Back to Authors

Grammas, Paula

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2636-3550

Mayo Clinic

Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center

Citations 3

Validation of a Serum Screen for Alzheimer's Disease Across Assay Platforms, Species, and Tissues
O’Bryant, Sid E. , Zhang, Fan , German, Dwight C., Yin, Xiangling, Como, Tori, Reisch, Joan, Huebinger, Ryan M. , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Hall, James , O’Suilleabhain, Padraig , Grammas, Paula , Xiao, Guanghua , Edwards, Melissa , Dickson, Dennis W. , Barber, Robert C. , O'Bryant, Sid

Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease | June 4, 2018 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 1325-1335

10.3233/jad-141041 Get It

Background: There is a significant need for rapid and cost-effective biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) for advancement of clinical practice and therapeutic trials. Objective: The aim of the current study was to cross-validate our previously published serum-based algorithm on an independent assay platform as well as validate across tissues and species. Preliminary analyses were conducted to examine the utility in distinguishing AD from non-AD neurological disease (Parkinson’s disease, PD). Methods: Serum proteins from our previously published algorithm were quantified from 150 AD cases and 150 controls on the Meso Scale Discovery (MSD) platform. Serum samples were analyzed from 49 PD cases and compared to a random sample of 51 AD cases and 62 controls. Support vector machines (SVM) were used to discriminate PD versus AD versus controls. Human and AD mouse model microvessel images were quantified with HAMAMATSU imaging software. Mouse serum biomarkers were assayed via MSD. Results: Analysis of 21 serum proteins from 150 AD cases and 150 controls yielded an algorithm with sensitivity and specificity of 0.90 for correctly classifying AD. This multi-marker approach was then validated across species and tissue. Assay of the top proteins in human and AD mouse model brain microvessels correctly classified 90–100% of the samples. SVM analyses were highly accurate at distinguishing PD versus AD versus controls. Conclusions: This serum-based biomarker panel should be tested in a community-based setting to determine its utility as a first-line screen for AD and non-AD neurological diseases for primary care providers.
Blood‐based biomarkers in Alzheimer disease: Current state of the science and a novel collaborative paradigm for advancing from discovery to clinic
Lista, Simone , Vanderstichele, Hugo, Posner, Holly, Hall, James , Johnson, Leigh , Fong, Y L, Luthman, Johan, Jeromin, Andreas, Batrla‐Utermann, Richard, Villarreal, Alcibiades E. , Britton, Gabrielle B. , Snyder, Peter J. , Henriksen, Kim , Grammas, Paula , Gupta, Veer Bala , Martins, Ralph N. , Hampel, Harald , Area, Biofluid Based Biomarker Professional Interest, O’Bryant, Sid E. , Mielke, Michelle M. , Rissman, Robert A. , Zetterberg, Henrik , Lewczuk, Piotr , Area, Biofluid Based Biomarker Professional Interest

Alzheimer's & Dementia | November 18, 2016 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 45-58

10.1016/j.jalz.2016.09.014 Get It

AbstractThe last decade has seen a substantial increase in research focused on the identification of blood‐based biomarkers that have utility in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Blood‐based biomarkers have significant advantages of being time‐ and cost‐efficient as well as reduced invasiveness and increased patient acceptance. Despite these advantages and increased research efforts, the field has been hampered by lack of reproducibility and an unclear path for moving basic discovery toward clinical utilization. Here we reviewed the recent literature on blood‐based biomarkers in AD to provide a current state of the art. In addition, a collaborative model is proposed that leverages academic and industry strengths to facilitate the field in moving past discovery only work and toward clinical use. Key resources are provided. This new public‐private partnership model is intended to circumvent the traditional handoff model and provide a clear and useful paradigm for the advancement of biomarker science in AD and other neurodegenerative diseases.
Guidelines for the standardization of preanalytic variables for blood‐based biomarker studies in Alzheimer's disease research
O’Bryant, Sid E. , Gupta, Veer Bala , Henriksen, Kim , Jeromin, Andreas, Lista, Simone , Bazenet, Chantal, Soares, Holly , Lovestone, Simon , Hampel, Harald , Montine, Thomas J. , Blennow, Kaj , Foroud, Tatiana, Carrillo, María C. , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Laske, Christoph , Breteler, Monique M.B. , Shaw, Leslie M. , Trojanowski, John Q. , Schupf, Nicole , Fagan, Anne M. , Oberoi, Pankaj, Umek, Robert M., Weiner, Michael W. , Grammas, Paula , Posner, Holly, Martins, Ralph N. , groups, STAR-B and BBBIG working, Edwards, Melissa , Rissman, Robert A. , groups, STAR-B and BBBIG working, O'Bryant, Sid

Alzheimer's & Dementia | October 1, 2014 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 549-560

10.1016/j.jalz.2014.08.099 Get It

Abstract The lack of readily available biomarkers is a significant hindrance toward progressing to effective therapeutic and preventative strategies for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Blood‐based biomarkers have potential to overcome access and cost barriers and greatly facilitate advanced neuroimaging and cerebrospinal fluid biomarker approaches. Despite the fact that preanalytical processing is the largest source of variability in laboratory testing, there are no currently available standardized preanalytical guidelines. The current international working group provides the initial starting point for such guidelines for standardized operating procedures (SOPs). It is anticipated that these guidelines will be updated as additional research findings become available. The statement provides (1) a synopsis of selected preanalytical methods utilized in many international AD cohort studies, (2) initial draft guidelines/SOPs for preanalytical methods, and (3) a list of required methodological information and protocols to be made available for publications in the field to foster cross‐validation across cohorts and laboratories.