Castle, Erik P.

168 Background: Androgens and estrogens have been shown to play an important role in normal prostate development and function as well as carcinogenesis and development of the castration resistant phenotype of disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a simultaneous administration of an androgen receptor antagonist (bicalutamide) and a selective estrogen receptor modulator (raloxifene) on both androgen sensitive and androgen insensitive prostate cancer cell lines. Methods: Experiments were performed on LNCaP, PC3 and DU145 cell lines. Western blot was utilized for the identification of androgen and estrogen receptors (a andb) in the cell lines. Drug concentrations required to achieve IC 50 were obtained using the MTT assay; such concentrations were identified for the drugs individually and when used in combination. The effect of the drugs on apoptosis was assessed using flow cytometry. Results: Results of the IC 50 for the drugs alone and in combination by each cell line are shown in the table. An enhanced effect was observed when the drugs were used in combination in all the cell lines. It was evident that the combination of the drugs decreased the total drug required to achieve the IC50 decreases considerably. Apoptosis rates were also affected by the simultaneous administration of bicalutamide and raloxifene. The synergistic effect of the combination was reflected in the increase of the apoptosis rate in all cell lines. Conclusions: The simultaneous administration of bicalutamide and raloxifene has a synergistic effect on cell death and apoptosis of DU145, PC3 and LNCaP cell lines. The pathway(s) responsible for this observation may be independent of the androgen receptor as both AR negative cell lines were still affected by the combination over the SERM alone. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

SAGE-Journals-Accessible-Video-Player 10.1089/vid.2016.0030.M1 sj-vid-1-vid-10.1089_vid.2016.0030

AbstractRobotic surgical techniques are now being applied in the setting of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (RPLND) for testicular cancer. While laparoscopic RPLND has not been widely accepted, reports of robot assisted RPLND (RARPLND) are emerging. This manuscript will review the application of RPLND for testicular cancer, evolution of minimally invasive techniques, the controversies, and current status of RARPLND. J. Surg. Oncol. 2015;112:736–740. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Abstract Monoclonal antibodies that target the programmed death-1 (PD-1)–programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) axis have antitumor activity against multiple cancers. The presence of sarcomatoid differentiation in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is associated with resistance to targeted therapy and poor responses to IL2 immunotherapy. Given the aggressive nature of RCC with sarcomatoid differentiation and the exclusion of sarcomatoid histology from metastatic RCC clinical trials, less is understood regarding selection of therapies. Here, we characterized the PD-1/PD-L1 axis in RCC with sarcomatoid differentiation. We directly compared two PD-L1 antibodies and found concordance of PD-L1 positivity in 89% of tested RCCs with sarcomatoid differentiation. Coexpression of PD-L1 on neoplastic cells and the presence of PD-1–positive tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were identified in 50% (13 of 26) of RCCs with sarcomatoid differentiation. In contrast, only 1 of 29 clear cell RCCs (3%) had concurrent expression of PD-L1 and PD-1 (P = 0.002). Our study suggests that RCC with sarcomatoid differentiation may express PD-1/PD-L1 at a higher percentage than RCC without sarcomatoid differentiation, and patients with these tumors may be good candidates for treatment with anti–PD-1/PD-L1 therapies. Cancer Immunol Res; 3(12); 1303–7. ©2015 AACR.

