Chaaya, Rody G. Bou

Introduction: Data on use of ICE guidance in TEER procedure is limited to case reports and small case series. Our study aims to assess the feasibility, safety, utilization patterns and clinical outcomes of mitral TEER procedure with ICE guidance using a nationally representative real-world cohort of patients.Hypothesis: There is no difference between ICE-guided TEER and TEE-guided TEER in the clinical outcomes and complications. Methods: This study used the National Inpatient Sample database from quarter 4 of 2015 to 2020. We used a propensity-matched analysis and adjusted odds ratios for in-hospital outcomes/complications. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: A total of 38,770 weighted cases of mitral TEER were identified. Of the included patients 665 patients underwent ICE-guided TEER while 38,105 had TEE-guided TEER. There were no differences in the in-hospital mortality between both groups (2.5% vs. 3.0%, p=0.58). Adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality (aOR 0.83, 95%CI [0.42-1.64]) were not significantly different. There were no differences in periprocedural complications including cardiac (aOR 0.85, 95%CI [0.54-1.35]), bleeding (aOR 1.45, 95%CI [0.93-2.33]), respiratory (aOR 0.88, 95%CI [0.61-1.25]), and renal (aOR 0.89, 95%CI [0.66-1.20]) complications between patients undergoing ICE-guided versus TEE-guided TEER. There was no difference in GI complications between both groups (aOR 1.11, 95%CI [0.46-2.70]). The adjusted length of stay was less among ICE-guided TEER (median: 1 vs. 2, p<0.01) with no differences in costs of hospitalization ($137,312 vs. $153,773, p=0.06), Conclusions: In conclusion, ICE-guided mitral TEER is safe when compared with TEE guided TEER with no significant differences in in-hospital mortality, cardiac, bleeding, respiratory, and renal complications. The length of stay in ICE group is shorter as compared with the TEE group.

Introduction: Data on clinical outcomes of percutaneous closure of iatrogenic atrial septal defect (PC-ASD) in patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) or mitral valve replacement (TMVR) remains limited. We used a real-world USA database to evaluate the differences in the in-hospital outcomes between both groups. Hypothesis: Is there a clinical significance for PC-ASD in patients undergoing TEER or TMVR? Methods: We used the National Inpatient Sample (2015-2020) by utilizing ICD-10 codes to identify all patients who underwent TEER or TMVR with or without PC-ASD. Multivariate logistic regression was used for adjusted outcomes (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]). Results: A total of 44,065 eligible weighted hospitalizations were included: 39,625 (89.9%) of the patients underwent TEER and 4,440 (10.1%) underwent TMVR. Rates of PC-ASD were higher in TMVR group compared to TEER group (10.7% vs. 2.0%, p<0.01). In patients who underwent TEER without PC-ASD, PC-ASD was more associated with acute heart failure (AHF) (aOR 1.42 [1.19-1.68], p<0.01) and longer hospitalizations (aOR 1.64 [1.41-1.89], p<0.01), without significant difference in inpatient mortality (aOR 0.97 [0.61-1.54], p<0.01), cardiogenic shock (aOR 1.13 [0.85-1.51], p=0.21), need for mechanical circulatory support (MCS) (aOR 0.98 [0.61-1.54], p=0.18), and stroke. Compared to patients who underwent TMVR without PC-ASD, PC-ASD was associated with higher inpatient morality (aOR 1.65 [1.13-2.4], p<0.01), need for MCS (aOR 1.91 [1.33-2.73], p<0.01) without significant difference in AHF (aOR 1.19 [0.94-1.51], p=0.18] and cardiogenic shock (aOR 0.83 [0.56-1.22], p=0.43). Remarkably, PC-ASD was less associated with stroke (aOR 0.27 [0.10-0.72], p<0.01). Conclusions: Rates of PC-ASD after TEER were lower than after TMVR and were associated with worse in-hospital mortality and need for MCS in TMVR but not in TEER. Also, PC-ASD was less associated with stroke after TMVR.