Korshunov, Andrey

Abstract Background Astroblastomas are rare brain tumors predominantly affecting children and young adults, for which molecular subtypes and clinical management remain undefined. Methods We analyzed tumor samples, molecular profiles, and clinical data from 200 patients, classified as “Astroblastoma, MN1-altered” under WHO criteria, using DNA methylation profiling, DNA/RNA profiling/sequencing, and survival analyses. Results DNA methylation analyses identified 3 groups: Group A (n = 143, characterized by MN1::BEND2 fusions, predominantly supratentorial location, with striking female predominance and favorable survival); Group B (n = 37, epigenetically and transcriptionally closely related to Group A, but characterized by EWSR1::BEND2 fusions, with spinal and infratentorial locations and poor prognosis); and Group C (n = 20, epigenetically and transcriptionally distinct, characterized by MN1::CXXC5 fusions, exclusively supratentorially located, with favorable survival). Progression-free and overall survival were significantly shorter in Group B (5-year PFS 14%; 10-year OS 54%) compared to A (5-year PFS 47%; 10-year OS 89%) and C (5-year PFS 75%; 10-year OS 89%). Radiotherapy improved PFS in Group B (hazard ratio 0.25), while no clear benefit was identified for Groups A and C. Conclusions Astroblastoma, MN1-altered, comprises 3 molecularly and clinically distinct groups, characterized by different fusion genes, including those without MN1. These new insights, including the identification of potential predictive biomarkers like 14q/16q loss, provide a framework for the development of risk-stratified therapeutic approaches. Importantly, we identified a molecularly defined high-risk group that benefits from radiation therapy. Our findings redefine Astroblastoma as a molecularly diverse tumor type, propose a refined classification, support the development of risk-adapted therapeutic strategies and provide a rational standard of care.

Abstract Major discoveries in the biology of nervous system tumors have raised the question of how non‐histological data such as molecular information can be incorporated into the next W orld H ealth O rganization ( WHO ) classification of central nervous system tumors. To address this question, a meeting of neuropathologists with expertise in molecular diagnosis was held in H aarlem, the N etherlands, under the sponsorship of the I nternational S ociety of N europathology ( ISN ). Prior to the meeting, participants solicited input from clinical colleagues in diverse neuro‐oncological specialties. The present “white paper” catalogs the recommendations of the meeting, at which a consensus was reached that incorporation of molecular information into the next WHO classification should follow a set of provided “ ISN ‐ H aarlem” guidelines. Salient recommendations include that (i) diagnostic entities should be defined as narrowly as possible to optimize interobserver reproducibility, clinicopathological predictions and therapeutic planning; (ii) diagnoses should be “layered” with histologic classification, WHO grade and molecular information listed below an “integrated diagnosis”; (iii) determinations should be made for each tumor entity as to whether molecular information is required, suggested or not needed for its definition; (iv) some pediatric entities should be separated from their adult counterparts; (v) input for guiding decisions regarding tumor classification should be solicited from experts in complementary disciplines of neuro‐oncology; and (iv) entity‐specific molecular testing and reporting formats should be followed in diagnostic reports. It is hoped that these guidelines will facilitate the forthcoming update of the fourth edition of the WHO classification of central nervous system tumors.