Rushing, Elisabeth Jane

ABSTRACT Aims X‐linked McLeod neuroacanthocytosis syndrome (MLS) is a rare neurodegenerative disorder characterised by the presence of red blood cell acanthocytosis and a chorea syndrome. Analogous to Huntington's disease (HD), MLS displays cognitive and behavioural symptoms besides the progressive movement disorder. This study aimed to describe the neuropathology of MLS in the largest case series to date. Methods Clinical data were collected, and neuropathological assessments were performed on eight male MLS patients originating from Finland, New Zealand, Switzerland, Scotland and the United States. Results Macroscopic data were available from six patients, with five showing atrophy of the basal ganglia, which was more pronounced in the caudate nucleus and to a lesser extent in the putamen and pallidum. Histology revealed neuronal loss and accompanying gliosis in the basal ganglia of all patients. The extent of these alterations varied widely, with a decreasing gradient of severity from the caudate nucleus to the putamen and the pallidum, mirroring the macroscopic findings. In addition, we detected intraneuronal vacuoles in the striatum in half of the patients. Conclusions MLS neuropathology is characterised macroscopically by atrophy and microscopically by neuronal loss and gliosis of the basal ganglia, with a decreasing gradient of severity from the caudate nucleus, the putamen to the pallidum. Analogous to the grading system for HD, we propose a neuropathological grading system for MLS based on the current observations in the largest MLS cohort examined to date. Standardised criteria are crucial for neuropathological assessment of this extremely rare disease.

Targeting a kinase common to both the EGFR and TNFα signaling pathways may prevent drug resistance in glioblastoma.

Abstract Major discoveries in the biology of nervous system tumors have raised the question of how non‐histological data such as molecular information can be incorporated into the next W orld H ealth O rganization ( WHO ) classification of central nervous system tumors. To address this question, a meeting of neuropathologists with expertise in molecular diagnosis was held in H aarlem, the N etherlands, under the sponsorship of the I nternational S ociety of N europathology ( ISN ). Prior to the meeting, participants solicited input from clinical colleagues in diverse neuro‐oncological specialties. The present “white paper” catalogs the recommendations of the meeting, at which a consensus was reached that incorporation of molecular information into the next WHO classification should follow a set of provided “ ISN ‐ H aarlem” guidelines. Salient recommendations include that (i) diagnostic entities should be defined as narrowly as possible to optimize interobserver reproducibility, clinicopathological predictions and therapeutic planning; (ii) diagnoses should be “layered” with histologic classification, WHO grade and molecular information listed below an “integrated diagnosis”; (iii) determinations should be made for each tumor entity as to whether molecular information is required, suggested or not needed for its definition; (iv) some pediatric entities should be separated from their adult counterparts; (v) input for guiding decisions regarding tumor classification should be solicited from experts in complementary disciplines of neuro‐oncology; and (iv) entity‐specific molecular testing and reporting formats should be followed in diagnostic reports. It is hoped that these guidelines will facilitate the forthcoming update of the fourth edition of the WHO classification of central nervous system tumors.