Flynn, Patrick J.

259 Background: Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet derived growth factor (PDGF) are produced by bladder cancer cell lines in vitro and expressed in human tumor tissues. Preclinical studies have also shown that bladder cancer cell lines express VEGF receptor 1 and 2 on their surface membrane. Pazopanib is a vascular endothelial receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor with anti-angiogenesis and antitumor activity in several preclinical models. A two-stage phase II study was conducted to assess the activity and toxicity profile of pazopanib administered to patients with metastatic, urothelial carcinoma. Methods: Patients with one prior systemic therapy for recurrent, metastatic urothelial carcinoma were eligible. Patients received pazopanib at a dose of 800 mg orally daily for 4 week cycle. Results: Nineteen patients were enrolled. Median age was 66 years, with > 89% of patients presenting poorly differentiated bladder cancer. Adverse event data is available on 18 patients. No grade 4 or 5 events have been experienced. Nine patients have experienced 11 grade 3 adverse events of which 7 were deemed at least possibly related to treatment. Most common toxicities were anemia, thrombocytopenia, leucopenia and fatigue. For stage 1, none of the first 16 evaluable patients were deemed success (CR or PR) by the RECIST criteria during the first four 4-week cycles of treatment. Median progression- free survival was 1.9 months. This met the futility stopping rule of interim analysis, and therefore, the trial was recommended to be permanently closed. Correlative studies including measurement of VEGF levels in archived tissues and blood are pending. Conclusions: Pazopanib did not show activity in urothelial carcinoma patients. The role of anti-VEGF therapies in urothelial carcinoma may need further evaluation in rational combination strategies. [Table: see text]

271 Background: Epidermal growth factor inhibitors show some benefit in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. A trial to evaluate the incorporation of Pmab into a conventional multimodality regimen and continuation as maintenance therapy was conducted in pts with LA disease. Methods: Pts with ECOG PS 0-1, preserved organ function and tumor encompassed within standard radiation fields were eligible. Pmab 6 mg/kg on days 1, 15, 29 and continuous infusion 5-FU 225 mg/m2/d or capecitabine 825 mg/m2 were given with RT. Pts then received weekly gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 and Pmab on days 1, 15 for three 4-week cycles. Maintenance Pmab was then continued for additional 6 months. RT consisted of 45 Gy to the tumor and regional nodes with a 5.4 Gy boost using conformal techniques. Primary endpoint of one-year survival (OS) with secondary endpoints progression-free survival (PFS), confirmed tumor response, and adverse events (at least possibly related) are reported. Results: 51 pts (23 M: 28 F) were enrolled with a median age of 65 (range: 43-84). Twenty-two pts (43%) received at least 1 cycle of post-chemo-RT, while 29 patients only received chemo-RT. All 51 pts have ended treatment with pts going off study because of: progression (39%), adverse events (27%), refusal (25%), and other reasons (8%). Frequently occurring maximum grade 3/4 AEs across the entire treatment course (chemo-RT + post-chemo-RT chemo) are shown below. With a median follow-up of 12.3 months, survival at 12 months is 50.2% (95% CI: 37.9-66.5%), median survival 12.1 mos (95% CI: 6.8-15.9) and median PFS 7.4 mos (95% CI: 3.7-8.6). Confirmed response rate was 5.9% (1-CR, 2-PR). Conclusions: The addition of Pmab to a conventional chemo-RT regimen provides benefit in terms of median survival. This is similar to reports of other EGFR inhibitors in LA disease. Adverse events, especially during the chemo-RT portion, were considerable and affected administration of subsequent systemic maintenance therapy. [Table: see text]

