Tan, Angelina D.

Abstract Background: Debate continues as to the clinical relevance of subclassifying patients with the myeloproliferative disorder (MPD) MMM into the subgroups of agnogenic myeloid metaplasia (AMM), post-polycythemic myeloid metaplasia (PPMM), and post-thrombocythemic myeloid metaplasia (PTMM). We looked to validate previously described phenotypic variability amongst subtypes, and explore relevant and differences in constitutional symptoms. Methods: An detailed analysis of patients with MMM whom responded to an international web based survey of MPD patients which registered responses regarding diagnosis, disease course, complete blood counts, co-morbidities (Charlson Co-morbidity index), symptoms, and fatigue (Fact-An and Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)). Results: A total of 456 patients self described as MMM responded of which 32.3% had AMM (n = 148), 38.0% % had PPMM (n = 174), and 29.7% had PTMM (n = 136). Detailed breakdown of differences in demographics, clinical course, current laboratory studies, treatment history, and current symptoms are outlined in the table below. Phenotypic Variability Amongst 458 MMM Patients Category AMM (N=148; 32.3%) PPMM (N=174; 38.0%) PTMM (N=136; 29.7%) MMM Total (N=458) Δ between groups (p = ) Hb = Hemoglobin; SCT = Stem Cell Transplant Age (Median) 61 57 57 58 0.09 Sex (% Males) 60% 49% 30% 47% <0.01 Yrs from MPD Dx 5 6 8 6 <0.01 Labs/ Prior History Hb (g/dL) 11.0 13.7 11.6 12.1 <0.01 % with RBC Tx 43% 6% 11% 20% <0.01 Leukocytes (×10(9)/L) 8.0 7.6 7.2 7.7 0.64 Platelets (×10(9))/L) 200 352 396 321 <0.01 % with Splenomegaly 76% 49% 41% 54% <0.01 % with Prior Thrombosis 10% 22% 31% 21% <0.01 % with Prior Bleed 16% 20% 31% 22% 0.01 Treatment History for the MMM % with Prior Tx for MPD 64% 88% 77% 77% <0.01 % Medical Therapy 57% 70% 75% 67% <0.01 # Meds (Median (Range)) 1 (0–8) 2 (0–6) 2 (0–6) 2 (0–8) <0.01 % with Splenectomy 8% 5% 6% 6% 0.48 % with SCT 6% 1% 1% 3% <0.01 MMM Associated Constitutional Symptoms % with Fatigue 85% 81% 85% 84% 0.56 % with Bone Pain 51% 46% 44% 47% 0.51 % with Fevers 19% 17% 18% 18% 0.87 % with Pruritus 39% 69% 39% 50% <0.01 % with Night Sweats 55% 58% 53% 56% 0.67 % with Weight Loss 30% 15% 16% 20% <0.01 Overall the data suggests patients with AMM are more likely male, with greater burdens of anemia, splenomegaly, and weight loss. However they are less likely to have experienced thrombohemorrhagic complications and have received fewer MPD medications. In contrast PPMM patients (not unsurprisingly) have little trouble from anemia, but have the most pruritus. Patients with PTMM are most likely female, with the highest platelet counts, and the greatest likelihood of thrombohemorrhagic complications. Additionally, all three subgroups of MMM had significant fatigue compared to published controls for both fatigue instruments (P<0.0001) yet there was no difference between MMM subtypes for the severity of fatigue. Conclusions: A large unselected series of MMM patients supports that although constitutional symptoms are significant and similar amongst MMM subgroups, these patients have variable burdens of other MPD manifestations.

