Bryce, Alan H.

536 Background: The management of malignant mesothelioma of the tunica vaginalis of the testes (MMTVT) is not clearly defined, though retroperitoneal lymph node dissection has been reported as a diagnostic and potentially therapeutic option. Herein we present our experience with robot assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RARPLND) in a series of patients with MMTVT. Methods: The Mayo Clinic cancer registry was queried from 1972-present for all patients who had a diagnosis of MMTVT. Six patients were identified, five of whom were treated with RPLND, where four underwent RARPLND. Data was collected on pertinent demographic, preoperative, perioperative, postoperative outcomes and follow-up oncological data. Results: In five patients who underwent RPLND, the median age was 50 years (IQR 34-51), median BMI was 26.9 (IQR 26.4-30.6). Four patients originally presented with right sided symptomatic hydroceles, while one presented with right sided chronic epididymitis. Orchiectomy (one simple, two inguinal radical) was performed in three patients and hydrocelectomy in the other two patients prior to presentation. Preoperative cross-sectional imaging, including PET-CT scan in three patients, was negative for lymphadenopathy or metastasis. RARPLND was performed in 4/5 (80%) cases and concomitant hemiscrotectomy in 4/5 (80%) cases. Full bilateral template was performed in three patients and right modified template was performed in the remaining two. Median lymph node yield was 29 (IQR 22-32) and median blood loss was 275 cc (IQR 200-300). Positive retroperitoneal lymph nodes were found in 3/5 (60%) cases. Final margins of hemiscrotectomy were negative in all four cases. All patients who underwent RARPLND were discharged home on postoperative day one. One patient received four cycles of adjuvant Cisplatin and Pemetrexed. Mean follow-up was 27 months (range 2-47). No patients recurred. Conclusions: MMTVT is a very rare malignancy with high potential for retroperitoneal lymph node dissemination. Regardless of the approach, RPLND may provide both a diagnostic and therapeutic benefit, with the robotic approach affording a potentially expedited recovery.

154 Background: Poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) are being studied as a treatment option for men with mCRPC and deficient homologous recombination DNA repair. While the FDA has granted “breakthrough” designation status to olaparib for use in mCRPC patients with either BRCA1/2 or ATM mutations, it is not known if responsiveness to PARPi may be influenced by the mutation type. Because ATM functions as a sensor of DNA damage rather than a mediator of DNA repair, we hypothesized that patients with ATM mutations may not show robust responses to PARPi therapy compared to those with BRCA1/2 mutations. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of mCRPC patients treated with off-label olaparib at Johns Hopkins Hospital and Mayo Clinic Scottsdale who had somatic or germline mutations in BRCA1/ 2 or ATM. The primary endpoint was PSA50 response. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and radiographic/clinical progression-free survival (PFS). Results: 40 men received olaparib for mCRPC of which 17 had pathogenic mutations (5 ATM-mutant, 12 BRCA1/2-mutant). Eleven (65%) had germline and 6 (35%) had somatic alterations. Five (29%) had Gleason sum ≤7 at diagnosis, 4 (24%) had Gleason sum 8, and 8 (47%) had Gleason sum ≥9. Three (18%) had metastatic disease at diagnosis. Mean age at start of olaparib therapy was 65.6 (range, 52-76) years. Prior chemotherapy was received by 59% of men, and prior abiraterone/enzalutamide by 88% of men. Eleven (65%) had extra-osseous metastases at start of therapy. PSA50 responses were achieved by 10/12 men (83%) with BRCA1/2 mutations and 0/5 men (0%) with ATM mutations (Fisher’s exact test, P= 0.003). Men with BRCA1/2 mutations had a median PFS of 12.3 mo versus 3.3 mo for those with ATM mutations (HR 0.14, 95%CI 0.03-0.60; P= 0.008). There was no difference in OS (HR 0.24, 95%CI 0.03-1.173; P= 0.16). Conclusions: Men with mCRPC harboring mutations in BRCA1/2 appear to have better PSA responses and longer PFS with olaparib compared to men with ATM mutations. ATM-mutant mCRPC patients may require alternative therapies ( e.g. chemotherapy, ATR inhibitors). Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm or refute these preliminary findings.

