Background: Statins have been associated with a reduced risk of primary liver cancer (PLC), primarily hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the optimal use for effective protection and whether benefits vary by patient characteristics remain unclear. We evaluated the association between statin use and PLC risk in metabolic-dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), considering cumulative exposure and potential effect modifiers. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Veteran Affairs electronic health records. Patients with chronically elevated liver enzymes and metabolic dysfunction, without other chronic liver diseases, were identified between 2007 and 2009 and followed through 2019 for incident PLC. Statin exposure was assessed at baseline and during the follow-up, with dose standardization by LDL-lowering potency (simvastatin-equivalent units). Time to PLC was analyzed using Cox models adjusted for covariates, considering potential interactions. Results: Among 329,577 patients (92% male; median age 62 years), 0.82% developed PLC (median follow-up of 9.7 years). Baseline statin use showed a significantly lower PLC risk (adjusted hazard ratio 0.64; 95% CI, 0.57–0.71; p < 0.0001). No significant interaction was observed with age, sex, metabolic syndrome, or cirrhosis. Higher cumulative statin exposure demonstrated a dose-dependent risk reduction, remaining significant at simvastatin-equivalent doses > 15,561 mg annually after accounting for incident cirrhosis. Atorvastatin/rosuvastatin use provided comparable protection, despite different lipophilicity, and demonstrated stronger effects than others. Conclusions: In MASLD, statin therapy was associated with a dose-dependent PLC risk reduction. High-intensity therapy (simvastatin-equivalent > 40 mg daily) conferred substantial protection regardless of age, sex, insulin resistance, or cirrhosis, supporting a potential statin-based PLC chemoprevention in MASLD.
Age and sex influence transcriptomic responses to statin therapy that control liver aging during systemic metabolic dysfunction
Background and Aims: Older age increases susceptibility to metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), but whether it impacts response to therapies, and how the therapies impact regulators of biological aging, are poorly understood. Statins inhibit the mevalonate pathway to block cholesterol biosynthesis and are widely used in MASLD patients to reduce cardiovascular disease. Whether statins prevent progression to cirrhosis is under investigation. However, the molecular effects of statins in human liver, particularly in the context of aging, remain poorly defined. Approach and Results: We analyzed liver transcriptomes and matched clinical data from 368 adults enrolled in the Duke MASLD Biorepository with a focus on age-dependent responses and the interplay between senescence and ferroptosis, a regulated death process that is constrained by the mevalonate pathway. Serum ALT, AST, and LDL cholesterol levels were lower in statin users of both sexes, particularly among older individuals. Transcriptome analyses revealed that statin use is strongly associated with suppression of senescence-related pathways. Statin use is also associated with increased activation of pathways linked to ferroptosis. Both responses persisted after propensity score matching to control for clinical confounders and were validated in an independent obese cohort. Conclusions: Age-dependent transcriptional remodeling in the liver differs in statin users and non-users. Pathways involved in senescence are suppressed while those that promote ferroptosis are induced in statin users. These results suggest that statins may suppress biological aging in MASLD by acting as senolytics and highlight the complex, context-specific roles of senescence in liver adaptation and remodeling.
Osteopontin Promotes Cholangiocyte Secretion of Chemokines to Support Macrophage Recruitment and Fibrosis in
MASH
ABSTRACT Background and Aims Osteopontin (OPN) promotes the ductular reaction and is a major driver of chronic liver disease (CLD) progression. Although CLD is characterised by the accumulation of inflammatory cells including macrophages around the peri‐portal regions, the influence of OPN on recruitment is unclear. We investigated the role of OPN in cholangiocyte chemokine production and macrophage recruitment by combining in vivo, in vitro, and in silico approaches. Methods The effects of OPN on cholangiocyte chemokine production and macrophage migration were assessed in culture, alongside RNA‐sequencing to identify genes and pathways affected by OPN depletion. Murine liver injury models were used to assess liver chemokine expression and liver macrophage/monocyte recruitment. OPN and chemokine expression were analysed in liver tissue and plasma from biopsy‐proven metabolic dysfunction‐associated alcoholic steatohepatitis (MASH) patients. Results OPN‐knockdown in cholangiocytes reduced chemokine secretion. RNA‐sequencing showed OPN‐related effects clustered around immunity, chemotaxis and chemokine production. Macrophage exposure to cholangiocyte‐conditioned media showed OPN‐supported migration via chemokines chemokine (C‐C motif) ligand (CCL)2, CCL5 and chemokine (C‐X‐C motif) ligand (CXCL)1. These effects were related to NF‐κB signalling. Murine liver fibrosis was accompanied by upregulated liver OPN, CCL2, CCL5 and CXCL1 mRNA, and accumulation of liver cluster of differentiation (CD)11b/F4/80 + CC chemokine receptors (CCR2) high macrophages but treatment with OPN‐specific neutralising aptamers reduced fibrosis, chemokine mRNAs and accumulation of liver CD11b/F4/80 + CCR2 high /lymphocyte antigen 6 complex high inflammatory monocytes. In human MASH, liver OPN correlated with chemokines CCL2 and IL8 in association with portal injury and fibrosis. Plasma OPN, serum CCL2 and IL8 also increased with fibrosis stage. Conclusions OPN promotes cholangiocyte chemokine secretion and the accumulation of pro‐inflammatory monocytes. These data support neutralisation of OPN as an anti‐inflammatory and anti‐fibrotic strategy.
