OBJECTIVETemporal lobectomy is a well-established treatment modality for the management of medically refractory epilepsy in appropriately selected patients. The aim of this study was to assess 30-day morbidity and mortality after temporal lobectomy in cases registered in a national database.METHODSA retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using a multiinstitutional surgical registry compiled between 2006 and 2014. The authors identified patients who underwent anterior temporal lobectomy and/or amygdalohippocampectomy for a primary diagnosis of intractable epilepsy. Univariate and multivariable analyses with regard to patient demographics, comorbidities, operative characteristics, and 30-day outcomes were applied.RESULTSA total of 216 patients were included in the study. The median age was 38 years and 46% of patients were male. The median length of stay was 3 days and the 30-day mortality rate was 1.4%. Fourteen patients (6.5%) developed at least one major complication. Return to the operating room was observed in 7 patients (3.2%). Readmission within 30 days and discharge to a location other than home were available for 2011–2014 (n = 155) and occurred in 11% and 10.3% of patients, respectively. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that increasing age was an independent predictor of discharge disposition other than home and that male sex was a significant risk factor for the development of a major complication. Interestingly, the presence of the attending neurosurgeon and a resident during the procedure was significantly associated with decreased odds of prolonged length of stay (i.e., > 75th percentile [5 days]) and discharge to a location other than home.CONCLUSIONSUsing a multiinstitutional surgical registry, 30-day outcome data after temporal lobectomy for medically intractable epilepsy demonstrates a mortality rate of 1.4%, a major complication rate of 6.5%, and a readmission rate of 11%. Temporal lobectomy is an extremely effective therapy for seizures originating there—however, surgical intervention must be weighed against its morbidity and mortality outcomes.
Analysis of Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism in Patients With Chronic Ulcerative Colitis: Is It the Disease or the Operation?
BACKGROUND: Patients with IBD have a higher baseline risk of venous thromboembolism, which further increases with surgery. Therefore, extended venous thromboembolism chemoprophylaxis has been suggested in certain high-risk cohorts. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether the underlying diagnosis, operative procedure, or both influence the incidence of postoperative venous thromboembolism. DESIGN: This was a retrospective review. SETTINGS: The American College of Surgeons–National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database was analyzed. PATIENTS: The NSQIP database was queried for patients with chronic ulcerative colitis and non-IBD undergoing colorectal resections using surgical Current Procedural Terminology codes modeled after the 3 stages used for the surgical management of chronic ulcerative colitis from 2005 to 2013. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured 30-day postoperative venous thromboembolism risk in patients with chronic ulcerative colitis based on operative stage and risk factors for development of venous thromboembolism. RESULTS: A total of 18,833 patients met inclusion criteria, with an overall rate of venous thromboembolism of 3.8. Among procedure risk groups, venous thromboembolism rates were high risk, 4.4%; intermediate risk, 1.6%; and low risk, 0.7% (across risk groups, p < 0.01). Emergent case subjects exhibited a higher rate of venous thromboembolism than their elective counterparts (6.9% vs 3.1%). Factors significantly associated with venous thromboembolism on adjusted analysis included emergent risk case (adjusted OR = 7.85), high-risk elective case (adjusted OR = 5.07), intermediate-risk elective case (adjusted OR = 2.69), steroid use (adjusted OR = 1.54), and preoperative albumin <3.5 g/dL (adjusted OR = 1.45). LIMITATIONS: Because of its retrospective nature, correlation between procedures and venous thromboembolism risk can be demonstrated, but causation cannot be proven. In addition, data on inpatient and extended venous thromboembolism prophylaxis use are not available. CONCLUSIONS: Emergent status and operative procedure are the 2 highest risk factors for postoperative venous thromboembolism. Extended venous thromboembolism prophylaxis might be appropriate for patients undergoing these high-risk procedures or any emergent colorectal procedures. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A339.