238 Background: Dual inhibition of the EGFR pathway using erlotinib and the monoclonal antibody panitumumab results in greater antitumor activity in preclinical pancreatic cancer models. A trial evaluating this approach was conducted. Methods: A safety analysis was initially performed with 6 patients at P 4 mg/kg every two weeks, E 100 mg daily, G 1000 mg/m2 weekly of a 28-day cycle. PGE was well tolerated with a grade 3 fatigue as only dose-limiting toxicity. Patients (pts) were then randomized to either PGE or GE alone. Eligibility included: no prior chemo, ECOG PS 0-1, bilirubin <2x UL, AST <2.5x UL. CT scans every 2 cycles. Results: 93 pts (46-GE; 47-PGE) were randomized from January to August, 2010. Median age 61 years and 65% male. ECOG PS 0 (51%) and PS 1 (49%). No significant differences in baseline characteristics observed between treatment arms. 81 pts evaluable for AEs; 37 (46%) had a maximum grade 3 (at least possibly related to treatment), and 12 (15%) maximum grade 4 or 5. Treatment arms similar with respect to the overall AEs with exception grade 1-3 acneiform rash, GE (65%) vs. PGE (85%). Commonly occurring grade 4 AEs (at least possibly related) consisted of thrombosis (3 pts) and thrombocytopenia (2 pts). Two grade 5 events occurred in PGE arm—duodenal hemorrhage (possibly related) and pancolitis with multisystem failure (unlikely). An additional PGE pt died 30 days off study (grade 5 CHF, possibly). 54 patients (67%; 31-GE, 23-PGE) ended treatment; 38 (70%) for disease progression (24-GE; 14-PGE). Other reasons for treatment discontinuation: AEs (9; 17%), pt refusal (4; 7%), death on study (2; 4%), other (1). In 81 pts with at least 1 cycle of chemotherapy, the median PFS for GE 2.0 months and 3.3 months for PGE. Accrual for the study was recently completed and overall and 6-month survival data will be presented. Conclusions: This study involved an initial run-in design to define tolerable doses of dual EGFR inhibitors, PGE, in pancreatic cancer patients. Although preliminary, the randomized phase II portion has been completed and differences between GE and PGE in terms of relevant clinical outcomes, PFS, are observed. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Purpose The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) has a policy and set of procedures for endorsing recent clinical practice guidelines that have been developed by other professional organizations. Methods The Cancer Care Ontario (CCO) Guideline on Follow-up Care, Surveillance Protocol, and Secondary Prevention Measures for Survivors of Colorectal Cancer was reviewed by ASCO for methodologic rigor and considered for endorsement. Results The ASCO Panel concurred with the CCO recommendations and recommended endorsement, with the addition of several qualifying statements. Conclusion Surveillance should be guided by presumed risk of recurrence and functional status of the patient (important within the first 2 to 4 years). Medical history, physical examination, and carcinoembryonic antigen testing should be performed every 3 to 6 months for 5 years. Patients at higher risk of recurrence should be considered for testing in the more frequent end of the range. A computed tomography scan (abdominal and chest) is recommended annually for 3 years, in most cases. Positron emission tomography scans should not be used for surveillance outside of a clinical trial. A surveillance colonoscopy should be performed 1 year after the initial surgery and then every 5 years, dictated by the findings of the previous one. If a colonoscopy was not preformed before diagnosis, it should be done after completion of adjuvant therapy (before 1 year). Secondary prevention (maintaining a healthy body weight and active lifestyle) is recommended. If a patient is not a candidate for surgery or systemic therapy because of severe comorbid conditions, surveillance tests should not be performed. A treatment plan from the specialist should have clear directions on appropriate follow-up by a nonspecialist.

Abstract Purpose: We hypothesized that vertical blockade of VEGF signaling by combining bevacizumab with sorafenib in patients with recurrent glioblastoma would result in a synergistic therapeutic effect. We also investigated whether VEGF, VEGFR2 and hypoxia-inducible factor-1α single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP), circulating biomarkers of angiogenesis, and MRI markers such as apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) are correlated with treatment efficacy and/or toxicity. Experimental Design: Patients received bevacizumab (5 mg/kg every 2 weeks) with sorafenib (200 mg twice a day, weekly, days 1–5; group A). Due to toxicity, the starting sorafenib dose was subsequently modified to 200 mg every day (group B). Results: Fifty-four patients were enrolled: 19 patients in group A and 35 in group B. Objective response rate was 18.5% with median duration of 6.7 months (range 0.5–24.1 months). Six-month progression-free survival (PFS6) was 20.4% (11/54), and median overall survival (OS) was 5.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 4.7–8.2]; outcome was similar between the two dose groups. We identified SNPs in the VEGF and VEGFR2 promoter regions, which were associated with PFS6 (P &lt; 0.022). Among molecular markers of angiogenesis, a higher log2 baseline level of stromal cell–derived factor-1 was associated with PFS6 success (P = 0.04). Circulating endothelial cells decreased during treatment with subsequent increase at disease progression (P = 0.022). Imaging analysis showed a trend associating ADC-L with poor outcome. Conclusions: The bevacizumab/sorafenib combination did not improve outcome of patients with recurrent glioblastoma versus historic bevacizumab-treated controls. Biologic markers of response and resistance to bevacizumab in gliomas were identified which merit prospective validation. Clin Cancer Res; 19(17); 4816–23. ©2013 AACR.