Peyrin‐Biroulet, Laurent

BACKGROUND: Cross-sectional studies in ulcerative colitis (UC) have shown at best a moderate association between histologic and clinical measures of disease activity, but few longitudinal studies have evaluated this relationship. As endoscopy and histology are both independent predictors of clinical outcomes in UC, there remains a need to assess these measures in parallel to demonstrate clinical benefit. HICKORY (NCT02100696) is an ongoing Phase 3 study evaluating etrolizumab in anti-tumor necrosis factor (aTNF)–experienced patients with moderate-to-severe UC. The correlation between histologic changes and established disease activity measures at end of induction (week 14) was assessed using data from the open-label induction (OLI) cohort of HICKORY. METHODS: Study analysis is based on data from patients in the OLI cohort who received ≥1 dose of etrolizumab 105 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks during the 14-week induction phase. Baseline and week 14 biopsies were scored by 1 of 4 central readers using the Nancy histologic index (NHI) and the Robarts histopathology index (RHI) in patients who had active baseline histology (NHI >1 and RHI >3) and complete scoring at week 14 (n = 97). Binary week 14 histologic outcomes were characterized by presence or absence of neutrophils (NHI ≤1 or RHI ≤3 and Geboes subgrades 2B.0/3.0). Mayo Clinic score (MCS) endoscopic subscore (ES) was used to assess endoscopy. Pairwise associations were quantified by Spearman correlation (ρ; for correlation between change from baseline scores) and Cohen kappa coefficients (κ; for agreement among week 14 outcomes). ΔNHI and ΔRHI were compared to determine presence of a minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in MCS (∆MCS ≥3 from baseline). RESULTS: At week 14, 22% (21/97), 23% (22/97), and 8% (8/97) of patients achieved resolution of neutrophilic inflammation based on either NHI or RHI/Geboes, endoscopic improvement (ES ≤ 1), and endoscopic remission (ES = 0), respectively. Among patients with endoscopic improvement and endoscopic remission, neutrophilic resolution was achieved in 55% (12/22) and 75% (6/8) of patients, respectively. ΔNHI and ΔRHI were highly correlated (ρ = 0.91). There was weak to no association between ΔNHI/ΔRHI/ΔES and Δfecal calprotectin (ρ = –0.02 to 0.38), ΔC-reactive protein (ρ = 0.03 to 0.07), Δalbumin (ρ = –0.19 to –0.10), Δhemoglobin (ρ = –0.22 to –0.19), and Δsegmented neutrophils in the blood (ρ = –0.06 to 0.01). Weak correlations were observed between ΔNHI/ΔRHI and ΔES (ρ = 0.26–0.27), Δrectal bleeding (ρ = 0.24–0.28), and Δstool frequency (ρ = 0.40–0.42). Correlations between NHI, RHI/Geboes, and ES with symptomatic outcomes were weak (κ = 0.28–0.45). Difference in the mean grouped by achievement of ΔMCS ≥3 suggests MCIDs in ΔNHI and ΔRHI of 1.2 and 8.6, respectively. CONCLUSION(S): The analysis showed weak to moderate agreement between changes in histologic scores and changes in endoscopic scores, and weak to no agreement between changes in histologic scores and changes in laboratory results at week 14. There was a weak correlation between histologic scores and symptoms at the end of induction. MCID results suggest that both the NHI and RHI appear to effectively evaluate neutrophilic resolution, making the changes in score more clinically interpretable.

