Pedersen, Katrina S.

AbstractImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), as a novel class of anticancer therapy, can be more efficacious and less toxic than chemotherapy, but their clinical success is confined to certain tumor types. Elucidating their targets, mechanisms and scope of action, and potential synergism with chemotherapy and/or targeted therapies are critical to widen their clinical indications. Treatment response to an ICI targeting programmed death‐1 (anti‐PD‐1) is sought to be understood here by conducting a preplanned correlative analysis of a phase II clinical trial in patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA). The cytolytic capacity of circulating immune cells in cancer patients using a novel ex vivo cytotoxicity assay is evaluated, and the utility of circulating biomarkers is investigated to predict and monitor the treatment effect of anti‐PD‐1. Baseline expression of Bim and NKG7 and upregulation of CX3CR1 in circulating T cells are associated with the clinical benefit of anti‐PD‐1 in patients with SBA. Overall, these findings suggest that the frequency and cytolytic capacity of circulating, effector immune cells may differentiate clinical response to ICIs, providing a strong rationale to support immune monitoring using patient peripheral blood.

Abstract Purpose: Small-bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is rare, and no standard of care exists for metastatic disease beyond first-line FOLFOX/CAPOX. SBA has higher rates of microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and T-lymphocyte infiltration than other gastrointestinal cancers. We hypothesize that pembrolizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, will induce antitumor response. Patients and Methods: Patients with previously treated advanced SBA received pembrolizumab 200 mg i.v. every 3 weeks until disease progression (PD), toxicity, or 35 doses maximum. Primary endpoint was confirmed overall response rate (ORR) with secondary progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity assessment endpoints. Outcomes were stratified by tumor location, microsatellite stability (MSS) or instability (MSI-H), and PD-L1 level. Results: Forty patients were treated for a median duration of four cycles (range, 1–35). All patients are off study treatment due to PD (75%), death (10%), 35 cycles completed (8%), refusal (3%), and adverse effects (AEs, 5%). Three confirmed partial responses [PRs; 8%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2–20] did not meet predefined success criteria of ORR 30%. Median OS (7.1 months; 95% CI, 5.1–17.1) and median PFS (2.8 months; 95% CI, 2.7–4.2) were similar across primary tumor sites. One confirmed PR (3%) was seen in patients with low MSS/MSI tumors and correlated with high tumor mutation burden (TMB). Fifty percent of patients with MSI-H tumors achieved PR and remain alive without progression. Twenty-five patients (63%) had grade ≥3 AEs and 11 patients (28%) had grade 4/5 AEs. Conclusions: In the largest study of SBA to date, pembrolizumab did not induce the hypothesized response rate; however, we did identify responses in key biomarker-selected cohorts.

This selection from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Colon Cancer focuses on systemic therapy options for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), because important updates have recently been made to this section. These updates include recommendations for first-line use of checkpoint inhibitors for mCRC, that is deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high, recommendations related to the use of biosimilars, and expanded recommendations for biomarker testing. The systemic therapy recommendations now include targeted therapy options for patients with mCRC that is HER2-amplified, or BRAF V600E mutation–positive. Treatment and management of nonmetastatic or resectable/ablatable metastatic disease are discussed in the complete version of the NCCN Guidelines for Colon Cancer available at NCCN.org . Additional topics covered in the complete version include risk assessment, staging, pathology, posttreatment surveillance, and survivorship.

Abstract Background Hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) is the most common regorafenib-induced adverse event and is in need of effective prevention and palliation. Materials and Methods The Regorafenib Dose Optimization Study (ReDOS), a four-arm, previously published trial with a 1:1:1:1 randomization scheme, was analyzed in a manner in keeping with the original protocol to assess whether clobetasol 0.05% cream (a corticosteroid) applied to the palms and soles twice per day for 8 weeks was more effective when prescribed preemptively (before the development of HFSR) versus reactively (after the development of HFSR). Patients were assessed during the first two cycles of regorafenib. Results Sixty-one patients received preemptive clobetasol, and 55 received reactive clobetasol. Groups were balanced on demographics. Over the first two cycles, no evidence of HFSR occurred in 30% with preemptive clobetasol versus 13% with reactive clobetasol (p = .03). During the first cycle, 54% and 45% of patients had no HFSR with preemptive and reactive clobetasol, respectively (p = .35). During the second cycle, 33% and 15% had no HFSR with preemptive and reactive clobetasol, respectively (p = .02). During the second cycle, rates of grade 1, 2, and 3 HFSR were 30%, 8%, and 3%, respectively, with preemptive clobetasol and 43%, 18%, and 7%, respectively, with reactive clobetasol (p = .12). Patient-reported outcomes showed HFSR compromised nearly all activities of daily living with worse quality of life in patients who received reactive versus preemptive clobetasol. No clobetasol-induced adverse events were reported. Conclusion Preemptive clobetasol might lessen regorafenib-induced hand-foot reactions compared with reactive therapy. Further confirmatory studies are needed in a larger patient cohort. Implications for Practice Regorafenib causes hand-foot skin reactions. Preemptive clobetasol, a high-potency topical corticosteroid, appears to lessen the severity of this adverse event. Although further study is needed, the favorable adverse event profile of this intervention might prompt clinicians to discuss this option with their patients.

