Naidu, Srihari S.

Despite advances in drug and device technology, health care delivery, and research infrastructure, cardiogenic shock (CS) continues to have nearly 50% in‐hospital mortality. In patients with CS, both the initial severity of Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention CS and its subsequent trajectory predicts the clinical outcomes. Accordingly, delayed initial recognition and failure to escalate or deescalate treatment can significantly affect the outcomes of CS. Traditional assessment methods, with the exception of blood pressure measurement, require a high index of suspicion and frequent reassessment by the clinical team. Electronic medical record‐based detection has been successfully implemented in acute and critical care patients with septic shock and acute kidney injury. In CS, electronic medical record‐based studies have largely focused on using models to predict outcomes in patients with CS, with limited data on electronic medical record‐based tools to assist with either predicting CS or providing real time alerts when escalation or de‐escalation might be indicated. Early detection of CS may be associated with detection of earlier Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention stages of CS and potentially prevent deterioration to higher stages. In this review, we seek to highlight a blueprint for electronic medical record‐based detection of CS that focuses on reproducibility, convenience, clinical decision support, and research aspects.

BACKGROUND: In severely symptomatic patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), VALOR-HCM trial (Study to Evaluate Mavacamten in Adults With Symptomatic Obstructive HCM Who Are Eligible for Septal Reduction Therapy [URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT04349072]) reported that mavacamten reduced the short-term need for septal reduction therapy (SRT). The current report examined the longer-term effect of mavacamten through end of treatment at week 128. METHODS: A double-blind randomized placebo-controlled multicenter trial at 19 sites in the United States included symptomatic obstructive HCM patients referred for SRT (enrollment July 2020 through October 2021). The group initially randomized to mavacamten continued the drug for 128 weeks and the placebo to mavacamten group from week 16 to 128 (112-week exposure). Dose titrations were performed using echocardiographic left ventricular outflow tract gradient and left ventricular ejection fraction measurements. The principal end point was proportion of patients proceeding with SRT or remaining guideline-eligible at week 128. RESULTS: At week 128, 17 of 108 (15.7%) patients in the total study sample met the composite end point (7 underwent SRT, 1 was SRT-eligible, and 9 SRT-status unevaluable). Additionally, 87 of 108 (80.5%) patients demonstrated ≥1 New York Heart Association class improvement by week 128, and 52 of 108 (48.1%) demonstrated ≥2, with a sustained reduction in resting and Valsalva left ventricular outflow tract gradients of 38.2 mm Hg and 59.4 mm Hg, respectively. Ninety-five of 108 (88%) patients transitioned to commercial mavacamten. Overall, 15 of 108 (13.8%) patients (5.41 per 100 patient-years) had an left ventricular ejection fraction <50% (2 with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤30%; 1 death). Of these, 12 of 15 (80%) continued treatment. New-onset atrial fibrillation occurred in 11 (10.2%) patients (4.55 per 100 patient-years). CONCLUSIONS: In severely symptomatic obstructive HCM patients, sustained freedom from SRT was observed at 128 weeks, with nearly 90% patients remaining on long-term mavacamten. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT04349072.

BACKGROUND: In severely symptomatic patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, VALOR-HCM (A Study to Evaluate Mavacamten in Adults With Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Who Are Eligible for Septal Reduction Therapy) demonstrated that mavacamten reduces the need for septal reduction therapy with sustained improvement in left ventricular (LV) outflow tract gradients and symptoms. Global longitudinal strain (GLS), a measure of regional myocardial function, is a more sensitive marker of systolic function. In VALOR-HCM, we assessed serial changes in LV and right ventricular (RV) strain. METHODS: VALOR-HCM included 112 patients with symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (mean, 60 years; 51% male; LV ejection fraction, 68%). Patients assigned to mavacamten at baseline continued the drug for 56 weeks (n=56) and those assigned to placebo (n=52) transitioned to mavacamten from weeks 16 to 56 (40-week exposure). LV-GLS and RV-GLS assessment was performed using a vendor-neutral software. Non-foreshortened apical (4-, 3-, and 2-chamber) views were used to obtain peak LV-GLS. RV focused 4-chamber view was used to calculate RV 4-chamber and free wall strain. A more negative strain value is favorable. RESULTS: At baseline, the mean LV-GLS, RV 4-chamber, and free wall strain values were −14.7%, −22.2%, and −16.8%, respectively (all worse than reported normal means). In the total study sample, LV-GLS significantly improved from baseline to week 56 ( P =0.02). Twelve patients had transient reduction in LV ejection fraction (<50%) requiring temporary drug interruption (including 3 permanent discontinuations). The LV-GLS in this subgroup was worse at baseline versus total study population (−11.4%), with no significant worsening from baseline through week 56 ( P =0.64). Both free wall and 4-chamber RV-GLS remained unchanged from baseline to week 56 ( P =0.62 and P =0.56, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In VALOR-HCM, treatment with mavacamten improved LV-GLS from baseline through week 56 (with no significant worsening of LV-GLS in patients with a reduction in LV ejection fraction ≤50%), suggesting a favorable long-term impact on regional LV systolic function. Additionally, there was no detrimental impact on RV systolic function. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT04349072.

