Li, Zhen

Abstract Background Robotic Whipple holds the promise to overcome safety concerns associated with laparoscopy, paving the way for widespread implementation of minimal-invasive surgery in this complex procedure. However, randomized data comparing robot vs. open Whipple demonstrate more pancreas-specific complications and R1-resections in the robotic arm. Recent international consensus identified establishing benchmarks as critical to ensure safe adoption of the robot. Benchmarking is a validated quality improvement tool, enabling comparison of surgical performance. Aims The aim was to define benchmarks for outcome parameters in robotic Whipple. Methods We analyzed consecutive patients undergoing robotic Whipple from January 2020 until December 2023 in 11 centers across 4 continents, with a minimum one-year follow-up. Centers had to perform ≥15 cases/year and have mounted their learning curve. Benchmark criteria included benign or resectable malignant disease without neoadjuvant therapy, arterial resection, major co-morbidities, or significant previous abdominal surgery. Medians across centers represented benchmark cutoffs. Results Eleven centers performed 1’037 Whipple procedures, of which 603 (58%) were benchmark cases. One third (n=192) were pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients. Key benchmarks at 6 months included ≤1.2% mortality, ≤24.2% major complications, and ≤ 8.7 points Comprehensive Complication Index®. Pancreas-specific cutoffs included ≤13.0% postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) B/C and ≤3.4% post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage B/C, with 100% R0-resection and ≥19 harvested lymph nodes in PDAC patients. One-year actuarial overall and recurrence-free survival was 87% and 77%. In the entire cohort POPF B/C occurred in 16% (n=195). Independent POPF predictors included duct diameter ≤4mm (OR 1.79 95%CI [1.27-2.55]), anticoagulation (OR 3.68 95%CI [2.14-6.24]), and indication other than PDAC (OR 3.17, 95%CI [2.13-4.85]). Conclusion This study establishes benchmarks for key outcomes in robotic Whipple, demonstrating oncologic adequacy and morbidity comparable to open surgery. Risk factors for POPF in open surgery also hold true in the robotic approach.

Abstract Background and study aims Killian-Jamieson diverticulum (KJD) is a rare type of esophageal diverticulum that occurs in a specific area called the Killian-Jamieson space. Although surgery has been the conventional treatment for symptomatic KJD, minimally invasive endoscopic techniques, particularly Killian-Jamieson per-oral endoscopic myotomy (KJ-POEM), have emerged as an alternative. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of KJ-POEM in treating KJD. Patients and methods This was an international, multicenter, retrospective study that included patients who underwent KJ-POEM for symptomatic KJD from October 16, 2018 to April 12,2023. The primary outcome was clinical success, defined as complete or near-complete resolution of symptoms (i.e., post-procedure Kothari-Haber Score ≤ 2). Secondary outcomes were technical success (defined as successful completion of all procedural steps), rate and severity of adverse events (AEs), total procedure duration, and symptom recurrence during follow-up. Results A total of 13 patients (mean age 65.23 years, 6 female) with KJD and a mean pre-procedure Kothari-Haber Score of 6 (standard deviation [SD] 2.16) underwent KJ-POEM across 10 participating centers. Clinical success and technical success were achieved in all cases (100%) with a mean post-procedure Kothari-Haber Score of 0.91 (SD 0.99). There were no AEs and no cases of injury to the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Mean length of hospital stay was 1.09 days (SD 0.74). Mean follow-up time was 9.41 months (SD 10.07) post-procedure. There was no post-procedure symptom recurrence any patient. Conclusions KJ-POEM is a safe and effective alternative treatment for symptomatic KJD with excellent short/mid-term outcomes.