Abstract Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in the United States. Aberrant activation of the Wnt signaling pathway is associated with CRC progression. Ring finger protein 43 (RNF43) is a single-pass type 1 transmembrane protein and a key feedback regulator of Wnt. SC-006 is a RNF43 targeted antibody drug conjugate, linked to a pyrrolobenzodiazepine dimer DNA crosslinking agent. Budigalimab (ABBV-181) is a PD-1 targeting, humanized, recombinant immunoglobulin G1 monoclonal antibody with Fc mutations (L234A, L235A) shown to reduce Fc receptor interactions and limit effector function. This open-label, Phase 1 clinical trial assessed the safety and efficacy of SC-006 as monotherapy and in combination with budigalimab in patients with CRC (NCT03035279). Methods: Evaluable patients had histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced metastatic or unresectable CRC. The trial consisted of 2 parts: part A (SC-006-monotherapy, 2 to 12 µg/kg, IV) and part B (SC-006 in combination with budigalimab at a fixed dose of 375 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks [Q3W]). Efficacy was assessed per RECIST 1.1 by radiographic assessments. Results: As of April 2019, 29 patients were enrolled (n=20 in part A and n=9 in part B). All patients experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). The most common TEAEs (>20% of patients) are summarized in Table 1. Two patients (7%) had dose-limiting toxicities of grade 4 thrombocytopenia. All 29 patients discontinued from the study, with study drug being discontinued for 76% of patients due to progressive disease. One death occurred in part A due to gastrointestinal hemorrhage with possible relation to SC-006. Serious TEAEs occurred in 8 patients (28%); these included thrombocytopenia and malignant neoplasm progression in 2 patients (7%) each. Progressive disease occurred in 18 patients (62%), stable disease was reported in 10 patients (34%) and the response for 1 patient was not reported. Conclusion: SC-006 dose escalation was limited by thrombocytopenia observed below the predicted efficacious dose, leading to study termination. Table 1.Summary of the Most Common Treatment-Emergent Adverse EventsPart A: SC-006-monotherapyPart B: SC-006+budigalimabTEAEs (>20% patients), n (%)2 ug/kg4 ug/kg8 ug/kg4 ug/kg8 ug/kg12 ug/kg4 ug/kg Q6W+budigalimab8 ug/kg Q6W+budigalimabOverallQ3WQ3WQ3WQ6WQ6WQ6W(N=1)(N=3)(N=1)(N=2)(N=10)(N=3)(N=4)(N=5)(N=29)Thrombocytopenia01 (33)1 (100)1 (50)4 (40)3 (100)1 (25)4 (80)15 (52)Fatigue0001 (50)3 (30)2 (67)3 (75)3 (60)12 (41)Nausea0001 (50)5 (50)1 (33)2 (50)2 (40)11 (38)Edema peripheral01 (33)01 (50)4 (40)02 (50)1 (20)9 (31)Decreased appetite01 (33)01 (50)4 (40)002 (40)8 (28)Dyspnea00004 (40)3 (100)01 (20)8 (28)Vomiting0001 (50)3 (30)1 (33)2 (50)1 (20)8 (28)Constipation0001 (50)3 (30)01 (25)2 (40)7 (24) Citation Format: Katrina S. Pedersen, Amit Mahipal, Andrea Cercek, Susanna Ulahannan, Michael Rossi, Abraham Fong, Daniel Brickman, Johanna Bendell. First-in-human clinical trial of SC-006, a RNF43 targeted antibody-drug conjugate, as a monotherapy and in combination with budigalimab in patients with advanced colorectal cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT167.

