Laskowski, Edward R.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether 8 weeks of ankle disk training alters ankle muscle onset latency of patients with a history of lateral ankle sprain. The training was completed by eight minimally symptomatic subjects with a history of nonrehabilitated, unilateral, inversion ankle sprain sustained between 6 and 16 months before entry into the study. Ankle inversion perturbations monitored by fine-wire electromyography were performed in four lower extremity muscles (anterior tibialis, posterior tibialis, peroneus longus, and flexor digitorum longus) of all subjects on both the injured (experimental) and noninjured (control) legs. Testing was performed at study entry and after 8 weeks of ankle disk training on the previously injured ankle. Results revealed a statistically significant decrease in the anterior tibialis onset latency in both the experimental (67.6 ± 20.3 to 51.7 ± 17.6) and control (65.5 ± 9.8 to 53.8 ± 23.7) ankles after the training period. These findings indicate that muscle onset latency decreases in specific ankle muscle groups after ankle disk training in previously injured ankles. Both the experimental and control ankles demonstrated a significant change, which raises the question as to whether a proprioceptive cross-training effect occurred.

Ankle disk training has been used as an exercise in sports medicine clinics to help protect against ankle sprains. This study investigated the effects of ankle disk training on the contraction pattern of the anterior tibialis, posterior tibialis, peroneus longus, and flexor digitorum longus muscles in a simulated ankle sprain. Twenty adults were recruited and divided into a control group and an experimental group. A platform with a trapdoor was used to simulate a lateral ankle sprain. Electromyographic data were recorded from each sub ject in pretraining and posttraining tests. The experi mental group underwent ankle disk training for 8 weeks between the pretraining and posttraining tests. In the pretraining test, the four muscles started to contract simultaneously; in the posttraining test, the contrac tions of the anterior and posterior tibialis muscles were delayed. This delay favors the correction of excessive ankle inversion. This study examined the effects of one form of proprioceptive training on muscle reaction times, and its results may explain why such training can help protect against ankle sprains.

The purpose of this study was to establish a data base on the isokinetic eccentric muscular performance char acteristics of external and internal rotator muscles in the shoulders of professional baseball pitchers. Con centric data are also included and compared with pre viously published concentric studies. Twenty-five pro fessional baseball pitchers were evaluated with a Kin- Com isokinetic dynamometer. The subjects tested had a mean age of 23.5 years and a mean body weight of 199 pounds. Eccentric and concentric isokinetic tests were performed at 60 and 120 deg/sec. The testing protocol was standardized for each subject. Test re sults indicated no statistically significant difference in mean torque between throwing and nonthrowing shoulders for either external or internal rotator muscle groups. Eccentric strength was significantly greater than concentric strength for all muscle groups tested. The external-to-internal rotator muscle strength ratios were well above those previously published for high school through professional pitchers. Mean torque-to- lean body weight ratios were also included to establish a data base. This study establishes one of the first data bases for eccentric isokinetic muscle strength of shoul der rotator muscles in professional baseball pitchers. The data may help clinicians prevent and rehabilitate shoulder injuries in professional throwing athletes.

This study, through retrospective review, examines the injury rate of selected disable skiing populations in general and as compared to able-bodied skiers in areas where comparison was possible. Data on disabled skiers gathered from instructional programs at multiple sites indicate that the disabled skier had a very low rate of injury occurrence. Where comparison could be make, it was found that there was no significant difference in overall injury rates between able-bodied and physically disabled skiers. Disabled skiers appear to sustain less severe injuries, and they do not show the trend in increasing injury rates that able-bodied skiers in this study show. In addition, the uphill transport of skiers with a disability who use sit- or mono-skis was exam ined in one large program and found to be efficient and exceedingly safe, with no injuries reported. A major limitation of this study is the inconsistency in methods of data collection and reporting. There is a need for further prospective studies in the general able-bodied and disabled skiing populations with direct comparisons of rate, location and severity of injury, type of disability, and experience level of the skier. We hope that this study will stimulate more ski areas to allow disabled skiers on their slopes, even it limited to participation in supervised, instructional programs.

Objective.To determine why people do or do not wear helmets while bicycling.Methods.A survey was conducted from August through October 1999. Two survey areas were chosen for this study: local public schools and paved bicycle trails. For the school arm of the study, 3 public elementary, middle, and high schools were selected from 3 different regions of Rochester, Minnesota, for participation in the study. For the bicycle arm of the study, 3 paved trails located in southeastern Minnesota were selected. A total of 2970 surveys were distributed to the public school system, and 463 surveys were collected from bicyclists on the paved bicycle trails. The survey population was split into 3 age categories for analysis: child (7–10), adolescent (11–19), and adult (older than 19).Results.Of the 2970 surveys distributed to Rochester public schools, 2039 (69%) were returned for analysis. Seventy-eight of the surveys that were completed in the public school system were discarded for the following reasons: age <10 years (35), insufficient completion (24), and selection of every reason for not wearing a bicycle helmet (19). A total of 463 surveys were completed on the 3 paved bicycle trails. One survey from the paved bicycle trail arm of the study was discarded because of insufficient completion. The total number of surveys used for statistical analysis was 2424. The distribution of male (52.7%) and female (47.3%) participants was similar. No significant difference in bicycle helmet use was found between genders.The age groups with the highest rate of bicycle helmet use were 50 to 59 years (62%) and older than 59 years (70%). The age groups with the lowest rate of bicycle helmet use were 11 to 19 years (31%) and 30 to 39 years (30%). The most common reasons given for not wearing a bicycle helmet were “uncomfortable,” “annoying,” “it's hot,” “don't need it,” and “don't own one.” Bicycle helmet use was significantly influenced by peer helmet use in all 3 age groups. Children also were more likely to wear a bicycle helmet when their parents wore bicycle helmets.A majority of respondents in all 3 age groups indicated that bicycle helmets provided either “moderate” or “great” protection from head injury, although significantly more adults (65.9%) than adolescents (43.9%) believed that the protection afforded by bicycle helmets was “great.” Despite this belief, a majority of adolescents and adults indicated that there was only a “slight risk” of head injury when bicycling without a helmet. Participants in all 3 categories were more likely to wear a bicycle helmet when they indicated either that there was a “great risk” of head injury when bicycling without a helmet or that helmets provided “great protection” from head injury. Adolescents and adults who believed that bicycling without a helmet put one at “great risk” for head injury also were more likely to indicate that helmets provided “great protection” from head injury.Conclusions.The prevalence of bicycle helmet use remains low despite research indicating the high level of head injury risk when bicycling without a helmet and the significant protection afforded by bicycle helmets. With the information provided by this survey, a well-designed intervention to increase the use of bicycle helmets can be implemented. Suggestions for a campaign to promote an increase in bicycle helmet use include focusing efforts on males and females between 11 and 19 years and 30 and 39 years of age; educating the public on new bicycle helmet designs that address comfort, ventilation, and fashion; educating adolescents on the significant protection from head injury afforded by bicycle helmets; and educating the public on the risk and severity of head injury associated with bicycling without a helmet. The influence of parents and peers on bicycle helmet use may be targeted through education and statements such as, “If you wear a bicycle helmet, you are not only protecting yourself, you are also helping to protect your friends and/or children.” bicycle, helmet, injury, accident, prevention.