Sex Differences in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: State of the Art and Identification of Research Gaps
Despite tremendous research advancements in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), our understanding of sex differences in NAFLD remains insufficient. This review summarizes the current knowledge on sex differences in NAFLD, identifies gaps, and discusses important considerations for future research. The prevalence and severity of NAFLD are higher in men than in women during the reproductive age. However, after menopause, NAFLD occurs at a higher rate in women, suggesting that estrogen is protective. Sex differences also exist for the major risk factors of NAFLD. In general, animal models of NAFLD recapitulate the sex differences observed in patients, with more severe steatosis and steatohepatitis, more proinflammatory/profibrotic cytokines, and a higher incidence of hepatic tumors in male than female subjects. Based on computer modeling, female and male livers are metabolically distinct with unique regulators modulating sex‐specific metabolic outcomes. Analysis of the literature reveals that most published clinical and epidemiological studies fail to examine sex differences appropriately. Considering the paucity of data on sex differences and the knowledge that regulators of pathways relevant to current therapeutic targets for NAFLD differ by sex, clinical trials should be designed to test drug efficacy and safety according to sex, age, reproductive stage (i.e., menopause), and synthetic hormone use. Conclusion: Sex differences do exist in the prevalence, risk factors, fibrosis, and clinical outcomes of NAFLD, suggesting that, while not yet incorporated, sex will probably be considered in future practice guidelines; adequate consideration of sex differences, sex hormones/menopausal status, age, and other reproductive information in clinical investigation and gene association studies of NAFLD are needed to fill current gaps and implement precision medicine for patients with NAFLD.
A longer duration of estrogen deficiency increases fibrosis risk among postmenopausal women with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Postmenopausal women with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis are at an increased risk of hepatic fibrosis compared with premenopausal women. Whether duration of estrogen deficiency in postmenopausal state dictates an individual's fibrosis risk remains uninvestigated. We assessed the associations of age at menopause and time from menopause with fibrosis severity in postmenopausal women with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Data from 488 postmenopausal women with (1) histologic diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and (2) self‐reported information on age at menopause were analyzed. The associations of premature menopause (age at menopause of <40 years) and time from menopause (age at study enrollment ‐ age at menopause, years) with fibrosis severity (stage 0‐4) were assessed using multiple ordinal logistic regression models with and without adjusting for clinical confounders. Among the participants (age at menopause 43.7 ± 8.6 years), women with premature menopause (29.3%) were younger at enrollment ( P < 0.001) and used hormone replacement therapy more often ( P < 0.003). After adjusting for age at enrollment, race, waist circumference standardized by body mass index, current smoking, current alcohol use, hypertension, diabetes/impaired fasting glucose, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, and hormone replacement therapy, premature menopause was associated with an increased likelihood of having more severe fibrosis (adjusted cumulative odds ratio = 1.9, 95% confidence interval 1.3‐2.7, P = 0.001), while time from menopause was directly associated with an increased likelihood of having more severe fibrosis (adjusted cumulative odds ratio for 5‐year unit = 1.2, 95% confidence interval 1.1‐1.3, P = 0.002). Conclusion : Duration of estrogen deficiency in postmenopausal state confers fibrosis risk among postmenopausal women with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. (H epatology 2016;64:85–91)