Mosca, Lori

Background/Hypothesis: Women have higher morbidity and mortality associated with CABG procedures than men. The extent intra-operative red blood cell (RBC) transfusions contribute to gender differences in surgical outcomes is not established. We hypothesized that women are at increased risk for RBC transfusions due to lower pre-op hematocrit (Hct) and blood volume, but that other factors may also contribute. Methods: Consecutive, non-reoperative CABG procedures from 189 institutions (2012 -2015) were reviewed. Gender differences and odds ratios for intra-operative transfusion were evaluated with logistic regression models adjusting for age, blood volume (Nadler formula-to normalize for height and weight), procedure acuity, net extracorporeal circuit prime volume, use of retrograde autologous priming, first Hct in OR, nadir Hct on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), volume added on CPB, ultra-filtration volume, urine output on CPB, and procedure duration. Results: Among 54,122 patients (25.3% female), 21.9% (n=11,901) received a RBC transfusion. Compared to men, female patients were older (66 yrs vs. 64 yrs, p<.001), had lower blood volumes (4.3L vs. 5.6L, p<.001), and lower pre-op Hct (32.9% vs. 37.2%, p<.001). Transfusion rates were 3-fold higher in women vs. men (45.1% vs 13.7%, p<.001). Even after adjustment for independent predictors of intra-operative transfusion, women remained at increased risk vs men (OR = 1.3, 95% CI = 1.2 -1.4). No gender differences in transfusion rates were observed for Hct 21%-23% (Figure). Conclusions: Women have an increased risk of intra-operative RBC transfusion vs men. After adjusting for height and weight, much of this risk is due to gender differences in pre-op Hct and blood volume, however a residual significant risk remained after adjustment. Perfusion strategies aimed at gender differences may minimize unnecessary transfusions. Future study on the impact of gender on transfusion practice in cardiac surgery is warranted.

Background— Few data have evaluated physician adherence to cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention guidelines according to physician specialty or patient characteristics, particularly gender. Methods and Results— An online study of 500 randomly selected physicians (300 primary care physicians, 100 obstetricians/gynecologists, and 100 cardiologists) used a standardized questionnaire to assess awareness of, adoption of, and barriers to national CVD prevention guidelines by specialty. An experimental case study design tested physician accuracy and determinants of CVD risk level assignment and application of guidelines among high-, intermediate-, or low-risk patients. Intermediate-risk women, as assessed by the Framingham risk score, were significantly more likely to be assigned to a lower-risk category by primary care physicians than men with identical risk profiles ( P <0.0001), and trends were similar for obstetricians/gynecologists and cardiologists. Assignment of risk level significantly predicted recommendations for lifestyle and preventive pharmacotherapy. After adjustment for risk assignment, the impact of patient gender on preventive care was not significant except for less aspirin ( P <0.01) and more weight management recommended ( P <0.04) for intermediate-risk women. Physicians did not rate themselves as very effective in their ability to help patients prevent CVD. Fewer than 1 in 5 physicians knew that more women than men die each year from CVD. Conclusions— Perception of risk was the primary factor associated with CVD preventive recommendations. Gender disparities in recommendations for preventive therapy were explained largely by the lower perceived risk despite similar calculated risk for women versus men. Educational interventions for physicians are needed to improve the quality of CVD preventive care and lower morbidity and mortality from CVD for men and women.