Back to Authors

Worthley, Stephen G.

Mayo Clinic

Royal Adelaide Hospital

Citations 2

One‐year clinical outcomes after sirolimus‐eluting coronary stent implantation in diabetics enrolled in the worldwide e‐SELECT registry
Bartorelli, Antonio L. , Assenza, Gabriele Egidy , Abizaid, Alexandre , Banning, Adrian , Džavík, Vladimír , Ellis, Stephen G. , Gao, Runlin, Holmes, David R. , Jeong, Myung Ho , Legrand, Victor , Spaulding, Christian , Worthley, Stephen G., Urban, Philip , Investigators, for the e‐SELECT, Gao, Runlin, Jeong, Myung Ho , Neumann, Franz–Josef , Investigators, for the e‐SELECT, Banning, Adrian , Abizaid, Alexandre

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions | May 27, 2015 | Volume: 87 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 52-62

10.1002/ccd.26026 Get It

BackgroundDiabetes mellitus has worse outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention.AimWe assessed stent thrombosis (ST), major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and major bleeding rates at 1 year after implantation of sirolimus‐eluting stents (SES) in patients with diabetes mellitus in a large multicenter registry.MethodsFrom May 2006 to April 2008, 15,147 unselected consecutive patients were enrolled at 320 centers in 56 countries in a prospective, observational registry after implantation of ≥ 1 SES. Source data were verified in 20% randomly chosen patients at > 100 sites. Adverse events were adjudicated by an independent Clinical Event Committee.ResultsComplete follow‐up at 1 year was obtained in 13,693 (92%) patients, 4,577 (30%) of whom were diabetics. Within diabetics, 1,238 (9%) were insulin‐treated diabetics (ITD). Diabetics were older (64 vs. 62 years, P < 0.001), with higher incidence of major coronary risk factors, co‐morbidities, and triple‐vessel coronary artery disease. Coronary lesions had smaller reference vessel diameter (2.88 ± 0.46 vs. 2.93 ± 0.45 mm, P < 0.001) and were more often heavily calcified (26.1% vs. 22.6%, P < 0.001). At 1 year, diabetics had higher MACE rate (6.8% vs. 3.9%, P < 0.001) driven by ITD (10.6% vs. 5.5%, P < 0.001). Finally, diabetics had significant increase in ST (1.7% vs. 0.7%, P < 0.001), principally owing to ITD (3.4% vs. 1.1%, P < 0.001). There was an overall low risk of major bleeding during follow‐up, without significant difference among subgroups.ConclusionsIn the e‐SELECT registry, diabetics represented 30% of patients undergoing SES implantation and had significantly more co‐morbidities and complex coronary lesions. Although 1‐year follow‐up documented good overall outcome in diabetics, higher ST and MACE rates were observed, mainly driven by ITD. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Cardiac magnetic resonance, transthoracic and transoesophageal echocardiography: a comparison of in vivo assessment of ventricular function in rats
Richardson, JD, Bertaso, AG, Psaltis, Peter J. , Koschade, B., Wong, DT, Nelson, Adam J. , Paton, Sharon , Williams, K., Azarisman, Shah M., Worthley, MI, Teo, KS, Gronthos, Stan , Zannettino, ACW, Worthley, SG, Frost, Lars , Carbone, Arnaldo , Zannettino, ACW, Worthley, Stephen G.

Laboratory Animals | July 8, 2013 | Volume: 47 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 291-300

10.1177/0023677213494373 Get It

In vivo assessment of ventricular function in rodents has largely been restricted to transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). However 1.5 T cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) have emerged as possible alternatives. Yet, to date, no study has systematically assessed these three imaging modalities in determining ejection fraction (EF) in rats. Twenty rats underwent imaging four weeks after surgically-induced myocardial infarction. CMR was performed on a 1.5 T scanner, TTE was conducted using a 9.2 MHz transducer and TOE was performed with a 10 MHz intracardiac echo catheter. Correlation between the three techniques for EF determination and analysis reproducibility was assessed. Moderate-strong correlation was observed between the three modalities; the greatest between CMR and TOE (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.89), followed by TOE and TTE (ICC = 0.70) and CMR and TTE (ICC = 0.63). Intra- and inter-observer variations were excellent with CMR (ICC = 0.99 and 0.98 respectively), very good with TTE (0.90 and 0.89) and TOE (0.87 and 0.84). Each modality is a viable option for evaluating ventricular function in rats, however the high image quality and excellent reproducibility of CMR offers distinct advantages even at 1.5 T with conventional coils and software.