Graff‐Radford, Jonathan

AbstractBackground and purposeAutoimmune encephalitis (AE) is a potentially treatable cause of rapidly progressive dementia that may mimic Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (CJD). Alzheimer disease (AD) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers may discriminate CJD from AD, but utility in discriminating CJD and AE is unclear. This study compared AD CSF biomarkers in CJD and AE.MethodsPatients with probable or definite CJD and probable or definite AE who underwent Roche Elecsys AD CSF biomarker testing at Mayo Clinic from March 2020 through April 2021 were included. Total‐tau, phosphorylated181 tau and amyloid‐β42 levels were compared.ResultsOf 11 CJD cases, four were autopsy proven; the rest had positive real‐time quaking‐induced conversion testing. Disease‐associated autoantibodies were detected in 8/15 cases of AE: leucine‐rich glioma‐inactivated 1 and neuronal intermediate filaments (two cases each), and N‐methyl‐d‐aspartate receptor, contactin‐associated protein‐like 2, dipeptidyl‐peptidase‐like protein 6 and immunoglobulin‐like cell adhesion molecule IgLON family member 5. Total‐tau provided excellent discrimination between CJD and AE in a univariate model (odds ratio 1.46 per 100 pg/ml, 95% confidence interval 1.17–2.11, p < 0.05, c = 0.93). Total‐tau was elevated in 91% of CJD cases (median > 1300, range 236–>1300 pg/ml), of which 55% were above the limit of assay measurement (>1300 pg/ml). Total‐tau was elevated in 20% of AE cases (median 158, range 80–>1300 pg/ml).ConclusionTotal‐tau was greater in CJD than AE. Given that amyloid‐β42 and phosphorylated181 tau were comparable, the ratio differences were probably driven by elevated total‐tau in CJD. This study supports the role for AD biomarker testing in patients with rapidly progressive dementia.

Abstract Introduction : Plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) may be associated with amyloid burden, neurodegeneration, and stroke but its specificity for Alzheimer's disease (AD) in the general population is unclear. We examined associations of plasma GFAP with amyloid and tau positron emission tomography (PET), cortical thickness, white matter hyperintensities (WMH), and cerebral microbleeds (CMBs). Methods : The study included 200 individuals from the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging who underwent amyloid and tau PET and magnetic resonance imaging and had plasma GFAP concurrently assayed; multiple linear regression and hurdle model analyses were used to investigate associations controlling for age and sex. Results : GFAP was associated with amyloid and tau PET in multivariable models. After adjusting for amyloid, the association with tau PET was no longer significant. GFAP was associated with cortical thickness, WMH, and lobar CMBs only among those who were amyloid‐positive. Discussion : This cross‐sectional analysis demonstrates the utility of GFAP as a plasma biomarker for AD‐related pathologies.

AbstractBackgroundUp to 30% of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) cases are due to known pathogenic mutations (f‐FTD). Little is known about the factors that predict who will choose to learn their results. Upcoming clinical trials in f‐FTD may require disclosure prior to enrollment, even before symptom onset, and thus characterizing this sample is important. Furthermore, understanding the mood impacts of genetic disclosure may guide genetic counseling practice.MethodF‐FTD participants (n=568) from families with a known pathogenic mutation (MAPT, C9orf72, GRN) were enrolled through the ARTFL/LEFFTDS Longitudinal FTD Study (ALLFTD) and provided the opportunity for disclosure. Independent‐sample t‐tests compared demographic and psychosocial factors between participants who did and did not receive their results. In participants who were asymptomatic at baseline and follow up (n=199,177 with follow‐up), linear mixed effects modeling was used to investigate pre‐ to post‐disclosure changes in the 15‐item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS).ResultOf participants from families with a known pathogenic genetic mutation, 47% received genetic disclosure. Of the asymptomatic subset (n=386), 36% know their mutation status. Of these asymptomatic learners, 46% received disclosure through the study, and the remainder learned their genetic status prior to study enrollment. None of the analyzed demographic or psychosocial factors (i.e., sex, age, education, having children) differed between learners and non‐learners (p’s > 0.05). In the longitudinal analysis of asymptomatic participants, learners showed a pre‐ to post‐increase of 0.31 GDS points/year (95%CI: ‐0.08, 0.69, p = 0.12), whereas non‐learners showed a slight decline (‐0.15 points/year, 95%CI: ‐0.36, 0.06, p = 0.16). This difference between slopes was statistically significant (0.46, 95%CI: 0.02, 0.89, p=0.04) but represents a small clinical effect. In asymptomatic learners, slopes did not differ based on mutation status (0.28, 95%CI: ‐0.66, 1.20, p=0.55). Conclusions were based on the estimates and full range of confidence intervals.ConclusionThe majority of asymptomatic research participants do not know their genetic status, which will be a consideration for clinical trials that require disclosure. No considered demographic factors were strongly associated with the decision to receive disclosure. The findings suggest that disclosure in asymptomatic participants has minimal impact on depressive symptoms regardless of genetic results.

AbstractBackgroundFrontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) refers to a group of neurodegenerative conditions, affecting the frontal and/or temporal lobes. Ongoing research has provided insight into developing clinical trials for FTLD and key clinical measures such as structural MRI. To inform clinical trial design and optimize participation, it is imperative to explore facilitators and barriers for potential candidates.ObjectiveThe objective of this study is to explore facilitators and barriers to participating in future clinical trials for FTLD.MethodsAdvancing Research and Treatment for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ARTFL) and Longitudinal Evaluation of Familial Frontotemporal Dementia Subjects (LEFFTDS) are observational studies focused on characterizing FTLD syndromes in preparation for clinical trials. The 584 participants enrolled across 18 research sites in the United States and Canada completed a survey assessing interest in clinical trial participation.Results29% of respondents self‐reported as patients (63±10 years), 26% self‐reported as caregivers answering on behalf of patients (65±10 years), and 45% self‐reported as healthy but at risk for FTLD (48±14 years). Travel reimbursement was the most common factor reported to positively influence participation (≧66%), with the healthy but at risk group showing the strongest endorsement (83%). Cost and time involved in travel were possible barriers for about half of the patients (48%) and healthy but at risk respondents (53%). The respondents value receiving feedback on the study findings (≧80%) and being informed of their individual disease progression (≧75%). Particularly, keeping participation confidential was very important for the healthy but at risk group (62%). In regard to research assessments, most participants demonstrated a high interest in physical and neurological exams at a research center (≧87%) whereas only half were interested in doing more invasive procedures such as the lumbar puncture (≧52%). Overall, respondents showed a positive attitude and support for research participation (≧77%) and trusted that their health information would remain confidential in a clinical trial (≧53%).ConclusionsFavorable attitudes and interest towards medical research exist among participants. To optimize participation, clinical trials should allocate funding for travel and involve participants in feedback about study results and their disease progression. Alternatives to invasive assessments may increase participation.

AbstractIntroductionBlood‐based biomarkers of amyloid pathology and neurodegeneration are entering clinical use. It is critical to understand what factors affect the levels of these markers.MethodsPlasma markers (Aβ42, Aβ40, NfL, T‐tau, Aβ42/40 ratio) were measured on the Quanterix Simoa HD‐1 analyzer for 996 Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (MCSA) participants, aged 51 to 95 years. All other data were collected during in‐person MCSA visits or abstracted from the medical record.ResultsAmong cognitively unimpaired (CU) participants, all plasma markers correlated with age. Linear regression models revealed multiple relationships. For example, higher Charlson Comorbidity Index and chronic kidney disease were associated with higher levels of all biomarkers. Some relationships differed between mild cognitive impairment and dementia participants.DiscussionMultiple variables affect plasma biomarkers of amyloid pathology and neurodegeneration among CU in the general population. Incorporating this information is critical for accurate interpretation of the biomarker levels and for the development of reference ranges.

