Back to Authors

Patel, Parag C.

0000-0002-2761-5895

Mayo Clinic

WinnMed

Citations 4

Cardiogenic Shock Detection Using Electronic Medical Records: A Review and Blueprint for Clinical Implementation and Future Research
Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra, Mehta, Chirag , Jindal, Atin , Mehta, Aryan , Khetpal, Vishal, Jentzer, Jacob C. , Ton, Van‐Khue, Patel, Parag C. , Naidu, Srihari S, Kapur, N., Abbott, J. Dawn, Patel, Parag C. , Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra , Ton, Van‐Khue , Mehta, Aryan , Vallabhajosyula, Saraschandra , Ton, Van-Khue , Naidu, Srihari S , Kapur, Navin K , Dawn Abbott, J , Jentzer, Jacob C , Khetpal, Vishal , Naidu, Srihari S. , Abbott, J. Dawn

Journal of the American Heart Association | February 11, 2026 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/jaha.125.047049 Get It

Despite advances in drug and device technology, health care delivery, and research infrastructure, cardiogenic shock (CS) continues to have nearly 50% in‐hospital mortality. In patients with CS, both the initial severity of Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention CS and its subsequent trajectory predicts the clinical outcomes. Accordingly, delayed initial recognition and failure to escalate or deescalate treatment can significantly affect the outcomes of CS. Traditional assessment methods, with the exception of blood pressure measurement, require a high index of suspicion and frequent reassessment by the clinical team. Electronic medical record‐based detection has been successfully implemented in acute and critical care patients with septic shock and acute kidney injury. In CS, electronic medical record‐based studies have largely focused on using models to predict outcomes in patients with CS, with limited data on electronic medical record‐based tools to assist with either predicting CS or providing real time alerts when escalation or de‐escalation might be indicated. Early detection of CS may be associated with detection of earlier Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention stages of CS and potentially prevent deterioration to higher stages. In this review, we seek to highlight a blueprint for electronic medical record‐based detection of CS that focuses on reproducibility, convenience, clinical decision support, and research aspects.
Stiff right atrial syndrome? A complex clinical case report utilizing multimodality imaging and invasive hemodynamics
Krishnarao, Krithika , Yip, D. , Goswami, Rohan , Leoni, Juan , Patel, Parag C. , Yip, Daniel S , Goswami, Rohan M , Leoni, Juan Carlos , Patel, Parag C. , Goswami, Rohan

European Heart Journal - Case Reports | April 29, 2024 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/ehjcr/ytae163 Get It

Abstract Background Stiff left atrial syndrome is a well-established cause of heart failure symptoms. A parallel entity involving the right atrium (RA) has not previously been described. We present a case of refractory right heart failure (RHF) 12 years following orthotopic heart transplantation. Case summary Patient underwent annuloplasty ring placement for severe tricuspid regurgitation in 2018 and kidney transplantation in 2020. The use of multimodality imaging and a multidisciplinary approach suggested a stiff RA as a potential etiology to refractory symptoms. Redo-heart and kidney transplantation in March 2021 led to the resolution of symptoms without recurrence. Discussion We propose stiff right atrial syndrome that may need to be considered in the setting of refractory RHF primarily suggested by significant right atrial enlargement and restrictive physiology.
Serial Assessment of Shock Severity in Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Patients
Jentzer, Jacob C. , Diepen, Sean van , Patel, Parag C. , Henry, Timothy D. , Morrow, David A. , Baran, David A. , Kashani, Kianoush , van Diepen, Sean , Kashani, Kianoush B , Patel, Parag C. , Jentzer, Jacob C , Baran, David A , Morrow, David A

Journal of the American Heart Association | November 6, 2023 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 23 | Pages: No page available

10.1161/jaha.123.032748 Get It

Background One‐time assessment of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) shock classification robustly predicts mortality in the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU). We sought to determine whether serial SCAI shock classification could improve risk stratification. Methods and Results Unique admissions to a single academic level 1 CICU from 2015 to 2018 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Electronic health record data were used to assign the SCAI shock stage during 4‐hour blocks of the first 24 hours of CICU admission. Shock was defined as hypoperfusion (SCAI shock stage C, D, or E). In‐hospital death was evaluated using logistic regression. Among 2918 unique CICU patients, 1537 (52.7%) met criteria for shock during ≥1 block, and 266 (9.1%) died in the hospital. The SCAI shock stage on admission was: A, 37.6%; B, 31.5%; C, 25.9%; D, 1.8%; and E, 3.3%. Patients who met SCAI criteria for shock on admission (first 4 hours) and those with worsening SCAI shock stage after admission were at higher risk for in‐hospital death. Each higher admission (adjusted odds ratio, 1.36 [95% CI, 1.18–1.56]; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.70), maximum (adjusted odds ratio, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.37–1.85]; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.73) and mean (adjusted odds ratio, 2.42 [95% CI, 1.99–2.95]; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.78) SCAI shock stage was incrementally associated with a higher in‐hospital mortality rate. Discrimination was highest for the mean SCAI shock stage ( P <0.05). Each additional 4‐hour block meeting SCAI criteria for shock predicted a higher mortality rate (adjusted odds ratio, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.07–1.24]). Conclusions Dynamic assessment of shock using serial SCAI shock classification assignment can improve mortality risk stratification in CICU patients by quantifying the magnitude and duration of shock.
Packing the donor heart: Is SherpaPak cold preservation technique safer compared to ice cold storage
Bitargil, Macit , Haddad, Osama , Pham, Si M. , Garg, Neha , Jacob, Samuel , Ahmed, Magdy M. El‐Sayed , Landolfo, Kevin , Patel, Parag C. , Goswami, Rohan , Leoni, Juan , Yip, Daniel , Sareyyüpoğlu, Başar , El-Sayed Ahmed, Magdy M , Goswami, Rohan M , Leoni, Juan Carlos , Yip, Daniel S , Patel, Parag C. , Pham, Si , Garg, Neha , Goswami, Rohan

Clinical Transplantation | May 11, 2022 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 8 | Pages: No page available

10.1111/ctr.14707 Get It

AbstractIntroductionThe present study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of heart transplant patients whose donor hearts were preserved with the SherpaPak controlled cold organ system versus the conventional ice storage technique.MethodsAll patients undergoing heart transplantation at our center between January 2019 and April 2021 were divided into two groups according to the technique used during donor heart preservation and transport. The first group consisted of 34 SherpaPak controlled temperature preservation patients, and the second group consisted of 47 patients where the conventional three bags and ice technique was utilized during organ transportation. The two groups were compared based on demographics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes.ResultsThere were no significant differences between the groups regarding Vasoactive Inotropic Score (VIS), Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD), and the need for a transient pacer. However, the VIS, PGD, and pacing trends were lower in the SherpaPak patients even though the total ischemic and cardiopulmonary bypass times were significantly longer. Furthermore, SherpaPak patients exhibited a shorter stay in the ICU with no severe PGD and mortality.ConclusionThe SherpaPak donor heart preservation provides safe outcomes in heart transplant patients. Further research is needed to utilize this method for longer durations of ischemic time and expand travel distances for organ transportation.