Starr, Jason S.

TPS4201 Background: Poorly differentiated, extrapulmonary NEC are rare cancers with median overall survival (OS) <1 year. Treatment is extrapolated from small cell lung cancer (SCLC) with use of P (cisplatin or carboplatin) + E. More effective treatment regimens and predictive biomarkers are needed to improve outcomes. In SCLC, induction therapy with combination of P/E + PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor atezolizumab and maintenance atezolizumab improved OS (12.3 months vs 10.3 months; HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.54 – 0.91, P=0.007) vs P/E alone (1). No study to date has compared PD-1/PD-L1 inhibition during induction only vs during induction and maintenance therapy. In SCLC, distinct molecular subtypes can be identified by the presence of specific transcription factors (e.g., ASCL1, NEUROD1, POU2F3) or an inflamed gene signature (SCLC-I), with SCLC-I pts more likely to benefit clinically from the addition of immunotherapy (2). In this study we plan to test the benefit of adding atezolizumab to induction P/E as well as the role of adding maintenance atezolizumab after induction P/E plus atezolizumab. We also plan to correlate tumor- and blood-based subtype biomarkers with response to therapy. Methods: Eligible pts ≥18 years old have evaluable, histologically confirmed extrapulmonary NEC, Zubrod PS ≤2, and are allowed to have up to 1 cycle of P/E prior to enrollment. P (cisplatin 75 mg/m2 or carboplatin AUC 5, iv) on day 1, E 100 mg/m2 iv on days 1-3, and atezolizumab 1200 mg iv on day 1 of q21 day cycles. Pts are randomized to 1 of 3 arms: A) Induction P/E + atezolizumab -> maintenance atezolizumab B) Induction P/E + atezolizumab -> observation C) Induction P/E -> observation. The primary objective is to compare the overall survival (OS, from randomization) between arms in a fixed sequence: A vs C -> B vs C -> A vs B. Secondary objectives include comparing OS (from start of maintenance/observation), progression free survival, response rate, duration of response, and safety/tolerability across arms. Tumor and blood samples will be banked for future biomarker analyses, including immunohistochemistry of transcription factors on tissue and whole exome sequencing on tumor and circulating tumor DNA. With 189 pts (168 eligible), the study has 84% power to detect an improvement in 12-months OS from 35% to 57.5% (HR 0.53). This study was activated December 2021 with 3 pts enrolled over 1 year due to restricting enrollment of NEC of small cell histology only. The protocol was amended in January 2023 to broaden eligibility to all NEC subtypes (small cell, large cell, and undefined histology with Ki-67 ≥55%). As of January 2024, 35 patients have been enrolled. A protocol amendment is planned to remove the need for Ki-67 index for NEC of genitourinary origin to improve accrual. 1. Horn L, et al. N Engl J Med 2018. 2. Gay CM, et al. Cancer Cell 2021. Clinical trial information: NCT05058651 .

3020 Background: Radioligand therapy (RLT) use has been increasing with the approval of 177Lu-Dotatate for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (NET) & 177Lu-PSMA-617 for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms [tMN, including myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) & acute myeloid leukemia, (AML)] have been reported after 177Lutetium (177Lu) for NET with rates of 2-20% & median time from first 177Lu to tMN of 2.8yrs [4-12]. Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) is a risk factor for tMN, with the spectrum of CH depending on selection pressures. To describe the prevalence of therapy selected CH & tMN, we performed a retrospective analysis of patients (pts) who had a bone marrow biopsy (BMB) post-177Lu. Methods: After IRB approval, we queried the electronic health record for pts with BMB post-177Lu. Pt demographics, treatment history, labs & BMB results were collected. Results: Fifty-seven pts met criteria, 41 (72%) with NET & 16 (28%) with mCRPC. . Median age at BMB was 68yrs (range, 28-85). Of the 57pts, prior treatments included: radiation (RT) in 21 (37%), temozolomide in 14 (25%), taxane in 15 (26%), & platinum agents in 10 (18%). The median number of 177Lu cycles was 4 (range, 1-11).Cytogenetics were available in 84% (n = 48) & were normal in 60% (n = 29). Of those with abnormal cytogenetics (n = 18, 38%), the most common abnormalities involved chromosome (chr) 7 (n = 12, 26%), chr 5 (n = 7, 15%), chr 20 (n = 5, 11%) and complex karyotypes in 7 (15%), with 3 (17%) of these patients having no mutations. Diagnoses were assessable in 49 (86%) pts: 15 (31%) with undefined cytopeniasand 16 (33%) with tMDS. Metastatic carcinoma was identified in 17 Fifty-one percent (n = 29), at a median of 0.5yrs (range, 0.04-2.6) after hematologic diagnosis. Conclusions: The enrichment of CH involving the DDR pathway in recipients of 177Lu underscores the impact of RLT on bone marrow progenitors.

