Gao, Feng

Abstract Follicular lymphoma (FL) is clinically heterogeneous, with select patients tolerating extended watch-and-wait, whereas others require prompt treatment, suffer progression of disease within 24 months of treatment (POD24), and/or experience aggressive histologic transformation (t-FL). Because our understanding of the relationship between genetic alterations in FL and patient outcomes remains limited, we conducted a clinicogenomic analysis of 370 patients with FL or t-FL (from Cancer and Leukemia Group B/Alliance trials 50402/50701/50803, or real-world cohorts from Washington University School of Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, or University of Miami). FL subsets by grade, stage, watch-and-wait, or POD24 status did not differ by mutation burden, whereas mutation burden was significantly higher in relapsed/refractory (rel/ref) FL and t-FL than in newly diagnosed (dx) FL. Nonetheless, mutation burden in dx FL was not associated with frontline progression-free survival (PFS). CREBBP was the only gene more commonly mutated in FL than in t-FL yet mutated CREBBP was associated with shorter frontline PFS in FL. Mutations in 20 genes were more common in rel/ref FL or t-FL than in dx FL, including 6 significantly mutated genes (SMGs): STAT6, TP53, IGLL5, B2M, SOCS1, and MYD88. We defined a mutations associated with progression (MAP) signature as ≥2 mutations in these 7 genes (6 rel/ref FL or t-FL SMGs plus CREBBP). Patients with dx FL possessing a MAP signature had shorter frontline PFS, revealing a 7-gene set offering insight into FL progression risk potentially more generalizable than the m7–Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (m7-FLIPI), which had modest prognostic value in our cohort. Future studies are warranted to validate the poor prognosis associated with a MAP signature in dx FL, potentially facilitating novel trials specifically in this high-risk subset of patients.

Abstract Purpose: Targeting focal adhesion kinase (FAK) renders checkpoint immunotherapy effective in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) mouse model. Defactinib is a highly potent oral FAK inhibitor that has a tolerable safety profile. Patients and Methods: We conducted a multicenter, open-label, phase I study with dose escalation and expansion phases. In dose escalation, patients with refractory solid tumors were treated at five escalating dose levels of defactinib and gemcitabine to identify a recommended phase II dose (RP2D). In expansion phase, patients with metastatic PDAC who progressed on frontline treatment (refractory cohort) or had stable disease (SD) after at least 4 months of standard gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (maintenance cohort) were treated at RP2D. Pre- and posttreatment tumor biopsies were performed to evaluate tumor immunity. Results: The triple drug combination was well-tolerated, with no dose-limiting toxicities. Among 20 treated patients with refractory PDAC, the disease control rate (DCR) was 80%, with one partial response (PR) and 15 SDs, and the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.6 and 7.8 months, respectively. Among 10 evaluable patients in the maintenance cohort, DCR was 70% with one PR and six SDs. Three patients with SD came off study due to treatment- or disease-related complications. The median PFS and OS on study treatment were 5.0 and 8.3 months, respectively. Conclusions: The combination of defactinib, pembrolizumab, and gemcitabine was well-tolerated and safe, had promising preliminary efficacy, and showed biomarker activity in infiltrative T lymphocytes. Efficacy of this strategy may require incorporation of more potent chemotherapy in future studies.

