Barnes, Sunni A.

Abstract Background: Debate continues as to the clinical relevance of subclassifying patients with the myeloproliferative disorder (MPD) MMM into the subgroups of agnogenic myeloid metaplasia (AMM), post-polycythemic myeloid metaplasia (PPMM), and post-thrombocythemic myeloid metaplasia (PTMM). We looked to validate previously described phenotypic variability amongst subtypes, and explore relevant and differences in constitutional symptoms. Methods: An detailed analysis of patients with MMM whom responded to an international web based survey of MPD patients which registered responses regarding diagnosis, disease course, complete blood counts, co-morbidities (Charlson Co-morbidity index), symptoms, and fatigue (Fact-An and Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)). Results: A total of 456 patients self described as MMM responded of which 32.3% had AMM (n = 148), 38.0% % had PPMM (n = 174), and 29.7% had PTMM (n = 136). Detailed breakdown of differences in demographics, clinical course, current laboratory studies, treatment history, and current symptoms are outlined in the table below. Phenotypic Variability Amongst 458 MMM Patients Category AMM (N=148; 32.3%) PPMM (N=174; 38.0%) PTMM (N=136; 29.7%) MMM Total (N=458) Δ between groups (p = ) Hb = Hemoglobin; SCT = Stem Cell Transplant Age (Median) 61 57 57 58 0.09 Sex (% Males) 60% 49% 30% 47% <0.01 Yrs from MPD Dx 5 6 8 6 <0.01 Labs/ Prior History Hb (g/dL) 11.0 13.7 11.6 12.1 <0.01 % with RBC Tx 43% 6% 11% 20% <0.01 Leukocytes (×10(9)/L) 8.0 7.6 7.2 7.7 0.64 Platelets (×10(9))/L) 200 352 396 321 <0.01 % with Splenomegaly 76% 49% 41% 54% <0.01 % with Prior Thrombosis 10% 22% 31% 21% <0.01 % with Prior Bleed 16% 20% 31% 22% 0.01 Treatment History for the MMM % with Prior Tx for MPD 64% 88% 77% 77% <0.01 % Medical Therapy 57% 70% 75% 67% <0.01 # Meds (Median (Range)) 1 (0–8) 2 (0–6) 2 (0–6) 2 (0–8) <0.01 % with Splenectomy 8% 5% 6% 6% 0.48 % with SCT 6% 1% 1% 3% <0.01 MMM Associated Constitutional Symptoms % with Fatigue 85% 81% 85% 84% 0.56 % with Bone Pain 51% 46% 44% 47% 0.51 % with Fevers 19% 17% 18% 18% 0.87 % with Pruritus 39% 69% 39% 50% <0.01 % with Night Sweats 55% 58% 53% 56% 0.67 % with Weight Loss 30% 15% 16% 20% <0.01 Overall the data suggests patients with AMM are more likely male, with greater burdens of anemia, splenomegaly, and weight loss. However they are less likely to have experienced thrombohemorrhagic complications and have received fewer MPD medications. In contrast PPMM patients (not unsurprisingly) have little trouble from anemia, but have the most pruritus. Patients with PTMM are most likely female, with the highest platelet counts, and the greatest likelihood of thrombohemorrhagic complications. Additionally, all three subgroups of MMM had significant fatigue compared to published controls for both fatigue instruments (P<0.0001) yet there was no difference between MMM subtypes for the severity of fatigue. Conclusions: A large unselected series of MMM patients supports that although constitutional symptoms are significant and similar amongst MMM subgroups, these patients have variable burdens of other MPD manifestations.