3077 Background: ATR protein kinase is activated by replication stress and recruited to stalled forks or single strand DNA defects in various cancers. The topoisomerase-I (Top1) inhibitor irinotecan induces DNA damage. The ATR inhibitor BAY1895344 (elimusertib) has demonstrated cytotoxic potential in SCLC and GI cancer xenografts when combined with Top1 inhibitors . Methods: This phase Ia trial assessed elimusertib in combination with irinotecan in adult patients with refractory advanced solid tumors for whom irinotecan can be considered standard care. Patients with previous irinotecan exposure were excluded. Two dosing schedules were used: 1) Biweekly - irinotecan IV (starting at 150 mg/m2) D1 + elimusertib (starting dose 20 mg PO BID) D1,D2 (cycle=14 days); 2) Weekly - irinotecan (starting at 50 mg/m2) IV on D1,8,15 with elimusertib (starting at 20 mg PO daily) on D2,D3,D9,D10 and D16,D17 (cycle=21 days). Dose escalation utilized a 3+3 design. Primary objectives were to assess safety and tolerability and estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Secondary objectives included estimating pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles and assessing anti-tumor activity. Results: A total of 21 patients were enrolled in dose escalation (N=9 [Biweekly] and N=12 [Weekly], median age 58 and 2 lines of prior therapy. For the Biweekly cohort: 3/3 patients enrolled at dose level (DL) 1 experienced hematologic dose-limiting toxicity (DLT); 6 patients received DL-1 without any DLTs. The weekly regimen escalation comprised of 12 patients: 6 enrolled in DL1 with 2/6 having hematologic DLT and 5/6 unable to complete ≥75% of cycle 1 dosing; 6 enrolled in DL-1 with no DLTs observed. Notable grade 3+ treatment-related adverse events and summary best response are summarized (Table 1). The majority of evaluable patients in both schedules had initial disease control (56% [biweekly] and 67% [weekly]). One confirmed partial response was seen in the biweekly RP2D. Median progression-free survival was 2.1 mo [biweekly] and 2.5 mo [weekly]. PK results will be presented at time of meeting. Conclusions: Both RP2D and MTD of elimusertib in combination with irinotecan were reached for both dosing schedules: irinotecan 150 mg/m2 IV D1 + elimusertib 10 mg BID PO D1,D2 (biweekly) and irinotecan 25 mg/m2 IV on D1 + elimusertib (20 mg PO daily) on D2,D3 (weekly). Dose escalation was notably limited by myelotoxicity. Due to sponsor decision, the study was halted prior to planned expansion but the concept of ATR + topo I combination remains scientifically relevant. Clinical trial information: NCT04514497 . [Table: see text]

e15138 Background: Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are poorly characterized due to their innate heterogeneity, thus limiting treatment and clinical trial options for patients. Here, we used whole exome sequencing (WES) and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) to explore the genetic and microenvironmental landscape of NECs in order to understand the unique features of different NEC types, with the aim of improving treatment modalities. Methods: We analyzed 51 NEC clinical samples morphologically verified by a pathologist: lung NEC (20 small cell NEC and 1 large cell NEC cases), gastroenteropancreatic NEC (GEP, 12 cases), cancer of unknown primary (7 cases), Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC, 5 cases), genitourinary tract NEC (3 cases), and breast NEC (3 cases). Findings on tumor mutational burden (TMB, mut/Mb), microsatellite instability (MSI), gene expression signatures, and tumor microenvironment (TME) profiling were reported. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) subtyping was performed as reported by Gay et al. on the entire NEC cohort. Results: Half of the patients with lung NEC and 84% of those with extrapulmonary NEC satisfied the molecular inclusion criteria for clinical trials, with the most frequent criterion being KRAS G12X or G13X mutations. Among the extrapulmonary NEC samples, 13.7% were deemed eligible for targeted therapy, specifically for cases with BRAF V600E mutation and/or high TMB (> 10 mut/Mb). We detected varying TMB and distinct gene expression features across the entire cohort. Specifically, we found 2 MCC cases to be Merkel cell polyomavirus-positive with low TMB and devoid of UV-associated