Marmagkiolis, Konstantinos

Introduction: Artificial intelligence (AI) and wider digital technologies are accelerating healthcare systems’ attempts to address the financial and moral imperatives of improving health disparities and thus wider population health outcomes. Yet adoption has thus far been slower in less common conditions including carcinoid, its syndrome, and related heart disease especially amid wider system shocks like the COVID-19 pandemic and its lingering effects. This is the first known AI-augmented nationally representative analysis of mortality and disparities for these associations. Methods: Quantum BAyesian Machine learning-augmented Propensity Score translational (QBAM-PS) statistics with multivariable regression was performed on the largest all payor US inpatient dataset, the National Inpatient Sample. Results: Of the 208,257,049 adult hospitalizations from 2016-2022, 124,954 (0.06%) had carcinoid tumors. Of the 71,402 hospitalizations with carcinoid from 2016-2019, 26,711 (37.41%) had metastases, 2,835 (3.97%) had acute heart failure, and 2,042 (2.86%) died. But of the 53,552 hospitalizations with carcinoid from 2020-2022, diagnosed metastases (38.04%) had increased, as did acute heart failure (4.21%) and mortality (3.73%), while 0.04% had diagnosed COVID. In all adult hospitalizations from 2016-2019 by QBAM-PS multivariable regression controlling for clinical confounders and severity, carcinoid and carcinoid syndrome did not significantly increase mortality, but carcinoid was significantly less likely to be diagnosed among Hispanics (OR 0.73) and Asians (OR 0.46) compared to Caucasians, in addition to Medicare (OR 0.71) and VA (OR 0.65) compared to private insurance, and more likely to be diagnosed in the highest versus lowest income quartile (OR 0.124) (all p<0.001). By 2020-2022, carcinoid and its syndrome did not significantly increase the odds of COVID diagnosis. But again carcinoid was significantly less likely to be diagnosed in Hispanics (OR 0.68), Asians (OR 0.61), Medicare (OR 0.78), and VA (OR 0.59), while the highest income again increased diagnosis odds (OR 1.19) (all p<0.01). There were no mortality disparities within carcinoid during either time period. Conclusions: This large multi-year analysis supports improvements in metastatic carcinoid detection and heart disease management, including through the COVID pandemic, though amid persistent racial, insurance, and income disparities.

Background and Objectives: Cancer and coronary artery disease (CAD) often coexist. Compared to quantitative coronary angiography (QCA), fractional flow reserve (FFR) has emerged as a more reliable method of identifying significant coronary stenoses. We aimed to assess the specific management, safety and outcomes of FFR-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in cancer patients with stable CAD. Materials and Methods: FFR was used to assess cancer patients that underwent coronary angiography for stable CAD between September 2008 and May 2016, and were found to have ≥50% stenosis by QCA. Patients with lesions with an FFR > 0.75 received medical therapy alone, while those with FFR ≤ 0.75 were revascularized. Procedure-related complications, all-cause mortality, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or urgent revascularizations were analyzed. Results: Fifty-seven patients with stable CAD underwent FFR on 57 lesions. Out of 31 patients with ≥70% stenosis as measured by QCA, 14 (45.1%) had an FFR ≥ 0.75 and lesions were reclassified as moderate and did not receive PCI nor DAPT. Out of 26 patients with <70% stenosis as measured by QCA, 6 (23%) had an FFR < 0.75 and were reclassified as severe and were treated with PCI and associated DAPT. No periprocedural complications, urgent revascularization, acute coronary syndromes, or cardiovascular deaths were noted. There was a 22.8% mortality at 1 year, all cancer related. Patients who received a stent by FFR assessment showed a significant association with decreased risk of all-cause death (HR: 0.37, 95% CI 0.15–0.90, p = 0.03). Conclusions: Further studies are needed to define the optimal therapeutic approach for cancer patients with CAD. Using an FFR cut-off point of 0.75 to guide PCI translates into fewer interventions and can facilitate cancer care. There was an overall reduction in mortality in patients that received a stent, suggesting increased resilience to cancer therapy and progression.

Since the late 1990s, there has been a steady decline in cancer-related mortality, in part related to the introduction of so-called targeted therapies. Intended to interfere with a specific molecular pathway, these therapies have, paradoxically, led to a number of effects off their intended cancer tissue or molecular targets. The latest examples are tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting the Philadelphia Chromosome mutation product, which have been associated with progressive atherosclerosis and acute vascular events. In addition, agents designed to interfere with the vascular growth factor signaling pathway have vascular side effects ranging from hypertension to arterial events and cardiomyocyte toxicity. Interestingly, the risk of cardiotoxicity with drugs such as trastuzumab is predicted by preexisting cardiovascular risk factors and disease, posing the question of a vascular component to the pathophysiology. The effect on the coronary circulation has been the leading explanation for the cardiotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil and may be the underlying the mechanism of presentation of apical ballooning syndrome with various chemotherapeutic agents. Classical chemotherapeutic agents such as cisplatin, often used in combination with bleomycin and vinca alkaloids, can lead to vascular events including acute coronary thrombosis and may be associated with an increased long-term cardiovascular risk. This review is intended to provide an update on the evolving spectrum of vascular toxicities with cancer therapeutics, particularly as they pertain to clinical practice, and to the conceptualization of cardiovascular diseases, as well. Vascular toxicity with cancer therapy: the old and the new, an evolving avenue.

In the United States alone, there are currently approximately 14.5 million cancer survivors, and this number is expected to increase to 20 million by 2020. Cancer therapies can cause significant injury to the vasculature, resulting in angina, acute coronary syndromes (ACS), stroke, critical limb ischemia, arrhythmias, and heart failure, independently from the direct myocardial or pericardial damage from the malignancy itself. Consequently, the need for invasive evaluation and management in the cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL) for such patients has been increasing. In recognition of the need for a document on special considerations for cancer patients in the CCL, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) commissioned a consensus group to provide recommendations based on the published medical literature and on the expertise of operators with accumulated experience in the cardiac catheterization of cancer patients. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

In the United States alone, there are currently approximately 14.5 million cancer survivors, and this number is expected to increase to 20 million by 2020. Cancer therapies can cause significant injury to the vasculature, resulting in angina, acute coronary syndromes (ACS), stroke, critical limb ischemia, arrhythmias, and heart failure, independently from the direct myocardial or pericardial damage from the malignancy itself. Consequently, the need for invasive evaluation and management in the cardiac catheterization laboratory (CCL) for such patients has been increasing. In recognition of the need for a document on special considerations for cancer patients in the CCL, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) commissioned a consensus group to provide recommendations based on the published medical literature and on the expertise of operators with accumulated experience in the cardiac catheterization of cancer patients. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.