Pillai, S.M.

Abstract Rationale Exertional dyspnea in children often necessitates a thorough evaluation to determine potential causes, with bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) and exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) being among the most common. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is widely recognized as the gold standard for diagnosing EIB; however, it requires significant patient cooperation and specialized resources. The methacholine challenge test (MCT), a bronchial provocation test, is commonly employed to evaluate baseline airway hyperreactivity. Nonetheless, its reliability in predicting EIB in pediatric patients experiencing exertional dyspnea has not been well established. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MCT compared to CPET in detecting BHR among pediatric patients with unexplained dyspnea. This assessment will help determine the potential of MCT as a complementary diagnostic tool for EIB. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study involving pediatric patients (up to 18 years of age) who underwent both CPET and MCT as part of their clinical evaluation for exertional dyspnea from July 2020 to February 2023. A reduction of ≥20% in FEV1% was considered a positive result for the methacholine challenge. In the CPET, a decrease of ≥10% in FEV1% post-exercise was indicative of EIB. The results from both tests were compiled in a 2x2 table, using MCT as the reference standard. Results Out of the 98 patients who underwent CPET, 53 also completed a methacholine challenge test. The mean age of participants was 14 years (SD ± 2.42), with a mean BMI of 22.2 kg/m² (SD ± 5.25), and 71% of the patients were female. Using CPET as the reference standard, the MCT demonstrated a sensitivity of 66.7%, specificity of 58%, positive predictive value of 8.7%, and a negative predictive value of 96.7% for identifying BHR in patients with exertional dyspnea. Conclusions MCT exhibited moderate sensitivity and specificity, and a high negative predictive value, indicating its effectiveness in ruling out BHR in children with exertional dyspnea. However, it is less reliable as a standalone diagnostic tool for EIB, and CPET remains essential for an accurate diagnosis of EIB in these patients.