Abstract Background: Scant data exists regarding the burden of fatigue and constitutional symptoms in patients with myeloproliferative disorders (MPDs) (essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), and myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM)). Methods: An Internet based survey of MPD patients regarding clinical course, blood counts, constitutional symptoms, and fatigue (FACT-AN and Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)). Results: Patient Demographics: A total of 1179 MPD patients (median age 56; 41.4% male) internationally (76% USA: 50 states, 30 countries, 6 continents) responded to the survey. Self reported diagnoses were PV (35%), ET (26%), or MMM (39%). Clinical History: 1025 patients (87%) had undergone MPD therapy (drugs 70.5%, phlebotomy 44.1%, other 16%). Thrombosis (n=261, 22%), hemorrhage (N=272; 23%), and splenomegaly (N=478 (43%) were frequently reported. Blood tests (available in 917) showed 39% were anemic, 7% transfusion dependent. Symptoms: Fatigue, pruritus, night sweats and bone pain were present across the majority of MPD patients (see table). Additionally it was observed that these symptoms appeared with nearly equal frequency in PV as in MMM patients. However MMM patients displayed more advanced features (fevers, night sweats and weight loss). MPD Associated Constitutional Symptoms in 1179 Patients SYMPTOM PV (N=405) ET (N=304) MMM (N=456) MISSING (N=14) TOTAL (N=1179) P VALUE Fatigue 344 (84.9%) 220 (72.4%) 381 (83.6%) 7 945 (81.1%) <0.0001 Pruritus 265 (65.4%) 120 (39.5%) 228 (50.0%) 3 613 (52.6%) <0.0001 Night Sweats 199 (49.1%) 123 (40.5%) 254 (55.7%) 4 576 (49.4%) 0.0002 Bone Pain 174 (43.0%) 125 (41.1%) 214 (46.9%) 4 513 (44%) 0.2480 Fevers 53 (13.1%) 26 (8.6%) 81 (17.8%) 2 160 (13.7%) 0.0013 Weight Loss 39 (9.6%) 22 (7.2%) 93 (20.4%) 0 154 (13.2%) <0.0001 Spleen Pain 17 (4.2%) 27 (8.9%) 30 (6.6%) 4 74 (6.3%) <0.0001 Fatigue (82% MPD linked) was significantly increased across all MPD subtypes compared to published controls for both the BFI (P<0.0001) and Fact-An (P<0.0001). Additionally 69% curtail social activity because of fatigue, 35% need assistance with activities of daily living, and 11% reported MPD associated medical disability. Fatigue strongly correlated with multiple MPD disease features including: anemia, bone pain, constitutional symptoms, pruritus, splenic pain, smoking, thrombosis, and hemorrhagic events (all p<0.0001). Interestingly, even in “asymptomatic” MPD patients (those without anemia, splenomegaly, or thrombohemorrhagic complications) (n=279)) 24% (41% PV, 31% ET, 28% MMM) described significant fatigue worse than published controls. Conclusions: Fatigue and other constitutional symptoms are a significant burden to MPD patients, despite current therapies employed. Additionally fatigue is also a significant problem even in MPD patients lacking other advanced disease features. Clearly, direct attempts to improve fatigue (through pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions) are necessary.

8527 Background: Minority patients (MP) suffer deficits in access to care and socioeconomic status. This study uses a patient-level pooled analysis to explore whether these deficits translate into quality of life (QOL) differences between MP and non-MP on clinical trials. Method: Baseline QOL scores were combined from 47 clinical trials (6,513 patients) conducted either at the Mayo Clinic Cancer Center or in the North Central Cancer Treatment Group. QOL scales used were the Uniscale, Linear Analogue Self Assessment (LASA), Symptom Distress Scale (SDS), Profile of Mood States (POMS) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (Fact-G). Fisher’s Exact tests and linear regression adjusted for age, site, and performance score. Survival data was compared using the method of Kaplan-Meier. Results: Eight percent (531) of patients self-reported as MP (0.45% American Indian/Alaskan Native, 0.7% Asian, 5% Black/African American, 1.5% Hispanic, 0.1% Native Hawaiian and 0.3% Other). MP had no meaningful deficits in overall QOL or the SDS and were slightly worse on FACT-G total score, physical, social/family, functional, and SDS nausea severity. MP among lung cancer patients reported greater nausea (58 vs 69) and sleep problems (34 vs 54), with neurological cancers reported worse emotional well-being (53 vs 74), and with GI tumors had lower social/family well-being (60 vs 67). Regression models confirmed these results. Median survival time was shorter for MP (198 vs 310 days, p=0.001) but was not significant after adjusting for disease severity. Conclusions: MP on these clinical trials did not report large QOL deficits at baseline relative to non-MP. MP did indicate small deficits in physical, social, and emotional subscales. MP experienced large tumor-specific deficits for a few QOL domains that might bear further attention. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

7545 Background: Interpretation of lung cancer clinical trials is complicated by the heterogeneity of the patient population due to disease burden and comorbidities making pre-trial assessment of OS probability challenging. Methods: To create and validate a scoring system to estimate OS and improve the quality of future trials, this study evaluated the pretreatment prognostic factors of 2,442 pts with NSCLC. Univariate (UV) and multivariate (MV) Cox models were used to evaluate the prognostic importance of each baseline factor on OS. Those prognostic factors significant on both UV and MV analyses that were used to develop the scoring system included overall quality of life, age, sex, stage, ECOG performance status, the presence of other cancers, and smoking cessation. The score for each factor was determined by dividing the 5-year OS rate (in %) by 10 and summing these scores to form a total score. Multivariate models and the score for each factor were validated using bootstrapping with 1000 iterations from the original samples. Results: The score for each factor ranged from 1 to 7 points and the total scores ranged between 23 and 39 points. Higher scores reflected better OS. Categorization of the score was delineated first by clinician expert opinion (see Table) and then by multiple statistically defined empirical cut points. All categorization schemes demonstrated successful prognostic power. The bootstrap method confirmed the reliability of multivariate Cox model and score (Spearman correlation coefficient= 0.45). Conclusions: Prognostic factors significantly associated with OS on both UV and MV analysis were used to construct a valid scoring system which can be used to predict survival of NSCLC pts. This scoring system can be used by clinicians in counseling pts and for stratification in future trial design. [Table: see text]

