Hijazi, Rhoda

Background Children's media both reflects and shapes societal attitudes toward physical disability. Despite its potential impact on self-concept and stigma, longitudinal, data-driven analysis of these portrayals remains scarce. This study aimed to quantify longitudinal trends in the tone and framing of physical disability representation in children's media and to explore implications for pediatric rehabilitation. Methods A quantitative content analysis was conducted on 68 children's media productions (1933–2025) sourced from the Vanderbilt Peabody database. Content was filtered to age-appropriate ratings (G, PG, PG-13, TV-14). Three trained reviewers classified depictions of physical disability by clinical category (e.g., spinal cord injury, limb difference) and tone (Positive, Neutral, Negative) and coded for the presence of rehabilitation themes. Inter-rater reliability (κ = 0.83) was achieved. Statistical testing included Mann-Kendall trend analysis and Fisher's exact tests to compare pre-2000 vs post-2000 portrayals. Results Positive portrayals increased significantly from pre-2000 (63%) to post-2000 (90%) (p = 0.01). A consistent upward trend across decades was confirmed (Z = 3.47, p < 0.01). Spinal cord injury was the most frequently depicted disability (40%); rehabilitation themes appeared in 24% of productions, more commonly post-2000. Productions with rehabilitation content were more likely to feature positive portrayals (94% vs 89%). Conclusions Over nine decades, children's media has shifted toward more affirming representations of physical disability, particularly after 2000. Findings suggest that pediatric rehabilitation providers can use positive media examples to reinforce therapeutic engagement, normalize assistive devices, and address stigma in age-appropriate ways.

Abstract Women remain underrepresented in physical medicine and rehabilitation, comprising only 36%–39% of residents despite evidence that diverse teams improve patient outcomes. Limited early exposure and systemic barriers may contribute to this disparity. In this cross-sectional study, we surveyed 1101 US premedical students from 198 colleges across 40 states and territories to assess perceptions of physical medicine and rehabilitation and identify effective early intervention strategies. While respondents included all gender identities, the analysis focused on the 870 female-identifying students (78.8%) due to the study’s primary aim of addressing gender equity in physical medicine and rehabilitation. Only 30.6% were familiar with physical medicine and rehabilitation, with exposure primarily through social media (42.6%) and personal connections (31.1%); just 9.0% had shadowed a physical medicine and rehabilitation physician. Financial concerns were prevalent, with 68.6% citing medical education costs and 66.4% citing application fees as deterrents. Despite these barriers, 60.6% expressed interest in learning more about physical medicine and rehabilitation. Preferred engagement strategies included shadowing (81.8%), interactive workshops (76.6%), mentorship programs (60.1%), and gender-specific events such as “Women in PM&R” (62.8%). These findings underscore the need for targeted, early outreach initiatives that address both informational and financial barriers, aiming to foster greater awareness and representation of women in physical medicine and rehabilitation and ultimately support a more inclusive physician workforce.