Katzman, Brooke M.

Abstract Background Capillary self-collection (CSC) devices allow patients to collect blood samples at home, potentially reducing outpatient phlebotomy visits. This study aimed to (a) assess the patient experience with multiple commercially available CSC devices; (b) determine which laboratory tests are commonly ordered together, which could reduce the need for appointments; and (c) evaluate the analytical performance of these tests using CSC samples. Methods User experience for 3 CSC devices was evaluated. Clinical feasibility was determined by comparing test results in paired sera collected by venipuncture (VP) and CSC devices. VP samples were centrifuged within 2 h and tested immediately. CSC sera were centrifuged and tested both immediately and after delayed processing to simulate shipping temperature extremes (−20°C or 40°C). Basic metabolic panel, lipid panel, thyroid function cascade, and prostate-specific antigen were evaluated. Differences between VP and CSC collections were characterized according to their statistical and clinical differences. Results Patients reported CSC devices were easy to use and painless. Clinically significant differences between VP and CSC sera processed immediately were limited to potassium and bicarbonate. Following delayed processing of CSC serum samples (48 h at room temperature), clinically significant differences in potassium, bicarbonate, and glucose were observed. Frozen samples could not be analyzed. A 48 h delay at 40°C caused clinically significant differences in all analytes except creatinine, lipid panel, prostate-specific antigen, and the thyroid cascade. Conclusion Potassium, bicarbonate, and glucose were not stable at room temperature in CSC sera. CSC serum specimens may be a viable option but require analyte-specific evaluation and consideration of transportation conditions.

Abstract Background The first international clinical standards of care for the gender-diverse population were formulated in the late 1970s. In the last 15 years, multiple subspecialty societies within the United States have developed clinical care guidelines for those with gender dysphoria, including gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) and surgical treatments. To date, there are no pathology- and laboratory medicine–specific recommendations in the United States for the gender-diverse population. Content This document outlines pathology- and laboratory medicine–specific recommendations for providing optimal care to the gender-diverse population, with a predominant focus on the adult population. The scope of this document focuses on the following 5 topics: (a) reference intervals and interpretation of laboratory tests impacted by use of GAHT (testosterone for transgender men; estradiol with or without antiandrogens for transgender women), focusing on those stably on GAHT for 6 months or longer; (b) transfusion medicine considerations for the gender-diverse patient population, (c) consideration of gender diversity in autopsy and death investigation, (d) interpretation of histology from tissues that are impacted by GAHT and surgical procedures; and (e) pathology and laboratory medicine informatics challenges and opportunities. Summary A relatively small group of laboratory tests is significantly impacted by GAHT. The histology of some tissues shows changes attributable to GAHT or to nonhormonal medical procedures. Autopsy and transfusion medicine practices for the gender-diverse population currently lack standardization, although this is evolving. The landscape of pathology informatics related to gender diversity is complicated by varying electronic health record and laboratory informatics systems functionality.

Abstract Background Automated phlebotomy has the potential to improve patient outcomes and address phlebotomist workforce challenges. The Autonomous Blood Drawing Optimization and Performance Testing trial (ADOPT, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05878483) assesses performance, safety, and patient experience of an autonomous robotic phlebotomy device (ARPD) that utilizes multimodal imaging. Methods Patients were recruited from outpatient phlebotomy departments in the Netherlands. In cohort 1, analytical equivalence was assessed by comparing within-subject test results from ARPD-collected and manually collected samples using Passing–Bablok regression analysis. In cohort 2, the ARPD was assessed in routine use. The primary performance endpoint was first-stick success rate; the primary safety endpoint was the rate of adverse events. Exploratory endpoints assessed pain and patient preference. Results One hundred fifty-three patients were enrolled in cohort 1. No statistically significant differences were observed in activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time, lactate dehydrogenase, aspartate transaminase, or platelet count, indicating analytical equivalence. A total of 1633 patients were enrolled in cohort 2. The overall first-stick success rate, in patients where the ARPD could identify a suitable vein, was 94.5% (95% CI, 93.3–95.5) and remained high in patients with difficult venous access (92.7%), obesity (97.4%), and age ≥65 years (93.4%). Adverse events, all mild, occurred at a rate of 0.6%. Ninety percent of patients reported far less (19%), less (32%), or similar pain (39%) compared with manual phlebotomy. Eighty-two percent indicated they would strongly prefer (16%) or prefer (31%) use of the ARPD in the future or had no preference (35%). Conclusions Automated phlebotomy using the ARPD shows a favorable performance and safety profile and may improve patient experience. ClinicalTrials.gov Registration Number: NCT05878483