7524 Background: A multicenter study (Z4032) compared sublobar resection (SR) to sublobar resection with brachytherapy (SRB) for stage I NSCLC. Local recurrence (LR) and overall survival (OS) rates at 3-years (3-yr) were similar between arms (see abstract 113613). This analysis combines arms, and evaluates the effect of factors previously reported to impact oncological outcomes after SR. Methods: 213 patients (pts) were evaluable for analysis. LR was defined as recurrence at the staple line (local progression), same lobe away from the staple line, or within hilar nodes. Factors assessed for impact on 3-yr outcomes were: resection type (wedge/segmentectomy), margin size (<1cm /≥1cm), margin:tumor ratio (<1/ ≥1), tumor size (≤2cm/>2cm) and staple line cytology (+/-). Results: LR occurred in 27/213 (12.6%) pts and included local progression in 12/213 (5.6%). OS rate at 3-yr was 152/213 (71.4%). Trends favored the use of segmentectomy, margin:tumor ratio≥1, tumor size ≤2cm and negative staple line cytology; no factor reached statistical significance at 3-yr. The only factor significantly (p=0.02) associated with decreased 3-yr LR was margin size ≥1cm (8.3%) compared to margin<1cm (19.3%). Conclusions: SR is a good option for high-risk pts with NSCLC. The 3-yr OS rate of 71.4% and local progression rate of 5.6% are useful benchmarks to compare to other therapies. A resection margin of at least 1 cm is desirable. Clinical trial information: NCT00107172. [Table: see text]

6108 Background: This pilot study evaluated whether providing clinicians with patient(pt) QOL results and symptom management pathways linked to QOL domains at the time of clinical appointment would result in improvement in QOL and treatment (tx) satisfaction. The objective was to obtain preliminary effect size estimates and logistical evidence for design of a larger, definitive trial. Methods: Oncology pts receiving 5-7 weeks of radiotherapy (RT) electronically completed QOL assessments (LASA) at baseline and biweekly prior to seeing clinicians. Was It Worth It (WIWI) and Interpersonal Patient-Provider Relationship (IPPRS) were measured at tx end. Pt endpoints (pro-rated primary endpoint LASA area under the curve (AUC), LASA changes from baseline, and WIWI responses) and clinician endpoints (IPPRS) were compared between the control group (Phase 1: no QOL feedback) and the intervention group (Phase 2: QOL feedback) via Wilcoxon, Chi-square and Fisher Exact tests. There was 80% power to detect a 10 point difference in average AUC. Results: 148 pts enrolled (79 Phase 1, 69 Phase 2) from 11/28/2008 to 09/20/2011 (sites GI (27%), Lung (22%) and Head and Neck (52%)). 68% received RT and chemo. There were consistently moderate effect sizes observed but no statistically significant differences in any AUC nor end of tx change from baseline scores. 20% fewer pts in phase 2 reported clinical deficits in overall QOL (pain). In pts receiving 7 weeks of RT, end of tx average overall QOL, mental well-being (WB), physical WB and pain severity were significantly better in Phase 2 pts. WIWI results showed 76% found participation worthwhile, 95% would participate again, and 92% would recommend the study to others. No differences between groups were found in communication between clinicians and pts (IPPRS). Conclusions: Preliminary estimates indicate potentially clinically significant improvements of moderate effect size in mental and physical WB and pain severity when clinicians received QOL real time with symptom management pathways. Further study is warranted in larger trial setting.

