Perez, Edith A.

Purpose This phase III study compared the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab combined with standard chemotherapy regimens versus chemotherapy alone as second-line treatment of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) –negative metastatic breast cancer. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to chemotherapy + bevacizumab or to chemotherapy + placebo. Before random assignment, investigators chose capecitabine, a taxane (paclitaxel, nab-paclitaxel, or docetaxel), gemcitabine, or vinorelbine. Dosing for bevacizumab or placebo was 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks or 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks, depending on chemotherapy regimen. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival, PFS by chemotherapy cohort, objective response rate (ORR), duration of objective response, 1-year survival rate, and safety. Results RIBBON-2 enrolled 684 patients (225, chemotherapy + placebo; 459, chemotherapy + bevacizumab). The combination of bevacizumab with chemotherapy demonstrated a statistically significant benefit. Median PFS increased from 5.1 to 7.2 months (stratified hazard ratio for PFS, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.93; P = .0072). The 10% improvement in ORR between the placebo- and bevacizumab-containing arms (39.5% v 29.6%; P = .0193), although not statistically significant, was consistent with previous trials. There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival. The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) related to bevacizumab treatment were hypertension (9.0%) and proteinuria (3.1%). There was an increased number of AEs leading to study discontinuation in the chemotherapy + bevacizumab arm compared with the chemotherapy + placebo arm (13.3% v 7.2%). Conclusion The combination of bevacizumab with commonly used chemotherapies improved PFS in the second-line treatment of patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, with a safety profile comparable with that in prior phase III studies.

Abstract Purpose: To investigate the associations between baseline and posttreatment circulating tumor cell (CTC) gene expression and outcome of patients enrolled in four North Central Cancer Treatment Group metastatic breast cancer (MBC) trials in which specimens were shipped (at 4°C) from community-based sites to a reference laboratory (Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN). Experimental Design: Blood was collected at treating sites from MBC patients before (baseline), during, and at the end of treatment with erlotinib + gemcitabine (N0234), sorafenib (N0336), irinotecan + cetuximab (N0436), or paclitaxel-poliglumex + capecitabine (N0437). CTCs from 10 mL of EDTA blood were enriched with CD45 depletion, 24 to 30 hours postblood collection. Reverse transcription/quantitative PCR was used to determine cytokeratin-19 (CK19) and mammaglobin (MGB1) mRNA levels in CTCs from up to 13 (N0234), 16 (N0336), 18 (N0436), and 39 (N0437) patients. The gene expressions were normalized to β2-microglobulin and calibrated to healthy blood using the 2–ΔΔCq algorithm; positivity was defined as 2 or more. Results: CK19+mRNA cells were detected in 56% to 75% and MGB1+mRNA cells in 23% to 38% of 86 patients at baseline. CK19+mRNA cells were detected in 30% to 67% and MGB1+mRNA cells in 14% to 64% of 110 postbaseline serial samples. The presence of baseline CK19+mRNA cells (P = 0.01) but not MGB1+mRNA cells (P = 0.14) was significantly associated with shorter overall survival. A decrease in MGB1+mRNA levels (baseline-week 8) seemed to be associated with clinical response (P = 0.05). Conclusions: CTC gene expression analysis conducted by a reference laboratory is feasible when blood is collected from treating sites and processed 24 to 30 hours postcollection. The presence of baseline CK19+mRNA CTCs was associated with poor prognosis; a decrease in MGB1+mRNA CTCs may help predict response to therapy of MBC patients. Clin Cancer Res; 17(22); 7183–93. ©2011 AACR.

Abstract Purpose: To conduct an exploratory analysis of the relationship between gene expression and recurrence in patients with operable triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with adjuvant doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy. Experimental Design: RNA was extracted from archived tumor samples derived from 246 patients with stage I-III TNBC treated with adjuvant doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy, and was analyzed by quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR for a panel of 374 genes. The relationship between gene expression and recurrence was evaluated using weighted Cox proportional hazards model score tests. Results: Growth factor receptor bound protein 7 (GRB7) was the only gene for which higher expression was significantly associated with increased recurrence in TNBC (Korn's adjusted P value = 0.04). In a Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for clinicopathologic features, higher GRB7 expression was associated with an increased recurrence risk (HR = 2.31; P = 0.04 using the median as the split). The 5-year recurrence rates were 10.5% [95% confidence intervals (CI), 7.8–14.1] in the low and 20.4% (95% CI, 16.5–25.0) in the high GRB7 groups. External validation in other datasets indicated that GRB7 expression was not prognostic in two adjuvant trials including variable systemic therapy, but in two other trials showed that high GBR7 expression was associated with resistance to neoadjuvant doxorubicin and taxane therapy. Conclusions: GRB7 was associated with an increased risk of recurrence in TNBC, suggesting that GRB7 or GRB7-dependent pathways may serve as potential biomarkers for therapeutic targets. Therapeutic targeting of one or more factors identified which function as interaction nodes or effectors should also be considered. Clin Cancer Res; 17(22); 7194–203. ©2011 AACR.