Abstract Background Hemolysis, a common pre-analytical interferent in clinical laboratory testing, can significantly affect accuracy and reliability of laboratory results. One test particularly susceptible to interference is direct bilirubin (D-bil). For example, during December 2024, 40% (500/1239) of specimens rejected due to hemolysis were orders for D-bil. The recently released Roche (Roche Diagnostics) direct bilirubin reagent (BILD2) has a lower threshold for hemolysis (H-index [HI]=25)) than the previous generation (HI=30). The aims of our study were to (1) establish concentration-specific hemolysis thresholds for D-bil and (2) investigate the instrument’s reduced volume function (dilution) as a possible mitigation strategy for samples with hemolysis indices exceeding the established thresholds. Methods Residual serum specimens from physician-ordered D-bil testing were used and analyzed on Roche cobas c701 and c501 analyzers. The instrument’s decreased volume function, intended for results outside the measuring range, was used as a 1:2 dilution and validated using 9 non-hemolyzed negative control specimens with D-bil results from 9.8-13.4 mg/dL. Recovery within 10% neat value was considered acceptable. EDTA whole blood was used to prepare hemolysate pools by washing red cells and lysing by freezing (-80 °C). Twenty-six serum pools with varying D-bil concentrations (0.2-3.4 mg/dL) were prepared. Each pool was split into 10 aliquots and spiked with increasing amounts of hemolysate, not exceeding 10% serum to interferent ratio. The decreased volume function (dilution) was utilized on a subset of the hemolysate-spiked aliquots (N=55) with D-bil results from 0.2-2.5 mg/dL. HI values were estimated to be 50% of neat HI due to the instrument’s inability to measure indices on specimens tested with the decreased volume function. Acceptance criteria for experiments utilizing hemolyzed specimens were ±0.1 mg/dL or 20% of neat sample. Results All non-hemolyzed specimens tested with the decreased volume function passed within acceptance criteria with average recovery of 109% (range: 106-110%) from undiluted specimens. Serum pools with D-bil <0.3 mg/dL (N=7) spiked with hemolysate (HI range: 7-191) had an average difference of -0.1 mg/dL (range: -0.2-0.0 mg/dL) from non-hemolyzed pools, D-bil pools 0.4-0.9 mg/dL (N=10; HI range: 6-173) had an average difference of -0.2 mg/dL (range: -0.5-0.0 mg/dL), and D-bil pools >1.0 mg/dL (N=9; HI range: 5-182) had an average difference of -20.7% (range –45.5-0.0%). Serum pools with D-bil <0.3 mg/dL (N=23; HI range: 43-191) tested using the decreased volume function had an average difference –0.1 mg/dL (range: -0.2-0.0 mg/dL; HI range: 22-96) from the non-hemolyzed specimens, D-bil pools 0.4-0.9 mg/dL (N=20; HI range: 39-173) had an average difference -0.1 mg/dL (-0.3-0.0 mg/dL; HI range: 19-86), and D-bil pools >1.0 mg/dL (N=12; HI range: 37-182 ) had an average difference of -0.2 mg/dL (-0.5-0.2 mg/dL; HI range: 19-91). Conclusion We established a new hemolysis interference threshold of 75 for samples with D-bil <0.3 mg/dL. Using the decreased volume function, we expanded the hemolysis interference threshold to HI=100 for specimens =0.3 mg/dL. All specimens with HI>100 will result in a recollection. With these changes, we estimate that we can reduce our D-bil recollections by up to 6% over six months.