Identifying a subset of patients with DCIS who have a low likelihood of residual disease at surgical excision following a core needle biopsy
Background and ObjectivesCurrent randomized controlled trials are investigating the outcomes of non‐surgical treatment for patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). We sought to evaluate pre‐operative factors associated with no residual disease at definitive resection following a core needle biopsy (CNB) diagnosis of DCIS.MethodsEight hundred and thirty‐four operations for DCIS were performed at our institution between January 2004 and October 2014. We evaluated patient and biopsy tumor characteristics to determine pre‐operative factors associated with no residual disease at surgical resection using uni‐ and multivariable analyses.ResultsSixty‐nine patients (8%) had no residual disease on final pathology. On multivariable analysis, low‐ or intermediate‐grade lesions, <1 cm in size on mammography, and lesions where ≥90% of calcifications were removed correlated with finding no residual disease on final pathology, c‐statistic 0.84. Of the 14 patients with all three low‐risk factors, 36% had no residual disease on final pathology.ConclusionsAlthough our multivariable analysis performed well, its clinical utility would be limited as we were unable to identify a subset of patients with DCIS in whom the probability of finding no residual disease is low enough to consider routine use of non‐surgical management.
Unplanned Readmissions Following Outpatient Hand and Elbow Surgery
Background: Unplanned readmission following surgery is a quality metric that helps surgeons assess initiatives targeted at improving patient care. We utilized the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database to determine the rates, causes, and predictors of unplanned 30-day readmissions after outpatient elective hand and elbow surgery. Methods: The ACS-NSQIP database was queried using hand-and-elbow-specific Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes to retrospectively identify patients who had undergone outpatient hand or elbow surgery in 2012 and 2013. Patients who required an unplanned readmission to the hospital within 30 days were compared with those who were not readmitted. Preoperative patient characteristics, intraoperative variables, complications, and mortality were compared between the cohorts. Cox proportional hazard models were used to determine independent associations with 30-day unplanned readmission. Results: A total of 14,106 outpatient hand or elbow surgery procedures were identified between 2012 and 2013, and 169 (1.2%) of them were followed by an unplanned readmission. The leading causes of readmission included postoperative infections (19.5%), pain (4.7%), thromboembolic events (4.1%), and pulmonary complications (3.0%). The causes of approximately 1/3 of the readmissions were missing from the database, and these readmissions were likely unrelated to the principal procedure. Independent predictors of readmission included an age of 70 to 84 years (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.67 to 4.78), smoking (HR = 2.23, 95% CI = 1.57 to 3.18), a lower hematocrit (HR = 2.19, 95% CI = 1.38 to 3.46), renal dialysis (HR = 3.32, 95% CI = 1.60 to 6.91), and an elbow procedure (with or without a hand procedure) (HR = 2.19, 95% CI = 1.57 to 3.04). Conclusions: The prevalence of unplanned readmission following outpatient hand and elbow surgery is low. Several modifiable factors, including preoperative smoking and anemia, are associated with unplanned readmission. These data may be helpful in developing quality-control initiatives to target unplanned readmissions following hand and elbow procedures. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
The effect of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with adverse pathology after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer.
367 Background: While neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for muscle−invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) is recognized as the standard of care, the management of patients with locally advanced and/or nodal disease after NAC and radical cystectomy (RC) is not well defined. We sought to evaluate the association of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) and overall survival (OS) among patients with adverse pathology after NAC and RC. Methods: The National Cancer Database was reviewed to identify patients with adverse pathology (pT3N0, pT4N0, or pTanyN1−3) at RC following NAC from 2006−2012. Patients were stratified by receipt of AC. Clinical and pathologic variables were abstracted. OS was the primary end−point and differences on the basis of AC were assessed by the Kaplan−Meier method and log−rank test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to assess the association of AC with OS controlling for age, sex, race, Charlson score, year of diagnosis, pathologic stage, and receipt of adjuvant radiotherapy. Results: Adverse pathology following NAC and RC was identified in 1,361 patients from 2006−2012, of whom 328 (24.1%) received AC. Staging was pT3N0 in 444 (32.6%), pT4N0 in 162 (11.9%), and pTanyN1−3 in 755 (55.5%). Median OS for the entire cohort was 22.9 months, which differed by pathologic stage: 34.6 months (pT3N0), 21.4 months (pT4N0), and 19.3 months (pTanyN1-3)(p < 0.01). No difference in OS was noted by receipt of AC in the overall cohort (median OS 24.6 months with AC vs 22.0 months without AC; p = 0.18), or when stratified by pathologic stage. On multivariable analysis, receipt of AC was not significantly associated with overall mortality (HR 0.86; 95%CI 0.74−1.01; p = 0.06) for all patients. When stratified by stage, AC was associated with a significantly decreased risk of mortality among patients with pT4N0 disease (HR 0.56; 95%CI 0.33−0.97; p = 0.04), but not pT3N0 or pTanyN1−3 (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Patients with adverse pathology at RC after NAC have a median OS of approximately 2 years. AC was not associated with improved survival, except in the subgroup with pT4N0 disease. Clinical trials with newer systemic therapies are warranted for patients in this setting.
