Andrews, Paul E.

Objectives To comprehensively review the available literature on prehabilitation and rehabilitation exercise, nutrition, and psychological support interventions for patients with kidney cancer (KC), to summarise the clinically relevant efficacy and cost‐effectiveness of interventions, to expose key knowledge gaps, and to inform future investigations and initiatives. Methods This review was performed according to the per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) Extension for Scoping Reviews Guidelines. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing programmes of prehabilitation or rehabilitation, exercise, psychological support, or nutrition components in patients with KC or KC caregivers from January 2004 to March 2022. Statistically significant positive (SS+) and negative (SS−) results were summarised. Results The systematic search yielded 10 968 records including 18 RCTs, involving 2774 unique subjects, 706 of whom were KC patients/survivors. None included caregivers or assessed cost‐effectiveness. Two interventions were implemented before surgery, one was implemented prior to initiation of systemic therapy, eight were implemented during systemic or radiation therapy, three were implemented after treatment, while implementation time was not specified for four interventions. Conclusion Most (14/18) RCTs involving exercise, nutrition, psychological support, or prehabilitative or rehabilitative programmes for KC performed to date demonstrated SS+ results. The evidence was most robust regarding previously evaluated psychological support, especially mindfulness‐based interventions (9/10 studies demonstrating SS+ improvement in primary outcomes), followed by therapeutically valid exercise with/without psychological support (5/8 RCTs demonstrated efficacy), then nutrition or pharmacological interventions (2/5 demonstrated efficacy). Level 1 evidence supports counselling patients and referral to mindfulness‐based psychological therapy along with physical therapy or physical medicine and rehabilitation, as well as consideration of preoperative carbohydrate drinks. No studies have examined impact on caregivers, or cost‐effectiveness, which are both critical areas for future study.

BACKGROUND: Although most transplant centers preferentially offer minimally invasive approaches to donor nephrectomies, there remains less standardization specific to the kidney extraction site. This study aimed to evaluate incisional hernia occurrence in living kidney donors based on kidney extraction site location. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective study of all donors who underwent minimally invasive living donor nephrectomies at the Mayo Clinic Arizona between 2011 and 2023 with a 2-year external validation cohort from Mayo Clinic Florida and Mayo Clinic Minnesota. The cohort was divided into 2 groups based on the kidney extraction site type: midline infraumbilical and Pfannenstiel. RESULTS: In the primary cohort, incisional hernia occurrence was observed in 1.2% of donors with an infraumbilical midline kidney extraction site compared with 0.1% with a Pfannenstiel extraction site (p = 0.04). Donors with an infraumbilical midline kidney extraction site were more likely to be men (50.8% vs 23.3%, p < 0.0001), have a higher BMI (mean 27.2 vs 26 kg/m2, p < 0.0001), and have current or former tobacco use (p = 0.002). There were no differences in incisional hernia occurrence when comparing minimally invasive surgical techniques (p = 0.52). In the external validation cohort, hernia occurrence was observed in 4.5% of donors with a midline incision compared with 0.0% with a Pfannenstiel incision (p = 0.09). Using combined data from the 3 sites, the use of a Pfannenstiel incision as the extraction site was associated with significantly lower odds of developing a hernia compared with the infraumbilical midline incision (odds ratio 0.06, 95% CI 0.008 to 0.456). CONCLUSIONS: Although the risk of hernia in living kidney donors is generally low, the use of a Pfannenstiel incision for kidney extraction appears to offer an additional incremental reduction in risk.