Abstract Introduction: The irreversible pan-HER inhibitor NER showed modest single agent activity for HER2mut MBC in Part I of MutHER trial. In Part II, we hypothesized that (1) N+F would improve activity in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) HER2mut MBC due to ER-HER2 crosstalk and (2) dual HER2 blockade by adding trastuzumab at disease progression (PD) could overcome resistance. Methods: Pts with ER+HER2mut MBC were enrolled to 2 cohorts (FUL treated or naive) to receive N+F with diarrhea prophylaxis. ER- pts received NER in an exploratory ER- cohort. Trastuzumab was added at PD if approved by insurance. Simon's Minimax 2-stage phase II design with the primary endpoint of clinical benefit rate (CBR: rates of complete/partial response [CR/PR] plus stable disease [SD] >24 weeks [wks]), with anticipated vs null hypothesis being CBR of 55% vs 35% (FUL treated) or 65% vs 40% (FUL naïve) with 80% power, 1 sided 0.05 alpha, was used. Secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS) and adverse events (AEs). Serial blood samples were analyzed for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) by Guardant360 for concomitant mutations, HER2mut variant allele frequency (VAF) dynamics, and resistance mechanisms. Results: Between Sep. 2015 and Oct. 2020, 40 pts with HER2mut MBC were enrolled, completing the 1st stage of each ER+ cohort. 35 pts (21 FUL treated, 10 FUL naïve, 4 ER-) were evaluable for response, with median age 63 (35-82) years, 3 (0-12) prior MBC regimen, lobular BC in 13 (37%) and visceral mets in 32 (91%) pts. 21 (68%) ER+ pts had prior CDK4/6 inhibitor. All but 1 pt has come off study due to PD. Table 1 shows the efficacy by cohort. Further enrollment is closed per protocol. Adding trastuzumab at PD induced CB in 4 (3 PR, 1 SD≥24 wks) of 5 pts (1 ER-, 4 ER+), with PFS 28 (95% CI 18~NA) wks. Common AEs across cohorts were diarrhea (G3 21%) and fatigue (G3 5%). No G4 AEs. ctDNA HER2mut was detected in 72% (23/32) baseline (BL) samples tested. In pts with paired samples, HER2mut VAF decreased at C1D15/C2D1 from BL in 75% (15/20) and rose in 89% (16/18) at PD. Acquired HER2mut, including the T798I gatekeeper mutation, were detected in 2 pts at PD. Mutations in TP53 (53%), PIK3CA (43%), and CDH1 (35%) were common, but none significantly associated with PFS in all or ER+ pts. Conclusions: NER, or N+F, is active for HER2mut MBC with good tolerability. Adding trastuzumab at PD induced further response, supporting dual HER2 blockade for HER2mut MBC. Table 1.EfficacyCohortFUL treatedFUL naïveER-Best Response, n evaluablen = 21n = 10n = 4CR, n100PR, n431SD (≥ 24 wks), n300SD (< 24 wks), n1030PD, n343CBR, n with CB/total n evaluable, % (95% CI)8 of 20*, 40% (19~64%)3 of 10, 30% (7~65%)1 of 4, 25% (0.6~81%)mPFS (95% CI), wks, ITT (n)24 (16~31) wks, (n = 24)20 (8~NA) wks, (n = 11)8.5 (8~NA) wks, (n = 5)*20 of 21 pts are evaluable for CBR in the FUL treated Cohort as 1 pt had SD as best response and treatment is still ongoing. ITT (intent to treat) population is used for mPFS estimate. Citation Format: Cynthia X. Ma, Jingqin Luo, Rachel A. Freedman, Timothy Pluard, Julie Nangia, Janice Lu, Frances Valdez-Albini, Melody Cobleigh, Jason Jones, Nancy U. Lin, Eric Winer, P. Kelly Marcom, Shana Thomas, Jill Anderson, Brittney Haas, Kimberly M. Hamann, Richard Bryce, Alshad S. Lalani, Lisa Carey, Matthew Goetz, Feng Gao, Gretchen Kimmick, Mark Pegram, Matthew J. Ellis, Ron Bose. A phase II trial of neratinib (NER) or NER plus fulvestrant (FUL) (N+F) in HER2 mutant, non-amplified (HER2mut) metastatic breast cancer (MBC): Part II of MutHER [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT026.