Association of age with utilization of radical cystectomy for high-grade nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer: Results from the National Cancer Database.
312 Background: Radical cystectomy (RC) is a preferred option for high−grade non−muscle invasive bladder cancer (HG NMIBC), particularly after failure of intravesical therapy. However, clinicians may be reluctant to offer surgery to older patients with NMIBC given concerns regarding morbidity. We therefore sought to evaluate the association of age with use of RC and clinicopathologic outcomes after RC for HG NMIBC. Methods: The National Cancer Data Base was queried to identify patients diagnosed with HG NMIBC between 2004−2013. Patients were stratified according to age at diagnosis: <60, 61−70, 71−80, >80 years. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess the associations of age group with utilization of RC and with pathologic upstaging (pT2−4 or pN+). Overall survival (OS) was evaluated using unadjusted and inverse propensity score weighted (IPTW) Kaplan−Meier methods and compared with the log-rank test. Results: RC was performed in 3,641 (5.7%) of 63,402 patients with HG NMIBC. Utilization of RC remained relatively constant over the study period (4.3%−6.8%; p=0.44). On multivariable analysis, increasing age was inversely associated with RC utilization, with the lowest utilization in those >80 (2.1% rate; OR 0.24; p<0.01). Similar associations of age with RC were observed at high volume centers (> 15 cases/year), academic centers, and for patients with cT1 disease. Among patients who underwent RC, pathologic upstaging was identified in 1,445 (43.6%), and no significant association was noted with age. NMIBC pathologic tumor stage was associated with improved OS compared to progression to pT2−4 or N+ disease at RC for all age groups: median OS improvement not reached in those under 60; 32 months in those 61−70; 55 months in those 71−80; and 34 months in those over 80 (all p<0.01). Similar improvements in survival were noted after IPTW. Conclusions: Older patients are significantly less likely to receive RC for HG NMIBC, despite a similar risk of upstaging and an improved survival when pathologic NMIBC is found at RC. These data support the use of RC for HG NMIBC in well selected patients across age strata.
Adherence to national quality guidelines for nodal staging and treatment of cutaneous melanoma.
110 Background: Assessment of compliance with national quality guidelines for the management of melanoma may be complicated by controversy about selection of patients for nodal surgery and limited by a lack of data on quality metrics. Previous reports suggest suboptimal overall compliance, with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) not performed for many suitable patients and completion lymph node dissection (CLND) omitted in many biopsy-proven node-positive (LN+) cases. The purpose of this study was to assess compliance with national ASCO/SSO guidelines for lymph node (LN) surgery for T2 and T3 (intermediate thickness, 1.01-4.00 mm) primary cutaneous melanoma patients and elucidate factors associated with non-compliance. Methods: All cases of T2 and T3, M0 melanoma were identified from 2004-2010 SEER data. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to identify independent predictors of compliance. Five-year cancer specific survival (CSS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Overall, 75.3% (6,609/8,782) of T2-T3 primary cutaneous melanoma patients underwent LN staging including SLNB in 6,330 (74.5%) of 8,492 clinically LN negative patients. Among these 6,609 patients, 1,279 (19.4%) had one or more LN+. 940 LN+ patients (73.4%) underwent CLND with removal of a mean (median, IQR) of 20.7 (18, 11-27) LNs. Compliance with LN staging and management guidelines was associated with truncal primary site (for SLNB), p<0.001 and with patient age <65 yrs and increasing number of metastatic LNs (for CLND), both p<0.0001. Compliance with CLND for LN+ patients was associated with improved 5 year CSS: 70.0% vs 64.6%, p<0.001. Conclusions: Compliance with guidelines for LN surgery in T2 and T3 melanoma is poor despite the well-defined benefit for this group of patients. These data suggest that non-compliance is multifactorial and not simply due to practice differences arising from the controversial aspects of melanoma management. Room for improvement exists. Assessment of modifiable factors associated with poor compliance, design of strategies to improve compliance and the development of performance measures around appropriate LN staging and management of T2 and T3 melanoma deserve further investigation.