mutations. One GEP-NEC case exhibited a high MSI (MSI-high) status. We detected 6 SCLC cases (3 non-smokers, 3 former smokers) with surprisingly low levels of tobacco-associated mutations (<10% of all mutations). Two GEP-NEC cases had high levels of mutations associated with tobacco smoking. While TME profiling showed no significant difference in cell population makeup across all samples, transcriptional SCLC subtyping revealed significant differences among the cases. Inflammatory SCLC (SCLC-I) samples showed statistically significant enrichment of all subpopulations of the immune microenvironment (i.e., B cells, T cells, NK cells), supporting the use of immune checkpoint blockade for treatment. The POU2F3+ SCLC (SCLC-P) samples showed low expression of all neuroendocrine diagnostic markers (i.e., INSM1, NCAM1, SYP, CHGA). Conclusions: Given the heterogeneous molecular features across diverse NEC tumors, a uniform treatment strategy is unlikely to benefit all NEC patients. Hence, our ability to detect these unique molecular features is crucial for matching individual NEC patients with specific clinical trials and targeted therapies that may improve their outcomes. Thus, a concerted effort using in-depth genomic, transcriptomic, and TME profiling for NEC tumors is warranted.

Abstract Introduction Pathogenic mutations in POLE/POLD1 lead to decreased fidelity of DNA replication, resulting in a high tumor mutational burden (TMB-H), defined as TMB ≥ 10 mut/Mb, independent of deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) and microsatellite instability high (MSI-H) status. Methods De-identified records of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) profiled with the Tempus xT assay (DNA-seq of 595-648 genes at 500×) were identified from the Tempus Database. Results Among 9136 CRC samples profiled, the frequency of POLE/POLD1 genomic alterations was 2.4% (n = 217). Copy number loss was the most common genomic alteration (64%, n = 138) of POLE/POLD1, followed by copy number amplifications (18%, n = 40) and short variant mutations (18%, n = 39). The POLE/POLD1 mutated group presented with a higher frequency of TMB-H phenotype relative to wild type (WT; 22% vs. 9%, P &lt; .001), with a median TMB of 127 mut/Mb in the TMB-H POLE/POLD1 subset. The TMB showed a dramatic contrast between POLE/POLD1 short variant mutations as compared to the group with copy number alterations, with a TMB of 159 mut/Mb vs 15 mut/Mb, respectively. Thus, the short variant mutations represented the so-called ultra-hypermutated phenotype. The POLE/POLD1 mutated group, as compared to WT, exhibited a higher rate of coexisting mutations, including APC, ALK, ATM, BRCA2, and RET mutations. Conclusion Patients with POLE/POLD1 mutations exhibited significant differences across immunological markers (ie, TMB, MMR, and MSI-H) and molecular co-alterations. Those with short variant mutations represented 18% of the POLE/POLD1 cohort and 0.4% of the total cohort examined. This group of patients had a median TMB of 159 mut/Mb (range 34-488), representing the ultra-hypermutated phenotype. This group of patients is important to identify given the potential for exceptional response to immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Abstract We present a 54-year-old White male with a diagnosis of stage IV pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma. Next-generation sequencing of the tumor/blood identified a complex tumor genome, which included a rearranged during transfection (RET) gene fusion. The patient initially received cytotoxic chemotherapy with a significant radiographic response. After 4 cycles of chemotherapy, the patient was transitioned to a clinical trial using selpercatinib, a RET inhibitor, as maintenance therapy. Unfortunately, our patient developed progression of disease at the first treatment monitoring scan. Our patient suffered primary resistance to RET-targeted therapy. Proposed mechanisms of resistance include intrinsic resistance of the nuclear receptor co-activator 4-RET fusion to RET inhibition, the RET fusion representing a passenger alteration to another tumorigenic driver pathway and/or decreased efficacy of RET inhibition after platinum-based chemotherapy. Our patient’s clinical course highlights the fact that “actionable” genomic alterations do not always equate to patient benefit.