Abstract Background Community Paramedic (CP) programs use specially trained paramedics to provide healthcare in the community to increase access to care, reduce unnecessary emergency department visits, and improve timeliness of care. Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN recently launched a CP Program to provide in-home care for patients who require regular intravenous medications, wound care, diuresis for heart failure, medication reconciliation, care plan compliance/education. CP utilizes i-STAT1 CHEM8+ and Lactate (CG4+) testing (Abbott Point of Care, Abbott Park, IL) to make therapy decisions primarily for heart failure patients based on rapid laboratory results. Having results available at the point of care (POC) eliminates delays between testing and treatments, expediting care for the patient. Prior to using i-STAT, CP traveled to the patient’s residence, drew blood tubes, delivered the tubes to Mayo Clinic, waited for test results, returned to the patient’s home, and provided treatment. In this observational study, we assessed the benefit of in-home POC i-STAT1 testing performed by our CP Program to improve patient care and increase efficiency. Methods Patients within a 40-mile radius of Mayo Clinic were eligible to receive CP service. Whole blood venous specimens were collected and tested using the i-STAT1 CHEM8+ metabolic panel cartridge according to manufacturer instructions to measure: ionized calcium, chloride, glucose, hematocrit, total carbon dioxide, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, potassium, sodium, anion gap while the i-STAT1 CG4+ cartridge measures lactate. The laboratory information system was used to extract laboratory results, and Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA) was used to filter data and perform calculations. Results November 2022 through December 2024, CP performed testing with 353 i-STAT cartridges (3862 tests) on 102 unique patients who each had 1-12 separate orders. Patient ages were 25 to 97 years. 41.2% (1590/3862) of the individual results obtained were outside of our reference intervals (23.0% high, 18.0% low), with 10.8% being ionized calcium, 10.2% chloride, 10.3% glucose, 13.0% hematocrit, 7.6% total carbon dioxide, 18.2% blood urea nitrogen, 16.4% creatinine, 6.7% potassium and 6.9% sodium. Additionally, 0.13% of results were critically high (ionized calcium, potassium, and sodium) and 0.10% were critically low (potassium and ionized calcium). Hypokalemic patients were sent to the infusion therapy center for IV potassium. Patients experiencing hyperkalemia were retested and sent to the emergency department (ED). Hyponatremic and hypercalcemic patients were sent to the ED for further treatment. Abnormal (non-critical) results were reviewed by CP personnel to make treatment recommendations or medication adjustments. Conclusion i-STAT1 home testing performed by CP facilitated rapid therapeutic interventions and expedited decision-making. POC testing has increased the group’s efficiency—alleviating the need to transport specimens to the central laboratory and wait on test results before returning to the patient for treatment. Paramedicine emphasizes a proactive and preventative approach to medicine. We anticipate that this model of care and testing will expand to cover other chronic health conditions due to the program’s early success.

Abstract Background The Oncology Department at our institution requested faster turn-around times (TAT) for chemistry testing. Prior to their request, serum separator tubes (SST) were collected and tested in our core laboratory. To accommodate the request, we added plasma total bilirubin and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to our stat laboratory test menu with collection in plasma separator tubes (PST). Upon implementation of this testing change, we observed an increase in specimen recollection rates due to hemolysis. We systematically evaluated laboratory testing variables that could have contributed to the increase: pneumatic tube transport path, differences in hemolysis measurements between chemistry analyzer models, and specimen types. Previous studies have demonstrated that lithium heparin plasma specimens are more susceptible to hemolysis than serum. Likewise, patients undergoing chemotherapy or radiation therapy may have fragile red blood cell (RBC) membranes, further complicating the issue. Our study*s objective was to assess the impact of changing from SST to PST collections. We conducted a 3-month pilot study to determine if we could reduce our recollection rates by collecting/testing Rapid Serum Tube (RST), while maintaining plasma TAT. Methods We compared recollection rates for specimens collected from the oncology patients and tested in our core laboratory (SST, May-June 2021), stat laboratory (PST, September-November 2022), pilot period in stat lab (RST, January-March 2023), and post-pilot period in stat lab (PST, May-July 2023). Data were extracted from our laboratory information system and recollection rates were calculated using Tableau (Salesforce, Inc, San Francisco, CA). Analysis was performed in Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA) using Student’s t-test, with p < 0.05 defined as statistically significant. Results SST specimens collected from oncology patients and tested in the core lab (May-June 2021) resulted in a recollection rate of 0.17% (4/2341). PST specimens sent to the stat lab (Sept-Nov 2022) had an increased recollection rate of 0.90% (55/6129, p-value < 0.001). During the pilot period when RST tubes were used (Jan-Mar 2023), our recollection rate decreased to 0.19% (11/5801, p-value 0.014). After the pilot period ended and PST tubes were again utilized for testing (May-July 2023), the recollection rate again increased to 0.34% (22/6500, p-value 0.019). Conclusion Rapid TAT of laboratory results within specialized-care settings, such as a cancer treatment clinic, is necessary to provide patients with the most effective and personalized treatment regimens. Hemolysis presents a challenge as it generates an analytical issue with the release of contents from RBCs that may spuriously affect the concentration of the analyte being measured, delaying result reporting due to the need for specimen recollection. The data from our study highlight the utility of rapid serum tubes. Not only did they achieve stat TAT that was observed with the use of PST, but they also decreased specimen recollection rates that mirror the low rates observed with the use of SST. Thus, this technology may be an excellent replacement for standard SST when specimen integrity is critical to rapidly reporting accurate test results.

