Zhang, Jie

Introduction: Quality of life changes can occur following procedural interventions and subarachnoid hemorrhage in unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA). The International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms conducted quality of life assessment using the Mini-Mental State Exam, Rankin Score, and Barthel Index at baseline and the Telephone Interview Cognitive Status Exam (TICS), Rankin Score, and Barthel Index at follow-up. Hypothesis: The purpose of this analysis was to compare the 1 year and 5 year outcome in the treatment cohorts (surgery and endovascular) with those of the untreated subgroup. Methods: Patients were subdivided into the initial treated and untreated cohorts based upon observation or treatment practices in 61 centers from 1991-1998. 1691 patients were in the observational cohort and 2388 in the treated cohort. The cohorts were followed annually with measures of neurological status, Rankin Scale, Barthel Index and cognition (TICS). Outcomes were determined prospectively. Comparison of outcomes was done using continuous and categorical data. Covariate adjustment was done using general linear models. Stratified analysis was done by Rankin Score at the time of follow-up. Results: The percent of patients with a Barthel Index score of less than 60 at 1 year in the cohort was 9.4% (treated patients, 9.7%; untreated patients, 9.2%). The percent of patients at year 1 with a score of greater than 90 was 87.6%, 87.4% for treated patients and 87.8% for untreated patients. The percent of patients with a Barthel Index score of less than 60 at 5 years in the cohort was 41.4% (treated patients, 41.4%; untreated patients, 41.4%). The percent of patients at year 5 with a score of greater than 90 was 56.3%, 56.1% for treated patients and 56.5% for untreated patients. TICS and Barthel Index scores were significantly associated with each other for patients with Rankin Scores 0-2 (P<0.0001). This was seen at both year 1 and year 5 follow-up, but not for patients with Rankin Score 3-5. At both 1 year and 5 year follow-up, after controlling for Rankin Score, the distribution of Barthel Index scores of untreated patients and treated patients did not significantly differ. At both the 1 year follow-up, baseline Rankin Score, TICS and follow-up Rankin Score were significant predictors of Barthel Score (P<0.0001). At 5 years, only the follow-up Rankin Score was associated with Barthel Score (P<0.0001). Conclusions: Barthel Index Score decreased over time, but does not differ with treatment. The Rankin Score was the main predictor at follow-up of Barthel Index Score distribution.

INTRODUCTION: The decision regarding whether to perform an interventional procedure as a strategy to prevent hemorrhage of an unruptured intracranial aneurysm (UIA) requires careful consideration of procedural risk and the UIA natural history. No randomized trial data are available. The International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms (ISUIA) included a prospective cohort, examining hemorrhage risk and treatment risk. Hypothesis: The purpose of this analysis was to compare the factors related to treatment selection and determination of the number of hemorrhages prevented. Methods: Patients were allocated into the initial treatment and untreated cohorts based upon observation or treatment practices in 61 centers from 1991-1998. 1691 patients were in the observational cohort, 471 were in the endovascular cohort and 1917 patients were in the surgical cohort. The cohorts were followed for a median follow-up of 9.2 years. Outcomes were determined prospectively and with central review. The data were grouped together and analyzed to determine treatment decisions. A Cox proportional hazards model predicting hemorrhage developed in the observation cohort and was applied to the surgery and endovascular cohorts across the follow-up period. Results: Significant baseline variable differences between treated and observed patients were aneurysm size, symptoms, age, prior SAH group, geographical region, treatment percentage, aneurysm daughter sacs or multiple lobes, and history of hypertension, smoking and myocardial infarction. Aneurysm site and family history were not significant. Site, size, and aspirin use were significant predictors of hemorrhage. Long-term the predicted hemorrhage rates were 6.7% at 5 years and 8.0% at 10 years in the surgery group and 8.1% and 9.6% for the endovascular group, respectively. For comparison the rates in the observed cohort were 4.1% and 4.8%, respectively. Conclusions: Decisions for treatment are influenced by patient characteristics such as age and medical history, aneurysm characteristics such as size and morphology and center and regional practices. Patients in the treated cohorts were at moderately increased risk for hemorrhage compared to those in the observed cohort.

Object The aim of this study was to determine age-related differences in short-term (1-year) outcomes in patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs). Methods Four thousand fifty-nine patients prospectively enrolled in the International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms were categorized into 3 groups by age at enrollment: < 50, 50–65, and > 65 years old. Outcomes assessed at 1 year included aneurysm rupture rates, combined morbidity and mortality from aneurysm procedure or hemorrhage, and all-cause mortality. Periprocedural morbidity, in-hospital morbidity, and poor neurological outcome on discharge (Rankin scale score of 3 or greater) were assessed in surgically and endovascularly treated groups. Univariate and multivariate associations of each outcome with age were tested. Results The risk of aneurysmal hemorrhage did not increase significantly with age. Procedural and in-hospital morbidity and mortality increased with age in patients treated with surgery, but remained relatively constant with increasing age with endovascular treatment. Poor neurological outcome from aneurysm- or procedure-related morbidity and mortality did not differ between management groups for patients 65 years old and younger, but was significantly higher in the surgical group for patients older than 65 years: 19.0% (95% confidence interval [CI] 13.9%–24.4%), compared with 8.0% (95% CI 2.3%–13.6%) in the endovascular group and 4.2% (95% CI 2.3%–6.2%) in the observation group. All-cause mortality increased steadily with increasing age, but differed between treatment groups only in patients < 50 years of age, with the surgical group showing a survival advantage at 1 year. Conclusions Surgical treatment of UIAs appears to be safe, prevents 1-year hemorrhage, and may confer a survival benefit in patients < 50 years of age. However, surgery poses a significant risk of morbidity and death in patients > 65 years of age. Risk of endovascular treatment does not appear to increase with age. Risks and benefits of treatment in older patients should be carefully considered, and if treatment is deemed necessary for patients older than 65 years, endovascular treatment may be the best option.