Gardner, Matthew R.

AbstractThe discrimination of ventricular tachycardia (VT) versus supraventricular wide complex tachycardia (SWCT) via 12‐lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is crucial for achieving appropriate, high‐quality, and cost‐effective care in patients presenting with wide QRS complex tachycardia (WCT). Decades of rigorous research have brought forth an expanding arsenal of applicable manual algorithm methods for differentiating WCTs. However, these algorithms are limited by their heavy reliance on the ECG interpreter for their proper execution. Herein, we introduce the Mayo Clinic ventricular tachycardia calculator (MC‐VTcalc) as a novel generalizable, accurate, and easy‐to‐use means to estimate VT probability independent of ECG interpreter competency. The MC‐VTcalc, through the use of web‐based and mobile device platforms, only requires the entry of computerized measurements (i.e., QRS duration, QRS axis, and T‐wave axis) that are routinely displayed on standard 12‐lead ECG recordings.

Background: We examined patient interest in a telehealth model in which the patient supplies the hardware and Internet connectivity to meet with a healthcare provider from his or her home via video call (video appointment). We hoped to understand prospectively the desirability, feasibility, and viability from the patient perspective. Materials and Methods: A phone survey was conducted of a random sample of patients who had been seen in the outpatient setting at a single institution. The sample was stratified by proximity to the local institution with oversampling for patients living outside a 120-mile radius. Results: Out of 500 total patients, 301 patients responded, and 263 met the inclusion criteria. Of those 263 respondents, 38% indicated “very likely” to accept an invitation to see their provider via video, 28.1% “somewhat likely,” and 33.8% “not at all likely.” Of respondents, 75% have broadband, although only 36% reported having a Web camera. The primary factors affecting willingness to participate in a video appointment include comfort in setting up a video call, age, and distance participants would have traveled for an in-clinic appointment. Conclusions: Patient survey data indicate that most patients are likely to be accepting of telehealth care to the home using video call and that most have the required technology. Nevertheless, there are still significant hurdles to effectively implement this adaptation of telehealth care as part of mainstream practice.