Abstract Background Platelet function tests (PFT) help assess bleeding risk and guide appropriate hemostatic measures in patients on antiplatelet therapy undergoing emergent surgical interventions. Light transmission aggregometry (LTA, BioData Corporation), the gold standard for assessing platelet function, cannot be performed rapidly enough for emergent interventions. In this study, we compared two PFT, Plateletworks (Helena Laboratories) and TEG 6S (TEG, Haemonetics) adenosine diphosphate-(ADP) and arachidonic acid (AA)-induced platelet function, evaluating analytical imprecision and their ability to differentiate healthy controls from patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) on dual antiplatelet therapy. Methods Fresh specimens were collected from healthy donors (HD, N=19) and a patient group (PG, N=17) on both aspirin and clopidogrel taken within 24 hours of procedure. Percent aggregation was measured according to manufacturers’ instructions using Plateletworks and TEG, utilizing both AA and ADP and compared to LTA performed on a PAP-8E Platelet Aggregometer. Two separate venipuncture collections from HD were used to obtain repeat measures of Plateletworks and TEG to assess variability in platelet function due to pre-analytical variables. Using a two-way nested ANOVA model on data from HD, we estimated variability between replicates of a single sample (intra-assay imprecision) and between blood draws within a single patient (inter-assay imprecision), reported as coefficient of variation (CV%). Platelet function results were summarized as median (interquartile range [IQR; 25th-75th percentiles]) and compared between groups using nonparametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis (using duplicate means from first blood draw) was performed. Results Plateletworks AA % aggregation, medians (IQR) were 96.3 (95.3-97.1) for HD and 48.9 (46.8-54.8) for PG (p<0.001); ADP % aggregation were 97.0 (94.5-98.2) and 37.1 (28.0-53.0) for HD and PG, respectively (p<0.001). TEG AA % aggregation was 97.8 (94.4-99.8) for HD and 13.5 (7.9-26.8) for PG (p<0.001); ADP % aggregation was 98.3 (95.3-99.9) for HD and 83.3 (77.8-87.7) for TG (p<0.001). LTA AA % aggregation was 55.0 (44.0-64.8) for HD and 0.0 (0.0-1.5) for PG (p<0.001); ADP % aggregation of 59.0 (40.8-70.8) and 14.5 (4.5-19.5) for HD and PG, respectively (p<0.001). Intra- and inter-assay imprecision estimates (CV%), respectively, in HD were 1.4 and 5.1 for Plateletworks AA, 5.5 and 15.9 for Plateletworks ADP, 3.0 and 0.0 for TEG AA, and 2.6 and 0.8 for TEG ADP. Intra-assay precision estimates for LTA AA and LTA ADP were 19.3 and 8.2. In PG, intra-assay precision was estimated as 7.0 for Plateletworks AA, 9.6 for Plateletworks ADP, 61.3 for LTA AA, 11.9 for LTA ADP, 37.6 for TEG AA, and 4.1 for TEG ADP. In our limited data set, ROC analysis showed optimal cutpoints (sensitivity/specificity) for Plateletworks AA 65.5 (1.0/1.0) and ADP 84.5 (1.0/0.90), TEG AA 87.1 (1.0/1.0) and ADP 92.7 (1.0/1.0), and LTA AA 8.75 (0.94/1.0) and ADP 25.0 (0.82/0.90) Conclusion Plateletworks most effectively distinguished % aggregation between healthy donors and patients on dual antiplatelet therapy. TEG also differentiated the groups, but differences in median ADP-induced aggregation were smaller than with Plateletworks. Both AA and ADP assays on LTA showed more variability than either Plateletworks or TEG.