Abstract Background Inhibition of PD-L1 with atezolizumab combined with chemotherapy has shown acceptable safety and improved survival in patients with metastatic PD-L1 positive triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Patients with TNBC who do not achieve a pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy have a high risk of disease recurrence and death. This randomized, open-label, phase 2 trial evaluates neoadjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel with or without atezolizumab in patients with previously untreated clinical stages II and III TNBC. Methods Women aged ≥18 years with clinical stage T2-T4c, any N, M0 primary tumor by AJCC 7th edition staging TNBC; ECOG PS 0-2; and no prior systemic therapy for the indexed breast cancer were eligible. Patients were randomized in a 1:2 ratio to carboplatin AUC5 q 3 weeks x 4 + paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 q week x 12 (Arm A), or carboplatin AUC5 q 3 weeks x 4 + paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 q week x 12 + atezolizumab 1200 mg q3 weeks x 4 (Arm B). Surgery was 3-6 weeks following neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide was administered q2 weeks with growth factor support to all patients as per routine care. pCR and tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) percentages are the co-primary endpoints. pCR-evaluable population includes all eligible women who have been randomized and received at least one dose of combination therapy, while the TIL-evaluable population includes all eligible women who have evaluable TIL percentage after one cycle of therapy. A sample size of 67 (22 in Arm A, and 45 in Arm B) provided 80% power at 1-sided alpha = 0.10 to detect a minimum of 15% difference in TIL and 29% improvement (40% vs. 69%) in pCR, respectively. Herein, we report pCR results in the per protocol modified intent-to-treat population (mITT), which includes all eligible patients who were randomized and received at least one dose of combination therapy. Results Sixty-seven patients were randomized between 8/2017 and 9/2019. Six patients randomized to Arm A withdrew consent; 2 of these received protocol therapy but are excluded from the mITT analyses as they are not evaluable because definitive pathology reports are not available. Median follow up is 6 months (range 0.3 - 12.6 months). Median age is 52 years (range 25 - 78). Forty-three (64.2%) were Caucasian and thirteen (19.4%) were African American. Twenty-five (37.3%) were pre-menopausal. 67.2% and 32.8% had stages II and III disease respectively. Nine (13.4%) had a germline mutation in either BRCA1 or BRCA2. In the mITT population, 3 of 16 patients achieved pCR in Arm A - 18.8% (95% CI 4.0%- 45.6%), versus 25 of 45 patients in Arm B - 55.6% (95% CI 40.0%-70.4%); p value 0.018. pCR in those with BRCA mutations was 50% and 80% in Arm A and Arm B, respectively. Treatment delays were observed in 9 patients (40.9%) in Arm A, and 20 (44.4%) in Arm B; dose reductions occurred in 4 patients (18.1%) in Arm A, and in 6 (13.3%) in Arm B. There were 4 SAEs in Arm A and 10 in Arm B. One patient in Arm B had grade 3 adrenal insufficiency. One patient in Arm B died from recurrent disease during the follow-up period. Conclusions: The addition of atezolizumab to neoadjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel resulted in an increased pCR rate in patients with clinical stages II and III TNBC. However, the pCR in the control Arm A was lower than expected, possibly due to the absence of neoadjuvant anthracyclines. The high pCR rate observed in the experimental arm of this study is similar to that observed in other neoadjuvant trials utilizing anthracyclines, taxanes, and carboplatin in TNBC. Clinical trial information: NCT02883062. Citation Format: Foluso O Ademuyiwa, Feng Gao, Ina Chen, Donald W Northfelt, Robert Wesolowski, Mili Arora, Adam Brufsky, Claire Dees, Cesar A Santa-Maria, Roisin M Connolly, Jeremy Force, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Sarah Larson, Elad Sharon, William Gillanders. Nci 10013 - A randomized phase 2 study of neoadjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel, with or without atezolizumab in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD14-09.

