Back to Authors

Fu, Yinlin

Mayo Clinic

Arizona State University

Citations 4

Identifying Migraine: Building Classifiers Using Resting-State fMRI Data (P4.112)
Gaw, Nathan , Fu, Yinlin, Li, Jing , Chong, Catherine D. , Wu, Teresa , Schwedt, Todd J.

Neurology | December 7, 2023 | Volume: 86 | Issue: 16_supplement | Pages: No page available

10.1212/wnl.86.16_supplement.p4.112 Get It

Quantitative Imaging System for Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Planning: An Interdisciplinary Approach
Gaw, Nathan , Xu, Yanzhe , Wang, Lujia , Fu, Yinlin, Silva, Alvin, Zwart, Christine M. , DeLeon, Thomas, Wu, Teresa , Li, Jing , Borad, Mitesh J. , Patel, Bhavika

The Operations Research Revolution | October 4, 2017 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: 152-175

10.1287/educ.2017.0173 Get It

Migraine classification using magnetic resonance imaging resting-state functional connectivity data
Chong, Catherine D. , Gaw, Nathan , Fu, Yinlin, Li, Jing , Schwedt, Todd J. , Wu, Teresa , Chong, Catherine D

Cephalalgia | June 16, 2016 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 828-844

10.1177/0333102416652091 Get It

Background This study used machine-learning techniques to develop discriminative brain-connectivity biomarkers from resting-state functional magnetic resonance neuroimaging ( rs-fMRI) data that distinguish between individual migraine patients and healthy controls. Methods This study included 58 migraine patients (mean age = 36.3 years; SD = 11.5) and 50 healthy controls (mean age = 35.9 years; SD = 11.0). The functional connections of 33 seeded pain-related regions were used as input for a brain classification algorithm that tested the accuracy of determining whether an individual brain MRI belongs to someone with migraine or to a healthy control. Results The best classification accuracy using a 10-fold cross-validation method was 86.1%. Resting functional connectivity of the right middle temporal, posterior insula, middle cingulate, left ventromedial prefrontal and bilateral amygdala regions best discriminated the migraine brain from that of a healthy control. Migraineurs with longer disease durations were classified more accurately (>14 years; 96.7% accuracy) compared to migraineurs with shorter disease durations (≤14 years; 82.1% accuracy). Conclusions Classification of migraine using rs-fMRI provides insights into pain circuits that are altered in migraine and could potentially contribute to the development of a new, noninvasive migraine biomarker. Migraineurs with longer disease burden were classified more accurately than migraineurs with shorter disease burden, potentially indicating that disease duration leads to reorganization of brain circuitry.
Accurate Classification of Chronic Migraine via Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Gaw, Nathan , Fu, Yinlin, Li, Jing , Schwedt, Todd J. , Chong, Catherine D. , Wu, Teresa

Headache: The Journal of Head and Face Pain | June 18, 2015 | Volume: 55 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 762-777

10.1111/head.12584 Get It

Background The International Classification of Headache Disorders provides criteria for the diagnosis and subclassification of migraine. Since there is no objective gold standard by which to test these diagnostic criteria, the criteria are based on the consensus opinion of content experts. Accurate migraine classifiers consisting of brain structural measures could serve as an objective gold standard by which to test and revise diagnostic criteria. The objectives of this study were to utilize magnetic resonance imaging measures of brain structure for constructing classifiers: (1) that accurately identify individuals as having chronic vs episodic migraine vs being a healthy control; and (2) that test the currently used threshold of 15 headache days/month for differentiating chronic migraine from episodic migraine. Methods Study participants underwent magnetic resonance imaging for determination of regional cortical thickness, cortical surface area, and volume. Principal components analysis combined structural measurements into principal components accounting for 85% of variability in brain structure. Models consisting of these principal components were developed to achieve the classification objectives. Tenfold cross validation assessed classification accuracy within each of the 10 runs, with data from 90% of participants randomly selected for classifier development and data from the remaining 10% of participants used to test classification performance. Headache frequency thresholds ranging from 5‐15 headache days/month were evaluated to determine the threshold allowing for the most accurate subclassification of individuals into lower and higher frequency subgroups. Results Participants were 66 migraineurs and 54 healthy controls, 75.8% female, with an average age of 36 +/− 11 years. Average classifier accuracies were: (1) 68% for migraine (episodic + chronic) vs healthy controls; (2) 67.2% for episodic migraine vs healthy controls; (3) 86.3% for chronic migraine vs healthy controls; and (4) 84.2% for chronic migraine vs episodic migraine. The classifiers contained principal components consisting of several structural measures, commonly including the temporal pole, anterior cingulate cortex, superior temporal lobe, entorhinal cortex, medial orbital frontal gyrus, and pars triangularis. A threshold of 15 headache days/month allowed for the most accurate subclassification of migraineurs into lower frequency and higher frequency subgroups. Conclusions Classifiers consisting of cortical surface area, cortical thickness, and regional volumes were highly accurate for determining if individuals have chronic migraine. Furthermore, results provide objective support for the current use of 15 headache days/month as a threshold for dividing migraineurs into lower frequency (ie, episodic migraine) and higher frequency (ie, chronic migraine) subgroups.