Spiceland, Clayton M.

Introduction Hospitalizations, proton-pump inhibitors (PPI), and systemic antibiotics increase the risk of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in cirrhosis. We compare the risk of CDI with hepatic encephalopathy (HE) medications, hypothesizing that rifaximin may decrease CDI risk. Materials and Methods A retrospective study of hospitalized HE patients treated with lactulose and/or rifaximin at Mayo Clinic Minnesota, Florida, and Arizona from 2008 to 2013 was conducted. Data on demographics, hospitalizations, antibiotics, and PPI use and CDI were gathered. Univariate and multivariable cox models were constructed. Results We found 1,112 hospitalizations in 1,055 unique patients (55 had 1 subsequent readmission, 1 patient had 2); 428 (40.6%) patients were women (median age: 58 years [interquartile range: 52–65]). CDI developed after 66/1,112 (5.9%) hospitalizations within 12 months post-discharge. Lactulose was administered in 21 (31.8%), rifaximin in 5 (7.6%), both in 40 (60.6%) hospitalizations. Systemic antibiotics were used in 28 (42.4%) patients and PPIs in 60 (90.9%) patients.Univariate analysis using medication (with lactulose alone as the reference group) showed rifaximin was not significantly associated with CDI compared with lactulose (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.57, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.57–4.33, p = 0.39). Use of both medications was not significant compared with lactulose (HR: 1.41, 95% CI: 0.84–2.38, p = 0.19). Results were similar after controlling for confounders. Multivariable analysis based on length of stay, age, and gender showed no differences between rifaximin versus lactulose and both versus lactulose. Conclusion There is no significant difference between lactulose and rifaximin on CDI development in HE patients. However, CDI should still be considered when managing diarrhea in HE patients.

Background and Goals: Fidaxomicin is a new antibiotic used to treat Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). Given limited clinical experience with fidaxomicin, we assessed outcomes in a diverse cohort of patients with CDI treated with fidaxomicin. Study: All CDI cases treated with fidaxomicin at 3 referral centers over a 4-year period were included. Response was defined as resolution of diarrhea and recurrence was defined by recurrence of CDI within 8 weeks of the end of treatment. Results: Overall, 81 patients (median age 55.9 y; 53% female; 26% with inflammatory bowel disease) were included. Response occurred in 90%. Responders had fewer prior CDI episodes [median 1 (range, 0 to 8)] than nonresponders [median 2.5 (range, 1 to 8)], P =0.01. Response after a first CDI episode was 100%, 96% after 1 prior episode, and 82% after 2 or more, P =0.02. Recurrence occurred in 19%. Patients without recurrence had fewer prior episodes of CDI [median 1 (range, 0 to 6)] than patients who recurred [median 2 (range, 1 to 8)], P =0.005. Recurrence after a first episode was 0%, 23% after 1 prior episode, and 29% after 2 or more, P =0.005. All patients with inflammatory bowel disease responded either with improvement of symptoms or a negative C. difficile test; 19% recurred. Conclusions: All patients with a first CDI episode treated with fidaxomicin responded with no recurrences. Patients with prior CDI episodes were less likely to respond (especially with more than 1 prior episode) and more likely to recur, suggesting a greater clinical benefit of fidaxomicin earlier in the course of CDI.

Abstract Background: Numerous studies have focused on the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastases. However, to our knowledge, few have sought to examine outcomes in patients who required whole brain radiation and developed radiation-refractory disease. Methods: This study examined the medical records of all non-small cell lung cancer patients who developed brain metastases between 2004 and 2013, required whole brain radiation, and received their cancer treatment at the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. Results: A total of 141 patients, most of whom were symptomatic, met the above criteria. Of these, 33 (23%) did not tolerate a corticosteroid taper and were therefore deemed to have radiation-refractory disease. The median survival of patients with and without radiation-refractory disease was 3.12 and 4.27 months, respectively, (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.65 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.44–0.99]; p =0.04 by log rank test). In a subgroup analysis of patients with radiation-refractory disease ( n =33) and radio-responsive disease ( n =43), median survival was 3.12 and 5.94 months, respectively (HR: 0.43 [95% CI: 0.26–0.70]). Among patients with radiation-refractory disease, 12 received chemotherapy after radiation, and two received erlotinib. Systemic therapy was associated with improved symptoms in two patients but did not appear to improve survival. Conclusion: Non-small cell lung cancer patients with radiation-refractory brain metastases represent a small subgroup who have a short survival and who appear to derive minimal benefit from systemic cancer therapy.

We sought to report incidence, risk factors, and survival related to bowel obstruction in 311 ovarian cancer patients with recurrent disease. A total of 68 (22%) had a documented bowel obstruction during their cancer course, and 49 (16%) developed it after cancer recurrence. Surprisingly, 142 (45%) fit into an “unknown” category (3+ months of data lacking from last contact/death). No risk factors were identified; management included surgery (n = 21), conservative measures (n = 21), and other (n = 7). Documented bowel obstruction was not associated with a statistically significant reduction in survival after cancer recurrence. In conclusion, although bowel obstruction occurs in only a subgroup of patients with ovarian cancer and does not appear to detract from survival after cancer recurrence, limited end-of-life information may be resulting in an underestimation of incidence.