Back to Authors

Valerio, Ian L.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8573-8810

Mayo Clinic

University of Washington

Citations 2

Peripheral nerve repair throughout the body with processed nerve allografts: Results from a large multicenter study
Safa, Bauback , Jain, Sonu A. , Desai, Mihir J., Greenberg, Jeffrey A., Niacaris, Timothy, Nydick, Jason A. , Leversedge, Fraser J. , Megee, David M., Zoldos, Jozef, Rinker, Brian, McKee, Desirae , MacKay, Brendan J. , Ingari, John V. , Nesti, Leon J. , Cho, Mickey, Valerio, Ian L. , Kao, Dennis S. , El‐Sheikh, Yasser, Weber, Renata V., Shores, Jaimie T. , Styron, Joseph F. , Thayer, Wesley P. , Przylecki, Wojciech, Hoyen, Harry A. , Buncke, Gregory M.

Microsurgery | February 26, 2020 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 527-537

10.1002/micr.30574 Get It

AbstractBackgroundPeripheral nerve damage resulting in pain, loss of sensation, or motor function may necessitate a reconstruction with a bridging material. The RANGER® Registry was designed to evaluate outcomes following nerve repair with processed nerve allograft (Avance® Nerve Graft; Axogen; Alachua, FL). Here we report on the results from the largest peripheral nerve registry to‐date.MethodsThis multicenter IRB‐approved registry study collected data from patients repaired with processed nerve allograft (PNA). Sites followed their own standard of care for patient treatment and follow‐up. Data were assessed for meaningful recovery, defined as ≥S3/M3 to remain consistent with previously published results, and comparisons were made to reference literature.ResultsThe study included 385 subjects and 624 nerve repairs. Overall, 82% meaningful recovery (MR) was achieved across sensory, mixed, and motor nerve repairs up to gaps of 70 mm. No related adverse events were reported. There were no significant differences in MR across the nerve type, age, time‐to‐repair, and smoking status subgroups in the upper extremity (p > .05). Significant differences were noted by the mechanism of injury subgroups between complex injures (74%) as compared to lacerations (85%) or neuroma resections (94%) (p = .03) and by gap length between the <15 mm and 50–70 mm gap subgroups, 91 and 69% MR, respectively (p = .01). Results were comparable to historical literature for nerve autograft and exceed that of conduit.ConclusionsThese findings provide clinical evidence to support the continued use of PNA up to 70 mm in sensory, mixed and motor nerve repair throughout the body and across a broad patient population.
Management of anterolateral thigh free Flap donor site defects with a continuous external tissue expander
Senchenkov, Alex, Agag, Richard L., Lee, Johnson, Patel, Ashit , Valerio, Ian L.

Microsurgery | September 16, 2014 | Volume: 35 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 290-294

10.1002/micr.22326 Get It

Anterolateral thigh (ALT) free flaps can result in donor site wounds that cannot be closed directly, requiring immediate or delayed split‐thickness skin grafting. The use of skin grafts for such wounds can impose postoperative activity restrictions and additional wound morbidity. The purpose of the study was to investigate the efficacy of continuous external tissue expander (CETE) in achieving staged direct closure of these wounds. Outcomes of 20 ALT free flap cases with flap widths up to 15 cm treated with CETE were retrospectively reviewed. Closure of the thigh wounds was achieved in 19 cases with an average expansion time of 9.6 days. The use of a CETE device was effective in achieving staged direct (tertiary) closure and avoiding skin grafting, which further decreased donor site morbidity of large ALT free flap reconstructions. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 35:290–294, 2015.