Background: Maintenance therapy with lenalidomide post-autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has shown to improve progression-free survival (PFS) in multiple myeloma (MM), and has largely become the standard of care. However, toxicity leads to early discontinuation in nearly one-third of patients and additional options are needed (McCarthy, et al, JCO, 2017). Ixazomib is another maintenance option that has been shown to improve PFS; however, studies comparing lenalidomide and ixazomib are lacking. In this randomized phase 2 study, we analyzed the safety and efficacy of using lenalidomide and ixazomib as part of consolidation and maintenance therapies after ASCT (NCT02253316). Methods: Eligible patients, age 18-70 with newly diagnosed MM undergoing ASCT during first-line treatment, were consented prior to ASCT. Approximately 4 months following ASCT, patients received 4 cycles of consolidation therapy with IRd [ixazomib 4 mg on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, lenalidomide 15 mg on days 1 through 21, and dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1, 8 and 15]. Primary data on IRd consolidation were presented at ASH 2018 (Abstract 109920). One month after the last consolidation cycle, patients were randomized (1:1) to maintenance therapy with single-agent ixazomib (4 mg on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle) or lenalidomide (10 mg daily months 1-3 followed by 15 mg for months 4+). The arms were stratified based on MRD-status post-consolidation. In total, 237 patients were enrolled from 10 US centers. This abstract coincides with planned interim analysis 3 which is the first comparison of ixazomib and lenalidomide maintenance. While the study was not powered to compare PFS between the two arms, the sample will provide a reasonable power to estimate non-inferiority. There is a planned stopping rule for non-inferiority set at a hazard ratio of >1.3 in favor of lenalidomide. Secondary end-points include MRD-negativity following 12 cycles and toxicity. Results: At time of abstract submission, 215 patients had completed IRd consolidation and 191 had begun maintenance. 90 were randomized to ixazomib and 94 to lenalidomide. 7 patients were not randomized due to toxicity during consolidation; data from these patients are not included in the analyses. The characteristics of the two arms are summarized in Table 1. Hematologic toxicity has been infrequent with ixazomib with neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurring in 11% and 23% of patients. In comparison, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 45% and 35% of patients on lenalidomide. The most common non-hematologic toxicities in both arms have been GI-related and infections, both expected events. 16% of patients on ixazomib have experienced Grade 3-4 non-hematologic toxicity compared to 34% on lenalidomide. No grade 3 or higher peripheral neuropathy has been reported in either arm. 11% of patients on ixazomib have discontinued due to toxicity and another 9% have required a dose reduction to 3mg. Lenalidomide toxicity has led to discontinuation in 15% of patients and another 12% were dose reduced to 5mg. Only 45% of patients receiving 4+ cycles of lenalidomide were able to titrate to the 15mg dose. After a median follow-up of 11.2 months from randomization (19.7 months post-ASCT), 30% of patients on ixazomib have discontinued treatment due to disease progression. After a median follow-up of 12.3 months from randomization (20.2 months post-ASCT), 18% patients on lenalidomide have discontinued treatment due to disease progression. Conclusion: Ixazomib and lenalidomide maintenance have been well tolerated to date. A comparison of PFS is currently being conducted as part of interim analysis 3 and final results will be presented, representing the first report directly comparing lenalidomide and ixazomib maintenance. Table 1: Disclosures Vij: Genentech: Honoraria; Karyopharm: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria. Martin:Amgen, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Roche and Juno: Consultancy. Fiala:Incyte: Research Funding. Deol:Novartis: Other: Advisory board; Kite: Other: Advisory board; Agios: Other: Advisory board. Kaufman:Celgene: Consultancy; Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University: Employment; Amgen: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Consultancy; Janssen: Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy. Hofmeister:Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Oncopeptides: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Honoraria; Nektar: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Imbrium: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Gregory:Poseida: Research Funding; Celgene: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Speakers Bureau. Berdeja:AbbVie Inc, Amgen Inc, Acetylon Pharmaceuticals Inc, Bluebird Bio, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Celgene Corporation, Constellation Pharma, Curis Inc, Genentech, Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Janssen Biotech Inc, Kesios Therapeutics, Lilly, Novartis, Poseida: Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding; Amgen Inc, BioClinica, Celgene Corporation, CRISPR Therapeutics, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Janssen Biotech Inc, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Kite Pharma Inc, Prothena, Servier, Takeda Oncology: Consultancy. Chari:Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millennium/Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Array Biopharma: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Oncoceutics: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rosko:Vyxeos: Other: Travel support.