Introduction: The performance of automated left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessment in patients with altered cardiac chamber geometry, such as those with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), is not well described. Aims: Accurate assessment of LVEF is required for dose titration and continuation of myosin inhibitors in obstructive HCM. From the VALOR-HCM trial (NCT04349072), the agreement of two commercially available software packages was compared with blinded core lab assessment of LVEF. Methods: From baseline and week 16, among 112 patients randomized to either mavacamten or placebo, 178 echocardiograms were analyzed. Representative clips were manually selected, and automated LVEFs were calculated. Comparisons of LVEFs were made using Pearson’s correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman analysis. Results: With core lab assessment, the overall median LVEF was 68% (Q1 66%, Q3 70%). The correlation with vendor 1 was moderate (r = 0.47, 95% CI 0.35-0.58, p <0.001) and weak with vendor 2 (r =0.21, 95% CI 0.07-0.35, p =0.004). Correlation was also weak between vendor 1 and 2 (r = 0.14, 95% CI 0.00-0.28, p = 0.06). Vendors 1 and 2 had an underestimation bias of LVEF of 8% (95% CI 6-9%) and 8% (95% CI 7-9%), respectively, compared to core lab LVEF (Figure 1). Conclusions: In VALOR-HCM, the concordance of LVEF between different commercially available software packages with each other and with a core lab assessment was limited. Further study is needed to evaluate and improve the performance of automated LVEF tools in obstructive HCM patients who have altered cardiac chamber geometry.

Introduction: Data on use of ICE guidance in TEER procedure is limited to case reports and small case series. Our study aims to assess the feasibility, safety, utilization patterns and clinical outcomes of mitral TEER procedure with ICE guidance using a nationally representative real-world cohort of patients.Hypothesis: There is no difference between ICE-guided TEER and TEE-guided TEER in the clinical outcomes and complications. Methods: This study used the National Inpatient Sample database from quarter 4 of 2015 to 2020. We used a propensity-matched analysis and adjusted odds ratios for in-hospital outcomes/complications. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: A total of 38,770 weighted cases of mitral TEER were identified. Of the included patients 665 patients underwent ICE-guided TEER while 38,105 had TEE-guided TEER. There were no differences in the in-hospital mortality between both groups (2.5% vs. 3.0%, p=0.58). Adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality (aOR 0.83, 95%CI [0.42-1.64]) were not significantly different. There were no differences in periprocedural complications including cardiac (aOR 0.85, 95%CI [0.54-1.35]), bleeding (aOR 1.45, 95%CI [0.93-2.33]), respiratory (aOR 0.88, 95%CI [0.61-1.25]), and renal (aOR 0.89, 95%CI [0.66-1.20]) complications between patients undergoing ICE-guided versus TEE-guided TEER. There was no difference in GI complications between both groups (aOR 1.11, 95%CI [0.46-2.70]). The adjusted length of stay was less among ICE-guided TEER (median: 1 vs. 2, p<0.01) with no differences in costs of hospitalization ($137,312 vs. $153,773, p=0.06), Conclusions: In conclusion, ICE-guided mitral TEER is safe when compared with TEE guided TEER with no significant differences in in-hospital mortality, cardiac, bleeding, respiratory, and renal complications. The length of stay in ICE group is shorter as compared with the TEE group.