688 Background: PACC is a rare malignancy originating from the exocrine pancreas, accounting for less than 1% of all pancreatic cancers. Due to the rarity of the disease entity, there is a paucity of data to guide treatment decisions. This retrospective study aims to provide additional clinical characteristics and outcomes to aid in future treatment decisions. Methods: Pathology records from Mayo Clinic (AZ, FL, MN) patients (pts) denoting acinar or mixed-acinar cell carcinoma were searched between 2002 to 2023 and selected for retrospective review. Pt demographics, treatment courses, and next generation sequencing (NGS) were collected. Results: A total of 62 pts (74% male, n = 46) were identified with median age 64 years old. Histologic subtypes were 67% pure acinar cell carcinoma (42/62), 24% mixed acinar-neuroendocrine (15/62), and 8% mixed acinar-adenocarcinoma (5/62). AJCC stages at diagnosis were 34% stage I/II (21/62), 16% stage III (10/62), and 50% stage IV (31/62). Early-stage disease was treated with upfront surgical resection (81%, 17/21). Locally advanced disease received neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) followed by surgical resection (80%, 8/10). FOLFIRINOX was most often chosen as NAT (65%, 11/17), while others received gemcitabine-based NAT. The R0 resection rate was 86%. The 3 and 5-year survival estimates for stage III were 90.9% (95% CI: 75.4 – 100%) and 67.3% (95% CI: 42.3 – 100%), respectively. The 3 and 5-year survival estimates for stage IV were 36.6% (95% CI: 18.6 – 71.9%) and 29.3% (95% CI: 13.1 – 65.5%), respectively. Median survival time for stage IV was 3 years. Somatic NGS testing was done in 24 pts with alterations found in: homologous recombination (HR) in 42% (10/24); RAF alterations in 25% (6/24); mismatch repair (MMR) in 13% (3/24; none of them with MMR germline mutations), 1 ETV6-NTRK3 fusion, and 1 FGFR mutation. Germline NGS testing was done in 21 pts and alterations in HR were seen in 33% (7/21) of pts. This led to additional therapeutic options in 46% (11/24) of pts. Conclusions: Unlike PDAC, PACC is a genomically diverse disease, with potentially targetable alterations in RAF, HRD, and MMR genes, offering additional therapeutic options for significant number of pts. In addition, more than one-third of the pts harbored germline mutations in HR genes. Therefore, somatic and germline testing should be considered for any pt diagnosed with PACC.