7502 Background: Prior studies suggest that adjuvant brachytherapy reduces local recurrence (LR) after sublobar resection (SR) for NSCLC. A multicenter randomized study was undertaken in patients (pts) with stage I NSCLC ≤3cm comparing SR to SR with brachytherapy (SRB). Methods: High-risk operable patients with NSCLC were randomized to SR or SRB. Brachytherapy involved placement of I125 seeds incorporated into Vicryl sutures or into Vicryl mesh placed over the staple line. Wedge or segmental resection was allowed. The primary endpoint was time to local recurrence (LR) defined as recurrence within the primary tumor lobe at the staple line (local progression), away from the staple line or within hilar nodes. The trial was designed to have 90% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.315 in favor of the SRB arm using a one-sided α of 0.05 with a sample size of 100 eligible pts per arm. Follow-up CT scans were obtained serially for 36 months. Results: 224 pts were randomized; 213 (109 SR,104 SRB) were eligible. Median (range) age was 71 (49-87) yrs; 94 (44%) were male. No differences were found in baseline characteristics. Adverse events, previously reported, were not different between arms. Median (range) follow-up was 4.06 (0.04, 5.0) yrs. There was no difference between arms in time to LR (HR = 0.87; 5% CI: 0.41, 1.86, p=0.72) or to LR or death (LRD) (HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.50, 1.32, p=0.40). There was no difference between arms in pattern of LR (table). In subgroups of pts with potentially compromised surgical margin (margin < 1cm; margin:tumor ratio <1; positive staple line cytology) SRB did not reduce LR or LRD at 3-yrs. Overall 3-yr survival was similar for SR (71%) and SRB (72%) (p=0.81). Conclusions: LR remains a concern after sublobar resection. However, local progression at the staple line was low. This trial demonstrated that adjuvant brachytherapy does not impact oncologic outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT00107172. [Table: see text]

Abstract Purpose Preclinical and clinical data have shown promise in using antiangiogenic agents to treat malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). We conducted this phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of single-agent pazopanib in patients with MPM. Materials and Methods Patients with MPM who had received 0–1 prior chemotherapy regimens were eligible to receive pazopanib at a dose of 800 mg daily. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival rate at 6 months (PFS6), with a preplanned interim analysis for futility. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), PFS, adverse events assessment and clinical benefit (complete response, partial response [PR], and stable disease [SD]). Results Thirty-four evaluable patients were enrolled, with a median age of 73 years (49–84). The trial was closed early because of lack of efficacy at the preplanned interim analysis. Only 8 patients (28.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 13.2–48.7%) in the first 28 evaluable were progression-free at 6 months. PFS6 was 32.4% (95% CI, 17.4–50.5). There were 2 PR (5.9%) and 16 SD (47.1%). The overall median PFS and OS were 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.0–6.0) and 11.5 months (95% CI: 5.3–18.2), respectively. The median PFS and OS for the previously untreated patients was 5.4 months (95% CI, 2.7–8.5) and 16.6 months (95% CI, 6.6–30.6), respectively; and 2.0 months (95% CI, 1.3–4.2) and 5.0 months (95% CI: 3.0–11.9), respectively, for the previously treated patients. Grade 3 or higher adverse events were observed in 23 patients (67.6%). Conclusion Single-agent pazopanib was poorly tolerated in patients with MPM. The primary endpoint of PFS6 was not achieved in the current study. ClinicalTrials.gov identification number. NCT00459862. Implications for Practice Single-agent pazopanib did not meet its endpoint in this phase II trial in malignant mesothelioma. Pazopanib is well tolerated in mesothelioma patients with a manageable toxicity profile. There is a need to better identify signals of angiogenesis that can be targeted in mesothelioma. Encouraging findings in frontline treatment warrant further investigations in combination with chemotherapy or immunotherapy.

Introduction: What if you could only ask one question of the patient during a clinic visit? Further, suppose the patient’s biggest concern can pragmatically be incorporated into routine clinical care and clinical pathways that can address the patient’s single biggest concern can be identified. If the principal concern can be dealt with efficiently at each visit through key stakeholder case management, positive outcomes should result. Therefore, motivated by the need for patient-centered health care visits, the Beacon electronic patient-reported outcomes (PRO) quality of life (QOL) tool was developed. Methods: Central to the tool is that at each health care visit, the patient’s biggest concern is electronically communicated to the health care team. Therefore, the tool can help catalyze important discussions between the health care team and the patient, perhaps on topics that would not have been discussed otherwise at a routine visit. In recognition of the community of resources needed to provide comprehensive care, the tool generates clinical pathways or actions that can be pursued to address the patient’s biggest concern. The concern is efficiently triaged such that members of the health care community with appropriate expertise and resources are identified to address and manage that single biggest concern signaled by the patient. A report, which can be uploaded into the patient’s medical chart, is created and provides a list of resources for a case manager to assist the patient and contains graphical presentations of the patient’s QOL and a history of prior concerns. The report also labels potentially significant changes in QOL. Discussion: The tool, which has been applied successfully in several health conditions, acts as a beacon to health care providers so that a patient’s self-reported concern can be consistently and effectively integrated into their care. Key Points: It is impractical to try to deal with every patient concern in every visit. The key to the Beacon tool is that at each visit the patient’s biggest concern is identified, clinical pathways indicated, and resources efficiently matched to address the patient’s biggest concern.