Importance There is an unmet need for novel medical therapies before recommending invasive therapies for patients with severely symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Mavacamten has been shown to improve left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient and symptoms and may thus reduce the short-term need for septal reduction therapy (SRT). Objective To examine the cumulative longer-term effect of mavacamten on the need for SRT through week 56. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, randomized clinical trial with placebo crossover at 16 weeks, conducted from July 2020 to November 2022. Participants were recruited from 19 US HCM centers. Included in the trial were patients with obstructive HCM (New York Heart Association class III/IV) referred for SRT. Study data were analyzed April to August 2023. Interventions Patients initially assigned to mavacamten at baseline continued the drug for 56 weeks, and patients taking placebo crossed over to mavacamten from week 16 to week 56 (40-week exposure). Dose titrations were performed using echocardiographic LVOT gradient and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) measurements. Main Outcome and Measure Proportion of patients undergoing SRT, remaining guideline eligible or unevaluable SRT status at week 56. Results Of 112 patients with highly symptomatic obstructive HCM, 108 (mean [SD] age, 60.3 [12.5] years; 54 male [50.0%]) qualified for the week 56 evaluation. At week 56, 5 of 56 patients (8.9%) in the original mavacamten group (3 underwent SRT, 1 was SRT eligible, and 1 was not SRT evaluable) and 10 of 52 patients (19.2%) in the placebo crossover group (3 underwent SRT, 4 were SRT eligible, and 3 were not SRT evaluable) met the composite end point. A total of 96 of 108 patients (89%) continued mavacamten long term. Between the mavacamten and placebo-to-mavacamten groups, respectively, after 56 weeks, there was a sustained reduction in resting (mean difference, −34.0 mm Hg; 95% CI, −43.5 to −24.5 mm Hg and −33.2 mm Hg; 95% CI, −41.9 to −24.5 mm Hg) and Valsalva (mean difference, −45.6 mm Hg; 95% CI, −56.5 to −34.6 mm Hg and −54.6 mm Hg; 95% CI, −66.0 to −43.3 mm Hg) LVOT gradients. Similarly, there was an improvement in NYHA class of 1 or higher in 51 of 55 patients (93%) in the original mavacamten group and in 37 of 51 patients (73%) in the placebo crossover group. Overall, 12 of 108 patients (11.1%; 95% CI, 5.87%-18.60%), which represents 7 of 56 patients (12.5%) in the original mavacamten group and 5 of 52 patients (9.6%) in the placebo crossover group, had an LVEF less than 50% (2 with LVEF ≤30%, one of whom died), and 9 of 12 patients (75%) continued treatment. Conclusions and Relevance Results of this randomized clinical trial showed that in patients with symptomatic obstructive HCM, mavacamten reduced the need for SRT at week 56, with sustained improvements in LVOT gradients and symptoms. Although this represents a useful therapeutic option, given the potential risk of LV systolic dysfunction, there is a continued need for close monitoring. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04349072

Introduction: In the randomized VALOR-HCM study of symptomatic patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM), mavacamten reduced the need for septal reduction therapy at 16 weeks. The current sub-study sought to assess the impact of mavacamten on systolic anterior motion (SAM) of the mitral valve and associated mitral regurgitation (MR). Methods: Patients on maximally-tolerated medical therapy referred for septal reduction therapy were randomized 1:1 to mavacamten or placebo. Echocardiographic assessment was performed by an independent, blinded core laboratory. SAM was assessed as none, mild (anterior leaflet >/= 1 cm from the septum), moderate (anterior leaflets <1cm from the septum), and severe (anterior leaflet in contact with septum). MR was assessed according to ASE guidelines. Results: Among 112 enrolled patients, 23.2% (n=27) had at least moderate (2+) MR. Most (92.9%, n=104) had at least moderate resting SAM, of whom 55.4% (n = 62) had severe SAM. At 16 weeks, 53.7% of patients treated with mavacamten had at least one level improvement in resting SAM compared to 21.6% of patients treated with placebo ( p = 0.001), and 35.2% had at least a two level improvement in SAM compared with 11.8% of placebo patients ( p = 0.007)(Figure 1A). Similarly, patients treated with mavacamten had an improvement of -36.0 + 28.8 mmHg in resting left ventricular outflow tract gradient at week 16 compared to -1.5 + 26.5 mmHg with placebo (<0.001). At week 16, 48.1% of patients treated with mavacamten had at least a one grade improvement in MR, and 23.1% had at least a two grade improvement compared to 12.2% and 6.1% of patients treated with placebo ( p <0.001 and 0.025, respectively)(Figure 1B). Conclusions: In highly symptomatic patients with oHCM, treatment with mavacamten reduced resting SAM with an improvement in associated MR.

Introduction: In the randomized VALOR-HCM study of symptomatic patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM), mavacamten reduced the need for septal reduction therapy at 16 weeks. Because mavacamten is a cardiac myosin inhibitor that may improve ventricular compliance, this sub-study hypothesized that mavacamten would favorably impact diastolic function. Methods: Symptomatic patients on maximally-tolerated medical therapy referred for septal reduction therapy were randomized 1:1 to mavacamten or placebo. Echocardiographic assessment was performed by an independent, blinded core laboratory. Diastolic grade was determined according to ASE guidelines. Between-group comparisons were made from baseline to week 16. Results: Among 112 enrolled patients, baseline left atrial volume index (LAVi) was similar (Table). At 16 weeks, mavacamten treatment resulted in a significant reduction in LAVi (-5.2 vs -0.5 with placebo, p = .003). Similarly, although lateral E/e’ and septal E/e’ were comparable at baseline, patients treated with mavacamten demonstrated a significant reduction at week 16 (lateral E/e’: -3.5 vs 0.7, p <0.001; septal E/e’: -3.3 vs 0.7, p < 0.001)(Table). Patients treated with mavacamten were also more likely to improve their diastolic dysfunction grade (31.4% vs 12.8%, p = 0.032) (Figure). Conclusions: After only 16 weeks of therapy, in a highly symptomatic oHCM population with echocardiographic-guided drug titration, mavacamten improved measures of diastolic function.