Abstract Introduction The CYP2D6 enzyme metabolizes opioids commonly prescribed for cancer‐related pain, and CYP2D6 polymorphisms may contribute to variability in opioid response. We evaluated the feasibility of implementing CYP2D6 ‐guided opioid prescribing for patients with cancer and reported pilot outcome data. Methods Adult patients from two cancer centers were prospectively enrolled into a hybrid implementation‐effectiveness clinical trial and randomized to CYP2D6 ‐genotype‐guided opioid selection, with clinical recommendations, or usual care. Implementation metrics, including provider response, medication changes consistent with recommendations, and patient‐reported pain and symptom scores at baseline and up to 8 weeks, were assessed. Results Most (87/114, 76%) patients approached for the study agreed to participate. Of 85 patients randomized, 71% were prescribed oxycodone at baseline. The median (range) time to receive CYP2D6 test results was 10 (3–37) days; 24% of patients had physicians acknowledge genotype results in a clinic note. Among patients with CYP2D6 ‐genotype‐guided recommendations to change therapy ( n = 11), 18% had a change congruent with recommendations. Among patients who completed baseline and follow‐up questionnaires ( n = 48), there was no difference in change in mean composite pain score (−1.01 ± 2.1 vs. −0.41 ± 2.5; p = 0.19) or symptom severity at last follow‐up (3.96 ± 2.18 vs. 3.47 ± 1.78; p = 0.63) between the usual care arm ( n = 26) and genotype‐guided arm ( n = 22), respectively. Conclusion Our study revealed high acceptance of pharmacogenetic testing as part of a clinical trial among patients with cancer pain. However, provider response to genotype‐guided recommendations was low, impacting assessment of pain‐related outcomes. Addressing barriers to utility of pharmacogenetics results and clinical recommendations will be critical for implementation success.

e14576 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the treatment of many solid malignancies. ICI appears particularly effective when tumors exhibit high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and/or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) status. Although the response is typically quite good in this setting, there are scenarios where benefit is less than anticipated. In this study, we aimed to explore the efficacy of ICIs in patients with MSI-H/dMMR cancers with peritoneal metastasis (PM). Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review to identify patients (pts) with PM from primary MSI-H/dMMR cancers treated with immunotherapy between 2010 and 2022 at Mayo Clinic. Data was collected to include pt demographics, tumor characteristics, pathology, tumor markers, imaging, mutational profile, and previous and subsequent treatments. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR), defined as objective response rate (RECIST v1.1 criteria) or stable disease. Results: Forty-six pts with MSI-H/dMMR and PM treated with ICIs. Most of our cohort were female (61%) with a median age at diagnosis of 61 years. Colorectal cancer was the most common primary site (69.6%), followed by endometrial (6.5%). Most pts received treatment with PD-1 antibodies as second-line therapy following systemic chemotherapy. DCR of the PM was 71.6 % (n= 13 PR, 9 CR, and 9 SD), with a median duration of response of 12.6 months. Thirteen pts (28.4%) had progressive peritoneal disease on ICI with a median PFS of 2.2 months. Ascites was a poor prognosticator and predicted a lack of benefit from ICI (HR 6.6, 95% CI=2.24-19.9, p= 0.006). Mucinous and signet ring histology were common in pts with peritoneal progression (61.5%); however, this was not statistically significant (HR=1.6; 95%CI= 0.4383 to 3.899, p 0.5). Multivariate analysis for the presence or absence of BRAF and/or RAS mutations was not statistically significant in predicting response. Neither was the specific MMR gene mutation(i.e., MLH1 or PMS2). Interestingly, discordant responses between the peritoneum and other sites of metastasis to immunotherapy were seen in 13 pts (28.4%), primarily as primary peritoneal progression compared to other tumor sites. Conclusions: In our cohort, the DCR of metastatic peritoneal disease in MSI-H/dMMR tumors was approximately 71%. The presence of ascites was identified as a poor prognosticator in this setting and was associated with a lack of response/benefit from ICIs. Histologic subtype (i.e., mucinous/signet ring) did not show statistical significance in predicting ICI response. The subpopulation with discordant response to ICI suggests that peritoneal immunobiology may differ from other sites. Further research on immunotherapy response in the peritoneum is needed for this special subset of pts.