Purpose This phase III study compared the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab (BV) when combined with several standard chemotherapy regimens versus those regimens alone for first-line treatment of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative metastatic breast cancer. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned in 2:1 ratio to chemotherapy plus BV or chemotherapy plus placebo. Before random assignment, investigators chose capecitabine (Cape; 2,000 mg/m 2 for 14 days), taxane (Tax) -based (nab-paclitaxel 260 mg/m 2 , docetaxel 75 or 100 mg/m 2 ), or anthracycline (Anthra) -based (doxorubicin or epirubicin combinations [doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide, epirubicin/cyclophosphamide, fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide, or fluorouracil/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide]) chemotherapy administered every 3 weeks. BV or placebo was administered at 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), 1-year survival rate, objective response rate, duration of objective response, and safety. Two independently powered cohorts defined by the choice of chemotherapy (Cape patients or pooled Tax/Anthra patients) were analyzed in parallel. Results RIBBON-1 (Regimens in Bevacizumab for Breast Oncology) enrolled 1,237 patients (Cape cohort, n = 615; Tax/Anthra cohort, n = 622). Median PFS was longer for each BV combination (Cape cohort: increased from 5.7 months to 8.6 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.84; log-rank P < .001; and Tax/Anthra cohort: increased from 8.0 months to 9.2 months; HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.80; log-rank P < .001). No statistically significant differences in OS between the placebo- and BV-containing arms were observed. Safety was consistent with results of prior BV trials. Conclusion The combination of BV with Cape, Tax, or Anthra improves clinical benefit in terms of increased PFS in first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer, with a safety profile comparable to prior phase III studies.

Abstract A personalized approach to breast cancer management is increasingly possible with state of the art diagnostics and treatments. However, many challenges still exist in choosing the right therapeutic strategy and the right dosing for a specific patient population. Biomarkers such as estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER-2 status are used to tailor therapy, but success rates with targeted therapy suggest that appropriate patient populations still require greater definition. The introduction of the genomic era has likewise advanced the ability to offer a tailored approach to breast cancer management, but much work is still needed in this area as well. Microarray-based gene expression profiles have demonstrated initial promise, but we need a better understanding of more complex tumor signaling pathways. Strategies include annotated tumor specimens, next-generation gene sequencing, proteomics, and metabolomics. An individualized approach to breast cancer management has the potential to offer clear clinical benefits and the ability to bring more tailored, cost-effective strategies to the market. The current issues facing the delivery of individualized breast cancer care will be the focus of this discussion.

Purpose Findings from the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) –positive National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B31 trial suggested that MYC/HER2 coamplification (> 5.0 copies/nucleus) was associated with additional benefit from adjuvant trastuzumab in patients with early-stage breast cancer. To further explore this relationship, we investigated associations between MYC amplification and disease-free survival (DFS) in a similar adjuvant trastuzumab HER2-positive breast cancer trial—North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) N9831. Patients and Methods This analysis included 799 patients randomly assigned to receive chemotherapy alone or with concurrent trastuzumab on N9831. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) was performed by using a dual-probe mixture for MYC and centromere 8 (MYC:CEP8) on tissue microarrays. MYC amplification was prespecified as MYC:CEP8 ratio > 2.2 or average MYC copies/nucleus > 5.0. Exploratory variables included polysomy 8. Results In comparing DFS (median follow-up, 4.0 years) between treatments, patients with MYC:CEP8 ratio ≤ 2.2 (n = 618; 77%) and > 2.2 (n = 181; 23%) had hazard ratios (HRs) of 0.46 (P < .001) and 0.67 (P = .33), respectively (interaction P = .38). Patients with MYC copies/nucleus ≤ 5.0 (n = 534; 67%) and > 5.0 (n = 265; 33%) had HRs of 0.52 (P = .002) and 0.48 (P = .02), respectively (interaction P = .94). Patients with MYC:CEP8 ratio < 1.3 with normal chromosome 8 copy number (n = 141; 18%) and ≥ 1.3 or < 1.3 with polysomy 8 (n = 658; 82%) had HRs of 0.66 (P = .28) and 0.44 (P < .001), respectively (interaction P = .23). Patients with MYC copies/nucleus < 2.5 (n = 130; 16%) and ≥ 2.5 (n = 669; 84%) had HRs of 1.07 (P = .87) and 0.42 (P < .001), respectively (interaction P = .05). Conclusion We did not confirm the B31 association between MYC amplification and additional trastuzumab benefit. Exploratory analyses revealed potential associations between alternative MYC/chromosome 8 copy number alterations and differential benefit of adjuvant trastuzumab.