Abstract Background: Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is consistently hyperactivated in multiple tumor types including PDAC. Our preclinical work showed that FAK and PD-1 inhibitors elicit significant tumor regression, and that combining FAK and PD-1 inhibitors with gemcitabine achieves a maximal response. This suggests the need for a cytotoxic agent to bolster antigen presentation. Defactinib is an orally available, well-tolerated, potent FAK inhibitor. Methods: This study included a dose escalation phase (all solid tumors) and dose expansion phase (metastatic PDAC). A 3+3 design with five dose levels was used in the dose escalation phase. For the expansion phase, 10 PDAC patients with stable disease on front-line gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel were enrolled in the Maintenance cohort (A), while 10 patients who progressed on at least one line of therapy were enrolled in the Refractory cohort (B). Pre and on-treatment biopsied were collected from all PDAC patients. The primary endpoint was to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Secondary endpoints included safety, toxicity, objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The exploratory endpoints included developing a molecular and immune profile for treatment response. Results: In dose escalation, the common low grade (G1/2) treatment-emergent adverse events included fatigue, anorexia, nausea and vomiting. No DLTs were seen. The RP2D was defactinib 400mg twice daily, gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 days 1, 8 and pembrolizumab 200mg day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Safety and toxicity results in the escalation cohort were reported at the 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting. Among 8 evaluable PDAC patients enrolled on the dose escalation phase, we observed 1 (13%) partial response (PR), 3 (38%) stable disease (SD), 4 (50%) progressive disease (PD). In the Maintenance cohort, 1 (10%) PR, 6 (60%) SD, and 3 (30%) PD were observed. Two patients in the Maintenance cohort remain on study, and the median time on treatment was 4.6 months. In the Refractory cohort, 5 (50%) had SD, 4 (40%) PD, 1 not evaluable; median PFS was 2.9 months and median OS was 7.6 months. Interestingly, two confirmed PR patients both have MSS disease. Paired biopsies in PDAC patients show increased proliferating CD8+ T cells, while Tregs, macrophages, and stromal density decrease with treatment. Conclusions: The combination regimen was well tolerated. Encouraging efficacy signals were observed in both Maintenance and Refractory cohorts. Updated outcomes and correlative analyses are forthcoming. Citation Format: Andrea Wang-Gillam, Robert McWilliams, A. Craig Lockhart, Benjamin R Tan, Rama Suresh, Kian-Huat Lim, Katrina S. Pedersen, Nikolaos Trikalinos, Olivia Aranha, Haeseong Park, Lee Ratner, Nicholas Boice, David G. Denardo. Phase I study of defactinib combined with pembrolizumab and gemcitabine in patients with advanced cancer: Experiences of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT118.

Abstract Immunotherapy targeting immune checkpoints has become a common approach for many types of cancer but currently there are no reliable biomarkers to predict and monitor treatment response. Immunohistochemical staining of PD-L1, which was initially developed as a companion diagnostic, is problematic due to tumor heterogeneity, variations in specimen preparation and multiple scoring schemes. There is, therefore, a critical need for a better biomarker to guide the use of immunotherapy to improve clinical outcomes. We previously reported that higher levels of Bim and CX3CR1/granzyme B in CD8+ T cells were associated with increased response to PD-1 blockade therapy in patients with melanoma; high levels of Bim were also prognostic of poor survival in melanoma patients. In this study, we investigated the roles of Bim and CX3CR1/granzyme B in patients receiving PD-1 blockade therapy (i.e. pembrolizumab) for small bowel adenocarcinoma as part of planned correlative analysis of the ACCRU clinical trial, NCT02949219. Patients with unresectable or metastatic biopsy-proven small bowel adenocarcinoma (excluding ampulla of Vater and appendix) who had at least one prior line of systemic chemotherapy were eligible for the trial. Pembrolizumab (200 mg) was administered over 30 minutes intravenously every 3 weeks until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, or patient refusal. All patients underwent peripheral blood collection at baseline prior to initiation of treatment and then after 3 cycles of treatment. Levels of Bim and CX3CR1/granzyme B in circulating T cells were quantified by flow cytometry using patients' peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Data was analyzed via Cox proportional hazards model, Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test, and Kaplan Meier curves using SAS 9.4. A total of 35 eligible patients were included in the analysis. Three patients had confirmed response (all partial responses) and 10 had stable disease as their best overall response. Seven patients had disease progression around the second blood draw. The median time from baseline to the second blood draw was 9 weeks. Lower levels of Bim in CD8+CD11ahi T cells at baseline on the percentage scale were associated with treatment response (median 54.5% vs. 79.5%; p=0.0087) and disease control (partial response plus stable disease; median 71.2% vs. 81.3%; p=0.0104) but higher levels led to worse progression-free survival (hazard ratio=1.05, 95% confidence interval 1.01-1.08; p=0.0051). In addition, positive changes in CX3CR1/granzyme B in CD8+CD11ahi T cells from baseline were associated with better overall survival (median 20.2 months vs. 3.7 months, p=0.0086). The levels of PD-1 and Ki-67 in CD8+CD11ahi T cells were not associated with treatment response or survival. In conclusion, Bim and CX3CR1/granzyme B are biomarkers that associate with response and survival benefits respectively of PD-1 blockade therapy. This preliminary data calls for a larger-scale, prospective study to validate their predictive and prognostic utilities. Citation Format: Mojun Zhu, Henan Zhang, Nathan R. Foster, Haidong Dong, Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab, Brandy L. Jaszewski, Patrick M. Boland, Michael J. Overman, Katrina Pedersen, Robert R. McWilliams, Academic and Community Cancer Research United (AACRU). Bim and CX3CR1/granzyme B in circulating CD8+ T cells are predictive biomarkers for PD-1 blockade therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 4467.

