Mehta, Minesh P.

Abstract Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are non-invasive, loco-regional, anti-mitotic treatment modality, based on low intensity alternating electric fields. Efficacy of TTFields in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been demonstrated in multiple in vitro and in vivo models, and in a phase I/II clinical study. TTFields treatment to the brain was safe and extended overall survival in newly-diagnosed glioblastoma patients. The study [NCT02831959] objectives are to test the efficacy, safety and neurocognitive outcomes of TTFields in this patient population. Patients (N=270) with 1-10 brain metastases (BM) from NSCLC are randomized 1:1 to stereotactic radio surgery (SRS) followed by TTFields or supportive care. Patients are followed-up every two months until 2nd intracranial progression. Patients in the control arm may cross over to TTFields at the time of 2nd intracranial progression. Key inclusion criteria: KPS ≥70, 1 inoperable or 2-10 brain lesions amenable to SRS, optimal standard therapy for the extracranial disease, no brain-directed therapy, no signs of significantly increased intracranial pressure, and no electronic implantable devices in the brain. Endpoints included time to 1st intracranial progression or neurological death (primary); time to neurocognitive failure, HVLT, COWAT and TMT); overall survival; radiological response rate; quality-of-life; and adverse events. Treatment comprised continuous TTFields at 150 kHz for > 18 hours/day applied to the brain within 7 days of SRS. The treatment system is a portable medical device allowing normal daily activities. The device delivers TTFields to the brain using 4 Transducer Arrays, which may be covered by a wig or hat. Patients receive the best standard of care for their systemic disease. Statistical Considerations: This is a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. The sample size (N=270) was calculated using a log-rank test (Lakatos 1988 and 2002) with 80% power at a two sided alpha of 0.05 to detect a hazard ratio of 0.57. Citation Format: Minesh Mehta, Vinai Gondi, Manmeet Ahluwalia,, Paul D. Brown. TTFields and radiosurgery for 1 to 10 brain metastases from NSCLC in the phase III METIS study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT151.

Abstract Patients who undergo surgical resection of brain metastases are at significant risk of cavity local recurrence without additional radiation therapy. Postoperative stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a method of focal treatment to the cavity to maximize local control while minimizing the risk of neurocognitive detriment associated with whole brain radiation therapy. Recently published randomized trials have demonstrated the benefit of postoperative SRS in terms of cavity tumor control and preserving neurocognition. However, there are several potential drawbacks with postoperative SRS including a possible increase in symptomatic radiation necrosis because of the need for cavity margin expansion due to target delineation uncertainty, the variable postoperative clinical course and potential delay in administering postoperative SRS, and the theoretical risk of tumor spillage into cerebrospinal fluid at the time of surgery. Preoperative SRS is an alternative paradigm wherein SRS is delivered prior to surgical resection, which may effectively address some of these potential drawbacks. The goal of this review is to examine the rationale, technique, outcomes, evidence, and future directions for the use of SRS as an adjunct to surgical resection. This can be delivered as either preoperative or postoperative SRS with potential advantages and disadvantages to both approaches that will be discussed.

Abstract BACKGROUND The influence of subtotal resection (STR) on neurocognitive function (NCF), quality of life, and symptom burden in glioblastoma is unknown. If bevacizumab preferentially benefits patients with STR is unknown. OBJECTIVE To examine these uncertainties. METHODS NCF and patient reported outcomes (PRO) were prospectively collected in NRG Oncology RTOG 0525 and 0825. Changes in NCF and PRO measures from baseline to prespecified times were examined by Wilcoxon test, and mixed effects longitudinal modeling, to assess differences between patients who received STR vs gross-total resection. Changes were also compared among STR patients on 0825 receiving placebo vs bevacizumab to assess for a preferential therapeutic effect. Overall survival between STR and gross-total resection patients was compared using the Kaplan–Meier method. RESULTS A total of 427 patients were eligible with STR present in 37%. At baseline, patients with STR had worse NCF, worse MD Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor Neurological Factor ratings ( P = .004), and European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire ( P = .002). Longitudinal multivariate analysis associated STR with worse NCF (Hopkins Verbal Learning Test–Revised Delayed Recognition [ P = .048], Trail Making Test Part A [ P = .035], and Controlled Oral Word Association [ P = .049]). One hundred eighty-three STR patients from 0825 were analyzed (89 bevacizumab, 94 placebo); bevacizumab failed to demonstrate improvement in select NCF or PRO measures. CONCLUSION STR patients had worse NCF and PROs before therapy. During adjuvant therapy, STR patients had worse objective NCF, despite accounting for tumor location. STR did not result in a detriment to OS. The addition of bevacizumab did not preferentially improve PRO or NCF outcomes in STR patients.

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a devastating brain tumor with poor prognosis despite advances in surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. Survival of patients with glioblastoma remains poor, with only 1 in 4 patients alive at 2 years, and a 5-year survival rate of about 5%. Recurrence is nearly universal and, after recurrence, prognosis is poor with very short progression-free survival and overall survival (OS). Various salvage chemotherapy strategies have been applied with limited success. Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are a novel treatment modality approved for treatment of either newly diagnosed or recurrent GBM. TTFields therapy involves a medical device and transducer arrays to provide targeted delivery of low intensity, intermediate frequency, alternating electric fields to produce antimitotic effects selective for rapidly dividing tumor cells with limited toxicity. In the phase 3 EF-14 trial, TTFields plus temozolomide provided significantly longer progression-free survival and OS compared with temozolomide alone in patients with newly diagnosed GBM after initial chemoradiotherapy. The addition of TTFields to standard therapy improved median OS from 15.6 to 20.5 months (P=0.04). In the phase 3 EF-11 trial, for recurrent GBM, TTFields provided comparable efficacy as investigator’s choice systemic therapy, with improved patient-reported quality of life and a lower incidence of serious adverse events. Primary toxicity associated with TTFields is skin irritation generally managed with array relocation and topical treatments including antibiotics and steroids. TTFields therapy has demonstrated proven efficacy in management of GBM, including improvement in OS for patients with newly diagnosed GBM, and is under current investigation in other brain and extracranial tumors.