Maples, William J.

4504 Background: Treatment options for metastatic NET, including islet cell carcinoma (ICC) and carcinoid tumor (CT), are limited. These tumors frequently express vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) and platelet derived growth factor receptor receptor-β (PDGFR-β). Sorafenib, a small-molecule inhibitor of the VEGFR-2 and PDGFR-β tyrosine kinase domains, is a rational targeted therapy to evaluate in NET. Methods: Eligibility criteria included: ECOG PS = 2, = 1 prior chemotherapy, good organ function and signed informed consent. Prior interferon and prior or concurrent octreotide at a stable dose were allowed. Pts unable to take oral medications, with uncontrolled hypertension or with symptomatic coronary artery disease were excluded. Pts received sorafenib 400 mg po BID. Primary endpoint was response by RECIST in two cohorts (ie, CT and ICC) using separate 2-stage phase II designs. Results: 93 pts were enrolled: (50 CT, 43 ICC). For pts evaluable for the primary endpoint, 4 of 41 (10%) CT pts and 4 of 41 (10%) ICC pts had a PR. There were 3 minor responses (MR = 20–29% decrease in sum of target lesion diameters) in CT pts and 9 MRs in ICC pts for PR+MR rate of 17% for CT pts and 32% for ICC pts. For pts evaluable, 6-month progression-free survival was observed in 8/20 CT and 14/23 ICC pts. Grade 3–4 toxicity occurred in 43% of pts, with skin (20%), GI (7%) and fatigue (9%) most common. Translational studies from tumor tissue will be presented. Conclusions: Sorafenib at 400 mg po BID has modest activity in metastatic neuroendocrine tumors, with frequent grade = 3 toxicity. Supported by NOI CM6225. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

69 Background: Healthcare organizations can cultivate the strength of a diverse workforce in creating a culture of excellence. Enabling the team to understand how personal and cultural beliefs affect our decision making and how we interact with patients and colleagues is integral. Gaps in care exist in cancer diagnoses and treatment in many minority groups. A need for education in the nature of assumptions, unconscious biases, and awareness around the existence of healthcare disparities, was identified through culture transformation work within multiple healthcare institutions. Methods: An experiential course was designed for multi-disciplinary groups of providers. Designed to meet the evolving demographics in the country and help participants recognize how their own cultural beliefs and values affect their decision making. Topics include cultural awareness, assumptions and unconscious bias, effective use of interpreters, and skills to recognize when cultural differences may be playing a role and how to successfully navigate these situations. Raising awareness of healthcare disparities is highlighted, including disparities in cancer care diagnosis, treatment and outcomes for different ethnicities and socioeconomic groups. Examples include disparities in diagnosis, treatment and outcomes of lung cancer, colon cancer and breast cancer in minorities. Results: Participants engage in skills-based work. Participants develop a plan how they can take this information and education back to help create an awareness of disparities and skills to successfully navigate these situations. After this program, participants will be cognizant of the nature of assumptions and unconscious bias and understand the strength of diversity as an asset rather than a hindrance. Conclusions: Healthcare disparities can have a significant impact on patient experience, quality and outcomes. Specific inequities in cancer diagnosis and treatment in minorities is highlighted. Participants are provided with information and skills that can be introduced to their home institutions to have all caregivers recognize and successfully navigate culturally sensitive situations.

