Cole, Daniel J.

In 2018, the American Board of Anesthesiology (ABA) became the first US medical specialty certifying board to incorporate an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) into its initial certification examination system. Previously, the ABA’s staged examination system consisted of 2 written examinations (the BASIC and ADVANCED examinations) and the Standardized Oral Examination (SOE). The OSCE and the existing SOE are now 2 separate components of the APPLIED Examination. This report presents the results of the first-year OSCE administration. A total of 1410 candidates took both the OSCE and the SOE in 2018. Candidate performance approximated a normal distribution for both the OSCE and the SOE, and was not associated with the timing of the examination, including day of the week, morning versus afternoon session, and order of the OSCE and the SOE. Practice-based Learning and Improvement was the most difficult station, while Application of Ultrasonography was the least difficult. The correlation coefficient between SOE and OSCE scores was 0.35 ([95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.30–0.39]; P < .001). Scores for the written ADVANCED Examination were modestly correlated with scores for the SOE ( r = 0.29 [95% CI, 0.25–0.34]; P < .001) and the OSCE ( r = 0.15 [95% CI, 0.10–0.20]; P < .001). Most of the candidates who failed the SOE passed the OSCE, and most of the candidates who failed the OSCE passed the SOE. Of the 1410 candidates, 77 (5.5%) failed the OSCE, 155 (11.0%) failed the SOE, and 25 (1.8%) failed both. Thus, 207 (14.7%) failed at least 1 component of the APPLIED Examination. Adding an OSCE to a board certification examination system is feasible. Preliminary evidence indicates that the OSCE measures aspects of candidate abilities distinct from those measured by other examinations used for initial board certification.

With its first administration of an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in 2018, the American Board of Anesthesiology (ABA) became the first US medical specialty certifying board to incorporate this type of assessment into its high-stakes certification examination system. The fundamental rationale for the ABA’s introduction of the OSCE is to include an assessment that allows candidates for board certification to demonstrate what they actually “do” in domains relevant to clinical practice. Inherent in this rationale is that the OSCE will capture competencies not well assessed in the current written and oral examinations—competencies that will allow the ABA to judge whether a candidate meets the standards expected for board certification more properly. This special article describes the ABA’s journey from initial conceptualization through first administration of the OSCE, including the format of the OSCE, the process for scenario development, the standardized patient program that supports OSCE administration, examiner training, scoring, and future assessment of reliability, validity, and impact of the OSCE. This information will be beneficial to both those involved in the initial certification process, such as residency graduate candidates and program directors, and others contemplating the use of high-stakes summative OSCE assessments.

Background Recent data indicate that the neuroprotective efficacy of isoflurane is not sustained. Delayed neuronal death, mediated in part by apoptosis, contributes to the gradual increase in the size of the infarction. These data suggest that isoflurane may not be able to inhibit delayed neuronal death. The prevention of apoptosis by a caspase inhibitor might provide neuroprotection in addition to that provided by isoflurane. The current study was conducted to determine whether isoflurane-mediated neuroprotection can be made more durable with the administration of z-VAD-fmk, a nonspecific caspase inhibitor. Methods Fasted Wister rats were allocated to awake-zVAD, awake-vehicle, isoflurane-zVAD, or isoflurane-vehicle groups (n = 16/group). Animals were subjected to focal ischemia for 60 min by filament occlusion of the middle cerebral artery. In the awake groups, isoflurane was discontinued after occlusion of the middle cerebral artery. In the isoflurane groups, isoflurane anesthesia was maintained at 1.5 minimum alveolar concentration during occlusion of the middle cerebral artery. Before and after ischemia, daily injections of z-VAD-fmk or vehicle were administered into the lateral cerebral ventricle for 14 days. Neurologic assessment was performed 14 days after ischemia. The volume of cerebral infarction and the number of intact neurons in the periinfarct cortex were determined by image analysis of hematoxylin and eosin-stained coronal brain sections. Results Infarction volume was less in the isoflurane-zVAD group (23 +/- 11 mm, mean +/- SD) than in isoflurane-vehicle, awake-vehicle, and awake-zVAD groups (82 +/- 31, 86 +/- 31, and 59 +/- 25 mm, respectively; P < 0.05). In comparison with the awake-vehicle and isoflurane-vehicle groups, the administration of z-VAD-fmk significantly decreased infarction volume (P < 0.05). The infarction volume between the awake-vehicle and isoflurane-vehicle groups was not different. The number of intact neurons within the periinfarct cortex was significantly less in the awake-vehicle group than in the other three groups (P < 0.05). The isoflurane-zVAD group demonstrated better neurologic function than the awake-vehicle group (P < 0.05). Conclusion These findings are consistent with the premise that ongoing delayed neuronal death, in part mediated by apoptosis, contributes to the progression of cerebral infarction during the recovery period, and its inhibition can provide sustained neuroprotection.