BACKGROUND: Vedolizumab (VDZ) is a gut-selective, humanized monoclonal antibody approved for moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD). Although VDZ efficacy and safety are well established, there are limited publications on longer-term (>3 years) treatment persistence. This study evaluated VDZ treatment persistence for up to 5 years in a GEMINI long-term safety (LTS) VDZ de novo cohort. METHODS: All patients in GEMINI LTS (NCT00790933) were treated with VDZ every 4 weeks. A post hoc analysis of data from patients not previously treated with VDZ before Week 0 of GEMINI LTS (de novo cohort) was conducted, with VDZ treatment persistence assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Treatment discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs) or lack of efficacy were considered for the analysis; discontinuations due to protocol deviation, patient withdrawal, or loss to follow-up were censored. Treatment persistence analyses were further stratified by Week 12 treatment response (primary response/nonresponder), prior anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) failure (Yes/No), type of anti-TNF failure (primary/secondary nonresponse), and concomitant therapy (corticosteroids, 5-aminosalicylates, immunomodulators, or their combinations) at baseline (Yes/No); a log-rank test assessed statistical differences between subgroups. RESULTS: The GEMINI LTS de novo cohort included 421 patients (UC 190; CD 231) with a mean disease duration of 8.7 (UC) and 10.6 (CD) years, 6.0 mean partial Mayo score (UC) and 11.1 mean Harvey-Bradshaw Index; 61% of patients with UC and 74% with CD had prior anti-TNF failure. Up to 5 years follow-up, 276 patients (66%) total discontinued VDZ: 16% with UC and 17% with CD due to AEs, and 24% with UC and 33% with CD due to lack of efficacy. Survival probabilities for VDZ treatment persistence at 54 months were 53% for UC and 41% for CD. These VDZ 54-month survival probabilities were higher in patients with VDZ treatment response at Week 12 vs without (UC, 60% vs 26%, respectively, P < 0.0001; CD, 42% vs 35%, respectively, P = 0.001) and in patients without prior anti-TNF failure vs with (UC, 63% vs 47%, respectively, P = 0.046; CD, 47% vs 42%, respectively, P = 0.016). Among patients with baseline anti-TNF failure, survival probabilities for VDZ treatment persistence at 54 months were higher in UC patients who were secondary nonresponders vs those who were primary nonresponders (65% vs 15%, respectively, P < 0.0001); this difference was not observed in CD patients (44% vs 40%, respectively, P = 0.573). There were no differences in survival probabilities of continuing VDZ at 54 months among patients with UC or CD who initiated VDZ therapy with vs without any concomitant medications. CONCLUSION(S): More than half of patients with UC and 4 of every 10 patients with CD persisted on VDZ for 54 months. Treatment persistence rates in UC and CD cohorts were significantly higher in Week 12 responders and patients without prior anti-TNF failure, whereas there were no differences in persistence rates with baseline use of concomitant medications. Vedolizumab discontinuation rates due to AEs were low. These findings from GEMINI LTS support the longer-term effectiveness and safety of VDZ in patients with moderately to severely active UC and CD.

INTRODUCTION: Histologic remission is associated with superior long-term clinical outcomes in ulcerative colitis (UC). VARSITY, the first head-to-head comparison of biologic agents in UC (NCT02497469; EudraCT 2015-000939-33), showed superior clinical remission and endoscopic improvement at Week 52 with vedolizumab (VDZ), a gut-selective, humanized, α 4 β 7 integrin monoclonal antibody, vs adalimumab (ADA), a systemic, human, anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) monoclonal antibody. 1 Both VDZ and ADA were generally safe and well-tolerated. 1 This analysis compared histologic improvements with VDZ vs ADA in VARSITY. METHODS: Patients with moderately to severely active UC were randomized 1:1 to active VDZ intravenous (IV) infusions (300 mg)/placebo subcutaneous (SC) injections or placebo IV/active ADA SC (160/80/40 mg). Prespecified histologic exploratory endpoints included histologic remission (Geboes score < 2 or Robarts Histopathology Index [RHI] score < 3) and minimal histologic disease activity (Geboes score < 3.2 or RHI score < 5) at Week 14 and Week 52. Histologic remission was also assessed based on previous anti-TNF use. RESULTS: A total of 769 patients received ≥1 dose of VDZ (n = 383) or ADA (n = 386). Median (range) duration of exposure was 477 (127, 630) days for VDZ and 420 (71, 454) days for ADA. Mean (standard deviation) baseline histologic disease activity was similar between groups (Geboes: VDZ, 15.0 [4.92]; ADA, 15.1 [5.03]; RHI: VDZ, 19.5 [8.74]; ADA, 19.6 [8.89]). Histologic remission induced by VDZ at Week 52 was greater than with ADA in the overall (Geboes or RHI), anti-TNF naïve (Geboes or RHI), and anti-TNF failure (RHI only) groups (Table 1). Histologic remission at Week 14 favored VDZ over ADA, with larger differentiation when using RHI (Table 1). VDZ also outperformed ADA in achieving minimal histologic disease activity at Weeks 14 and 52 (Table 1). CONCLUSION: VARSITY showed that use of VDZ, compared with ADA, achieved higher rates of histologic remission and minimal histologic disease activity at Weeks 14 and 52 in patients with moderately to severely active UC. These data support the use of VDZ over ADA in UC.