Purpose Patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) or locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) were randomly assigned to 21-day doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide administered for five cycles (standard arm) versus weekly doxorubicin and daily oral cyclophosphamide administered with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support for 15 weeks (continuous arm). All patients had subsequent weekly paclitaxel for 12 weeks before surgery. Patients and Methods Patients (n = 372) were randomly assigned to the standard arm (n = 186) or the continuous arm (n = 186) stratified by disease type (LABC, n = 256; IBC, n = 116). The primary outcome was microscopic pathologic complete response (pCR) at surgery. Secondary outcomes included disease-free survival, overall survival, and toxicity. Results More patients in the standard arm had grade 3 to 4 leukopenia and neutropenia, but there were more instances of stomatitis/pharyngitis and hand-foot skin reaction in the continuous arm. Assessed among 356 eligible patients, pCR was not different between the treatment groups stratified by disease type (P = .42). In subset analysis, higher pCR rates were observed in the continuous arm versus the standard arm only for stage IIIB disease (P = .0057) and in IBC (P = .06). Comparison of overall survival and disease-free survival showed no difference between treatment groups (P = .37 and P = .87, respectively). Conclusion No significant clinical benefit was seen for the investigational arm in this trial overall.

Abstract Background: N9831 is the only randomized phase III trial comparing safety and efficacy of the addition of trastuzumab (H) to doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide then paclitaxel (Arm A: AC→T) either following (Arm B: AC→T→H) or starting concurrently with paclitaxel (Arm C: AC→T+H→H) for women with resected Stage I-III invasive HER2+ breast cancer. The 3 yr cumulative incidence of NYHA class III or IV congestive heart failure or sudden cardiac death was previously reported: 3.3% in Arm C, 2.8% in Arm B (Perez EA, et al. JCO 2008). The comparison of AC→T to AC→T+H→H was reported in a joint analysis of N9831 and NSABP B-31 in 2005 and updated in 2007, demonstrating a 52% reduction in risk of a disease event (Romond E et al., NEJM 2005; Perez EA, et al. ASCO 2007).Materials and Methods: Primary endpoint is disease-free survival (DFS). At the second planned interim analysis of Arm A vs. Arm B, the O’Brien-Fleming boundary (OFB) was crossed. NCCTG Independent Data Safety Monitoring Committee approved the release of these data as well as the data pertaining to Arm B vs. Arm C due to slow pace of events [expected 647 events in 4 yr follow-up period (f/u) vs. actual 334 events in 4.5 yr f/u]. Shortly thereafter, there were sufficient events to perform the first planned interim analysis of B vs. C. We present the results of each of these pairwise comparisons taking into account the potential for crossover to Arm C after the release of the joint analysis findings in 2005.Results: From 5/2000 to 4/2005, 2448 eligible women were enrolled for the Arm A (n=1087) vs. Arm B (n=1097) comparison. Median f/u is 5.5 yrs. with 386 events. The addition of trastuzumab sequentially to AC→T significantly improved DFS, univariately [HR(Arm B/Arm A)=0.70, 95% CI: 57-86%, logrank p=0.0005] and after adjusting for age, tumor size, number of positive nodes, and ER [PPH: HRadj=0.67 (95% CI: 0.55-0.82)]. 5 yr DFS was increased from 72% with AC→T to 80% with AC→T →H.From 5/2000 to 4/2005, 1903 eligible women were enrolled for the Arm B (n=954) vs. Arm C (n=949) comparison. Median f/u is 5.3 yrs. with 312 events. The log-rank p-value testing whether DFS differs with respect to starting time of trastuzumab was 0.019. [Not crossing pre-specified OFB for statistical significance]. After adjusting for tumor size, number of positive nodes, and ER, HRadj(Arm C/Arm B)=0.75 (95% CI: 0.60-0.94)]. 5 yr DFS was increased from 80% with AC→T →H to 84% for AC→T+H →H.Conclusions: DFS is significantly improved with the addition of 52 weeks of H (sequentially or concurrently) to AC→ T. There is a statistically significant 33% reduction in the risk of an event with the sequential addition of H following AC→T. There is a strong trend for a 25% reduction in the risk of an event with starting H concurrently with T relative to sequentially after T. Therefore, based on a positive risk/benefit ratio, we recommend that trastuzumab be incorporated in a concurrent fashion with T chemotherapy.Acknowledgements: NIH CA25224, Breast Cancer Research Foundation, Genentech. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 80. NOTE: This abstract was accepted for presentation at the Symposium after the Abstract Book went to press.