TPS592 Background: Persistent cell proliferation (Ki67 > 10%) on tumor biopsies as early as 2-4 weeks (wks) on neo endocrine therapy (ET) identifies resistant tumors in ~20% patients (pts) with early stage ER+ HER2- BC who are at high risk of relapse. Palbo plus ET significantly improves progression free survival in pts with ET naïve or resistant advanced ER+ HER2- BC, and is being evaluated in the adjuvant setting. However, biomarkers predictive of palbo sensitivity are unknown. Ki67 analysis of serial tumor biopsies in the neo palbo and ana (NeoPalAna) trial demonstrated that 2 wks of palbo plus ana potently inhibited Ki67 and induced complete cell cycle arrest (CCCA, Ki67≤2.7%) in tumors with high Ki67 post 4 wks ana run-in. This study is therefore aimed to prospectively investigate the biological activity of palbo plus ana in ET resistant ER+ HER2- BC. Methods: The primary objective is to assess the rate of CCCA (central Ki67 ≤2.7%) after 2 wks of neo palbo and ana. Secondary objectives include analysis of tumor biopsies to explore response biomarkers. Key inclusions include women with clinical stage 2/3 ER+ HER2- BC, central Ki67 > 10% after ≥2 wks of any neo ET, adequate organ function. Key exclusions include prior CDK 4/6 inhibitor, treatment of BC except ET, concomitant use of strong CYP3A4 inhibitor. Pts receive palbo (125mg PO daily, days 1-21, 28-day cycle), ana (1 mg PO daily) and goserelin (if premenopausal). Pts with C1D15 Ki67 > 10% will discontinue study. If C1D15 Ki67 ≤10%, pt will receive 4 cycles of treatment, and additional 10-12 days of palbo if counts normalized within 3 wks post C4D28. Following surgery, pts are eligible for 2 years of adjuvant palbo. A sample size of 37 (stage 1, n = 12, stage 2 n = 25) by simon optimal two stage phase II design will be employed to assess whether the rate of CCCA is ≤5% vs ≥20% (90% power, alpha 0.1). Stage 2 will proceed if ≥1 had CCCA in stage 1. If ≤3 of 37 had CCCA, this regimen will be considered ineffective. The study is active and has enrolled 4 pts. Clinical trial information: NCT01723774.

Abstract Introduction: MutHER is a phase II trial that demonstrated the anti-tumor activity of the pan-HER inhibitor neratinib in HER2mut, non-amplified MBC. The major challenges to accrue to this trial were the large number of pts to screen for the 2-3% HER2mut population and the high rate (24%) of poor quality tumor DNA for sequencing. The goals of this ctDNA study were: 1) the concordance of HER2mut detected by ctDNA versus tumor testing; 2) the incidence of ctDNA HER2mut in HER2 non-amplified MBC; 3) changes in HER2mut variant allele frequency (VAF) on neratinib therapy. Methods: A sample size of 30 negative (neg) controls was needed to ensure 90% confidence if ctDNA testing has >90% specificity in detecting HER2mut. Thus, plasma from MBC pts obtained at screening for MutHER trial (Neg control: 40 pts without HER2mut on tumor testing; Positive (pos) control: 14 pts with known HER2mut who received neratinib) were subjected to Guardant360 ctDNA 70-gene panel sequencing (all exons of HER2 included). ctDNA from the 14 neratinib treated pts were also analyzed at week (wk) 4 and upon progression. ctDNA data from MBC pts clinically tested at Guardant Health were interrogated for HER2mut incidence. Results: Among the 14 pts with tumor pos for HER2mut, ctDNA sequencing identified the same HER2mut in 11, discrepant HER2mut in 1, and neg in 2. The 2 pts with ctDNA neg for HER2mut had progressive disease (PD) and stable disease (SD > 6 months) on neratinib, respectively. Among the 40 neg controls, 8 were not evaluable (no detectable ctDNA or assay unsuccessful) and all 32 successfully sequenced cases were neg for HER2mut. The sensitivity and specificity of ctDNA for HER2mut detection