AbstractIntroductionThe prognostic utility of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) phosphorylated tau 217 (p‐tau217) and p‐tau181 is not understood.MethodsAnalyses included 753 Mayo Clinic Study on Aging participants (median age = 71.6; 57% male). CSF amyloid beta (Aβ)42 and p‐tau181 were measured with Elecsys immunoassays. CSF p‐tau181 and p‐tau217 were also measured with Meso Scale Discovery (MSD). We used Cox proportional hazards models for risk of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and linear mixed models for risk of global and domain‐specific cognitive decline and cortical thickness. Analyses were stratified by elevated brain amyloid based on CSF Aβ42 or amyloid positron emission tomography for those with imaging.ResultsCSF p‐tau217 was superior to p‐tau181 for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology. CSF MSD p‐tau181 and p‐tau217 were associated with risk of MCI among amyloid‐positive individuals. Differences between CSF p‐tau measures predicting cortical thickness were subtle.DiscussionThere are subtle differences for CSF p‐tau217 and p‐tau181 as prognostic AD markers.

ABSTRACT Background and Purpose Neurodegeneration of the substantia nigra in Lewy body disease is associated with iron deposition, which increases the magnetic susceptibility of the substantia nigra on MRI. Our objective was to measure iron deposition in the substantia nigra in patients with probable dementia with Lewy bodies (pDLB) and patients who are at risk for pDLB by quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM). Methods Participants included pDLB ( n = 36), mild cognitive impairment with at least one core feature of DLB (MCI‐LB; n = 15), idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (iRBD; n = 11), and an age‐and gender‐matched clinically unimpaired control group ( n = 102). QSM was derived from multi‐echo 3D gradient recalled echo MRI at 3T, and groups were compared on mean susceptibility values of the substantia nigra and its relation to parkinsonism severity. Results Patients with pDLB had higher susceptibility in the substantia nigra compared to controls ( p < 0.001) and MCI‐LB ( p = 0.043). The susceptibility of substantia nigra showed an increasing trend from controls to iRBD and MCI‐LB, and to pDLB ( p < 0.001). Parkinsonism severity was not associated with the mean susceptibility in the substantia nigra in the patient groups. Conclusions Our data suggested that QSM is sensitive to the increased magnetic susceptibility due to higher iron content in the substantia nigra in pDLB. The trend of increasing susceptibility from controls to iRBD and MCI‐LB, and to pDLB suggests that iron deposition in the substantia nigra starts to increase as early as the prodromal stage in DLB and continues to increase as the disease progresses, independent of parkinsonism severity.

AbstractIntroductionWe determined whether cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) neurofilament light (NfL), neurogranin (Ng), and total‐tau (t‐tau) differentially mapped to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures of cortical thickness, microstructural integrity (corpus callosum and cingulum fractional anisotropy [FA]), and white matter hyperintensities (WMH).MethodsAnalyses included 536 non‐demented Mayo Clinic Study of Aging participants with CSF NfL, Ng, t‐tau, amyloid beta (Aβ)42 and longitudinal MRI scans. Linear mixed models assessed longitudinal associations between CSF markers and MRI changes.ResultsHigher CSF NfL was associated with decreasing microstructural integrity and WMH. Higher t‐tau was associated with decreasing temporal lobe and Alzheimer's disease (AD) meta region of interest (ROI) cortical thickness. There was no association between Ng and any MRI measure. CSF Aβ42 interacted with Ng for declines in temporal lobe and AD meta ROI cortical thickness and cingulum FA.DiscussionCSF NfL predicts changes in white matter integrity, t‐tau reflects non‐specific changes in cortical thickness, and Ng reflects AD‐specific synaptic and neuronal degeneration.

