Back to Authors

Akech, Jacqueline

Mayo Clinic

University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School

Citations 3

The SWI/SNF ATPases Are Required for Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cell Proliferation
Wu, Qiong , Madany, Pasil, Akech, Jacqueline, Dobson, Jason R. , Douthwright, Stephen, Browne, Gillian , Colby, Jennifer L., Bradner, James E. , Pratap, Jitesh , Sluder, Greenfield, Chiosea, Simion I. , Wijnen, André J. van , Stein, Janet L. , Stein, Gary S., Lian, Jane B. , Nickerson, Jeffrey A. , Imbalzano, Anthony N. , van Wijnen, Andre J, Winter, Georg E. , Bhargava, Rohit , van Wijnen, Andre J

Journal of Cellular Physiology | March 24, 2015 | Volume: 230 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 2683-2694

10.1002/jcp.24991 Get It

The Brahma (BRM) and Brahma‐related Gene 1 (BRG1) ATPases are highly conserved homologs that catalyze the chromatin remodeling functions of the multi‐subunit human SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling enzymes in a mutually exclusive manner. SWI/SNF enzyme subunits are mutated or missing in many cancer types, but are overexpressed without apparent mutation in other cancers. Here, we report that both BRG1 and BRM are overexpressed in most primary breast cancers independent of the tumor's receptor status. Knockdown of either ATPase in a triple negative breast cancer cell line reduced tumor formation in vivo and cell proliferation in vitro. Fewer cells in S phase and an extended cell cycle progression time were observed without any indication of apoptosis, senescence, or alterations in migration or attachment properties. Combined knockdown of BRM and BRG1 showed additive effects in the reduction of cell proliferation and time required for completion of cell cycle, suggesting that these enzymes promote cell cycle progression through independent mechanisms. Knockout of BRG1 or BRM using CRISPR/Cas9 technology resulted in the loss of viability, consistent with a requirement for both enzymes in triple negative breast cancer cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 9999: 2683–2694, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Targeting of Runx2 by miR-135 and miR-203 Impairs Progression of Breast Cancer and Metastatic Bone Disease
Taipaleenmäki, Hanna , Browne, Gillian , Akech, Jacqueline, Zustin, Jozef , Wijnen, André J. van , Stein, Janet L. , Hesse, Eric , Stein, Gary S., Lian, Jane B. , van Wijnen, Andre J, van Wijnen, Andre J

Cancer Research | January 29, 2015 | Volume: 75 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 1433-1444

10.1158/0008-5472.can-14-1026 Get It

Abstract Progression of breast cancer to metastatic bone disease is linked to deregulated expression of the transcription factor Runx2. Therefore, our goal was to evaluate the potential for clinical use of Runx2-targeting miRNAs to reduce tumor growth and bone metastatic burden. Expression analysis of a panel of miRNAs regulating Runx2 revealed a reciprocal relationship between the abundance of Runx2 protein and two miRNAs, miR-135 and miR-203. These miRNAs are highly expressed in normal breast epithelial cells where Runx2 is not detected, and absent in metastatic breast cancer cells and tissue biopsies that express Runx2. Reconstituting metastatic MDA-MB-231-luc cells with miR-135 and miR-203 reduced the abundance of Runx2 and expression of the metastasis-promoting Runx2 target genes IL11, MMP-13, and PTHrP. In addition, tumor cell viability was decreased and migration suppressed in vitro. Orthotopic implantation of MDA-MB-231-luc cells delivered with miR-135 or miR-203, followed by an intratumoral administration of the synthetic miRNAs, reduced the tumor growth and spontaneous metastasis to bone. Furthermore, intratibial injection of these miRNA-delivered cells impaired tumor growth in the bone environment and inhibited bone resorption. Importantly, reconstitution of Runx2 in MDA-MB-231-luc cells delivered with miR-135 and miR-203 reversed the inhibitory effect of the miRNAs on tumor growth and metastasis. Thus, we have identified that aberrant expression of Runx2 in aggressive tumor cells is related to the loss of specific Runx2-targeting miRNAs and that a clinically relevant replacement strategy by delivery of synthetic miRNAs is a candidate for a therapeutic approach to prevent metastatic bone disease by this route. Cancer Res; 75(7); 1433–44. ©2015 AACR.
The Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor, Vorinostat, Reduces Tumor Growth at the Metastatic Bone Site and Associated Osteolysis, but Promotes Normal Bone Loss
Pratap, Jitesh , Akech, Jacqueline, Wixted, John J. , Szabo, Gabriela, McGee‐Lawrence, Meghan E. , Bedard, Krystin, Dhillon, Robinder J., Wijnen, André J. van , Stein, Janet L. , Westendorf, Jennifer J., Lian, Jane B. , Hussain, Sadiq , Li, Xiaodong , Stein, Gary S. , van Wijnen, Andre J , McGee-Lawrence, Meghan E

Molecular Cancer Therapeutics | December 15, 2010 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 3210-3220

10.1158/1535-7163.mct-10-0572 Get It

AbstractVorinostat, an oral histone deacetylase inhibitor with antitumor activity, is in clinical trials for hematologic and solid tumors that metastasize and compromise bone structure. Consequently, there is a requirement to establish the effects of vorinostat on tumor growth within bone. Breast (MDA-231) and prostate (PC3) cancer cells were injected into tibias of SCID/NCr mice and the effects of vorinostat on tumor growth and osteolytic disease were assessed by radiography, micro-computed tomography, and histologic and molecular analyses. Vorinostat-treated and control mice without tumors were also examined. Tumor growth in bone was reduced ∼33% by vorinostat with inhibited osteolysis in the first few weeks of the experiment. However, osteolysis became more severe in both the vehicle and vorinostat-treated groups. Vorinostat increased the expression of tumor-derived factors promoting bone resorption, including PTHrP, IL-8, and osteopontin. After 4 weeks of vorinostat therapy, the non–tumor-bearing contralateral femurs and limbs from vorinostat-treated tumor-free SCID mice showed significant bone loss (50% volume density of controls). Thus, our studies indicate that vorinostat effectively inhibits tumor growth in bone, but has a negative systemic effect reducing normal trabecular bone mass. Vorinostat treatment reduces tumor growth in bone and accompanying osteolytic disease as a result of decreased tumor burden in bone. However, vorinostat can promote osteopenia throughout the skeleton independent of tumor cell activity. Mol Cancer Ther; 9(12); 3210–20. ©2010 AACR.