Purpose: To determine whether on-clamp partial nephrectomy (ON-PN) has any significant impact on long-term renal function in a two kidney model. Patients and Methods: From November 1999 to July 2013, 607 patients underwent PN at our institution. After excluding patients with solitary kidneys, multiple renal masses, and follow-up less than 90 days, 331 remained. Patient demographics were assessed, as was renal function based on pre- and postoperative mercaptoacetyltriglycine (MAG-3) renal scans and change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the preoperative and most recent recorded creatinine levels. Results: There were a total of 236 patients who underwent ON-PN and 95 who underwent off-clamp PN (OFF-PN) during the study period. The longest follow-up was 12.6 years with mean follow-up of 3 years. Mean ischemia time of patients undergoing ON-PN was 25 minutes (range 8–63 min). No differences were noted between the ON-PN and OFF-PN cohorts with respect to estimated change in eGFR (ON-PN: −6.07 mL/min/1.73 m 2 vs OFF-PN: −6.00 mL/min/1.73 m 2 , P =0.69). No differences were noted in the % change in the MAG-3 renal scans (ON-PN: −0.77% vs OFF-PN: −1.1%, P =0.94). A post hoc sensitivity analysis of the same two variables stratified by age revealed no differences in change in estimated GFR or % change in differential function on renal scan. Conclusions: In the two kidney model, ischemia does not appear to affect long-term renal function outcomes after PN. These data provide evidence that ON-PN is perfectly acceptable in the appropriately selected patient with two kidneys.

Objective To determine if massive renal size should be a contraindication for attempting a laparoscopic approach to bilateral native nephrectomies in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease ( ADPKD ). Patients and Methods We retrospectively reviewed all laparoscopic bilateral nephrectomies performed for ADPKD at our institution from 1 J anuary 2000 to 31 D ecember 2012. We stratified patients by kidney weight (with or without at least one kidney weighing >2500 g) and compared perioperative data, complications, and status of kidney allografts. Additionally, the subset of patients with at least one kidney weighing >3500 g was compared with the rest of the cohort. Results We identified 68 patients; mean (range) individual kidney weight was 1984 (197–5042) g. In all, 24 patients had at least one kidney weighing >2500 g, yet patients in this group were not significantly different from the rest of the cohort for complications, estimated blood loss, transfusion rate, or duration of hospitalisation. For those who underwent simultaneous renal allotransplantation, native kidney size was not associated with graft outcomes. Additionally, of the six patients with at least one kidney weighing >3500 g, only one required a blood transfusion, and the group had no intraoperative or postoperative Clavien grade ≥3 complications. None of the cohort required conversion to open surgery. Conclusion Massive size of polycystic kidneys is not a contraindication to attempting a laparoscopic approach to bilateral nephrectomies in an experienced, high‐volume centre.

Objective To evaluate outcomes of the first 18 patients treated with robot‐assisted retroperitoneal lymph node dissection ( RA‐RPLND ) for non‐seminomatous germ cell tumours ( NSGCT ) and paratesticular rhabdomyosarcoma ( RMS ) at our institution. Patients and Methods Between M arch 2008 and M ay 2013, 17 patients underwent RA‐RPLND for NSGCT and one for paratesticular RMS . Data were collected retrospectively on patient demographics, preoperative tumour characteristics, and perioperative outcomes including open conversion rate, lymph node ( LN ) yield, rate of positive LNs , operative time, estimated blood loss ( EBL ), and length of stay ( LOS ). Perioperative outcomes were compared between patients receiving primary RA‐RPLND vs post‐chemotherapy RA‐RPLND . Medium‐term outcomes of tumour recurrence rate and maintenance of antegrade ejaculation were recorded. Results RA‐RPLND was completed robotically in 15 of 18 (83%) patients. LNs were positive in eight of 18 patients (44%). The mean LN yield was 22 LNs . For cases completed robotically, the mean operative time was 329 min, EBL was 103 mL, and LOS was 2.4 days. At a mean (range) follow‐up of 22 (1–58) months, there were no retroperitoneal recurrences and two of 17 (12%) patients with NSGCT had pulmonary recurrences. Antegrade ejaculation was maintained in 91% of patients with a nerve‐sparing approach. Patients receiving primary RA‐RPLND had shorter operative times compared with those post‐chemotherapy (311 vs 369 min, P = 0.03). There was no significant difference in LN yield (22 vs 18 LNs , P = 0.34), EBL (100 vs 313 mL, P = 0.13), or LOS (2.75 vs 2.2 days, P = 0.36). Conclusion This initial selected case series of RA‐RPLND shows that the procedure is safe, reproducible, and feasible for stage I – IIB NSGCT and RMS in the hands of experienced robotic surgeons. Larger studies are needed to confirm the diagnostic and therapeutic utility of this technique.

SAGE-Journals-Accessible-Video-Player 10.1089/vid.2013.0079.M1 sj-vid-1-vid-10.1089_vid.2013.0079