Abcejo, Arnoley S.

Mortality rates from pulmonary embolism (PE) remain significant, highlighting the need for alternative treatment strategies beyond traditional anticoagulation. Percutaneous interventions, including mechanical thrombectomy and catheter-directed thrombolysis, are emerging as promising options. Given the complex pathophysiology and unique risk profiles of these patients, meticulous multidisciplinary planning is essential. Anesthesiologists play a central role in coordinating care and managing perioperative risks to improve outcomes. This article provides insights into best safety practices and shares experiences from a leading quaternary center. It offers guidance for anesthesia providers to proactively engage in comprehensive risk stratification, participate in multidisciplinary discussions, and support robust contingency planning for managing PE patients undergoing percutaneous interventions in non-operating room anesthesia settings.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Venous air embolism (VAE) can cause significant morbidity and mortality. Prevention and management of VAE include cessation of air entrainment, positioning changes, and hemodynamic support. The degree to which position change and cardiac output (CO) moderate resolution of intracardiac air has not been rigorously studied using contemporary transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). METHODS: This observational cohort-type study aimed to identify the effect of supine vs sitting positioning on the movement and resolution of intracardiac air. In 20 patients undergoing seated neurosurgery, central venous air aspiration catheters were placed through the median basilic vein. TEE was used to estimate the time required for clearance of agitated microbubbles from the right atrium and ventricle in both the supine and sitting position. Estimates of CO were also obtained echocardiographically in each position. RESULTS: Average clearance time was faster in the sitting vs the supine position with no significant difference in CO. A negative correlation between CO and right atrial clearance time across all patients was demonstrated with a Pearson coefficient of −0.4 (95% CI −0.07, −0.65) with P = .02. CONCLUSION: During VAE, both patient position and CO can significantly affect how bubbles move through intracardiac chambers. However, augmenting CO during VAE may be clinically more feasible, efficient, and productive than changing positioning—especially during crises unless the changing in position is intended to halt the entrainment of air. Further TEE studies of intravascular air movement affected by other position changes (lateral, reverse Trendelenburg) and vasopressors should be considered.

Pulmonary embolism (PE) embodies a large healthcare burden globally and is the third leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Submassive (intermediate-risk) PE accounts for 40% of this burden. However, the optimal treatment pathway for this population remains complex and ill-defined. Catheter-directed interventions (CDIs) have shown promise in directly impacting morbidity and mortality while demonstrating a favorable success rate, safety profile, and decreased length of stay (LOS) in the intensive care unit and hospital. This retrospective review included 22 patients (50% female) with submassive PE who underwent mechanical thrombectomy (MT). A total of 45% had a contraindication to thrombolytics, the mean pulmonary embolism severity index was 127, 36% had saddle PE, the average decrease in mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) was 7.2 mmHg following MT, the average LOS was 6.9 days, the 30-day mortality rate was 9%, the major adverse event (MAE) rate was 9%, and the readmission rate was 13.6%. A total of 82% had successful removal of thrombus during MT with no major bleeding complications, intracranial hemorrhage events, or device-related deaths. Acknowledging the limitation of our small sample size, our data indicate that MT in the intermediate-high-risk submassive pulmonary embolism (PE) cohort resulted in a decreased hospital length of stay (LOS) and in-hospital mortality compared to standard anticoagulation therapy alone.