidemiologic data and earlier retrospective studies, we revisited the effect of gender on survival in 1,494 patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET). The primary study population included 904 patients from the Mayo Clinic (median age 58 years; 65% females); risk distribution, according to the international prognostic score for ET (IPSET), was 23% high, 42% intermediate and 35% low. Multivariable analysis that included IPSET‐relevant risk factors identified male sex (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.3‐2.0), age ≥60 years (HR 4.3, 95% CI 3.4‐5.4) and leukocyte count ≥11 × 10(9)/L (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3‐1.9) as independent predictors of shortened survival. These findings were confirmed by analysis of a separate cohort of 590 ET patients (65% females) from the University of Florence, Italy, with corresponding HRs (95% CI) of 1.6 (1.1‐2.5), 4.6 (2.2‐9.5) and 1.8 (1.1‐2.8). The independent prognostic effect of gender was further corroborated by a separate multivariable analysis against IPSET risk categories; HR (95% CI) for the Mayo Clinic/Florence cohorts were 1.5/1.6 (1.2/1.1‐1.8/2.5) for male sex, 6.8/7.5 (5.0/3.1‐9.3/18.3) for IPSET high risk and 2.8/4.1 (2.1/1.8‐3.8/9.5) for IPSET intermediate risk. Furthermore, the survival disadvantage in men was most apparent in IPSET high risk category and in patients older than 60 years. In both patient cohorts, thrombosis history garnered significance in univariate, but not in multivariable analysis. The observations from the current study suggest that women with ET live longer than their male counterparts and that gender might supersede thrombosis history as a risk variable for overall survival.