Abstract Background: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common type of kidney cancer responsible for ∼80% of kidney cancer cases. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are emerging as an important prognostic and predictive biomarker in several types of metastatic cancers. However, methods for CTC detection that target only EpCAM and/or cytokeratin (CK) to enrich CTCs, may fail to recognize the CTCs in clear cell RCC (ccRCC) because ccRCC lacks expression of EpCAM. The objective of this study was to develop a new technology capable of detecting CTCs including those with a mesenchymal phenotype in metastatic RCC. Methods: Blood samples from patients affected by metastatic RCC were provided by Mayo Clinic Arizona and analyzed by Creatv MicroTech. CellSieveTM microfilters, which have 7 µm diameter pores in a uniform array, with 160,000 pores in a 9 mm diameter area, were used for separation of CTCs in the blood specimen. 7.5 mL of whole blood was diluted in the prefixation buffer and filtered through the microfilter. Clinical immunohistochemical markers for RCC such as CD10 and vimentin were used to identify candidate CTCs. The cells collected on the filter were fixed, permeabilized, and stained with DAPI and fluorescent antibodies specific to CD10, vimentin, and CD45. The assay protocol was developed using three RCC cell lines, 786-O, Caki-1, and Caki-2, and validated using blood samples from patients with metastatic RCC. Results: The capture efficiencies for 786-O, Caki-1, and Caki-2 cell lines were determined to be 98%, 98% and 97%, respectively. On-filter antibody staining revealed heterogeneous expressions of vimentin and CD10 in RCC cells. Patient samples were collected in duplicate CellSaveTM tubes and processed one day later. A CD10+/vimentin+/CD45- cell population was detected in blood samples with enumeration ranging from 4 to 86 cells/7.5 mL of blood. We found that the RCC CTC profile was distinct from other types of cancers. The typical CTCs display abnormal morphology, including large nuclei (typically 15-30 µm in size), irregular cell size and shape, and high nucleus-to-cytoplasm ratio. Although CD10 and vimentin antibodies have cross-reactivity with white blood cells (WBC), the CTCs could be distinguished from WBC based on morphology, cell size and CD45- staining. Conclusions: We demonstrated that the CellSieveTM microfiltration assay is a very simple and efficient method to isolate a CD10+/vimentin+/CD45- cell population from patients affected by metastatic ccRCC. Future studies include fluorescence in situ hybridization to confirm loss of 3p, a molecular event that occurs in >90% of ccRCC. We are also analyzing blood samples from patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors to determine if cell enumeration is predictive of response to treatment. This technology might greatly facilitate detection of EpCAM negative ccRCC CTCs. The clinical significance of these unusual, large, rod-shaped, naked nuclei require further molecular characterization. Citation Format: Peixuan Zhu, Thai Ho, Erik P. Castle, Richard W. Joseph, Melissa L. Stanton, Shuhong Li, Daniel Adams, Olga V. Makarova, Platte T. Amstutz, Cha-Mei Tang. Isolation and identification of circulating tumor cells in renal cell carcinoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 3081. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-3081

SAGE-Journals-Accessible-Video-Player 10.1089/vid.2015.0007.M1 sj-vid-1-vid-10.1089_vid.2015.0007

Purpose: To determine whether on-clamp partial nephrectomy (ON-PN) has any significant impact on long-term renal function in a two kidney model. Patients and Methods: From November 1999 to July 2013, 607 patients underwent PN at our institution. After excluding patients with solitary kidneys, multiple renal masses, and follow-up less than 90 days, 331 remained. Patient demographics were assessed, as was renal function based on pre- and postoperative mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG-3) renal scans and change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the preoperative and most recent recorded creatinine levels. Results: There were a total of 236 patients who underwent ON-PN and 95 who underwent off-clamp PN (OFF-PN) during the study period. The longest follow-up was 12.6 years with mean follow-up of 3 years. Mean ischemia time of patients undergoing ON-PN was 25 minutes (range 8–63 min). No differences were noted between the ON-PN and OFF-PN cohorts with respect to estimated change in eGFR (ON-PN: −6.07 mL/min/1.73 m 2 vs OFF-PN: −6.00 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , P =0.69). No differences were noted in the % change in the MAG-3 renal scans (ON-PN: −0.77% vs OFF-PN: −1.1%, P =0.94). A post hoc sensitivity analysis of the same two variables stratified by age revealed no differences in change in estimated GFR or % change in differential function on renal scan. Conclusions: In the two kidney model, ischemia does not appear to affect long-term renal function outcomes after PN. These data provide evidence that ON-PN is perfectly acceptable in the appropriately selected patient with two kidneys.