Stulak, John M.

Introduction: Omentum flap is a viable reconstructive option for complex chest wall and mediastinal reconstruction. The impact of vasoconstrictors and the laminar pattern of blood flow associated with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) on the outcomes of reconstructions has not been thoroughly evaluated. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent chest wall or mediastinal reconstruction using pedicled omentum flaps between 2003 and 2019. Results: Forty patients (60% males) underwent chest wall or mediastinal reconstruction using a pedicled omentum flap at a mean age of 58 years. The median follow-up was 24.3 months. The most common indication was the reconstruction of anterior chest wall/sternal defects (n = 16), followed by coverage of repaired bronchopleural fistula (n = 6), osteoradionecrosis of the anterolateral chest wall (n = 5), reconstruction of anterior/lateral chest wall following oncologic resections (n = 5), coverage of replaced infected LVAD (n = 4), and coverage of exposed/replaced aortic root vascular grafts (n = 4). Vasoconstrictors were used in 26 patients (65%). Eight flaps had partial necrosis, and none of the flaps had complete necrosis. There was no difference in flap complication rates in patients who received vasoconstrictors during the case compared to those who did not ( P = 1.0). Thirteen (33%) flaps were skin grafted at a median of 13 days with 100% skin graft viability. Abdominal incisional hernia developed in 8 patients. In patients with LVADs, the omentum remained viable during the follow-up period. Conclusion: The ability of the omentum to easily reach various regions in the chest and the low failure rate make this flap a reliable reconstructive method.

Background: Diversity within the healthcare workforce is essential to improve quality of care, although evaluation of diversity within surgical training remains limited. This study analyzed diversity in recruitment of residents into surgical subspecialties at a large academic medical institution and national trends. Methods: A 21-year cross-sectional study of medical school graduates accepted into all surgical subspecialty training programs was performed. The institutional cohort was divided into two groups (1997–2006, 2007–2017). Subspecialty acceptance rates were determined between 2011 and 2018. Data on candidate demographics including gender, race, ethnicity, citizenship, and origin of medical education at a single institution and nationally were extracted. Results: Two thousand found hundred seventy-two residents were included in this study. From 1997 to 2018, female acceptances increased from 21.1% to 29.7% (p < 0.01), non-White increased from 27.9% to 31.8% (p = 0.01), and international medical graduates decreased from 28.8% to 25.5% (p = 0.02). There was no significant change in accepted Hispanic and Non-US candidates. Female subspecialty rates for subspecialties increased nationally and was comparable to our cohort, except in general surgery. Hispanic subspecialty acceptance rates were less than 10% and Black/African American acceptance rates remained less than 5% across subspecialties nationally and at our institution. Conclusion: Diversity in surgical training has modestly progressed over the last two decades, but the degree of positive change has not been universal and highlights the critical need for improvement and action. Continued institution driven and collaborative strategies are essential to promote diversity in recruitment across all surgical specialties that has implications on our future workforce and surgical leadership.

The aim of this study was to identify the optimal echocardiographic measurement of aortic regurgitation (AR) in continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) and determine risk factors and clinical implications of de novo AR. Echocardiographic images from consecutive patients who underwent LVAD implantation from February 2007 to March 2017 were reviewed. Severity of de novo AR was determined by vena contracta (VC). Preimplant clinical characteristics, LVAD settings at discharge, and outcomes including heart failure hospitalizations, all-cause mortality, and ventricular arrhythmias of patients with greater than or equal to moderate de novo AR were compared with those with mild or no AR. Among 219 patients, greater than or equal to moderate de novo AR occurred in 65 (29.7%). Left ventricular assist devices support duration was longer with greater than or equal to moderate AR than no or mild AR. In multivariable analysis, preimplant trivial AR and persistent aortic valve (AV) closure were independently associated with de novo AR. By time-varying covariate analysis, survival and freedom from cardiovascular events in greater than or equal to moderate AR were significantly worse (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.947, p < 0.001 and HR = 4.666, p < 0.001). In conclusion, de novo greater than or equal to moderate AR measured by VC increases risk of adverse events. Longer LVAD support duration, preimplant trivial AR, and a closed AV are associated with occurrence of greater than or equal to moderate de novo AR.

