Deasy, Joseph O.

Abstract Introduction: Radiotherapy (RT)-induced acute esophagitis (AE) is a common side effect in lung cancer patients receiving RT, which can significantly impact their quality of life. This highlights the need for a predictive model that can estimate AE risk in advance using pretreatment imaging data. However, collecting sufficient data for model development is often resource-intensive and costly. Additionally, acquiring a homogeneous training dataset (e.g., from a single center or modality) is not always feasible. This study aimed to develop an automated artificial intelligence-based 3D vision foundation model (VFM) combining standard-of-care planning computed tomography (pCT) and planned radiation dose maps to predict grade II or higher AE. Materials and methods: This study included 246 patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent either image-guided radiation treatment (IMRT) or proton-beam radiation therapy. The endpoint was grade two or higher AE (33% positive and 67% negative). The IMRT group consisted of 182 patients from a single center, whereas the proton therapy group included 64 patients from the Proton Collaborative Group trial from 11 different institutions. For each patient, pCT, dose maps, and radiotherapy segmentations were available. The VFM was created using a transformer pretrained using a large number of unlabeled volumetric 3D CTs from patients with varied diseases through a self-supervised learning approach, which extracts useful features directly from images. Next, the pretrained encoder was combined with fully connected classification layers and fine-tuned using stratified 5-fold cross-validation with 20 patients set aside for testing. We developed two models: a CT only and CT + dose model. Model performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC), specificity, and sensitivity. Results: In cross-validation, adding dose information to CT (CT+Dose) improved model performance, increasing AUC from 0.72 ± 0.08 to 0.76 ± 0.10 and specificity from 0.82 ± 0.09 to 0.87 ± 0.04, while sensitivity remained the same. On the independent test set, CT+Dose showed a marked improvement over CT only (AUC: 0.82 vs. 0.59; sensitivity: 0.57 vs. 0.14), with a slight decrease in specificity (0.77 vs. 1.00). Conclusion: A VFM model combining CT and radiation dose showed the capability to predict AE more accurately with higher specificity. Further studies on larger cohorts of testing patients are planned to assess model generalization. Citation Format: Chloe Min Seo Choi, Jue Jiang, Nikhil Mankuzhy, John Chang, Jing Zeng, Carlos Vargas, James Urbanic, Isabella Choi, Mark Mcdonald, James Gray, Joseph Deasy, Maria Thor, Charles Simone, Harini Veeraraghavan. Prediction of radiotherapy-Induced esophagitis in non-small cell lung cancer using a 3D vision foundation model [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning; 2025 Jul 10-12; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2025;31(13_Suppl):Abstract nr B022.

Abstract Purpose: To quantitatively predict the impact of cardiopulmonary dose on overall survival (OS) after radiotherapy for locally advanced non–small cell lung cancer. Experimental Design: We used the NRG Oncology/RTOG 0617 dataset. The model building procedure was preregistered on a public website. Patients were split between a training and a set-aside validation subset (N = 306/131). The 191 candidate variables covered disease, patient, treatment, and dose-volume characteristics from multiple cardiopulmonary substructures (atria, lung, pericardium, and ventricles), including the minimum dose to the hottest x% volume (Dx%[Gy]), mean dose of the hottest x% (MOHx%[Gy]), and minimum, mean (Mean[Gy]), and maximum dose. The model building was based on Cox regression and given 191 candidate variables; a Bonferroni-corrected P value threshold of 0.0003 was used to identify predictors. To reduce overreliance on the most highly correlated variables, stepwise multivariable analysis (MVA) was repeated on 1000 bootstrapped replicates. Multivariate sets selected in ≥10% of replicates were fit to the training subset and then averaged to generate a final model. In the validation subset, discrimination was assessed using Harrell c-index, and calibration was tested using risk group stratification. Results: Four MVA models were identified on bootstrap. The averaged model included atria D45%[Gy], lung Mean[Gy], pericardium MOH55%[Gy], and ventricles MOH5%[Gy]. This model had excellent performance predicting OS in the validation subset (c = 0.89). Conclusions: The risk of death due to cardiopulmonary irradiation was accurately modeled, as demonstrated by predictions on the validation subset, and provides guidance on the delivery of safe thoracic radiotherapy.

Abstract Motion and uncertainty in radiotherapy is traditionally handled via margins. The clinical target volume (CTV) is expanded to a larger planning target volume (PTV), which is irradiated to the prescribed dose. However, the PTV concept has several limitations, especially in proton therapy. Therefore, robust and probabilistic optimization methods have been developed that directly incorporate motion and uncertainty into treatment plan optimization for intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Thereby, the explicit definition of a PTV becomes obsolete and treatment plan optimization is directly based on the CTV. Initial work focused on random and systematic setup errors in IMRT. Later, inter-fraction prostate motion and intra-fraction lung motion became a research focus. Over the past ten years, IMPT has emerged as a new application for robust planning methods. In proton therapy, range or setup errors may lead to dose degradation and misalignment of dose contributions from different beams – a problem that cannot generally be addressed by margins. Therefore, IMPT has led to the first implementations of robust planning methods in commercial planning systems, making these methods available for clinical use. This paper first summarizes the limitations of the PTV concept. Subsequently, robust optimization methods are introduced and their applications in IMRT and IMPT planning are reviewed.