328 Background: Patients with a history of solid organ transplants have been excluded from PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor clinical trials due to concern for graft rejection. Only 2 case reports of PD-1 inhibitor use in patients with liver transplantation (LT) have been reported thus far. Here, we report our experience with using checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic cancer patients with LT. Methods: A single center pilot evaluation was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients with LT. PD-L1 staining on both the tumor and allograft were assessed if there was available tissue. The primary endpoint was evaluation of the risk for allograft rejection. Secondary endpoints included RECIST v1.1 and Immune-Related Response criteria (iRC) response rates, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Translational objectives included the relationship of PD-L1/PD-1 staining of tumor/allograft with response and rejection. Results: Six metastatic cancer patients with a history of LT received PD-1 inhibitor therapy (hepatocellular n=5, melanoma n=1). 3 patients were on mTOR inhibitor as immunosuppressive regimen and 3 on calcineurin inhibitor. Overall, allograft rejection was observed in 1/6 patients (on mTOR inhibitor). One patient achieved a CR (melanoma), 3 patients had PD and 2 patients discontinued therapy prior to restaging assessments. A single response (by both RECIST v1.1 and iRC) and rejection were reported in patients who received mTOR inhibitors (1 of 3). Three patients were tested for PD-L1 staining in the allograft tissue and all of them were negative (0% staining) with no graft rejections observed. Four patients had tumor PD-L1 evaluated (2 patients tested positive with 1 patient obtained a CR). The median OS, PFS and duration of therapy were 1.2, 1.8 and 1.2 months respectively. Conclusions: In this pilot evaluation of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in LT patients both preliminary efficacy (1 of 4) and allograft rejection (1 of 6) was exhibited. Larger, prospective trials are needed to elucidate optimal patient and immunosuppressive regimen selection in these patients.

2519 Background: PT-112 is a novel platinum-pyrophosphate agent designed to avoid the toxicity and drug resistance mechanisms of conventional chemotherapy. Pre-clinical models show effects on multiple cell signaling components: p16 mediated G1/S cell cycle arrest; modulation of MDM2/p53 expression; extrinsic apoptosis initiation; and immunogenic cell death (ICD) induction. This Phase I first-in-human, multicenter, open label study assesses PT-112’s safety and pharmacokinetic (PK) profile in advanced solid tumor patients (pts), to determine the RP2D and signals of activity. Methods: Pts with advanced solid tumors and acceptable marrow / organ function received PT-112 IV over 1-hr on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 wks in a 3+3 dose escalation design. Intra-subject escalation was allowed. PK samples from cycles 1-2 were analyzed by ICP-MS and LC-MS/MS. Results: 44 pts have been treated across dose levels (DL) from 12-300mg/m2. Cumulative dosing ranged from 1 to 60 infusions, and cumulative exposure from 96 to 5,244 mg/m2. PK parameters were dose proportional. Target Cmax and AUC levels were achieved, with constant VD. DLTs were observed at 150mg/m2 (G3 pancytopenia); 250mg/m2 (G2 renal injury in a cervical ca pt with hydro-nephrosis); and 300mg/m2 (G3 rash). The most common treatment-related AEs were G1-2 fatigue (26% pts), nausea (23%), vomiting (14%), constipation (12%), and diarrhea (12%). Numerous signals of activity were observed at DLs ≥ 125mg/m2. These include a confirmed PR in a NSCLC pt with 6 prior lines of therapy and no response to TKI inhibition or PD-1 blockade; PFS > 6 months (7-18 months) in 3 pts; metabolic response via PET scan in bone and liver mets (basal cell and pancreatic ca.); biomarker responses in ovarian and prostate ca.; and nodal/metastatic volumetric reduction in 3 pts. Conclusions: PT-112 is a well-tolerated novel agent with a pleiotropic mode of action and feasibility for long-term and combination treatment. Numerous signals of anti-cancer efficacy in heavily pre-treated pts suggest lack of cross-resistance with conventional agents. MTD has not yet been reached. PT-112’s profile makes it an attractive candidate for further development, including in combination with immunotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02266745.