INTRODUCTION: VARSITY is the first head-to-head trial comparing the efficacy and safety of 2 biologic therapies, vedolizumab (VDZ) and adalimumab (ADA), in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). We previously reported significantly higher rates of clinical remission (31.3% vs 22.5%; P = 0.0061) and endoscopic improvement (39.7% vs 27.7%; P = 0.0005) at Week (Wk) 52 with VDZ vs ADA. 1 METHODS: VARSITY was a phase 3b, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled study (NCT02497469; EudraCT 2015-000939-33). Here we report the predefined, exploratory endpoints of early clinical response and clinical remission (defined in the Table 1) within the first 14 wks, as well as durable clinical remission (patients in clinical remission at Wk 14 and Wk 52). RESULTS: A total of 769 patients received ≥1 dose of VDZ (n = 383) or ADA (n = 386). Baseline characteristics were comparable between the 2 groups. A trend for separation in clinical response started to emerge at Wk 6 favoring VDZ vs ADA. Clinical response at Wk 14 favored VDZ vs ADA (257 [67.1%] vs 177 [45.9%]; treatment difference 21.2%). More patients achieved clinical remission at Wk 14 on VDZ vs ADA (102 [26.6%] vs 82 [21.2%]; treatment difference 5.3%). Patients on VDZ achieved higher rates of durable clinical remission (70 [18.3%] vs 46 [11.9%]); laboratory results correlated with these findings. Post hoc analyses showed a larger mean (standard deviation) change of C-reactive protein (CRP) from baseline to Wk 14 (−32.88 [155.77] nmol/L VDZ vs −3.35 [260.81] nmol/L ADA) and to Wk 52 (−50.87 [174.76] nmol/L VDZ vs −37.21 [169.17] nmol/L ADA) in favor of VDZ. Greater mean declines in fecal calprotectin (FCP) levels were seen in patients on VDZ compared with ADA (Wk 14: −1,551.3 [6,236.70] mg/kg VDZ vs −1,167.6 [4,647.67] mg/kg ADA; Wk 52: −2,187.3 [7,440.42] mg/kg VDZ vs −1,846.6 [4,560.55] mg/kg ADA). CONCLUSION: Patients on VDZ had numerically higher rates of both clinical response and clinical remission by Wk 14 compared with ADA. Patients on VDZ also achieved higher rates of durable clinical remission compared with ADA. CRP and FCP results correlated with these findings. These data on early clinical response and clinical remission, as well as durable remission, further support the use of VDZ over ADA in patients with moderately to severely active UC.

Objective We evaluated the reliability and responsiveness of available but incompletely validated UC histological disease activity indices using standardised rules for centralised assessment. Design Disease activity was assessed in biopsies collected in a phase II placebo-controlled ozanimod trial by four blinded pathologists using the Geboes (GS) and modified Riley (MRS) scores, the Robarts Histopathology (RHI) and Nancy Histological (NHI) indices and a Visual Analogue Scale. Reliability was assessed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Index responsiveness was evaluated by assessing longitudinal validity (Pearson correlations of changes in index scores and other disease measures), and effect size estimates (standardised effect size (SES)) using two criteria for change (treatment assignment and >2 point decrease in total Mayo Clinic score). Area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve estimates evaluated the probability of the indices to discriminate between treatment and placebo. Results Inter-rater reliability of the histological indices was substantial to almost perfect (ICC>0.61), and responsiveness was moderate to large (SES estimates>0.5); 0.81 (0.52, 1.10), 0.87 (0.58, 1.17), 0.57 (0.30, 0.84) and 0.81 (0.52, 1.09) when treatment assignment was the criterion for change and 1.05 (0.80, 1.31), 1.13 (0.87, 1.39), 0.88 (0.64, 1.12) and 1.06 (0.80, 1.31) for the change in Mayo score criterion for the GS, MRS, RHI and NHI, respectively. The indices had similar drisciminative ability based on AUROC estimates (range 0.608–0.649). Conclusion All four existing histological indices were similarly reliable and responsive based on this dataset.

Background and aim Disease activity for Crohn's disease (CD) and UC is typically defined based on symptoms at a moment in time, and ignores the long-term burden of disease. The aims of this study were to select the attributes determining overall disease severity, to rank the importance of and to score these individual attributes for both CD and UC. Methods Using a modified Delphi panel, 14 members of the International Organization for the Study of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IOIBD) selected the most important attributes related to IBD. Eighteen IOIBD members then completed a statistical exercise (conjoint analysis) to create a relative ranking of these attributes. Adjusted utilities were developed by creating proportions for each level within an attribute. Results For CD, 15.8% of overall disease severity was attributed to the presence of mucosal lesions, 10.9% to history of a fistula, 9.7% to history of abscess and 7.4% to history of intestinal resection. For UC, 18.1% of overall disease severity was attributed to mucosal lesions, followed by 14.0% for impact on daily activities, 11.2% C reactive protein and 10.1% for prior experience with biologics. Overall disease severity indices were created on a 100-point scale by applying each attribute's average importance to the adjusted utilities. Conclusions Based on specialist opinion, overall CD severity was associated more with intestinal damage, in contrast to overall UC disease severity, which was more dependent on symptoms and impact on daily life. Once validated, disease severity indices may provide a useful tool for consistent assessment of overall disease severity in patients with IBD.