was 11/14 (79%, 90% CI: 53-94%) and 32/32 (100%, 90% CI: 91-100%), respectively. Among the 11 paired baseline and wk 4 samples, 9 (82%) had lower HER2mut VAFs at wk 4 than at baseline, with 1 complete response (CR), 1 partial response (PR), 5 SD, and 4 PD at wk 8 as best tumor response. Two pts had higher wk 4 ctDNA HER2mut VAFs and both had radiographic PD at wk 8. The absolute HER2mut VAF levels at wk 4 were significantly associated with TTP (Spearman rho=-0.69, p=0.02) and tumor size change (rho=0.67, p=0.05). The HER2mut VAFs were significantly higher at progression than wk 4 in all pts (p<0.01). One pt acquired a new HER2mut T798I, which is analogous to the gate-keeper mutation EGFR T790M. The incidence of HER2mut without amplification in unselected consecutive MBC clinically tested by Guardant360 was 3% (48/1,584), with mutation pattern similar to published tumor testing data. Conclusions: ctDNA sequencing is sensitive and highly specific in detecting HER2mut, offering a non-invasive method to identify pts for trials of HER2mut-targeted therapy. Decreased HER2mut VAFs at wk 4 was observed in 82% of cases, consistent with the on-target effect of neratinib. Increased HER2mut VAFs at wk 4 is a potential early marker of progression. Citation Format: Cynthia Ma, Ron Bose, Feng Gao, Rachel Freedman, Melinda Telli, Gretchen Kimmick, Eric Winer, Michael Naughton, Matthew Goetz, Christy Russell, Debu Tripathy, Melody Cobleigh, Andres Forero, Timothy Pluard, Carey Anders, Shana Thomas, Jill Anderson, Caroline Bumb, Kimberly Banks, Richard Lanman, Richard Bryce, Alshad Lalani, John Pfeifer, Daniel Hays, Mark Pegram, Kimberly Blackwell, Philippe Bedard, Hussam Al-Kateb, Matthew Ellis. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) sequencing for HER2 mutation (HER2mut) screening and response monitoring to neratinib in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT011. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-CT011

Abstract Purpose: Based on promising preclinical data, we conducted a single-arm phase II trial to assess the clinical benefit rate (CBR) of neratinib, defined as complete/partial response (CR/PR) or stable disease (SD) ≥24 weeks, in HER2mut nonamplified metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity, and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) HER2mut detection. Experimental Design: Tumor tissue positive for HER2mut was required for eligibility. Neratinib was administered 240 mg daily with prophylactic loperamide. ctDNA sequencing was performed retrospectively for 54 patients (14 positive and 40 negative for tumor HER2mut). Results: Nine of 381 tumors (2.4%) sequenced centrally harbored HER2mut (lobular 7.8% vs. ductal 1.6%; P = 0.026). Thirteen additional HER2mut cases were identified locally. Twenty-one of these 22 HER2mut cases were estrogen receptor positive. Sixteen patients [median age 58 (31–74) years and three (2–10) prior metastatic regimens] received neratinib. The CBR was 31% [90% confidence interval (CI), 13%–55%], including one CR, one PR, and three SD ≥24 weeks. Median PFS was 16 (90% CI, 8–31) weeks. Diarrhea (grade 2, 44%; grade 3, 25%) was the most common adverse event. Baseline ctDNA sequencing identified the same HER2mut in 11 of 14 tumor-positive cases (sensitivity, 79%; 90% CI, 53%–94%) and correctly assigned 32 of 32 informative negative cases (specificity, 100%; 90% CI, 91%–100%). In addition, ctDNA HER2mut variant allele frequency decreased in nine of 11 paired samples at week 4, followed by an increase upon progression. Conclusions: Neratinib is active in HER2mut, nonamplified MBC. ctDNA sequencing offers a noninvasive strategy to identify patients with HER2mut cancers for clinical trial participation. Clin Cancer Res; 23(19); 5687–95. ©2017 AACR.