e21057 Background: BRAF, NRAS, CDKN2A and P53 mutations are commonly observed pathogenic mutations in cutaneous melanoma. The influence of mutations such as BRAF, NRAS, CDKN2A and P53 on treatment response in the PD1 inhibitor era has not been well defined. Methods: This study included patients with melanoma with a cutaneous or unknown primary. All patients had genomic profiling with the Mayo Clinic 50-gene solid tumor mutation panel. Treatment response to first line immunotherapy with PD1, CTLA-4, or combination PD1/CTLA-4 inhibitors were assessed by response rate and time-to-progression (TTP) rate at 12 months. Each patient outcome was stratified by non-mutually exclusive gene mutation status into BRAF, NRAS, P53, CDKN2A, or quadruple negative (N4) groups. Results: Genomic profiling was performed on 208 patients, of whom 102 received first line immunotherapy. Most patients received a PD1 inhibitor (n = 62), followed by CTLA-4 inhibitor (n = 34), and combination therapy (n = 6). A trend towards improved outcomes was observed in CDKN2A and BRAF mutated patients with worse outcomes noted in P53, N4, and NRAS patients. The percent without progression at 12 months were BRAF 52.2%, CDKN2A 58.2%, NRAS 30.5%, P53 37.7%, and N4 26.7% (see table below). Response rates were BRAF 46.4%, CDKN2A 38.5%, NRAS 22.2%, P53 40.0%, and N4 33.3%. Conclusions: There is a trend towards improved outcomes with immunotherapy in BRAF and CDKN2A mutated patients while P53, NRAS and N4 patients have inferior outcomes. [Table: see text]

5053 Background: Genomic aberrations associated with resistance/response to AA/P are not known. In a prospective study we assessed whole-exome/RNA-seq based aberrations in CRPC metastatic biopsies for identifying molecular markers associated with primary resistance and response duration. Methods: Sequencing of metastatic biopsies was performed for analyzing molecular aberrations that predict primary resistance (defined as progression at 12-weeks of therapy (non-responders) using PSA, RECIST, bone scan criteria per PCWG2). Gene network analysis was performed in genes mutated more frequently in non-responders and in genes differentially expressed between non-responders and responders using a “risk ratio” (RR) of ≥2. Cox regression models with multiple gene network pathways were used for determining association with time to treatment change (TTTC). Results: Of 92 enrolled pts 82 had complete whole-exome, RNA-seq & 12-week outcome data available for analysis. At 12-weeks 33/82 had progressed. Using a RR of ≥2, 113 genes were more frequently mutated in non-responders & 292 in responders. In non-responders, gene network analysis revealed frequent mutations in Wnt/β-catenin pathway genes; frequent deletion of negative regulators of Wnt pathway ( DKK4, SFRP2, LRP6). Gene expression analyses revealed significantly reduced expression levels of Wnt/β-catenin pathway inhibitors and increased expression levels of cell cycle proliferation (CCP) genes in non-responders. Median study follow up was 32 months during which time 58/82 pts progressed and switched treatments. Median TTTC was 10.1 months (IQR:4.4-24.1). In multivariate analysis CCP scores of ≥50 predicted shorter TTTC (HR = 2.11, 95% CI: 1.17-3.80; p = 0.01). Conclusions: In metastases Wnt/β-catenin pathway activation is associated with primary AA/P resistance and increased CCP with acquired drug resistance. These findings offer molecular based predictive biomarkers in CRPC stage treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT#01953640.