AbstractCoagulopathy is common during left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, treatment of which can be challenging given the often‐limited ability for the right ventricle to accommodate volume transfusion after device initiation with 20% to 40% of patients developing right ventricular failure (RVF). Transfusion of plasma late on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) combined with ultrafiltration may replace clotting factors while reducing volume administration. We compared outcomes in patients undergoing LVAD implantation receiving plasma on CPB and ultrafiltration with traditional transfusion practices. Co‐primary outcomes needed for blood product transfusion in the first 6 and 24 hours after CPB. Secondary outcomes included metrics of morbidity and mortality. 396 patients were analyzed (59 plasma on CPB). Patients receiving plasma on CPB had a greater volume of blood products transfused (3764 vs. 2741 mL first 6 hours; 6059 vs. 4305 mL first 24 hours) in unadjusted analysis. In adjusted analysis, plasma transfusion on CPB with ultrafiltration had no significant effect on the primary outcomes of blood products given in the first 6 hours (estimated effect size 982 [−428, 2392] mL, P = .17) and 24 hours (estimated effect size 1076 [−904, 3057] mL, P = .29). Patients receiving plasma on CPB were more likely on either vasopressors or inotropes at 24 hours after ICU admission (P = .01), however, indices of coagulopathy and RVF were similar between groups. While prospective studies would be necessary to definitively evaluate the clinical utility of this strategy, no signal for benefit was observed suggesting plasma should not be used for this purpose.

Device infection is a major potential complication following ventricular assist device implantation and can lead to devastating consequences. The treatment options are few and often challenging to implement. The most durable option may require device exchange to obtain adequate source control. Due to the prolonged support times offered by the new left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), there is concern that the number of patients that will eventually require repeated device exchanges for device infection will increase. The benefit of medical antibiotic therapy alone is limited and is frequently unsuccessful. Surgical treatment strategies that improve outcomes by eliminating the infection and by preventing infection recurrence are needed. We report a case of a third-time LVAD exchange (4th device implant) for device infection within eight years of the index implant, and we briefly discuss the role of the greater omentum in the surgical treatment of this complication.

Background: Left ventricular assist devices as destination therapy (DT-LVAD) have been shown to decrease mortality compared with medical management, and can improve quality of life for many patients with advanced heart failure. However, while most patients live longer with DT-LVAD than they would have with medical therapy, deaths still occur. We sought to systematically examine the end-of-life care of patients who died with a DT-LVAD at a single center. Methods: All patients undergoing DT-LVAD at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota from January 1, 2007 through September 30, 2014 who subsequently died prior to July 1, 2015 were included. The cause of death was determined based on review of documentation in the electronic medical record, including autopsy reports, death certificates and clinical notes. Details about palliative care consultations, hospice enrollment, hospitalizations, and device deactivation at the end-of-life were obtained from the electronic medical record. Results: Of 89 patients that died with a DT-LVAD (84 HeartMate II, 3 HeartWare, 2 Heartmate XVE, mean age at death 66.1 years), the mean (standard deviation) time from LVAD implantation to death was 2.0 (1.9) years. The most common causes of death were multiorgan failure (25.9%), hemorrhagic stroke (24.7%), and progressive heart failure (20.0%). Nearly half (45.6%) of patients saw palliative care in consultation within a month prior to death. However, only 13 (15.5%) patients enrolled in hospice a median of 11 (range 1-315) days prior to death, including 4 patients with concurrent cancer, 2 with stroke, and 7 with multiorgan failure. The vast majority of patients (78.6%) died in the hospital, and of those hospitalized at death, 87.7% died in the intensive care unit. Most patients hospitalized at death transitioned to a comfort-directed approach to care within 24 hours of dying. In total, 43 (48.3%) patients had their LVAD deactivated prior to death, with all but 3 undergoing deactivation in the hospital. The vast majority of patients died within an hour of LVAD deactivation, and all within 26 hours. Conclusions: In contrast to the general heart failure population, most patients with DT-LVAD die in the hospital and very few enroll in hospice. A significant body of research has demonstrated that patients who die in the intensive care unit and the hospital, as opposed to home or with hospice assistance, experience worse quality of life, quality of death and caregiver outcomes. Potential reasons that patients with DT-LVAD may experience different end-of-life care than other patients with heart failure exist, including that they often experience sudden changes in health status prior to death from acute events such as hemorrhagic stroke. However, further work is needed to understand these differences and to determine whether patients with DT-LVAD are receiving optimal end-of-life care.

