Back to Authors

Abdul-Muhsin, Haidar M.

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic Hospital

Citations 3

From Generation to Collaboration: Using LLMs to Edit for Empathy in Healthcare
Luo, Man, Bahareh, Bahareh, Tariq, Amara, Abbas, Halim, Ghaffar, Umar, Warren, Christopher J, Kolade, Segun O., Abdul-Muhsin, Haidar M., Tariq, Amara , Ghaffar, Umar , Warren, Christopher J. , Kolade, Segun O.

No container title available | July 14, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.21203/rs.3.rs-10022883/v1 Get It

Abstract Clinical empathy is essential for patient care, but physicians need continually balance emotional warmth with factual precision under the cognitive and emotional constraints of clinical practice. This study investigates how large language models (LLMs) can function as empathy editors, refining physicians’ written responses to enhance empathetic tone while preserving underlying medical information. More importantly, we introduce novel quantitative metrics, an Empathy Ranking Score and a MedFactChecking Score to systematically assess both emotional and factual quality of the responses. Experimental results show that LLM-edited responses significantly increase perceived empathy while preserving factual accuracy compared with fully LLM-generated outputs. These findings suggest that using LLMs as editorial assistants, rather than autonomous generators , offers a safer, more effective pathway to empathetic and trustworthy AI-assisted healthcare communication.
Robot Assisted Surgery of the Vena Cava: Perioperative Outcomes, Technique, and Lessons Learned at The Mayo Clinic
Navaratnam, Anojan , Abdul-Muhsin, Haidar , Eversman, Sarah, Moss, Adyr A. , Eversman, William G. , Stone, William M., Money, Samuel R., Davila, Victor J. , Castle, Erik P., Rose, Kyle M., Navaratnam, Anojan K, Abdul-Muhsin, Haidar M., Faraj, Kassem S, Eversman, Sarah A, Rose, Kyle , Faraj, Kassem

Journal of Endourology | October 5, 2019 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1009-1016

10.1089/end.2019.0429 Get It

Introduction: This study aims to describe robot assisted surgery of the inferior vena cava (IVC) by assessing techniques utilized, perioperative outcomes, complications, and long-term patency of the IVC. Methods: A retrospective review was performed on all robotic surgeries involving dissection and repair of the IVC at our institution. Patient characteristics, operative reports, and follow-up visits were analyzed. Preoperative and postoperative imaging was independently reviewed by a single radiologist to determine changes in IVC diameter. Complications were analyzed according to early (<30 days) vs late (>30 days). Results: Thirty-four patients underwent robot assisted surgery of the vena cava from 2008 to 2018. Twenty-six cases were performed for urologic malignancy, four were performed for IVC filter explantation, and four renal vein transpositions were performed for nutcracker syndrome. Twenty-four of the 26 patients with urologic malignancy underwent radical nephrectomy with IVC tumor thrombectomy. Three cases were converted to open. Median length of stay was two nights, and mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 375 mL. There were five complications, ranging from Clavien-Dindo grade II–IIIa, four of which were early complications. No patients required return to the operating room, and there were no perioperative mortalities. IVC diameter was reduced by 41% on axial diameter, with no patients experiencing compromised venous return. Conclusion: Robot assisted surgery offers the advantage of minimally invasive surgery with the ability to apply open surgical principles. In our series, an experienced multidisciplinary team approach yielded low EBL, short length of stay, and low complication rates.
Robot‐assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in testicular cancer
Abdul‐Muhsin, Haidar , L’Esperance, James O., Fischer, Kimberly, Porter, James , Castle, Erik P., Abdul-Muhsin, Haidar M., Woods, Michael E.

Journal of Surgical Oncology | September 10, 2015 | Volume: 112 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 736-740

10.1002/jso.24018 Get It

AbstractRobotic surgical techniques are now being applied in the setting of retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (RPLND) for testicular cancer. While laparoscopic RPLND has not been widely accepted, reports of robot assisted RPLND (RARPLND) are emerging. This manuscript will review the application of RPLND for testicular cancer, evolution of minimally invasive techniques, the controversies, and current status of RARPLND. J. Surg. Oncol. 2015;112:736–740. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.