Abstract Background: Scant data exists regarding the burden of fatigue and constitutional symptoms in patients with myeloproliferative disorders (MPDs) (essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), and myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM)). Methods: An Internet based survey of MPD patients regarding clinical course, blood counts, constitutional symptoms, and fatigue (FACT-AN and Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)). Results: Patient Demographics: A total of 1179 MPD patients (median age 56; 41.4% male) internationally (76% USA: 50 states, 30 countries, 6 continents) responded to the survey. Self reported diagnoses were PV (35%), ET (26%), or MMM (39%). Clinical History: 1025 patients (87%) had undergone MPD therapy (drugs 70.5%, phlebotomy 44.1%, other 16%). Thrombosis (n=261, 22%), hemorrhage (N=272; 23%), and splenomegaly (N=478 (43%) were frequently reported. Blood tests (available in 917) showed 39% were anemic, 7% transfusion dependent. Symptoms: Fatigue, pruritus, night sweats and bone pain were present across the majority of MPD patients (see table). Additionally it was observed that these symptoms appeared with nearly equal frequency in PV as in MMM patients. However MMM patients displayed more advanced features (fevers, night sweats and weight loss). MPD Associated Constitutional Symptoms in 1179 Patients SYMPTOM PV (N=405) ET (N=304) MMM (N=456) MISSING (N=14) TOTAL (N=1179) P VALUE Fatigue 344 (84.9%) 220 (72.4%) 381 (83.6%) 7 945 (81.1%) <0.0001 Pruritus 265 (65.4%) 120 (39.5%) 228 (50.0%) 3 613 (52.6%) <0.0001 Night Sweats 199 (49.1%) 123 (40.5%) 254 (55.7%) 4 576 (49.4%) 0.0002 Bone Pain 174 (43.0%) 125 (41.1%) 214 (46.9%) 4 513 (44%) 0.2480 Fevers 53 (13.1%) 26 (8.6%) 81 (17.8%) 2 160 (13.7%) 0.0013 Weight Loss 39 (9.6%) 22 (7.2%) 93 (20.4%) 0 154 (13.2%) <0.0001 Spleen Pain 17 (4.2%) 27 (8.9%) 30 (6.6%) 4 74 (6.3%) <0.0001 Fatigue (82% MPD linked) was significantly increased across all MPD subtypes compared to published controls for both the BFI (P<0.0001) and Fact-An (P<0.0001). Additionally 69% curtail social activity because of fatigue, 35% need assistance with activities of daily living, and 11% reported MPD associated medical disability. Fatigue strongly correlated with multiple MPD disease features including: anemia, bone pain, constitutional symptoms, pruritus, splenic pain, smoking, thrombosis, and hemorrhagic events (all p<0.0001). Interestingly, even in “asymptomatic” MPD patients (those without anemia, splenomegaly, or thrombohemorrhagic complications) (n=279)) 24% (41% PV, 31% ET, 28% MMM) described significant fatigue worse than published controls. Conclusions: Fatigue and other constitutional symptoms are a significant burden to MPD patients, despite current therapies employed. Additionally fatigue is also a significant problem even in MPD patients lacking other advanced disease features. Clearly, direct attempts to improve fatigue (through pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions) are necessary.

Abstract Background: Little objective data exists regarding the impact that myeloproliferative disorders (MPDs) (essential thrombocythemia (ET), polycythemia vera (PV), and myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia (MMM)) have on quality of life. Methods: An Internet based survey of MPD patients regarding clinical course, co-morbidities (through the Charlson Co-Morbidity Index), fatigue (through two validated fatigue instruments (FACT-AN and Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)), and exercise tolerance (Godin Leisure-Time Questionnaire). Results: Patient Demographics: A total of 830 MPD patients (median age 56; 60.8% male) from a broad geographic distribution (77% USA: 50 states, 30 countries, 5 continents) responded to the survey. Self reported diagnoses were PV (N=272; 33%), ET (N=221; 27%), or MMM (N=329; 40%) for a median of 5 years (range (0–53). Clinical History: 708 patients (87%) had undergone treatment for their MPD (drugs 84.6%, phlebotomy 49.5%, other 16%). A history of thrombotic (n=195, 24%) or hemorrhagic events (N=214; 26%) were frequently reported. Blood tests (available in 597 a median 1.65 months prior to survey) showed 37% were anemic (7% transfusion dependent). Additionally, 347 (44%) had splenomegaly, painful in 21%. Symptoms: Frequent symptoms reported included fatigue (90%), pruritus (57%), night sweats (54%), bone pain (48%), undesired weight loss (15%), and/or fevers (15%). 41% felt restricted in their activities, and 89 (11%) were medically disabled secondary directly to their MPD. 82% of patients felt their fatigue was linked to their MPD. Additionally 69% curtail social activity because of fatigue, and 41% need some degree of assistance with activities of daily living. Charlson co-morbidity index demonstrated 722 (87%) had minimal co-morbidities strengthening the association between fatigue and their MPD. The burden of fatigue decreased from MMM to PV to ET respectively (p=0.0002). Results from both fatigue assessment tools (FACT-AN and BFI) were highly correlated. Fatigue (FACT-AN fatigue subscale) strongly correlated with multiple MPD disease features including: anemia, bone pain, constitutional symptoms, pruritus, splenic pain, hemorrhagic events (all p<0.0001) and thrombosis(p=0.01). Additionally, currently smoking (as opposed to being a prior smoker) was highly associated with increased fatigue (p<0.0001). Interestingly, even in “asymptomatic” patients (those without anemia, splenomegaly, or thrombohemorrhagic complications (n=187)) 73% (n=128; 40% PV, 32% ET, 27% MMM; p=N.S.) described moderate to severe MPD associated fatigue. Reported physical activity was diminished (Godin Leisure Score) between MPD patients and published norms, with 38% describing minimal to no exercise. Overall, 86% stated fatigue was the major obstacle to exercise. Conclusions: Fatigue is an extremely common problem in patients with MPDs despite current therapies, and a minimal burden of co-morbidities in the majority of patients. Fatigue is also common in patients lacking advanced MPD disease features, or thrombohemorrhagic complications. Clearly, direct attempts to improve fatigue (through pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic interventions) are necessary.