Introduction: Recent reports have documented an abrupt increase in 3-month confirmed HeartMate II left ventricular assist device (LVAD) thrombosis beginning in 2011 without a plateau observed to date. Because very little data exist from multi-institutional efforts, we report our experience. Methods: From January 2004 to December 2013, 516 pt underwent HeartMate II LVAD implant at three institutions (University of Michigan (n=254), Mayo Clinic Rochester (n=205), and Vanderbilt Heart and Vascular Institute (n=57)). Median age at implant was 60 yr (range, 18-82) and 428 (83%) were male. Confirmed pump thrombosis at 3 months was defined as thrombus found in the blood-contacting surfaces of the pump at the time of urgent transplant, device exchange or autopsy. Pt without at least 3 months of follow-up were excluded. Results: Confirmed pump thrombosis occurred in 9 pt within 3 months post implant. The incidence was greatest in the year 2012 (5.3%). Following this peak, the incidence of 3-month confirmed pump thrombosis decreased significantly to 2.9% (Figure). Significant differences in preoperative characteristics between patients with pump thrombosis and without thrombosis included female sex (36% vs. 16%, p=0.01), bridge to transplant (77% vs. 54%, p=0.03), atrial fibrillation (55% vs. 32%, p=0.04), and preop platelet count (231,000 vs. 172,000, p<0.001). Follow-up was available in all for a total of 857 patient years of support. At a median follow-up of 1.2 years (max., 9.8 years), a similar proportion of patients were alive (73% vs. 74%, p=0.9). Conclusions: We report a recent decrease in early, confirmed HeartMate II LVAD thrombosis to historically observed levels, which is disparate to recent reports. While we identified several differences in clinical characteristics between patient groups, the issue of pump thrombosis is complex and multifactorial. Most importantly, our findings demonstrate the need for more granular analyses from collaborative efforts.

Introduction: Frailty has recently been shown to be associated with increased risk of death after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation as destination therapy (DT), but no data exists specifically analyzing its association with specific early and late adverse events. Methods: Between February 2007 and May 2014, 251 patients (205 male) underwent primary implantation of CF-LVAD at our institution; 157 (63%) were implanted as DT and preoperative frailty assessment was available in 96 pt. Frailty was identified in 58/96 (60%) patients according to the deficit index (31 impairments, disabilities and comorbidities) and defined as > 25% deficits. Age (67 vs. 64 years, p=0.12), male sex (79% vs. 87%, 0.63), chronic kidney disease (64% vs. 63%, p=0.74), creatinine (1.7 vs. 1.5, p=0.1), hemoglobin (11.6 vs. 11.5, p=0.98), and albumin levels (3.7 vs. 3.8, p=0.53) were similar between frail and non-frail pt, while diabetes (59% vs. 13%, p<0.001), ischemic etiology (64% vs. 45%, p=0.04), and preop balloon pump (50% vs. 26%, p=0.01) were significantly different. Results: All patients underwent CF-LVAD implantation and cardiopulmonary bypass time was similar between groups (102 vs. 111 min., p=0.3). There were no significant differences in early adverse events between frail and non-frail pt, including inotrope duration (120 vs. 96 hr., p=0.11), right ventricular failure (19% vs. 13%, p=0.44), respiratory failure (26% vs. 18%, p=0.34), acute renal failure (16% vs. 13%, p=0.69), and hepatic dysfunction (16% vs. 13%, p=0.69). Median length of stay (20 vs. 16 days, p=0.25) and early mortality (12% vs. 8%, p=0.48) were also similar. During a median follow up of 2 years with 224 patient/years of support, any GI bleed (43% vs. 42%, p=0.79), any thromboembolic event (34% vs. 39%, p=0.74), and driveline infection (10% vs. 26%, p=0.052). Conclusions: In this select cohort of patients, frailty did not portend higher risk of adverse events after CF-LVAD implantation for DT despite prior observation that late survival is reduced in these patients. These findings are extremely important in patient selection and counseling of patients prior to LVAD implantation.