The NCCN Guidelines for Rectal Cancer provide recommendations for the diagnosis, evaluation, treatment, and follow-up of patients with rectal cancer. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel discussion behind recent important updates to the guidelines. These updates include clarifying the definition of rectum and differentiating the rectum from the sigmoid colon; the total neoadjuvant therapy approach for localized rectal cancer; and biomarker-targeted therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer, with a focus on new treatment options for patients with BRAF V600E– or HER2 amplification–positive disease.

11586 Background: Hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) is the most common regorafenib adverse event. However, no intervention has demonstrated efficacy in preventing or palliating this adverse event, short of modulating the regorafenib dose. Methods: The Regorafenib Dose Optimization Study (ReDOS) was a randomized trial ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02368886 ); here we describe an a priori secondary analysis of ReDOS with the goal of assessing whether clobetasol 0.05% cream (a potent corticosteroid) applied to the palms and soles twice per day is more effective when prescribed pre-emptively (before the development of HFSR) versus reactively (after the development of HFSR). Patients were assessed during the 1st 2 cycles of regorafenib. Results: Among 116 evaluable patients, 61 received pre-emptive clobetasol, and 55 reactive clobetasol. Baseline demographics were comparable between groups. During the 1st regorafenib cycle, 46% and 52% of patients developed HFSR with pre-emptive and reactive clobetasol, respectively (p = 0.52). However, during the 2nd cycle, 56% (of 47 total patients) and 80% (of 41 total patients), developed this toxicity with pre-emptive and reactive clobetasol, respectively (p = 0.02). Of note, during the 2nd cycle, rates of grade 1,2, and 3 HFSR were 40%, 11%, and 4% (pre-emptive) and 45%, 25%, and 10% (reactive) (p = 0.07). A sensitivity analysis to examine rates of no HFSR over all 2 regorafenib cycles showed that no HFSR occurred in 33% (of 61 total patients) with pre-emptive clobetasol versus 15% (of 55 total patients) with reactive clobetasol (p = 0.02). Patient-reported outcomes showed HFSR compromised activities of daily living, including getting dressed, preparing meals, walking, and even driving, with seemingly worse descriptive outcomes in patients who received reactive therapy. No adverse events from clobetasol were reported. Conclusions: Compared to reactive therapy, pre-emptive topical clobetasol might lessen regorafenib-induced HFSR. Clinical trial information: NCT02368886.

Small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) is a rare malignancy of the gastrointestinal tract that has increased in incidence across recent years. Often diagnosed at an advanced stage, outcomes for SBA are worse on average than for other related malignancies, including colorectal cancer. Due to the rarity of this disease, few studies have been done to direct optimal treatment, although recent data have shown that SBA responds to treatment differently than colorectal cancer, necessitating a separate approach to treatment. The NCCN Guidelines for Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma were created to establish an evidence-based standard of care for patients with SBA. These guidelines provide recommendations on the workup of suspected SBA, primary treatment options, adjuvant treatment, surveillance, and systemic therapy for metastatic disease. Additionally, principles of imaging and endoscopy, pathologic review, surgery, radiation therapy, and survivorship are described.