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide information on how health care affects patient health and well-being and represent a patient-centered approach. Despite this potential, PROs are not widely used in clinical settings. Semi-structured focus groups were conducted with 3 stakeholder groups (patients, providers, and health care administrators) to determine the top 5 perceived barriers and benefits of PRO implementation. The Delphi technique was employed to obtain consensus and rank order responses. Patients perceived survey length to be important, whereas providers and administrators perceived time to collect data and patient health literacy, respectively, as the greatest barriers to PRO implementation. The greatest perceived benefits were the ability to track changes in clinical symptoms over time, improved quality of care, and better disease control among patients, providers, and administrators, respectively. These results may guide the development of novel frameworks for PRO implementation by addressing perceived barriers and building on the perceived benefits to encourage adoption of PROs.

Purpose The goal of this study was to compare open and arthroscopic surgical techniques for “cam‐type” femoroacetabular impingement in terms of feasibility and reliability. Methods We used 5 fresh‐frozen cadaver specimens (10 hips). Anteroposterior and cross‐table radiographs were taken for each. The head‐neck union diameter was measured for each. The amount of bone resection at the anterolateral quadrant of the head‐neck union was planned for each, with specific references to width, length, depth, and position. One side was randomly assigned to the open group and the other to the arthroscopic group. Surgical time, position of the osteotomy, and variation of the length, width, and depth of the final osteotomy with respect to the proposed dimensions were compared. Results In all specimens partial resection of the anterior‐lateral femoral head‐neck junction with improvement of the femoral head‐neck offset was accomplished. A statistically significant difference ( P < .05) was observed for surgical time between the open and arthroscopic groups (shorter in open group). Conclusions When comparing surgical precision, no statistically significant differences were found between the open and arthroscopic procedures in any of the measurements. The depth and width of the osteoplasty were reliably obtained by the arthroscopic technique. However, there was a tendency to underestimate the osteoplasty length with the arthroscopic procedure. Positioning the osteoplasty was also less reliable with the arthroscopic procedure than with the open procedure because of the tendency to place the osteoplasty more posterior and distally than intended. Clinical Relevance Surgical resection of the femoral neck prominence and/or part of the anterolateral neck has been reported to improve femoral head offset and alleviate impingement. This study attempts to document the accuracy of this resection when done arthroscopically compared with an open procedure.

Purpose There has been a significant increase in surgeon as well as patient interest in arthroscopic treatment of shoulder pathology. We hypothesize that patients have a strong preference for arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Currently, there are no data in the literature reporting on how people perceive open versus arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Methods Prospectively, a total of 202 patients were administered a questionnaire at the offices of 2 fellowship‐trained shoulder surgeons, 1 located at a tertiary referral center (center A) and 1 in private practice (center B). The questionnaire asked a series of questions about specific factors when choosing an orthopaedic surgeon and the preference for arthroscopic or open surgery. In addition, 7 short‐term and long‐term outcomes were listed, and the patient was asked to choose whether open or arthroscopic surgery would provide the best outcome or whether he or she felt that there was no difference. Results Among patients at center A, 88% would prefer arthroscopy if they were to have shoulder surgery, as would 96% of patients at center B. Among patients at center A, 14% would avoid shoulder surgery if the only option was open surgery, as would 25% at center B. The reputation of the surgeon and institution were the primary factors in choosing a surgeon. Recommendation of a former patient and years of surgeon experience were less important factors for patient selection of a shoulder surgeon. Conclusions The study shows that the vast majority of patients perceive multiple advantages of arthroscopic shoulder surgery despite a lack of published data to support many of these assumptions, particularly with regard to expected functional outcome of arthroscopic versus open shoulder surgery. Clinical Relevance Shoulder surgeons should be aware of these perceptions when discussing treatment options with patients. A continued effort should be made to emphasize known scientific data when considering the relative risks and benefits of arthroscopic and open shoulder surgery.