Purpose: Guidelines recommend serum estradiol concentrations of 100–200 pg/mL for transgender women prescribed oral, subcutaneous, or transdermal estradiol with or without adjunct antiandrogen as gender-affirming feminizing hormone therapy (HT). The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate if the guideline range of 100–200 pg/mL for estradiol concentration is associated with indicators of adequate gender-affirming feminizing HT, specifically feminizing sufficiency, insufficiency, testosterone suppression, or toxicity in transgender women. Methods: The Populations/Intervention/Comparator/Outcome model was applied to the study question, whereby the target population included transgender, gender-diverse, and nonbinary adults using gender-affirming feminizing HT by any route of administration, with or without adjunct antiandrogen use. The comparator was defined as estradiol concentrations within (100–200 pg/mL or 367–734 pM) versus outside (</>100–200 pg/mL) the guideline range; evaluated outcomes were listed by the same clinical guidelines that recommend using the 100–200 pg/mL range. Embase, MEDLINE, and Web of Science were queried over a 24-year time frame (January 1, 1999–April 20, 2023); the search was restricted to English. The extracted outcomes were categorized as indicators of therapeutic insufficiency, sufficiency, toxicity, or hormone concentration. Results: There were 49 studies that met the inclusion criteria, of which 9, 42, 25, and 5 studies included indicators of therapeutic insufficiency, sufficiency, toxicity, or hormone concentration, respectively. The search did not identify articles demonstrating that the 100–200 pg/mL guideline range provides optimal feminizing outcomes or reduces adverse events. Conclusions : Evidence does not support using the guideline range of 100–200 pg/mL to indicate sufficient feminization in transgender women using gender-affirming feminizing HT.

Abstract Background Managing preanalytical variables is critical to providing quality laboratory test results. However, this can be a challenge for laboratory staff, particularly with manual detection of interfering substances and complicated workflows. For coagulation testing, we assess specimen integrity and acceptability by visual checks and quantification of interfering substance on a chemistry analyzer. To improve this subjective process, we evaluated the technical performance of a new model of coagulation analyzer with automated preanalytical specimen integrity detection. Our objective was to determine if we could reduce the number of specimens requiring visual inspection/off-analyzer interference testing in order to simplify our testing workflow. Methods Citrated plasma specimens received in the Hospital Clinical Laboratory at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN) were tested on the TOP ACL 500 or TOP ACL 550 Series Coagulation analyzers (Werfen, Boston, MA) according to manufacturer’s instruction. Specimens tested on the TOP 500 were visually inspected for hemolysis, icterus, and lipemia (HIL). If the technologist detected a possible interferent, an aliquot of plasma was analyzed on our cobas c501 chemistry analyzer (c501) (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) to obtain HIL values. Laboratory-established or manufacturer-defined interference thresholds were applied in determining specimen acceptability. For samples tested on the TOP 550, specimen integrity was assessed by the instrument’s automated interference detection module. The analyzer reported HIL as an “interference cloud” or estimated range, rather than a single value like the c501. HIL values were estimated by visual assessment of the low end of the “interference cloud”. Values were confirmed on the c501 only for specimens with an “interference cloud” at/exceeding the test-specific interference thresholds. We analyzed data from a 2-month period pre- (TOP 500) and post-implementation (TOP 550). The percent of specimens requiring quantitation/confirmation on the c501 was calculated. Statistical significance was calculated using the Chi-squared test where significance was defined as p&lt;0.01. Correlation between c501 and TOP 550 estimated HIL values was evaluated. Results A total of 2.2% (171/7605) and 1.3% (113/8983) of specimens tested on the TOP 500 and TOP 550, respectively, required HIL measurements on the c501 (p&lt;0.001). Of those samples, 8.2% (14/171) and 14.2% (16/113) from the TOP 500 and TOP 550, respectively, had HIL values above the interference thresholds and were rejected by the laboratory. Comparison of the estimated HIL values from the “interference cloud” and from the c501 resulted in slopes (Pearson correlation coefficients) of: H 1.56 (0.77), I 0.67 (0.97), and L 1.35 (0.99). Conclusions In comparison to our workflow with visual assessment of interference, use of the automated interference detection functionality on the TOP 550 instrument resulted in a lower percentage of specimens requiring HIL measurements on the chemistry analyzer. Agreement between interference measurements obtained on the c501 and the TOP 550 was moderate where TOP 550 overestimated the degree of hemolysis and lipemia and underestimated icterus. Implementation of automated interference detection on the TOP 550 analyzer improved our workflow by eliminating the need for tedious and subjective visual checks and reducing the percentage of specimens requiring additional HIL measurements.