AbstractBackgroundRecent evidence has implicated brain networks in the pathophysiology of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). However, the phenotypic variability in AD, inter‐individual differences in tau PET uptake patterns, and dynamic nature of functional connectivity have been relatively neglected. In this talk, I will discuss our recent work linking measures of dynamic brain organization to spatially independent tau PET patterns defined in a phenotypically diverse cohort.MethodsWe identified all Mayo Clinic participants with concurrent amyloid PET (PiB), tau PET (AV1451) and task‐free fMRI (impaired participants were all Aβ+). We used independent component analysis (ICA) to identify spatially independent patterns of tau PET uptake. For the fMRI data, we used a Hidden‐Markov Model (HMM) design to identify distinct patterns of activity/connectivity (‘states’). The ICA and HMM parameters were used to project/segment an independent cohort (ADNI) and subsequent longitudinal timepoints for the Mayo cohort. Multilevel Bayesian regression models were fit in Stan to explore the association between phenotype, component load and brain state.ResultsThe optimal HMM model identified 10 brain states (Figure 1). The optimal ICA decomposition identified 42 tau PET components, of which 13 were potentially related to AD pathobiology (Figure 1). Component loads and brain state dwell time differed between diagnostic groups in both Mayo and ADNI cohorts. One state was much more likely to occur in AD in both cohorts (State 8). Cross‐sectionally, State 8 dwell time was associated with higher tau loads, while higher baseline dwell‐time was predictive of ∆tau in participants with at least 2 timepoints (Figure 2).ConclusionWe found links between dynamics of functional connectivity, tau deposition, and cognitive impairment across the AD spectrum using two different cohorts and longitudinal data. Specifically: 1) our method for characterizing tau PET uptake was able to capture the magnitude and spatial pattern of binding across diverse phenotypes; 2) Our data supports a role for dynamic brain connectivity in cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease; 3) Dynamic connectivity appears to be directly related to AD pathobiology as measured by tau PET. Incorporating the time‐varying nature of connectivity will be important in future studies of connectome‐based disease progression in AD.

AbstractBackgroundThe LEFFTDS Consortium involves investigators at 8 centers in North America evaluating individuals in kindreds with mutations in microtubule associated protein tau (MAPT), progranulin (GRN), or chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9orf72) genes using a standardized battery of measures. Participants are evaluated annually. We sought to determine possible correlations between FTLD disease progression and neuropsychiatric features.MethodThe Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI‐Q) scale is an informant‐based instrument that measures the presence and severity of 12 neuropsychiatric features in patients with dementia. The NPI‐Q was completed at each LEFFTDS visit. The individual NPI questions and total score were analyzed in those with CDR® Dementia Staging Instrument PLUS National Alzheimer Coordinating Center Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (CDR®+ NACC FTLD) ratings of 0 (i.e., clinically normal), 0.5 (i.e., questionably/minimally abnormal), 1, 2, and 3.ResultThe 472 participants enrolled to date with a baseline (Visit 1) assessment have the following characteristics: 261 (55.5%) female, mean age 48 (range 18‐80) years, mean education 16 (range 11‐22) years, and 275 participants with a CDR®+NACC FTLD=0 (58%) and known genetic status. Participants with a CDR®+NACC FTLD=0 plus a genetic mutation were compared to those without a mutation and found to have increased severity of apathy (mean score of 0.116 versus 0.035, p=0.0302). Regardless of the specific mutation, those with a CDR®+NACC FTLD=0.5 were reported to have increased severity of apathy, disinhibition, and irritability. For most domains, mean NPI‐Q severity scores increase between groups up to CDR®+NACC FTLD=2. Depression increases in severity up to CDR®+NACC FTLD=1, whereas apathy severity continues to increase with increasing disease severity through CDR®+NACC FTLD=3. Twenty participants converted from CDR®+NACC FTLD 0 to >0 between their baseline and most recent visit; apathy severity almost tripled in these participants. For those that converted, disinhibition, irritability, and NPI total score were different between baseline and most recent visit (Wilcoxon signed rank test, p<0.05).ConclusionKey neuropsychiatric features measured by the NPI‐Q demonstrate differences in apathy severity between clinically normal mutation vs non‐mutation carriers. Key domains differ at different levels of FTLD severity and show dynamic changes with increasing level of FTLD severity. Supported by AG063911, AG045390, NS092089, AG016976.