Abstract Lessons Learned Everolimus does not have sufficient activity to justify its use as single agent in metastatic melanoma. Patients treated with 10 mg per day dose were most likely to require dose reductions. Everolimus appeared to reduce the numbers of regulatory T cells in approximately half of the treated patients; unfortunately, these effects were not correlated with clinical outcomes. Background Everolimus (RAD-001) is an orally active rapamycin analogue shown in preclinical data to produce cytostatic cell inhibition, which may be potentially beneficial in treating melanoma. We conducted a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of everolimus in patients with unresectable metastatic melanoma (MM). Methods This study included two cohorts; cohort 1 received 30 mg of everolimus by mouth (PO) weekly, and cohort 2 was dosed with 10 mg of everolimus PO daily. The endpoints of the study were safety, 16-week progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and measures of immunomodulatory/antiangiogenic properties with therapy. Tumor samples before therapy and at week 8 of treatment were analyzed. Peripheral blood plasma or mononuclear cell isolates collected prior to therapy and at weeks 8 and 16 and at time of tumor progression were analyzed for vascular endothelial growth factor and regulatory T-cell (Treg) measurements. Results A total of 53 patients were enrolled in cohort 1 (n = 24) and cohort 2 (n = 29). Only 2 patients of the first 20 patients enrolled in cohort 2 had treatment responses (25%; 95% confidence interval, 8.6%–49.1%); this result did not allow full accrual to cohort 2, as the study was terminated for futility. Median OS was 12.2 months for cohort 1 versus 8.1 months in cohort 2; no PFS advantage was seen in either group (2.1 months vs. 1.8 months). Dose-limiting toxicities included grade 4 myocardial ischemia (3.4%); grade 3 fatigue, mucositis, and hyperglycemia (10.3%); and anorexia and anemia (6.9%). Everolimus significantly reduced the number of Tregs in approximately half of the treated patients; however, these effects were not correlated with clinical outcomes. Conclusion Everolimus does not have sufficient single-agent activity in MM; however, we have identified evidence of biological activity to provide a potential rationale for future combination studies.

Abstract Background: Based upon preclinical synergy and prior phase 1 study results, the clinical efficacy of flavopiridol combined with cisplatin was assessed in patients with recurrent ovarian and primary peritoneal cancers. Methods: A two cohort phase 2 trial of cisplatin (60 mg/m2 IV) followed by flavopiridol (100 mg/m2 IV, 24 h continuous infusion; 21 day cycles) was undertaken in patients with recurrent platin-sensitive or platin-resistant ovarian/primary peritoneal cancers (defined by disease progression > vs. <6 months following platin-based therapy). Measurable disease (RECIST criteria) – or evaluable disease plus CA125 >2X the post-treatment nadir – was required, as was ECOG performance <2 and exposure to only one prior treatment regimen. Results: Forty-five patients were enrolled between April 20, 2004 and March 4, 2010 – 40 platin-resistant patients (Group 1), and 5 platin-sensitive patients (Group 2). In Group 1, the median number of treatment cycles was 3 (range 2-12); 39 of the 40 eligible patients have now discontinued treatment. While only 10% of all patients incurred grade 4 toxicities, grade 3 toxicities were seen in the majority (65%). The most frequent grade 3 and 4 toxicities were neutropenia (all grade 3, 17.5%); nausea (12.5%); vomiting, fatigue, thrombosis, anemia (10% each). Sensory neuropathy, grade 1 or 2, was observed in 75% of all patients – with grade 3 and 4 neuropathy not observed primarily due to pre-specified aggressive dose reductions. Six patients (15%) in Group 1 achieved a confirmed response (1 CR, 5 PR), with a median response duration of 119 days (range 84-212). Ten additional Group 1 patients (32.5%) experienced maintained stable disease. Median Group 1 overall time to progression was 3.7 months; overall survival was 17.2 months. Pilot assessment of attained ascites flavopiridol level and sensitivity of patient ascitic tumor cells to flavopiridol confirmed that patient flavopiridol levels were consistent with observed clinical antitumor efficacy. In Group 2, although 2 of 5 patients also responded (40%; 2 PR), the cohort was closed due to poor accrual. Conclusions: The combination of flavopiridol and cisplatin has promising clinical activity in both platin-sensitive and platin-resistant ovarian and primary peritoneal cancers. Supported in part by NCI CA097129, CA15083 and CM62205; clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT00083122 Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4712. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-4712

The development of subspecialty tumor groups for uncommon malignancies represents an effective approach to building experience, increasing patient volumes and referrals, and fostering development of increased therapeutic options and clinical trials for patients afflicted with otherwise historically neglected cancers.