Back to Authors

Browne, Gillian

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2116-6555

Mayo Clinic

University of Vermont

Citations 3

The SWI/SNF ATPases Are Required for Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cell Proliferation
Wu, Qiong , Madany, Pasil, Akech, Jacqueline, Dobson, Jason R. , Douthwright, Stephen, Browne, Gillian , Colby, Jennifer L., Bradner, James E. , Pratap, Jitesh , Sluder, Greenfield, Chiosea, Simion I. , Wijnen, André J. van , Stein, Janet L. , Stein, Gary S., Lian, Jane B. , Nickerson, Jeffrey A. , Imbalzano, Anthony N. , van Wijnen, Andre J, Winter, Georg E. , Bhargava, Rohit , van Wijnen, Andre J

Journal of Cellular Physiology | March 24, 2015 | Volume: 230 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 2683-2694

10.1002/jcp.24991 Get It

The Brahma (BRM) and Brahma‐related Gene 1 (BRG1) ATPases are highly conserved homologs that catalyze the chromatin remodeling functions of the multi‐subunit human SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling enzymes in a mutually exclusive manner. SWI/SNF enzyme subunits are mutated or missing in many cancer types, but are overexpressed without apparent mutation in other cancers. Here, we report that both BRG1 and BRM are overexpressed in most primary breast cancers independent of the tumor's receptor status. Knockdown of either ATPase in a triple negative breast cancer cell line reduced tumor formation in vivo and cell proliferation in vitro. Fewer cells in S phase and an extended cell cycle progression time were observed without any indication of apoptosis, senescence, or alterations in migration or attachment properties. Combined knockdown of BRM and BRG1 showed additive effects in the reduction of cell proliferation and time required for completion of cell cycle, suggesting that these enzymes promote cell cycle progression through independent mechanisms. Knockout of BRG1 or BRM using CRISPR/Cas9 technology resulted in the loss of viability, consistent with a requirement for both enzymes in triple negative breast cancer cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 9999: 2683–2694, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Runx1 is associated with breast cancer progression in MMTV‐PyMT transgenic mice and its depletion in vitro inhibits migration and invasion
Browne, Gillian , Taipaleenmäki, Hanna , Bishop, Nicole , Madasu, Sharath C. , Shaw, Leslie M., Wijnen, André J. van , Stein, Janet L. , Lian, Jane B. , van Wijnen, Andre J, Shaw, Leslie M., Stein, Gary S. , van Wijnen, Andre J

Journal of Cellular Physiology | March 20, 2015 | Volume: 230 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 2522-2532

10.1002/jcp.24989 Get It

Runx1 is a transcription factor essential for definitive hematopoiesis, and genetic abnormalities in Runx1 cause leukemia. Runx1 is functionally promiscuous and acts as either an oncogene or tumor suppressor gene in certain epithelial cancers. Recent evidence suggests that Runx1 is an important factor in breast cancer, however, its role remains ambiguous. Here, we addressed whether Runx1 has a specific pathological role during breast cancer progression and show that Runx1 has an oncogenic function. We observed elevated Runx1 expression in a subset of human breast cancers. Furthermore, throughout the course of disease progression in a classical mouse model of breast cancer (i.e., the MMTV‐PyMT transgenic model), Runx1 expression increases in the primary site (mammary gland) and is further upregulated in tumors and distal lung metastatic lesions. Ex vivo studies using tumor epithelial cells derived from these mice express significantly higher levels of Runx1 than normal mammary epithelial cells. The tumor cells exhibit increased rates of migration and invasion, indicative of an aggressive cancer phenotype. Inhibition of Runx1 expression using RNA interference significantly abrogates these cancer‐relevant phenotypic characteristics. Importantly, our data establish that Runx1 contributes to murine mammary tumor development and malignancy and potentially represents a key disease‐promoting and prognostic factor in human breast cancer progression and metastasis. J. Cell. Physiol. 230: 2522–2532, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Targeting of Runx2 by miR-135 and miR-203 Impairs Progression of Breast Cancer and Metastatic Bone Disease
Taipaleenmäki, Hanna , Browne, Gillian , Akech, Jacqueline, Zustin, Jozef , Wijnen, André J. van , Stein, Janet L. , Hesse, Eric , Stein, Gary S., Lian, Jane B. , van Wijnen, Andre J, van Wijnen, Andre J

Cancer Research | January 29, 2015 | Volume: 75 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1433-1444

10.1158/0008-5472.can-14-1026 Get It

Abstract Progression of breast cancer to metastatic bone disease is linked to deregulated expression of the transcription factor Runx2. Therefore, our goal was to evaluate the potential for clinical use of Runx2-targeting miRNAs to reduce tumor growth and bone metastatic burden. Expression analysis of a panel of miRNAs regulating Runx2 revealed a reciprocal relationship between the abundance of Runx2 protein and two miRNAs, miR-135 and miR-203. These miRNAs are highly expressed in normal breast epithelial cells where Runx2 is not detected, and absent in metastatic breast cancer cells and tissue biopsies that express Runx2. Reconstituting metastatic MDA-MB-231-luc cells with miR-135 and miR-203 reduced the abundance of Runx2 and expression of the metastasis-promoting Runx2 target genes IL11, MMP-13, and PTHrP. In addition, tumor cell viability was decreased and migration suppressed in vitro. Orthotopic implantation of MDA-MB-231-luc cells delivered with miR-135 or miR-203, followed by an intratumoral administration of the synthetic miRNAs, reduced the tumor growth and spontaneous metastasis to bone. Furthermore, intratibial injection of these miRNA-delivered cells impaired tumor growth in the bone environment and inhibited bone resorption. Importantly, reconstitution of Runx2 in MDA-MB-231-luc cells delivered with miR-135 and miR-203 reversed the inhibitory effect of the miRNAs on tumor growth and metastasis. Thus, we have identified that aberrant expression of Runx2 in aggressive tumor cells is related to the loss of specific Runx2-targeting miRNAs and that a clinically relevant replacement strategy by delivery of synthetic miRNAs is a candidate for a therapeutic approach to prevent metastatic bone disease by this route. Cancer Res; 75(7); 1433–44. ©2015 AACR.