Abstract Background: Gene expression profiling is an important tool in prediction, prognosis, and cancer modeling. The DASL® assay (cDNA –mediated Annealing, extension, Selection, and Ligation; Illumina; San Diego, CA) is a gene expression profiling system designed for degraded RNAs such as those derived from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor samples. FFPE tumor samples are invaluable resources for cancer research, being the most widely available materials for which patient outcomes are known. Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of Illumina's Whole Genome DASL platform (24,526; 24K) at distinguishing HER2-positive (HER2+) from HER2-negative (HER2-) FFPE breast tumors. Methods: We measured the relative gene expression of biological and technical replicates using nine HER2+ and 11 HER2- primary breast tumors from patients that were all node-positive and estrogen receptor-positive. The HER2 status of the tumors was determined using the Dako Hercept Test following the 2007 ASCO/CAP guidelines for HER2 positivity. The non-background corrected probe-expression data were exported from Illumina BeadStudio software and normalized using the software R and the function fastlo. Log2 transformed expression values were used to obtain the relative gene expression per probe. Spearman correlations were calculated between both types of replicates. Unequal-variance t-tests were conducted to test for differences in expression levels between HER2+ and HER2- tumors. An overall ERBB2 gene expression level was calculated by taking the average of the three ERBB2 probes for each tumor across all replicates. To simulate the possible outcome if only one replicate of each tumor was measured for gene expression, differential expression was tested for all possible combinations of single replicate probe expression values. Results: Spearman correlations for technical and biological replicates within tumor samples ranged from 0.9804 – 0.9946, and 0.9822 – 0.9945, respectively. The overall ERBB2 gene expression was significantly lower in HER2- tumors than in HER2+ tumors (p = 0.0000018). The top five most differentially expressed genes (p &lt; 0.0005) included ERBB2, GRB7, C17ORF37, PERLD1, and ASF1B. For each of the three ERBB2 probes, there were 65,536 possible ways to combine the individual probe expression values. The p-values for testing differential expression in each of these 65,536 combinations of HER2+ tumors versus HER2- tumors ranged from 0.00029 – 0.0091 for ILMN_1717902, 0.0000078 – 0.00026 for ILMN_1728761, and 0.000000002 – 0.0000032 for ILMN-2352131. Conclusions: Illumina's Whole Genome Platform provided highly reproducible gene expression values among biological and technical replicates of breast tumors. This platform also demonstrated significant differential ERBB2 gene expression between HER2+ and HER- breast tumors, which correctly classified the breast tumors as HER2+ and HER2-. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 6127.

Abstract Background: Three prior Phase III trials (E2100, AVADO, and RIBBON-1) established the clinical benefit of adding bevacizumab (BV) to various chemotherapies (chemos) as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). A previous Phase III study (AVF2119g) in patients with predominantly heavily pre-treated MBC, in which BV was added to capecitabine (Cape), resulted in a significant increase in objective response rate (ORR), but did not meet the primary endpoint for progression-free survival (PFS). The current study, RIBBON-2, was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the addition of BV to chemotherapies used as second-line treatment for MBC.Methods: Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to chemo+BV or chemo+placebo (PL). Key eligibility criteria included one prior cytotoxic treatment for MBC, ECOG performance status of 0 to 1, and HER2-negative or unknown status. Prior to randomization, investigators chose one of the following chemo agents: taxane (T; paclitaxel 90 mg/m2/wk for 3 of the 4 weeks; paclitaxel 175 mg/m2, nab-paclitaxel 260 mg/m2, docetaxel 75–100 mg/m2, all given q3wk), gemcitabine (G; 1250 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8 q3wk), Cape (2000 mg/m2 Days 1–14 q3wk), or vinorelbine (V; 30 mg/m2/wk). BV or PL was administered at 10 mg/kg q2wk or 15 mg/kg q3wk, depending on the chemo regimen. The primary endpoint of the study was investigator-assessed PFS pooled across the chemo cohorts. Key secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), PFS within individual chemo cohorts, ORR, and safety.Results: 684 patients (T, 304; G, 160; Cape, 144; and V, 76) at 211 sites in 19 countries were randomized between February 2006 and June 2008. Overall, the two study arms were balanced for patient characteristics at baseline. The study met its primary endpoint of PFS pooled across chemo cohorts and also demonstrated a 10% increase in ORR when BV was added to chemo. At the interim analysis for OS, the median durations were 18 mo for chemo+BV and 16.4 mo for chemo+PL (see table).Across all chemo cohorts the incidence of BV-related AEs was consistent with data from previous studies. Hypertension was the only BV-related AE consistently increased in the chemo+BV arm across all chemo cohorts.Conclusions: The addition of BV to chemotherapies used for second-line treatment of MBC led to a significant improvement in PFS. The AE profile of BV in the overall study population and across the chemotherapy cohorts was consistent with that previously observed. Additional analyses, including PFS for the individual chemo cohorts, will be presented. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(24 Suppl):Abstract nr 42.