Mesquita, Cynthia Florêncio de

Summary Introduction Postoperative delirium is a common complication following cardiac surgery. Despite its known impact on patient outcomes, effective preventative strategies remain elusive. We aimed to perform a comprehensive Bayesian network meta‐analysis of randomised controlled trials assessing the effect of pharmacological interventions on the incidence of postoperative delirium. Methods Databases were searched from inception to September 2024. Our search was updated in January 2025. Eligible studies included randomised controlled trials reporting the incidence of postoperative delirium in patients having cardiac surgery treated with pharmacological interventions. Bayesian models were used to estimate risk ratios (RR) and mean differences with 95%CrI through Markov chain Monte Carlo. Interventions were ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve. Sensitivity analyses and grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation assessment were conducted to evaluate the robustness and certainty of evidence. Results Seventy‐nine randomised controlled trials comprising 24,827 patients were included, with 29 pharmacological interventions compared. Dexmedetomidine combined with melatonin was the most effective intervention, reducing the incidence of postoperative delirium compared with placebo (risk ratio 0.31, 95%CrI 0.13–0.69; low certainty). Dexmedetomidine with melatonin also significantly decreased intensive care unit stay (2.4 days, 95%CrI ‐3.50–1.10) and hospital stay (1.32 days, 95%CrI ‐2.09 to ‐0.57). Other interventions, including ketamine and risperidone, showed potential efficacy but with low or very low certainty of evidence. Discussion We identified dexmedetomidine with melatonin as the most effective pharmacological strategy for preventing postoperative delirium following cardiac surgery. Whilst these findings highlight potential benefits, the low certainty of evidence underscores the need for more high‐quality primary evidence.

Background. The Fontan procedure has transformed the management of congenital heart defects characterized by single ventricle physiology, yet it predisposes individuals to Fontan-associated liver disease. Combined heart and liver transplantation (CHLT) emerges as a therapeutic option, but evidence of its efficacy and safety remains limited. This study aimed to comprehensively evaluate CHLT in Fontan patients, focusing on patient characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and posttransplant morbidity and mortality. Methods. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted. Studies meeting the intervention of CHLT in Fontan patients were included, and data were collected and synthesized using proportion meta-analysis techniques. Statistical analysis was carried out using R software. Results. Four studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 67 Fontan patients undergoing CHLT. All included studies were observational retrospective cohorts performed in the United States. The 1-y survival rate post-CHLT was 88% (95% confidence interval [CI], 70%-98%). Liver graft rejection rates were low, 4% (95% CI, 0%-22%), and no heart graft rejection greater than mild was reported. Postoperative complications included acute kidney injury 75% (95% CI, 50%-93%), temporary dialysis 27% (95% CI, 9%-51%), neurologic events 7% (95% CI, 0%-26%), infection 23% (95% CI, 3%-55%), and unplanned medical procedures 40% (95% CI, 23%-59%). Conclusions. CHLT in Fontan patients demonstrates promising survival rates, but graft rejection and postoperative complications pose challenges. The rate of renal complications is particularly notable and requires further evaluation. Future research should prioritize comparative different management strategies and long-term follow-up to refine protocols and optimize outcomes.

Background: The Fontan procedure has transformed the management of congenital heart defects (CHD) characterized by single ventricle physiology, yet it predisposes individuals to Fontan-associated liver disease (FALD), potentially leading to end-stage liver disease (ESLD). Combined heart and liver transplantation (CHLT) emerges as a therapeutic option, but evidence on its efficacy, safety, and outcomes remains limited. Objectives: This systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis aims to comprehensively evaluate the literature on CHLT in Fontan patients, focusing on patient characteristics, perioperative outcomes, and post-transplant morbidity and mortality. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Studies meeting the intervention of CHLT in Fontan patients were included and data were collected and synthesized using proportion meta-analysis techniques. Statistical analysis was carried out using R software. Results: Four studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 67 Fontan patients undergoing CHLT. All included studies were observational retrospective cohorts performed in the United States. One-year survival rate post-CHLT was 84% (95% CI 66%-94%), Figure 1A. Rates of liver and heart graft rejection were low 10% (95% CI 3%-33%) and 8% (95% CI 2%-31%), respectively, Figure 1B. Postoperative complications included acute kidney injury 72% (95% CI 46%-88%), temporary dialysis 31% (95% CI 14%-55%), neurologic events 14% (95% CI 5%-34%), infection 24% (95% CI 6%-63%), and unplanned medical procedures 41% (95% CI 24%-60%), Figure 1C. Conclusion: CHLT in Fontan patients demonstrates promising survival rates, but graft rejection and postoperative complications pose challenges. The rate of renal complications is particularly notable and requires further evaluation. Future research should prioritize comparative different management strategies and long-term follow-up to refine protocols and optimize outcomes.